James Spang, a convicted sex offender with a dubious background, is running for the Democratic State Committee in Lehigh County. After a groping incident that started at the Sands casino and continued during a ride home, Spang entered a plea to misdemeanor harassment. he was also accused, but acquitted, of a similar groping incident in 1993.
Other candidates include Ed Pawlowski, Celeste Dee, Fran Eddings, Veronica Clemons, Walter Felton, Daniel Shackleford, April Riddick, Jackson Eaton, George Maniatty, Jr, Elizabeth Marcon and Kevin T Deely Jr.
well at least he beats out king ed
I have deleted two comments taking exception to my calling Spang a sex offender. That is what he is. A groper may not be the worst thing in the world, but is a sex offender. He has a right to run and I have a right to warn people about him.
This is the kind of thing that divides us. While an occasional bad egg gets by the party on the right it seems the left just doesn't mind bad behavior. Just as Obama draws an invisible it seems the party does too.
Am I wrong here Bernie?
He is not someone to be proud of and any position where people go out of their way to vote for a person, it used to be we cared more and would not reward such people.
This once again speaks volumns and for those of us who could not relate it is divisive.
Now it's winning at any cost. Kids, woman, drug users, liars, you name it.
This also splits the party on the left but not enough.
He is someone who should not be supported for any position.
8:15 Is this really a proxy for the entire Democratic party? "Occasional bad eggs" get by everywhere. Whenever I see "Obama" connected with a generalization, my bs meter pegs. I'd sooner agree with a topic-relative comment related to Clinton, but I wouldn't agree it proves the point either.
I lean Democrat usually, but that wouldn't mean a person with this resume would stand a snowball's chance in he!! of getting my vote. I don't see it as a "divisive" issue, but maybe some of those who vote party line would. I don't see the point of voting a label, because that is what lets bad eggs in.
"it seems the left just doesn't mind bad behavior. Just as Obama draws an invisible"
Baggers, get a life! I guess we should all just follow your drug sniffers and prostitute buyers.. Sorry, right wing behavior is just fine.
Mr. Wide stance
Spanggy likes and should be considered for the 69 position
I'm voting for him several times. Bill Clinton showed us that personal behavior has no bearing on job performance.
'Baggers get a life"Anon 11;38? Do you know why the conservatives have taken this term? In case you don't know, it is because of the TEA trade monopoly and taxes that it became perhaps ,the catalyst, 'the beginnings' of the revolution against the King. This was about 3 years before the signing of our Declaration. Early patriots here signed this document,at risk that their heads would be cut off if found.
Additionally; Bernie is right. Let's say this man get nominated , This certainly would be used on TV in ads and then become adverse to legitimate hard working straight forward folks that are registered Democrats. Sex offenders have been and will be again ,unless SHOT BETWEEN HIS privates with .45 by a would be victim. Sorry I'm trying to be polite .
A teabbager by any other name is still a teabagger, hotshot. Try to keep up!
Teabaggers is not accusatory. They wear the label proudly. Compare them to your 99% which you obviously are and it's no wonder they are proud.
Ever see an area when either group has occupied it? Ever look at the cost to police or clean up after either.
Yes we are the proud ones and many are your parents or grandparents. Guess u hate them too.....
Yes we are proud of your label. And you are proud of your hate.....
C'mon Bern he was JUST trying to change the channel on the TV.
Peter Proud said...
Republican miscreants exist. The idea that sexual predators and social misfits exist in one party is the very nature of lack of brains the teagaggers proudly display for all to read.
Post a Comment