Zrinski Unveils Long-Term Gracedale Plan in State of the County

Yesterday, at the close of the work-day, members of our local ruling party convened at the National Museum of Industrial History on Bethlehem's south side to hear Tara Zrinski's first "State of the County" address as County Executive. I watched it on Facebook, not in person, because I had a conflicting matter at the same time.  I'm glad I watched. At the end of her presentation, Zrinski finally unveiled what I've been waiting for - a long-term plan for Gracedale.  

The beginning intros were a bit cringeworthy. It's a bit unclear to me, but there may have been an open bar. It wasm, after all, happy hour. But this is a far cry from the 7 am addresses delivered in previous years by the likes of John Stoffa and Glenn Reibman. Instead of black coffee and orange juice, there was Rocky music and some goofy guy who sounded like a WWE announcer introducing speakers who themselves were making introductions and announcing a lengthy list of corporate sponsors. I was waiting for "Let's get ready to ruuuuumble," from this guy but he must have left for a Trump rally somewhere. Nearly eight minutes went by before Zrinski ever made it to the podium. 

When she did, she was fairly relaxed and amiable. She started off with the obligatory joke (about her numerous hair colors), told guests she didn't mind of they wanted to sneak off to the bar, and went to work. 

About 90% of what she had to say could have been said by the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission's Becky Bradley. It was all about county demographics and how they've changed over the years. 

Toward the end of a 47-minute speech, Zrinski unveiled her "strategic" plan for Gracedale. Administrator Michelle Morton had a "strategic plan" for the beleaguered nursing home nearly a year ago. This is a new one. 

Zrinski's goal is to keep Gracedale both county-owned and county-operated (meaning no third-party manager). She also wants it to be self-sustaining with no need for county contributions. 

To accomplish this feat, she's planning for a new Gracedale that makes use of its 365-acre campus. A rejuvenated Gracedale, with adjoining medical offices, a dialysis center, workforce housing for county employees and retail space. There already is a daycare at the facility, and she is hoping to partner with area colleges that offer nursing, and Gracedale would in turn provide affordable housing for these students after they graduate. "That is how we solve our agency-nurse dependency," she said. She acknowledged "it's not going to be easy." 

Zrinski said people might think she's cRaZy after seeing this plan, but I'll be honest. It is eerily similar to a proposal I made in December 2024. I called it "A Modest Plan to Retain NorCo County Workers and Provide Workforce Housing."

The county owns 375 acres at Gracedale and 500 acres elsewhere. Here's what I suggested back then:

Northampton County has about 1700-1800 employees, though its actual number should be closer to 2,000. It has problems attracting nursing care at Gracedale, despite offering retention bonuses and even building a daycare that may or may not yet be open. This is a nationwide problem, and the county has been forced to hire outside nurses to provide care at higher rates than it pays its own. 

In addition to a shortage of nursing care at Gracedale, there is also a shortage of corrections officers, youth care workers and 911 dispatchers. They are often forced to work overtime to fill gaps in coverage, which exhausts them and can make conditions unsafe. 

Couldn't we express our appreciation to these unsung heroes by providing them with an affordable place to live?

Here's what I would suggest as a pilot program. The Gracedale campus is huge. Some of that land is used neither for farming nor anything else. It's just grass to cut. How about a small development of about 30 homes for workers in critical departments like the jail, Gracedale, Juvenile Justice Center and 911. I'm not speaking of McMansions but am thinking of smaller homes like the Boxable Casita. 

The county could offer these homes and agree to hold the mortgage at a low interest rate. The qualifying employee would own, not rent the property to erase any illusion that this is a company store. If the employee either leaves county employment or decides to sell the property for a larger home, the county would have an option to repurchase at its appraised market value. That way the employee could build equity, and the county could attract and retain good workers. 

I discussed this idea with several members of County Council, who themselves had similar ideas. So I think she'd have support and believe this could actually solve Gracedale's biggest problem, a reliance on agency nurses who lack the empathy that county employees have. The only part of her Gracedale presentation I dislike is her insistence that the home be county-managed. I think the county has demonstrated over and over that it lacks the expertise to manage a nursing facility. 

Zrinski never got into some of the many other issues facing the county. She noted the county has had no tax hike for eight years (hint, hint), that there's been no reassessment since 1995 (hint, hint). 

Defeated NorCo Council Candidate Sam Elias Was Featured at Trump Rally

I thought Sam Elias, a Bethlehem police officer and a member of the Lebanese diaspora here in NorCo, had a very good shot at winning one of the five at-large seats up for grabs last year. But when the votes were tallied, he ran a distant 6th. He was nearly 10,000 votes behind Nadeem Qayyum, the fifth-place finisher. But yesterday afternoon, during a Trump rally at Mack Truck, he got rock star treatment from none other than the President himself. 

According to Trump, Elias has named his youngest child Melania. 

I hope it's a girl. 

For his part, Elias thanked Trump, Congressman Ryan Mackenzie and the entire white house for helping him as a father of six in a single-income household. "Hard work should pay off, not get punished with higher taxes," he said. He lauded Trump for severely curtailing tax on tips and overtime. 

He also praised Trump for his approach to Lebanon. "The Lebanese people finally have an American ally who advocates for a sovereign and independent Lebanon governed by the Lebanese people." 

Israel thought it had a great American ally in Trump, too. 

So did Italy ... and Britain ... and Canade ... and Mexico ... and Denmark.

Ukraine was a bit smarter and started making its own drones. 

Two Suicides at NorCo Jail Within Past 10 Days

NorCo Exec Tara Zrinski has confirmed that, over the past 10 days, there have been two suicides at the jail. The names of the deceased are being withheld until next of kin are notified and Coroner Zach Lysek completes his investigation. I will update this story with more details as they are known. I am told by a source (the mother of an inmate) that the deaths include one male and one female and they were days apart. 

According to a news release from Coroner Zach Lysek,

"One of the individuals is Katelyn M. Godiska, a 34-year-old woman from Bethlehem, PA. On June 14, 2026, she was transported to St. Luke’s Hospital, Easton Campus from the prison, where she was pronounced deceased. The cause of death was Asphyxiation, and the manner of death was Suicide.

"The other individual is Randolph P. Adams, a 35-year-old man from Bethlehem, PA. On June 19, 2026, he was transported to St. Luke’s Hospital, Easton Campus from the prison, where he was pronounced deceased. The cause of death was Asphyxiation, and the manner of death was Suicide."

According to her obituary, Godiska was "a bright and gifted graduate of Nazareth Area High School, where she also excelled in Lacrosse. Kate was working for Nick’s On Main, of Bethlehem. She was known for her artistic creativity, vibrant imagination, and ability to bring beauty and inspiration to those around her. Kate had unconditional love for her family and held a strong bond with her siblings."

Godiska was in jail because she was unable to post $75,000 bond after being charged by Bethlehem police with aggravated assault and related offenses. She was still awaiting her preliminary hearing., which would have taken place today.

Like Godiska, Adams was in jail because he was unable to post $50,000 bond after being charged by Palmer Tp police with robbery of a motor vehicle, theft and unlawful use of a motor vehicle. 

When there is a suicide at the jail, it goes into lockdown. Inmates are stuck in their cells and only allowed out for showers and meals.  Given that a high number are already suffering from serious mental illness, this policy should be reconsidered. According to Truthout, lockdowns are considered more severe than solitary confinement because of the lack of structure. They cause or exacerbate anxiety, depression, PTSD, and other mental health issues

(Originally posted 6/22/26 at 1:56 pm.)

NorCo's New Fiscal Affairs Director Declines the Job Over Low Salary

Last week, Northampton County Council voted to confirm Deb Watlington, a CPA with 30 years of accounting experience, as the county's new Fiscal Director. But they did so at a lower starting salary - $109,632 - than the $125,108 proposed by Executive Tara Zrinski.  Council members Ken Kraft, Kelly Keegan, Jason Boulette, and Jeff Warren were more than happy with a higher salary for what would have been the county's first Fiscal Director with a CPA. 

The final vote to confirm Watlington at the lower salary of $109,632 was approved by Council members Lori Vargo Heffner, Tom Giovanni, Ken Kraft, Dave Holland, Jason Boulette and Theresa Fadem.

Council member Qayyum was opposed to hiring Watlington at any salary.

County Solicitor Melissa Rudas had argued that the Executive has the authority to hire at a higher rate, but my reading of the Career Service Regulations (which could be incorrect) limits the Executive's authority to raise anyone's salary to only one step. Council approval is needed for anything higher. 

In a comment published on this blog, Council member Kelly Keegan warned that this could happen. She stated, 

Northampton County has gone months without a Fiscal Director, one of the most critical financial positions in county government. We've struggled to attract qualified candidates because the salary simply isn't competitive. Potential candidates have declined interviews or withdrawn from consideration because they could earn significantly more elsewhere.

Then, after an extensive search, we finally found a highly qualified candidate willing to leave her current position and take a pay cut to serve Northampton County. Instead of welcoming her and recognizing the sacrifice she was making, Council chose to amend the resolution and reduce her starting salary from Step 3 to Step 1.

Think about the message that sends.

We complain that we can't find qualified people. We acknowledge that the private sector and neighboring organizations pay more. We finally find someone willing to come here anyway, and then we decide to pay her even less?!

This wasn't fiscal responsibility. The difference in salary is negligible in a multi-million-dollar county budget. What isn't negligible is the cost of leaving a key financial leadership position vacant, delaying projects, overburdening existing staff, and creating instability in county government.

The question taxpayers should be asking is simple: Are we trying to recruit and retain talented professionals, or are we making political points at the expense of effective government?

Actions have consequences. If this candidate walks away, Northampton County will once again be searching for a Fiscal Director while wondering why qualified applicants aren't lining up for the job.

I believe that Watlington should have been hired at the higher rate requested by Zrinski. In pushing this hire down to the low rung on the pay scale, a majority of County Council allowed the perfect to be the enemy of the good. Watlington may have had no specific experience with county government. But she has 30 years of accounting experience and is a CPA and would be part of an office that is already very talented. County Council should reconsider what really was a mistake if Watlington is still willing to serve. 

Gracedale is Only Nursing Home in Pa With a Provisional II License

As I told you last week, Northampton County's Gracedale nursing home now has a Provisional II license. It previously had a Provisional I license. In early May, Executive Tara Zrinski said the home did very well in its annual survey, but the downgrade from Provisional I to Provisional II indicates that the facility is in worse shape now than it has ever been. 

Although Zrinski has previously stated that she is happy with Administrator Michelle Morton, the state Department of Health has had to visit the home 27 times since she has been there. Gracedale has been cited eight times since her arrival last year (six times last year and twice this year). The home has been repeatedly cited for elopements (escapes) and a failure to meet minimum staffing requirements. 

I've told you that the latest CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) rating places the home at just one star, which is considered well below average. The home has the added indignity of a scarlet letter in the form of a 

 next to its name to warn potential residents and their families about the possibility of abuse. The home has operated with a Provisional license since February.

All of this, not some of it, has happened during Morton's tenure. And that's understandable. She's had 23 different jobs since 1983. Her background is therapeutic recreation, not nursing or nursing homes. 

In her Exec report last week, Zrinski tried to downplay the problems, stating that they were caused by being too lax in admitting people. I'll agree that is likely one of the causes. Sure, Gracedale should be a sanctuary for the indigent, but should decline residents who are violent to other residents and to staff. But that is only one of the causes. 

Administration is another. The sheer number of visits from the DOH alone indicate that people (staff, residents or both) are unhappy with Michelle Morton, the current Administrator. The decline in the home's ratings, the citations, and the downgrade to a Provisional I and then a Provisional II license have all happened under her watch. I have no doubt she could succeed in some role, but not as Gracedale's administrator. 

A third root cause of Gracedale's problems is its heavy reliance on agency nursing. These are nurses brought in from outside agencies. They are paid far more than regular staffers, which obviously causes resentment. And since they come and go as they please, they are unable to build up the relationships with residents that regular staff have.

A final problem, quite frankly, is politics. The continuum of care positions that Zrinski sought and got are political hires who come and go with the exec. They should have the protection of either career service or a contract. When he was first elected Exec, one of the first things Lamont McClure did was fire the Director of Nursing, Her position was career service, but she must have been probationary, or he'd be unable to axe her. Here's what she wrote in 2018:

"Gracedale has been neglected for years. Not just the last four years but for many decades. The outdated and appalling status of the living conditions for the residents of Gracedale actually brought me to tears the first time I saw the cinder block walls and furniture obviously from decades ago. The resident mattresses had not been replaced for years (actually no one could tell me when) leading to resident skin pressure injury. An assessment revealed these mattresses were no longer offering any pressure reduction. The mechanical lifts recently assessed found 22 lifts were in poor condition. The most vulnerable of our population have been ignored and the taxpayers should be appalled as I was. However, my goal was to work to improve the conditions and the mattresses have been replaced, some furniture has begun to be purchased and the next step was to begin mechanical lift replacement. The ultimate goal being to develop a purchasing replacement plan yearly to assure that this would never happen again.

"I knew the position would be a challenge, and I happen to love a challenge that works to improve the lives of residents in long term care. So imagine my response in early December when I received a letter from the new county executive- elect that stated “this past November our voters spoke loudly and issued a mandate for change.” It went on to say “ I write at this time to inform you that you will not be re-appointed to your position in the new administration” and “your last day of employment with the County of Northampton will be January 1, 2018.”

I believe this nurse was canned because she was chosen by the John Brown administration. 

In her report to County Council last week, Zrinski stated that the downgrade to Provisional II occurred because of yet another resident elopement as well as a resident who brought contraband (I'm told it was a K-Bar knife) into the facility. These matters do not yet appear on the DOH deficiency site, but I suspect we'll be seeing them soon. An alarm actually went off during one of Zrinski's visits. "I assure you that person did not get away," she declared.

As NorCo Council member Dave Holland stated last week, a provisional license means that the state DOH can do a number of things. They can stop new admissions. They can stop Medicaid reimbursements. They can take over the facility with their own managers. 

How common is a provisional license in Pennsylvania? I decided to check.

According to the DOH nursing home facility webpage, there are 661 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. Gracedale is the only one operating with a Provisional II license. 

Of 417 for-profit nursing homes, four are operating with Provisional I licenses: Emerald Nursing and Rehabilitation (Elizabethtown); Kadima Rehabilitation and Nursing (Palmyra Pa); Rochester Residence and Care Center (Rochester); and Wecare at South Hills (Canonsburg) Provisional I.

Of 223 NonProfit Facilities, all have regular licenses. 

Of 14 county-owned facilities, only Gracedale has a Provisional license

Of 7 State-owned facilities for veterans, all have regular licenses.

Another point made by Zrinski during her Exec report is that for-profit homes are less likely to accept Medicaid. Northampton County has 11 nursing homes.  All but 1 accept Medicaid. 

Holland on What a Provisional II License Means at Gracedale

Dave Holland, a nurse practitioner and nursing professor at East Stroudsburg University, was also an administrator at Gracedale and at Monroe County's nursing home. He knows about medical care. He also knows about nursing homes. Last year, Northampton County voters fortunately elected him to an at-large seat on Northampton County Council. Since that time, his insights and attempts to provide advice about the home have been strangely ignored by Executive Tara Zrinski, who prefers listening to an administrator whose background is therapeutic recreation. While she does zumba classes, the home is clearly and objectively declining. It was placed in a Provisional I license last year. Despite claims that things were improving, the state Department of Health has downgraded Gracedale's license to Provisional II.  

When did this happen? When was Administrator Morton informed? When was Executive Zrinski informed? We do not have the answers to these questions, but the public itself was in the dark until earlier this week. 

The most important question is what does a Provisional II license mean? Despite attempts by Council President Ken Kraft to muzzle Holland at last night's meeting, he explained in very clear terms precisely what options are now available to the state Department of Health, and it's pretty bad. Here's what Holland said: 

If we don't resolve our noncompliance status, we're not going to have to worry about the continuum of care because we won't be able to have the license to do so.

So what do I mean by that?

So, in a provisional license status, every day that goes by that we're not in compliance, there are remedies that are available to the Department of Health, which they have not instituted yet, but they certainly could at any day.

That includes denial of new admissions to the facility.

If we're denied admissions to the facility, we're not allowed to carry out the mission of Gracedale, which I'm going to read to you.

Gracedale is a skilled nursing facility that serves the medically challenged and financially indigent residents of Northampton County and surrounding communities. The mission of the facility is to rehabilitate its residents to their highest practical level of medical, social, and psychosocial well-being.

If we get into a situation because of noncompliance, fair or not, that's the situation we're in from the Department of Health.

We're not gonna' be able to meet that mission because we may be denied admission at some point.

Second to that, the other option is to deny payment.

And again, we will not be able to comply with our mission to the residents of Northampton County if we're going to be denied payment for Medicaid or Medicaid residents.

There's a process where the agreement to provide payment for Medicare Medicaid can start, they can start that process to nullify and separate from that agreement based on noncompliance.

So the other options are temporary management.

If we don't get into compliance within a certain period of time, they can basically deem we are no longer capable of managing it ourselves and institute temporary management.

Zrinski Attempts to Minimize Gracedale's Problems

At last night's meeting of Northampton County Council, Executive Tara Zrinski spoke twice about Gracedale, both during courtesy of the floor and in her Executive report.  In hir first oration, she spoke about the good care the nursing facility provided to her mother, something she has done several times in the past. She never mentioned that this care was during a time when Jennifer Stewart King, and not Michelle Morton, was the Administrator. In her Exec report, she tried very hard to paint the home in a positive light. She noted that there were 14 citations in 2025, but only 4 "technical" violations this year. She did not point out that we're not even halfway through the year. She said the root cause of these problems go back several years. She said none of the citations this year reflect a failure to provide care, which is utter nonsense. In fact, the poor staffing is precisely why the home was cited in January and again in May.  I'd also say that a failure to follow doctor's orders, especially concerning medications and blood sugar levels, is indicative of outright negligence. 

She did finally mention Gracedale's downgrade from a Provisional I to a Provisional II license. She believes the root cause was the county's admission process, under which some risky residents were accepted. She said the home is now more selective in who it accepts. 

I'd like to know what the DOH has been at Gracedale 27 times since Michelle Morton was hired as Administrator. It's true that most of these complaints are unfounded, but the sheer number suggests to me that employees, residents and family are unhappy. This reflects on Morton's leadership. 

I'd like to know why, after being repeatedly cited for falling below the state minimum nursing care requirements, Gracedale was cited for that again and with a provisional license. Amazingly, Morton claimed this shortage was caused by call offs. Why on earth would the home fail to plan for call offs? 

I'd like to know how Gracedale, whose very mission is to take care of people, could ignore doctor's orders. 

We got answers to none of these questions because as soon as she was done with her Exec report, Zrinski asked for an Exec session to discuss "personnel."  And accompanying her into the back room were Morton and Human Services Director Sue Wandalowski, who is supposed to have nothing to do with Gracedale. That's the whole point of the new positions sought by Zrinski. No doubt, the purpose of the exec session was to scapegoat someone for problems that have grown worse since Michelle Morton arrived. 

Finally, I'd look to know when Zrinski was apprised of the downgrade to Provisional II. It certainly belies her previous reports. 

NorCo's Human Relations Comm'n Members Confirmed

At last night's meeting, Northampton County Council confirmed the following appointments to the newly established Human Relations Comm'n. 

Sylvia Keverenge Bethlehem, PA 18015 

Grace Crampsie Smith Bethlehem, PA 18018 

Peter Hristofas Easton, PA 18042 

Victoria Opthof-Cordaro Bethlehem, PA 18015 

Jessica Teel Sadler Wind Gap, PA 18091 

Marc Singer Easton, PA 18042 

Patricia Baranowski Wind Gap, PA 18091 

Reginald Belon Easton, PA 18042 

Thomas Raymond Dubreuil Bethlehem, PA 18020 

Arlene Ifill-Leon Easton, PA 18042 

Elena Kenney Bethlehem, PA 18018 

Ron Moyer Easton, PA 18042

I omitted precise mailing addresses. 

The vote was 8-0, with Council member Nadeem Qayyum abstaining (He said "absent"). Qayyum argued that the appointments should consist of "protected" classes, even though Council Solicitor Matt Deschler explained that we all can be considered a "protected" class, depending  on the circumstances. He wanted to know, as he did in a committee meeting the previous day, how many of the appointments were persons "of color." He asked Executive Tara Zrinski whether she went to churches and temples to recruit candidates, something she said she did not do or feel obliged to do. She said her picks were as diverse a group as she could possibly choose. 

NorCo Council Confirms New Fiscal Director, but at a Lower Pay Than Proposed by Executive

 At last night's meeting, Northampton County Council voted to approve the appointment of Deb Watlington as the county's new Fiscal Director, but at a lower starting salary than what had been proposed by Executive Tara Zrinski. 

Zrinski's appointment would start Watlington at a salary of $125,108, and with benefits would give her a total compensation package of $164,923. 

While she agreed with the appointment, Council member Lori Vargo Heffner said that the starting salary should be $109,632 and proposed confirming the appointment at the lower rate. Her motion to amend was passed by a 5-4 vote, The Yes votes were from Vargo Heffner, Theresa Fadem, Tom Giovanni, Nadeem Qayyum and Dave Holland. Voting No were Council members Ken Kraft, Kelly Keegan, Jason Boulette, and Jeff Warren. 

At this lower rate of $109,632, Watlington's appointment was approved in a 6-3 vote. Voting yes were Vargo Heffner, Giovanni, Fadem, Holland, Boulette and Kraft. Voting No were Keegan, Warren and Qayyum. 

Before the vote, County Solicitor Melissa Rudas advised that the Executive has the right to hire a Fiscal Director at any salary she chooses, and that reducing the pay was an "exercise in futility." Vargo Heffner strongly disagreed, stating that Council approves the budget and corresponding salaries. 

This issue has arisen before. When he was Executive, John Brown knocked his Administrator's salary up by three steps without getting permission from County Council. Then Controller Steve Barron noted this increase violated Career Service Regulations (Section 4.01) that require County Council to approve any pay raise that bumps anyone up more than one step in the payscale.  The Home Rule Charter does specifically provide that County Council sets the wages (Section 202(11).

While Zrinski has the authority to award a one-step increase right now, it's unclear to me what authority she has to set a higher salary. 

Zrinski made clear in her introduction of Watlington that a higher salary was necessary to lure Watlington, a CPA, from Lehigh. So I fail to understand why Council went with a lower compensation package for someone who already is taking a pay cut.