NorCo Exec Tara Zrinski has confirmed that, over the past 10 days, there have been two suicides at the jail. The names of the deceased are being withheld until next of kin are notified and Coroner Zach Lysek completes his investigation. I will update this story with more details as they are known. I am told by a source (the mother of an inmate) that the deaths include one male and one female and they were days apart. Bernie O’Hare
Lehigh Valley Ramblings
Today's one-liner: “In a republican nation whose citizens are to be led by reason and persuasion and not by force, the art of reasoning becomes of first importance.” T Jefferson
Monday, June 22, 2026
Gracedale is Only Nursing Home in Pa With a Provisional II License
As I told you last week, Northampton County's Gracedale nursing home now has a Provisional II license. It previously had a Provisional I license. In early May, Executive Tara Zrinski said the home did very well in its annual survey, but the downgrade from Provisional I to Provisional II indicates that the facility is in worse shape now than it has ever been.
Although Zrinski has previously stated that she is happy with Administrator Michelle Morton, the state Department of Health has had to visit the home 27 times since she has been there. Gracedale has been cited eight times since her arrival last year (six times last year and twice this year). The home has been repeatedly cited for elopements (escapes) and a failure to meet minimum staffing requirements.
next to its name to warn potential residents and their families about the possibility of abuse. The home has operated with a Provisional license since February.
All of this, not some of it, has happened during Morton's tenure. And that's understandable. She's had 23 different jobs since 1983. Her background is therapeutic recreation, not nursing or nursing homes.
In her Exec report last week, Zrinski tried to downplay the problems, stating that they were caused by being too lax in admitting people. I'll agree that is likely one of the causes. Sure, Gracedale should be a sanctuary for the indigent, but should decline residents who are violent to other residents and to staff. But that is only one of the causes.
Administration is another. The sheer number of visits from the DOH alone indicate that people (staff, residents or both) are unhappy with Michelle Morton, the current Administrator. The decline in the home's ratings, the citations, and the downgrade to a Provisional I and then a Provisional II license have all happened under her watch. I have no doubt she could succeed in some role, but not as Gracedale's administrator.
A third root cause of Gracedale's problems is its heavy reliance on agency nursing. These are nurses brought in from outside agencies. They are paid far more than regular staffers, which obviously causes resentment. And since they come and go as they please, they are unable to build up the relationships with residents that regular staff have.
A final problem, quite frankly, is politics. The continuum of care positions that Zrinski sought and got are political hires who come and go with the exec. They should have the protection of either career service or a contract. When he was first elected Exec, one of the first things Lamont McClure did was fire the Director of Nursing, Her position was career service, but she must have been probationary, or he'd be unable to axe her. Here's what she wrote in 2018:
"Gracedale has been neglected for years. Not just the last four years but for many decades. The outdated and appalling status of the living conditions for the residents of Gracedale actually brought me to tears the first time I saw the cinder block walls and furniture obviously from decades ago. The resident mattresses had not been replaced for years (actually no one could tell me when) leading to resident skin pressure injury. An assessment revealed these mattresses were no longer offering any pressure reduction. The mechanical lifts recently assessed found 22 lifts were in poor condition. The most vulnerable of our population have been ignored and the taxpayers should be appalled as I was. However, my goal was to work to improve the conditions and the mattresses have been replaced, some furniture has begun to be purchased and the next step was to begin mechanical lift replacement. The ultimate goal being to develop a purchasing replacement plan yearly to assure that this would never happen again.
"I knew the position would be a challenge, and I happen to love a challenge that works to improve the lives of residents in long term care. So imagine my response in early December when I received a letter from the new county executive- elect that stated “this past November our voters spoke loudly and issued a mandate for change.” It went on to say “ I write at this time to inform you that you will not be re-appointed to your position in the new administration” and “your last day of employment with the County of Northampton will be January 1, 2018.”
I believe this nurse was canned because she was chosen by the John Brown administration.
In her report to County Council last week, Zrinski stated that the downgrade to Provisional II occurred because of yet another resident elopement as well as a resident who brought contraband (I'm told it was a K-Bar knife) into the facility. These matters do not yet appear on the DOH deficiency site, but I suspect we'll be seeing them soon. An alarm actually went off during one of Zrinski's visits. "I assure you that person did not get away," she declared.
As NorCo Council member Dave Holland stated last week, a provisional license means that the state DOH can do a number of things. They can stop new admissions. They can stop Medicaid reimbursements. They can take over the facility with their own managers.
How common is a provisional license in Pennsylvania? I decided to check.
According to the DOH nursing home facility webpage, there are 661 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. Gracedale is the only one operating with a Provisional II license.
Of 417 for-profit nursing homes, four are operating with Provisional I licenses: Emerald Nursing and Rehabilitation (Elizabethtown); Kadima Rehabilitation and Nursing (Palmyra Pa); Rochester Residence and Care Center (Rochester); and Wecare at South Hills (Canonsburg) Provisional I.
Of 223 NonProfit Facilities, all have regular licenses.
Of 14 county-owned facilities, only Gracedale has a Provisional license
Of 7 State-owned facilities for veterans, all have regular licenses.
Another point made by Zrinski during her Exec report is that for-profit homes are less likely to accept Medicaid. Northampton County has 11 nursing homes. All but 1 accept Medicaid.
Friday, June 19, 2026
Holland on What a Provisional II License Means at Gracedale
Gracedale is a skilled nursing facility that serves the medically challenged and financially indigent residents of Northampton County and surrounding communities. The mission of the facility is to rehabilitate its residents to their highest practical level of medical, social, and psychosocial well-being.
Zrinski Attempts to Minimize Gracedale's Problems
NorCo's Human Relations Comm'n Members Confirmed
At last night's meeting, Northampton County Council confirmed the following appointments to the newly established Human Relations Comm'n.
Sylvia Keverenge Bethlehem, PA 18015
Grace Crampsie Smith Bethlehem, PA 18018
Peter Hristofas Easton, PA 18042
Victoria Opthof-Cordaro Bethlehem, PA 18015
Jessica Teel Sadler Wind Gap, PA 18091
Marc Singer Easton, PA 18042
Patricia Baranowski Wind Gap, PA 18091
Reginald Belon Easton, PA 18042
Thomas Raymond Dubreuil Bethlehem, PA 18020
Arlene Ifill-Leon Easton, PA 18042
Elena Kenney Bethlehem, PA 18018
Ron Moyer Easton, PA 18042
I omitted precise mailing addresses.
The vote was 8-0, with Council member Nadeem Qayyum abstaining (He said "absent"). Qayyum argued that the appointments should consist of "protected" classes, even though Council Solicitor Matt Deschler explained that we all can be considered a "protected" class, depending on the circumstances. He wanted to know, as he did in a committee meeting the previous day, how many of the appointments were persons "of color." He asked Executive Tara Zrinski whether she went to churches and temples to recruit candidates, something she said she did not do or feel obliged to do. She said her picks were as diverse a group as she could possibly choose.
NorCo Council Confirms New Fiscal Director, but at a Lower Pay Than Proposed by Executive
At last night's meeting, Northampton County Council voted to approve the appointment of Deb Watlington as the county's new Fiscal Director, but at a lower starting salary than what had been proposed by Executive Tara Zrinski.
Zrinski's appointment would start Watlington at a salary of $125,108, and with benefits would give her a total compensation package of $164,923.
While she agreed with the appointment, Council member Lori Vargo Heffner said that the starting salary should be $109,632 and proposed confirming the appointment at the lower rate. Her motion to amend was passed by a 5-4 vote, The Yes votes were from Vargo Heffner, Theresa Fadem, Tom Giovanni, Nadeem Qayyum and Dave Holland. Voting No were Council members Ken Kraft, Kelly Keegan, Jason Boulette, and Jeff Warren.
At this lower rate of $109,632, Watlington's appointment was approved in a 6-3 vote. Voting yes were Vargo Heffner, Giovanni, Fadem, Holland, Boulette and Kraft. Voting No were Keegan, Warren and Qayyum.
Before the vote, County Solicitor Melissa Rudas advised that the Executive has the right to hire a Fiscal Director at any salary she chooses, and that reducing the pay was an "exercise in futility." Vargo Heffner strongly disagreed, stating that Council approves the budget and corresponding salaries.
This issue has arisen before. When he was Executive, John Brown knocked his Administrator's salary up by three steps without getting permission from County Council. Then Controller Steve Barron noted this increase violated Career Service Regulations (Section 4.01) that require County Council to approve any pay raise that bumps anyone up more than one step in the payscale. The Home Rule Charter does specifically provide that County Council sets the wages (Section 202(11).
While Zrinski has the authority to award a one-step increase right now, it's unclear to me what authority she has to set a higher salary.
Zrinski made clear in her introduction of Watlington that a higher salary was necessary to lure Watlington, a CPA, from Lehigh. So I fail to understand why Council went with a lower compensation package for someone who already is taking a pay cut.
Thursday, June 18, 2026
Zrinski Declines to Specify Race, Religion or Gender Identity of Human Relations Comm'n Members
During yesterday's NorCo Council Personnel Committee hearing, attended by five Council members*, a list of 13 nominations for the newly established Human Relations Commission was considered. Since I can only go by phonetic spelling of some of these hopefuls, I'll forego naming them until tomorrow. Things were going smoothly until member Nadeem Qayyum decided he had some questions.
Qayyum, who has a very annoying habit of refusing to use his mike, decided he wanted to know how many of these selections are persons of color and wanted to know details like religion, etc.
Zrinski, who is increasingly getting irritated by questions that Qayyum has written out in advance because his English skills are so subpar, said she declines "to specifically identify who is ... who is a person of color, who is Muslim, who is gay, who's trans. I am supposed to identify those individuals on this list? I would think that that is almost discriminatory."
I'd say it is definitely discriminatory.
"For the record, I need to ask these questions," explained Qayyum.
"Sure, sure, sure, sure, sure sure," responded Zrinski. "For the record, I'm not going to specifically identify people."
In the desire to be inclusive, we often make the mistake of being exclusive.
_____
* This meeting was attended by Council members Nadeem Qayyum, Jason Boulette, Tom Giovanni, Dave Holland and Kelly Keegan.
Pa DOH Downgrades Gracedale's License
Zrinski Nominates a CPA as NorCo's New Fiscal Affairs Director
Northampton County Executive has nominated Deborah Watlington, a CPA, as the county's new Director of Fiscal Affairs. She was introduced at yesterday's Personnel Committee and is set for confirmation by County Council this evening. If confirmed, the county will finally have a Director of Fiscal Affairs for the first time since October of last year.
Watlington, who as a degree in accounting and an MBA from Lehigh U, has been employed by Lehigh for the past 16 years. She's worked in accounting for 30 years. She is currently Senior Financial Analyst in the Provost Office.
She is one of 10 applicants for the job. "I believe she will be an asset to the county throughout my tenure," said Zrinski.
Qayyum, who earlier had reservations about the Human Relations Comm'n appointments and the salaries for Continuum of Care directors, had written questions about whether Watlington had direct government financial experience, but conceded she had good qualifications.
He also complained about the proposed salary of $125,108. Zrinski responded that this salary is actually lower than what she was getting at Lehigh. His numerous objections are hard to report because he consistently fails to use his mike.
Finally, Council member Kelly Keegan interjected that "it seems like we're badgering a woman we're lucky to get."
For once, I agree with her.
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
A Trip Around the LV Blogosphere
Pinsley's So Called Wealth Tax Under Fire
Lehigh County Controller Mark Pinsley has proposed recycling an antiquated county intangible personal property tax by branding it a “wealth tax.” Once levied by counties in Pennsylvania, it disappeared 25 years ago for many reasons: legal challenges, administrative problems and broad acknowledgement that it was bad policy.
Most concerning, the current label of a “wealth tax” is a sales pitch. Political marketing. It makes the proposal sound narrow, targeted and aimed only at billionaires. That is not accurate.
This is not a tax exclusively on the ultra wealthy or the “Elon Musks” of the world. Plain and simple, it's a tax on personal financial assets. It hits common savings tools and certain small business ownership interests. Stocks, bonds, mutual funds and non-retirement brokerage accounts are all specifically named in the Controller’s report. The enabling law also raises unresolved questions about other useful family, retirement and estate planning tools, including custodial brokerage accounts, 529 college accounts and private mortgages held as assets. These are all tools working families, seniors, parents saving for their children and small business owners use to make responsible plans for their futures. As presented, this tax has no minimum income threshold. And adding one later may only deepen the legal problem because the 1913 law does not clearly give the County the authority to create one.
This is all part of the central problem. The public is being sold a narrow tax on extreme wealth, but the actual proposal reaches everyone. Repeating a misleading label does not change what the tax actually does nor does it change who it hurts.
This is not a Republican, Democratic or Independent concern. That is why the three of us, from different political backgrounds, agree on this point: Lehigh County should not revive a legally risky tax on savings, common investment tools and small businesses.
While some might dance around what this really is, others are more direct, describing this kind of saving as “hoarding wealth.” We strongly disagree. For generations of Lehigh Valley families, including people who worked hard their entire lives at places like Mack, Bethlehem Steel and other local employers, saving was not "hoarding wealth". These were not millionaires hiding money. They were working families taking responsibility for their futures, supporting children, driving modest cars, fixing what they could and planning ahead so they would not have to depend on the government later. That is basic financial discipline. We should encourage it, not punish it.
At a time when credit card debt is near record highs, younger folks struggle to save or invest, family sustaining jobs are harder to find, and basic costs keep rising, the answer is not to punish folks who manage to save. We should want people to work, save, invest and build security, not tax the same dollars a second or even third time because they planned responsibly.
The proposal also hits small businesses at exactly the wrong time.
Supporters claim owner-operated small businesses would be excluded, but Mr. Pinsley’s own report admits very common small business structures are actually the source of the majority of revenue. These are not exotic structures used only by the wealthy. They are common ways small businesses, especially family businesses, are organized.
Small business owners routinely work 50, 60 or more hours a week under pressures most never see: payroll, rent, insurance, utilities, supplies, repairs, maintenance, taxes, compliance, permitting, staffing and constant uncertainty.
For most small business “wealth” is not cash sitting in a bank account. It's tied up in equipment, inventory, buildings, debt, invoices and the business itself. On paper, a business owner may look successful. But in reality, many are fighting every month to make payroll, cover bills and keep the doors open, yet still find time and resources to sponsor youth teams, support fundraisers, and donate to fire companies, schools, churches, nonprofits and community events. This is exactly the wrong environment to pile another tax on small business owners and could force them to either cut back on their community support, or not grow their business.
The legal risk is also serious.
If this tax were clearly legal and clean, the county would not need outside tax counsel, as recommended by the Controller in his report, to find a constitutional workaround. This alone should raise alarms. This sounds less like confidence in the law and more like shopping for a legal theory to support the outcome they want. Passing a constitutionally suspect tax does not just invite a lawsuit. It would send taxpayers the bill.
Lehigh County should focus on controlling costs, delivering core services and encouraging economic growth.
This is not a bold new idea. It's a recycled bad idea that every county that once had it walked away from. Taxing savings discourages saving. Taxing investment discourages investment. Taxing small business ownership discourages growth, expansion, and job creation.
Do not be fooled. This proposal is not a so-called wealth tax. It is an asset tax. A broad tax on common savings tools and small businesses that punishes responsible behavior, creates huge legal risk and adds another burden at exactly the wrong time. Lehigh County should reject it clearly, publicly and permanently.
Commissioner Ron W. Beitler, Independent
Commissioner Antonio Pineda, Republican
Phil Armstrong, former Lehigh County Executive, Democrat
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Gracedale - Four Deficiencies, Including Failure to Meet State Nursing Care Minimum ... Again
Since the beginning of this year, Gracedale nursing home has done its best to establish a very positive social media presence. It has highlighted Valentine Day, Mardi Gras, its executive chef, volunteers, a food truck festival, its employees and tuition assistance program and even its very own prom night. Without question, there are good things to say about the home and the people who work there. NorCo Exec Tara Zrinski has said she plans to unveil her long-range plans for the facility at the next Human Services Committee. The fact remains, however, that it still has issues. The home has been the subject of eight visits from the state DOH this year. On two of these inspections, Gracedale was cited for deficiencies.
The most recent published survey (they appear online 41 days after the event) was on May 1. The state DOH was there for four reasons: a Medicare and Medicaid Recertification; state licensing; civil rights compliance, and one complaint. Unfortunately, several deficiencies were found. (You can read them yourself).
Two residents were victims of Chemical Restraints. - Many nursing home residents suffer from dementia. Others may need antianxiety medication at times. But when it is prescribed, it must stop after 14 days unless the resident is re-evaluated by a physician. Two residents were being given these medications beyond the 14-day limit.
The home failed to implement doctor's orders for four residents. - These include a failure to take blood stool samples, failure to notify physician of dropping blood sugar as requested; administering blood pressure medication despite physician order that it be skipped if resident's heartbeat is too low; and failure to follow a doctor's order to provide a resident with a certain kind of boot that prevents bed sores.
Inaccurate assessments - In at least two instances, nursing staff failed properly to document a resident's condition. In one case, nurses inaccurately reported that a resident had no falls when notes reflect he did. In another, a nurse incorrectly reported that a resident was receiving dialysis.
Failure to provide minimum required nursing care. - Gracedale has been cited repeatedly over its failure to meet the state minimum nursing care standard, including earlier this year. It blew it again over one of 22 das reviewed.
Zrinski has previously stated on several occasions that Administrator Michelle Morton is doing a good job. The facts tell a different story.
Will this negatively impact Gracedale's effort to have its provisional license recertified to regular? Online, the home is still listed as having only a provisional, but as previously stated, there is a 41-day lag between real time and what appears online.
Brooks Bash of Volunteer Firefighters Catches Attention of Washington Free Beacon
Like it or not, and I don't, Bob Brooks is the Democratic nominee for the Pa. 07 Congressional District, which includes Lehigh, Northampton, Carbon and a small part of Monroe County. Incumbent Republican Ryan Mackenzie, a Trump acolyte, lust know he's in trouble. But leave it to my party and the experts at the DCCC to pour in enough money to ensure that the shadiest of four Democrats has been proclaimed the party's standard bearer. Mackenzie is wasting no time in making sure that the entire Congressional district knows all about Brooks before November. He's getting some free help from the right-wing Washington Free Beacon, which purports to cover "the enemies of freedom the way the mainstream won't."
The Beacon's Chuck Ross has some up with something I failed to cover during the primary, and that is Brooks' revulsion at professional firefighters who dare act as volunteer firefighters in their own communities. Ross points to angry social media posts from Brooks, calling them "scabs" and "shitbags."
This country currently faces a severe decline in volunteer firefighters. The number of volunteers has declined about 25% over the past two decades, while emergency calls have increased 70%, particularly in the MidAtlantic. The shortage is so serious that Lehigh and Northampton Counties both offer real estate tax rebates to volunteer firefighters.
I understand that Brooks may have no issue with volunteer firefighters so long as they stay out of a municipality covered by a professional and unionized fire department. But does that make sense. The Lehigh Valley's three cities have all had major fires over the years during which volunteer firefighters from other municipalities assist. The most recent example of this is at an Easton hotel. Should a professional Easton or Bethlehem firefighter refuse to assist if he is also a volunteer at Plainfield's fire department and that company responds? Should they just stand by and watch a building burn?
Union solidarity is one thing. Public safety should trump it.