About Me

My photo
Nazareth, Pa., United States
Showing posts with label attorney general. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attorney general. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

Stollsteimer Leads in Money Race for Dem AG Candidates

The campaign finance reports of three out of five Democratic candidates for Attorney General. Because the state elections office is still importing data from reports into their system, the reports filed by Jared Solomon and Keir Bradford-Grey are unavailable. Reports are on file for Eugene De Pasquale, Joe Khan and Jack Stollsteimer. 

Of these three, Stollsteimer is way ahead in the money game. He raised $353k in the most recent filing period, which gave him a $$871k warchest. He spent $637k, leaving him with $234k for the closing days. He is heavily funded by trade unions.

Joe Khan raised $276k in the most recent reporting period, giving him a total of $619k. He spent $479k, leaving him with $140k. Locally, he did get a $10k contribution from State Rep Josh Siegel, who while qa member of Allentown City Council voted No to police grants and participated in "Fuck the Police" demonstrations. 

If I were Khan, I'd have sent that money back. 

Eugene DePasquale raised $88k in the most recent reporting period, giving him a warchest of $226k. He spent $132k and had $94k for the closing days of his race. 

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

Who is the Best Dem in PA Attorney General Race?

Pennsylvania's Attorney General, who is paid $197,748 a year, is the Commonwealth's chief law enforcement officer; the state's collection agency; defends all actions brought against the state; administers consumer protection laws; prosecutes violations of antitrust laws; and represents the Commonwealth in cases where a local District Attorney has a conflict of interest. Five Democrats seek their party's nomination. They are Keir Bradford-GreyEugene DePasqualeJoe KhanJack Stollsteimer and Jared Solomon. Above you can see a debate involving all five. Below I'll tell you a little bit about each of them.

Keir Bradford-Grey - She's a graduate of Ohio Northern University Pettit School of Law and served as Chief Public Defender in Montgomery County and as the leader of the largest public defender's organization in Philly. If elected, she would be the first public defender to be elected as the state's top prosecutor. "I'm running to be the people's lawyer, and that's what the Attorney General is in every other state," she has said. The "people's lawyer" in other states prosecutes criminals. She promised to go after criminals in the board room."

As of March, she had raised a total of $640,000 and had $211,000 to spend. 

Eugene DePasquale - He's a graduate of Widener University School of Law who served as a state representative for three terms and as state auditor general for two terms but lost a race for Congress. Though he has no experience as a professional prosecutor, he touts an enviable record during his time as auditor general. "It is my investigation that found over 3,000 untested rape kits. ... It is my investigation that found 58,000 [one out of five] unanswered phone calls at the child abuse hotline. Any single one of those calls could have meant life or death for a child."

DePasquale's work as auditor general found that a former Bangor school Superintendent was paid $142,000 for "consulting services" never provided.  He blew the whistle on voting machine providers who shower county officials with gifts. It is he who revealed that funds from the state's high gas tax were being diverted to fund state police instead of repairing roads. 

His work made him unpopular with the Governor, but he was independent. 

As of March, he had raised $570,000, and had $180,000 to spend. 

Joe Khan - He's a graduate of University of Chicago Law School and served as a local and federal prosecutor, including the corruption investigation that led to the prosecution and conviction of the Mayors of Reading and Allentown. But he fell short in his bid for election as Philadelphia DA. 

He certainly has experience as a prosecutor. He led the pay-to-play corruption investigation that led to the conviction of the Mayors of Allentown and Reading, but he also closed the grand jury even though FBI agent Scott Curtis claimed that the problem still exists in this area. 

As of March, he's raised $923,000 and has $314,000 to spend. 

Jack Stollsteimer - A graduate of Temple Law, Stollsteimer is Delaware County's DA. He led the effort to deprivatize the jail in that county and reduced its population by 30%. Asked whether this is dangerous, he responded by saying he balances criminal justice reform with public safety. He said he actually has reduced the jail population by 40% and uses those savings to get low level offenders the help they need. As a result, shootings in his county are down 72% and homicides are down 68%. 

He's the only Democratic candidate who actually has been a District Attorney. He has support from the trades union and has prosecuted worker misclassification. 

He said he's spent his entire career trying to reduce easy access to guns, not by those who have the right to have them, but from thse who don't. 

As of March, he raised a little over $1 million and had $368,000 to spend. 

Jared Solomon - Thus guy id simultaneously running for AG and for re-election as State Rep. That takes him out of the picture for me. 

My Opinion: I really like DePasquale but believe Stollsteimer will be most effective in that office. I think DePasquale is in the best position to win because he comes from the western part of the state and has no competition from that region. The other candidates are all from the Philly area and might cancel each other out. 

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Kane in Cuffs

Kathleen Kane's fall from grace is now complete. Once a rising star touted as Pennsylvania's next US Senator or governor, she was clapped in handcuffs yesterday after being sentenced to 10-23 months of county jail time for leaking grand jury materials. She pleaded with the judge for a sentence that would allow her to remain with her two sons, but the judge told her she put herself in that situation.

Kane's stay in jail was short-lived because she posted bail. But when she got back to her black Land Rover, there was a $28 parking ticket attached to the windshield.

Not a good day for her.

Not a good day for Democratic AG candidate Josh Shapiro, either. In a debate on the same day that Kane was sentenced, republican AG candidate slammed Shapiro as  "Kathleen Kane in a suit,"notingthat Shapiro has even less experience in a courtroom than Kane did.

Rafferty, himself a former prosecutor, is right. Shapiro was also slammed because he obviously is using the AG's office as a stepping stone at a time when that demoralized office needs a prosecutor.

That's why I voted for Rafferty.

Wednesday, April 06, 2016

Friday, April 01, 2016

Morganelli Seeks Ethics Investigation for Shapiro

Nearly two weeks ago, standing at the steps of the Montgomery County Courthouse, NorCo DA John Morganelli provided a fairly extensive list of Josh Shapiro campaign contributors who ended up with deals in Montgomery County, where he is a County Commissioner.

Yesterday, from Harrisburg, he called for the State Ethics Commission to commence an investigation based on more recent discoveries. According to Morganelli, Shapiro "has used his position as a County Commissioner to not only reward his campaign contributors with lucrative county contracts, but he has also, in at least 2 county contracts, failed to disclose that he is using his position to steer lucrative county contracts to his own clients - vendors who are clients of his law firm- Stradley Ronon."

Morganelli claims that Shapiro may have engaged in a "conflict of interest," in violation of the state Ethics Act, because he voted to award to award lucrative contracts to PECO and Exelon, who happened to be his clients.

Here is an excerpt of Morganelli's remarks:
Josh Shapiro likes to lecture everyone about ethics and integrity. He brags about his so-called "integrity agenda " for Pennsylvania. He says that he will adopt a gift ban that will forbid an official from accepting even a free cup of coffee so as not to be influenced with respect to his public duties. He says he will lead by example. Yet, his rhetoric does not match his conduct. He runs around with ethics and integrity on his sleeve, but where is that when it comes to his own conduct? Shapiro wants to ban state officials from accepting a free cup of coffee, but at the same time, in Montgomery County, Josh Shapiro has no problem at all soliciting campaign contributions from special interests who he then awards lucrative county contracts, including the clients of his own law firm.

Blogger's Disclosure: I support John Morganelli in the AG race and have contributed to his campaign.

Updated 10 am: Common Cause of Pa Exec Director Barry Kauffman has told Pittburgh Tribune that Shapiro or any other elected official whose law firm benefits from a vote needs to make complete disclosure

Monday, March 28, 2016

John Morganelli - "What I'll Do as Attorney General"



In this brief video, John Morganelli explains why he should be the next Attorney Gen'l. For his part, Allegheny County DA Steve Zapalla is portraying himself in a TV spot running only in Philly as a champion of "Black Lives Matter." Montgomery County Comm'r Josh Shapiro touted an endorsement from Planned Parenthood.Senator Bob Casey, aka "Fillintheblank", has given his "strong" endorsement of Shpario.

Interestingly, Morganelli has denied working in concert with Zapalla to deny the nod to Shapiro. “I'm not going to blow $600,000 just to help somebody else, though it may end up that way,” he told Pittsburgh Tribune reporter Brad Bumstead.

In the final analysis, this may all be academic. Democrats allowed themselves to be played by Republicans concerning Kathleen Kane instead of forcefully demanding her resignation. Her trial is set to start in August and oh what a show that will be!  If that's delayed, Republicans who control the state house will work hard for her impeachment. Democrats will drown in a sea of corruption that includes state representatives, Mayors and the Attorney General. When they needed to call on her to step down, they didn't. The Republican nominee, most likely John Rafferty, will likely be the next Attorney General, no matter who Democrats choose.

I'd love to see Morganelli elected. There is no doubt in my mind that he'd restore morale and be an effective prosecutor.  But I fear this job is going to go to a politician.

(Blogger's Note: As a matter of full disclosure, I support John Morganelli and have contributed to his campaign.)

Monday, March 21, 2016

Shapiro's Pay-to- Play Slammed in Montgomery County

People in the Lehigh Valley are waking up to the evils of pay-to-play, which has spawned a federal investigation into political corruption in Allentown and Reading. But not Josh Shapiro. This Democratic candidate for Attorney General has clearly benefited from County vendors. Today, at the Montgomery County Courthouse, Morganelli has called on the County Controller to audit Shapiro's campaign finances:

I am here today in Montgomery County to compare Josh Shapiro's rhetoric to his actions and conduct. I am also here, as a first step, to ask the Montgomery County Controller to look into the relationship between campaign contributions to Commissioner Josh Shapiro from vendors who have been awarded lucrative contracts with Montgomery County. An audit is in order as first step to fully identify all county vendors who have been solicited by Josh Shapiro, and who have dumped thousands of dollars into his campaign coffers either immediately before, or immediately after Shapiro has voted on awarding county contracts to these same vendors.

In this campaign to date, and in the forums we have participated in, Josh Shapiro likes to lecture everyone about ethics and integrity. He brags about his so-called "integrity agenda " for Pennsylvania. He says that he will adopt a gift ban that will forbid an official from accepting even a free cup of coffee so as not to be influenced with respect to his public duties. He says that even if none of the little gifts a public official may accept are intended to influence public policy, that such practises "appear suspect" and must be stopped. He says he will lead by example.

But as I have pointed out in debate after debate, Josh Shapiro does not practise what he preaches. His rhetoric does not match his conduct. He runs around with ethics and integrity on his sleeve, but where is that when it comes to his own conduct? Are the folks of Montgomery County paying attention to what is going on right here under this roof? Are they aware that Josh Shapiro wants to ban state officials from accepting a free cup of coffee, but at the same time, here in Montgomery County, Josh Shapiro has no problem at all soliciting campaign contributions from special interests who he then awards a lucrative county contract. Let's look at the facts:

McCormick Taylor
* February 20, 2015 - $2500 contribution to Shapiro

* March 6, 2015- Shapiro votes for a $400,000 contract award to McCormick Taylor for engineering services

And another $1,000 from a principal of McCormick on March 7,2016

Matt McTish ( McTish, Kunkel Associates)
* June 18,2014- Shapiro makes the motion and votes for $1 million dollar contract for construction inspection services

* February 23, 2015- Shapiro accepts $5,000 from Matt McTish
Exelon Corporation- energy company in Chicago/subsidiary is Constellation Co.
* June 19, 2014- $2.4 million dollar contract awarded

* February 19, 2015- Shapiro accepts $5,000 contribution from Exelon

And more recently, Exelon PAC contributed another $2500 to Shapiro on March 7, 2016.
PECO Energy Co
* October 15, 2015- PECO awarded a $73,896 contract

* October 19,2015- Shapiro accepts $1,000 contribution/ he had previously received a $500 contribution on 1/19/15
Gannet Fleming- engineering services
* February 18,2015- Shapiro accepts a $1,000 contribution

* October 15,2015- Gannet awarded a $285,400 contract
Aetna Inc
* January 15,2015- Aetna awarded a $2 million dollar contract for dental services

* March 20, 2015- Shapiro accepts $2500 fro Aetna PAC
Allan Myers
Between 2012 and 2015 Shapiro accepted $30,000 in campaign contributions from the head of Allan Myers Construction Co. Myers was awarded an $11.5 million contract for highway work in Montgomery County- a contract Shapiro voted to increase by $3.4 million in August of 2014.
The aforesaid information was gathered in about an hour of time comparing campaign finance reports filed by Shapiro with Montgomery County contract awards and minutes of commissioner meetings. Josh Shapiro is worried about a public official accepting a free cup of coffee. He says such an incidental gift "... appears suspect and we must put a stop to it." But he doesn't think this pattern of awarding lucrative contracts to vendors and then either right before or right after having his campaign coffers filled with cash by these vendors is a problem. Josh Shapiro needs to answer to this. Today, I am asking Josh Shapiro to come clean. I am asking him to address this directly, not through some spokesperson or paid mouthpiece. I am asking him to disclose all of the other vendors doing business with Montgomery County that are also depositing campaign cash into his bank account. As I have said, I am also asking the Montgomery County Controller to audit this- to place a big flash light on what Josh Shapiro is doing.

Josh is great at giving lofty speeches and lecturing everyone else on ethics and integrity. Meanwhile, he has hand out to vendors who have to have his vote and support for work in Montgomery County. Josh voted on all these contracts and never once disclosed that he was in bed with these vendors-- that they were giving money to him right before or right after the award of these lucrative contracts. He could have even abstained, but he didn't. This is hypocrisy of the greatest degree. When will Josh address this?? When will the press stop promoting the Josh Shapiro fairytale that he is some kind of boy scout. The truth is, his self described description on his Facebook page as a politician is accurate. He is nothing more than a typical politician. If Josh wants to adopt an "integrity agenda", why doesn't he start here in Montgomery County and ban campaign contributions from vendors doing business with the county? Why doesn't he? Because the rules do not apply to Josh.

Full Disclosure: I support John Morganelli for AG and have made a small contribution.

Updated 10:15 pm:  The Morning Call has picked up on Morganelli's accusations. The Shapiro campaign has responded by claiming that he gave Montgomery County an ethics policy and is fighting patronage. He does not appear to respond to Morganelli's very specific accusations.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Morganelli Wants More Debates in AG Race

Pennsylvania's League of Women Voters is attempting to schedule a debate among the three Democratic candidates for Attorney General, but it seems that the only one who can make it is NorCo DA John Morganelli. The veteran prosecutor put his courtroom experience to good work in two previous encounters, and he's beginning to wonder whether self-described politician Josh Shapiro and Allegheny County DA Steve Zapalla are running scared. Shapiro just can't seem to squeeze it in his busy schedule, while Zapalla never bothered to respond.

"I will debate any place, anywhere, and any time," claims Morganelli.

In previous debates, Morganelli zeroed in pretty effectively on Shapiro's complete lack of experience and willingness to accept a large contribution from a charter school PAC while simultaneously claiming to endorse public education.
Quite frankly, I believe that Josh Shapiro is ducking any further debates, and will try to stall and run out the clock to primary election day. Josh Shapiro has been exposed in every forum we have had, and there is more to come and he knows that. Josh, let me say this-- there is NOTHING that you are doing that is more important than to face your opponents in a real debate. You have ducked the questions about your lack of experience and your hypocrisy when it comes to your lectures on integrity. Why are you afraid to engage in a real debate? Not a forum where you can give lofty speeches with no substance, but a real debate where you and I can have a real exchange
.Morganelli has appealed to Pa news agencies to host three debates "so the people of Pennsylvania can decide for themselves who is the most experienced person to be Pennsylvania's chief law enforcement officers."

Short-staffed newspapers will decline. But after the election is over, they will piously condemn the apathy among every day voters.

Full Disclosure: I have made a small contribution to John Morganelli's campaign. If I could make a big one, I would.

Wednesday, March 09, 2016

Morganelli Slams Teacher' Union Endorsement Process

Using one of his fake names, Easton Mayor Sal Panto has taken a few shots at District Attorney John Morganelli. Hiding behind this alias, Panto has also ripped the teachers' unions and teachers themselves. The difference between someone like Panto and Morganeli is that Morganelli is honest. Today, from Harrisburg, he leveled a devastating attack at the endorsement process used by the PSEA, the teachers' union. It recently endorsed Montgomery County Comm'r Josh Shapiro, who has never tried a case, but is funded by the charter school lobby.

I am here today in Harrisburg to question the true agenda of the leadership of PSEA , the Pennsylvania State Education Association, with respect to its political endorsement process, and comment on the duplicitous conduct of one of my opponents, Josh Shapiro.

For the past few years, PSEA has made choices with respect to its political endorsements which are suspect. They are based on personal friendships between board members and certain political candidates that have not advanced the real interests of our state's teachers or other members of PSEA.

Let me be more specific. In 2008, when I was the Democratic candidate for AG, I came to PSEA in good faith with a longstanding record of supporting public education and protecting teachers. PSEA leadership sat there quietly and listened to my record . They were told of my background:
* Endorsed by PSEA for District Attorney
* A life time of being a pro-union, Democrat- endorsed by many labor unions on numerous occasions
* A labor background- My dad a life time union member with AFL/CIO/Operating Engineers/ Teamsters
- My mom- a union garment worker
* The fact that prior to being DA, I represented a labor union
* The fact that as DA, I was praised editorially for standing up for teachers right to use reasonable force in our schools to protect themselves from unruly students.
* the fact that I opposed vouchers, was a product of public schools and had family members who are teachers
Despite a 100% record of supporting the entire agenda of PSEA, the leadership voted to endorse Republican Tom Corbett. When I asked at that time how PSEA could endorse Tom Corbett , a man who was so opposite the interests of public education, opposite my pro- union, pro public education record, I was told by PSEA leadership that there were personal relationships on the board that were developed with Corbett because he had attended quarterly meetings of PSEA . In short, PSEA leadership put aside the interests of its own members, and endorsed and funded a person who wanted to bring public education to its knees, and who always said that he would make Pennsylvania a right to work state if the legislation was brought to him. Tom Corbett devastated public education and he did so with the help of PSEA who helped get him re-elected AG and propelled him to the Office of Governor 2 years later.

Now, here in 2016, PSEA has ignored certain facts about their endorsed AG candidate Josh Shapiro. In a debate a few weeks ago, I exposed the fact that Josh Shapiro accepted a $25,000 campaign contribution from Students First, a charter school advocacy group that is hurting public schools. That contribution was in March of 2015. It was later determined that Josh accepted an additional $25,000 from Students First PAC in 2012. Who knows how much more he may have received from them that has not yet surfaced. In my view, Shapiro is duplicitous in his conduct telling both sides what they want to hear behind closed doors. This is not consistent with his so-called "integrity" campaign.

The Students First web site says this about public education: "Statistics reveal that education offered by public schools in America is increasingly failing to meet the expectations of students..... According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP 2012), “three out of four eighth-and 12th-grade students cannot write proficiently.. Statistics also show that nearly 1.1 million students in USA drop out of the education system every year."

There are many unanswered questions about why Josh Shapiro would accept $50,000 from a group that condemns public education:
* Why is Students First PAC giving these large contributions to Josh Shapiro?
* What do they expect of him with respect to their agenda?
* Why is Josh seeking funding from a group that is hurting public schools with the proliferation of charter schools?
* What has Josh promised them?
* Why won't Josh address this? What is Josh telling 2 different , opposing groups behind closed doors?
* Why won't PSEA address this?
* Why haven't all of you, the media , asked him about this?
These are not nominal contributions. $50,000 represents a huge contribution from a special interest group that takes dollars from our public schools. And the largest question: How can PSEA endorse a candidate who is in bed with the Charter school folks? This would be like someone being funded by both the NRA and CeaseFire- inconceivable!

And the contributions from Students First PAC to Josh is not the only issue. In 2006, Josh Shapiro filled out a Project Vote Smart questionnaire and was asked his position on national standards. Here is the question, and here is his answer:
Indicate which principles you support( if any) regarding education:

X Support national standards and testing of public school students
So, here we have PSEA, endorsing a candidate for AG who is funded by the folks that oppose public education. Here we have an endorsement of a man who said he supported national standards, another issue opposed by PSEA. So what is the rationale for this endorsement?

Mr. Dan Wittimer of PSEA contacted my campaign and told us that Josh was endorsed, because of personal relationships Josh developed with board members. This is now the second time I have heard this rationale for a PSEA endorsement. Once again, personal friendships, like the Corbett endorsement in 2008, takes precedence over the interests of the membership of this union. In my opinion, the leadership of PSEA is morally bankrupt.

Despite the PSEA endorsement, I am taking my pro union, pro labor, pro teacher record directly to the folks of Pennsylvania and the rank and file membership of this union. I am asking every teacher and member of this union in Pennsylvania, and particularly in the LV to ask themselves if they believe that the best person for AG is a person with absolutely no prosecution or legal experience, who takes money from charter school special interests and supports national standard, or a career prosecutor who has stood up over and over again for our teachers in the class rooms. I am also asking all PSEA members to contact their main office in Harrisburg at _717 255 7000 and demand an explanation about what their union leadership is really doing to protect their interests.

Tuesday, March 01, 2016

Boscola Endorses Morganelli For AG

State Senator Lisa Boscola endoesed NorCo DA John Morganelli in the Attorney General race yesterday. First elected to the State House in 1994, Boscola is currently representing the 18th Senatorial District. Since 2011, she has been Chair of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee.

Boscola states, "John Morganelli is presently Pennsylvania's longest serving district attorney. He is the only candidate with hands on prosecutorial experience personally obtaining convictions in over 20 first degree murder cases involving some of Pennsylvania's most dangerous criminals. John also has been a leader in criminal justice issues that protect Pennsylvanians, and has been in the forefront on issues important to women including establishing a domestic violence unit and hiring women in important positions in law enforcement."

Morganelli replied, "Lisa is an advocate for the regular folks, and has never been afraid to stand up for what is right. Her support is very much valued."

Morganelli also picked up the endorsement of noted Allentown civil rights lawyer Rick Orloski.

Today, Morganelli will participate in an AG debate at the Philadelphia Bar Association. His Democratic opponents, Josh Shapiro and Steve Zappala, will be joined for the first time by Republican John Rafferty. In the first debate at the progressive Summit, the issues of political corruption and Kathleen Kane were nearly buried. My guess is that Rafferty will hold them all accountable.

Thursday, February 25, 2016

LV Bldg Trades Endorse Morganelli in AG Race

The Lehigh Valley Building Trades today formally endorsed Northampton County District Attorney John Morganelli for Attorney General yesterday, following a meeting in Allentown.

Morganelli has a long history of labor support. His father was a lifetime union blue collar worker who worked as an oiler with the International Union of Operating Engineers Local #542 for 30 years. He was also a Teamsters for 10 years. As a steelworker, he was a member of AFL/CIO. John's mother was a union garment worker and member of ILGWU. Morganelli represented a union before he was DA and has been attentive to union issues including enforcement of the Construction Misclassification Act.

"I am proud to have the support of the LV Building Trades," beamed Morganelli. "They know me the best and my commitment to enforcing laws that protect the hard working men and women in the labor force."

The Lehigh Valley Building Trades is an organization composed of local construction unions. The members are local residents who are plumbers, electricians, carpenters, painters, bricklayers and members of various other construction related professions. The following are the constituent unions: Boilermakers Local 13; Bricklayers, Tilesetters and Cement Masons Local 5; Carpenters Local 600; Cement Masons and Plasterers Local 592; IBEW Local 102; IBEW Local 375; Elevator Constructors Local 84; Glaziers Local 252 DC 21; Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers Local 23; Heavy Highway Construction Workers Local 158; Ironworkers Local 36; Laborers Local 1174; Millwright and Machinery Erectors Local 1906; Operating Engineers Local 542; Painters and Allied Trades Local 1269 DC 21; Plumbers Local 690; Road Sprinkler Fitters Local 669; Roofers and Waterproofers Local 30; Sheet Metal Workers Local 19; Steamfitters Local 420 and Teamsters Local 773.

Full Disclosure: I support John Morganelli in this race and made a small donation to his campaign.

Monday, February 22, 2016

Winner of Democratic AG Debate? Republicans

Three Democrats running for Attorney General had the opportunity to trade barbs during a weekend debate at the Progressive Summit, which was held this year inside the swanky Hilton Harrisburg.  People inside could pretend to be liberal, but without really having to look at the poverty that engulfs so much of our urban cores.

The three Democrats seeking their party's nomination are Northampton County DA John Morganelli, Allegheny County DA Steve Zappala and Montgomery County Commissioner Josh Shapiro.

Republicans seeking the nod of their party are Montgomery State Senator John Rafferty and former federal prosecutor Joe Peters. They declined to attend a debate at which their presence was obviously unwelcome and joked about by moderator Mike Morrill.

The only candidate with no experience as a prosecutor, or in trying any cases, for that matter, is Josh Shapiro. So naturally, he would be the favorite in a straw poll of 65% of the so-called progressives at this oh-so-important gathering. The crowd seemed to be limited to people from southeastern Pa. and the Harrisburg area. Shapiro's inexperience was blasted again and again by Morganelli, and to a lesser extent, by Zappala.

Noting his 24 years of experience as Northampton County DA, Morganelli argued he is the state's most senior DA, and one who has personally tried 25 first degree murder cases. Zappala has 18 years of experience in Allegheny County, but tries no cases. In a county his size, which prosecutes more cases every year than the entire population of Northampton County, he explained that it's more important to be an administrator.

In contrast to two veteran prosecutors, Morganelli called Shapiro a "self-described politician." When Shapiro touted his chairmanship of the Pa. Commission on Crime and Delinquency, Morganelli derided it as a "MAC machine" that hands out federal funds to municipalities. "It has nothing to do with crime fighting," he complained, noting that Shapiro has only held this particular title for a few months.

"He has titles but no experience," Morganelli observed. "How do you fix something you know nothing about?"

Shapiro eventually countered that he would be an "activist" Attorney General who would stand up for the constitutional right to a thorough education as well as clean air and water. He portrayed himself as a "reformer" who as a state representative stood up for "Democratic" values against the "status quo." Shapiro later added he was not running to be the state's 68th District Attorney.

After Shapiro stressed this constitutional right to a through education, Morganelli noted that Shapiro accepted $25,000 from Students First PAC, which advocates for charter schools.

Moderator Morrill failed to pose a single question about two 800-lbs gorillas in the room - Kathleen Kane and rampant political corruption in Pennsylvania. He instead focused in issues that mean little to everyday Pennsylvanians, like the LGBT movement and "structural racism."
 
From time to time, the issues came up. Zappala conceded that Pennsylvania is the "most corrupt state" in the country, and Shapiro blasted the "mess" in the AG's office. Though Morganelli has previously called for an overhaul of that office, he actually defended Kane at the debate, admitting only that "she made mistakes."

All candidates pledged to support the eventual nominee.

On points, Morganelli scored an easy victory. If you want to see a vivisection, watch the debate.

You could say Zappala won, too. Morganelli was a pit bull with Shapiro. As underdog, he needed to be tough. But he probably hurt himself as well. Zappala was able to just sit there and watch.

But the real winners weren't there. The Republicans won. If this debate establishes anything, it's that the Republican nominee, most likely John Rafferty, will be the next Attorney General.

Democrats have already ruined any hope they have of retaining this important office with their abysmal failure to address the real issues confronting every day citizens. It's not, like Kathleen Kane thinks, a group of old farts in black robes who sometimes send naughty emails to their pals. Nor is it, as Michael Morrill seems to think, "structural racism," although that sounds very liberal. Nor is it the LGBT movement, which is oh-so-passe.

People don't give a shit about a transgender's right to tinkle in a public ladies' room. What bothers ordinary people are street gangs, fatal drug overdoses, random violence and ripoffs by predatory lenders and other shady businesses. In addition, there's no public confidence in a government so gridlocked it's unable to even agree on a budget. Legislators engage in rampant pay-to-play, ghost voting and violate campaign finance laws as a matter of routine in Harrisburg, where Shapiro claimed to be a reformer.

In the urban communities, crony capitalists have taken over, leading to federal investigations in Harrisburg, Reading, Allentown and Philadelphia. The state's top prosecutor is herself facing perjury charges and her law license is suspended. The party's top Democrat, Marcel Groen, may yet be caught up in the federal investigation in Allentown.

Republicans have long had the power to remove Kathleen Kane from office. But they've allowed her to remain. They know she is a constant reminder to ordinary citizens, including me, that we made a big mistake four years ago when we chose a pretty face over someone who was actually qualified.

In this climate, people will turn to the Daddy party - the Republicans. This debate also establishes that so-called progressive Democrats are out-of-touch. One of the hosts bragged about being at the Hilton without a tux, but he was still at the Hilton. Maybe Governor Wolf should take another trip in his Jeep Wrangler and pretend he's poor.

Blogger's Note:  I am compelled to note that I personally support and have contributed $100 to John Morganelli's campaign. In my view, he would be an outstanding Attorney General who would ovehaul that office and restore confidence, but his fellow Democrats have already lost this race.

Updated 9:15 am: In an earlier version of this story, I got one of the Republicans wrong. I have corrected this error and apologize. 

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Lynne Abraham Endorses Morganelli in AG Race

Former Philadelphia DA Lynne Abraham has endorsed John Morganelli in the AG's race, according to a report from PoliticsPa.
“As Philadelphia’s District Attorney for almost 19 years, John and I worked closely protecting the public from the ravages of crime and violence everywhere in our Commonwealth. John is a tested, proven leader, who will bring his vast prosecutorial experience and leadership skills to the Office of Attorney General while serving all citizens of Pennsylvania with distinction and honor.”
Morganelli, who is seeking the Domocratic nomination, is opposed by Josh Shapiro and Allegheny County DA Stephen Zappala.

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Morganelli on Kane's Decision Against Re-Election

Embattled Pennsylvania AG Kathleen Kane announced today, the last possible day for filing nominating petitions, that she's finally decided against seeking re-election. That's too late to help Democrats. After a Senate removal vote recently "failed," Kane's trial on perjury and related charges will take place in August. And if that's not enough, the House will vote to impeach her, forcing another trial in the state senate. Along the way, every Democrat who refused to demand her to step down will be attacked, and rightly so.

With Kane out, the remaining Democrats in contention are Northampton County DA John Morganelli, Montgomery County Comm'r Josh Spairo and Allegheny County DA Stephen Zappala. Both Morganelli and Zappala are seasoned prosecutors, while Shapiro's strength is his ability to raise money.

Whoever climbs to the top of the Democratic Mountain will face State Senator Steve Rafferty, a former Deputy AG, in November.

Along the way, I'm sure Rafferty will be eminding voters what they got the last time they elected a Democrat.

Morganelli, who has called for a complete overhaul of the AG's office, nevertheless stated yesterday that "I always liked Ms. Kane and I wish for her the best as she faces the challenges with respect to her law license and the allegations against her."

In my opinion, this race is already over. Rafferty will be overwhelmingly elected. and Josh Shairo will have to figure out some other way to position himself to run for Governor.

The most qualified candidates - Morganelli and Zappala - will watch from the sidelines.

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Morganelli Calls For End to PornGate ... and Kane

I am one of those who voted for Kathleen Kane ... twice. I voted for her in both the Democratic primary and general election. I never imagined that someone who had so much potential could go so wrong so quickly.

DA John Morganelli was one of her original supporters, too. Not anymore. Now, he is seriously considering a run for the job himself, in what will undeniably be an uphill battle against other Democrats as well as Republicans who have allowed Kane to twist slowly in the wind, hoping to get political mileage out of this walking disaster.

Morganelli conducted a news conference in Harrisburg today. He is calling for a complete housecleaning in the Office of Attorney general (OAG), including the elimination of a special prosecutor who is not even licensed in Pennsylvania and who has been given unfettered access to Grand Jury materials. That's the same thing that got Kane into hot water in the first place.

John's statement is below:


Kathleen Kane mug shot
The OAG is a paralyzed and divided ship adrift at sea in need of a complete house cleaning. The first place to start is the termination of the so called special prosecutor Douglas Gansler. Let me explain.

It was reported last week that First Deputy Attorney General Bruce Beemer has demanded the return of 850,000 emails that were handed over to the so-called special prosecutor, Douglas Gansler, by AG Kane in the so called "Porn Gate " investigation. Mr. Beemer contends that Kane, in turning over the emails to Mr. Gansler, improperly gave him many messages with confidential details of secret grand jury investigations. According to Mr. Beemer, the emails handed to Gansler contain a relatively small set of offensive messages, and hundreds of thousands of ordinary work emails in which prosecutors discussed pursuing criminal and civil cases. Beemer further stated that anyone who reviews grand jury material must get permission from the grand jury supervising judge who apparently has not given such authorization to Gansler. Letters made public last week suggests that the supervising grand jury judge may be taking steps to investigate yet another unauthorized disclosure of protected grand jury material.

Attorney Gansler has apparently refused the request of the OAG, Mr. Gansler is apparently going rogue. This matter represents, yet another legal mess that has the OAG paralyzed and divided. There continues to exist a disconnect between the elected AG and top people in her office. This has resulted in the OAG being akin to a ship adrift at sea with no one knowing for sure who is in charge. In fact, there is outright revolt.

As Pennsylvania's most senior district attorney, today I am calling on the termination of Mr.Gansler's relationship with the Pennsylvania OAG and the immediate return of property of the OAG. If Mr. Gansler continues to refuse to return property that is not his, I am also calling on the Department of Justice to intervene and seek in federal court an Order of Court directing Mr. Gansler to return the property of the Pennsylvania OAG. I call for this for several reasons:

First, there is no need for a "Special Prosecutor" that will cost taxpayers millions of dollars to do this type of investigation. The fact that the OAG's email servers have been a hub for the exchange of sexually explicit content and messages mocking women, minorities, gays, and others, while reprehensible, is not a crime. There has never been the slightest indication that any of the material contained child pornography which IS a crime. Adult pornography is generally viewed as legal and non prosecutable. Further, even if one could argue that Pennsylvania's obscenity statutes, which are still on the books, are in play, the OAG would not even have jurisdiction. The OAG has only limited criminal jurisdiction as authorized by the Commonwealth's Attorneys Act with the rest left to county district attorneys. Enforcement of obscenity statutes is not within their authority.

Second, there has never been the slightest indication that any of the material establishes to any degree any case fixing, criminal conspiracies to obstruct justice or any other crimes. Thus, Pennsylvanians may foot a bill for millions of dollars for a lawyer to look for material that at most will embarrass folks. That is not a proper mission of a special prosecutor appointed by the AG or the goal of a criminal investigation in general. Criminal investigations are initiated when there is some hint that criminal activity may be occurring. In this case, there has never been that suggestion and it appears that the goal here is not to look at folks who may be committing a crime, but rather, to try to find a crime against someone.

Third, Gansler is NOT independent. He was retained by Ms. Kane. He has made public remarks critical of both the Supreme Court's decision to suspend her license and the Senate's bid to remove her. As such, he is tainted. If it is in the public interest to finish the job of an independent review of the emails for the purpose of determining whether ethical violations may have occurred, the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board that oversees lawyers, the Pennsylvania Ethics Commission and the Judicial Conduct Board working together offer a much more independent review with out bias or with any agenda of revenge and/or retribution. In short, it is not the role of the OAG to conduct this kind of inquiry or appoint a special counsel to do it.

In addition to the termination of Gansler, the OAG itself needs a house cleaning of all top tier people. If Ms. Kane is removed by action of the Senate and Governor, and an interim AG is appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate, the first order of business should be to ask for the resignations of all top level people. A new AG just cannot be saddled with Kane appointees, people loyal to Tom Corbett and/or people mired in "Porn Gate". A new AG needs a completely new team of professional prosecutors with no agenda, bias or loyalties other than to the people of Pennsylvania devoted solely to clean up this mess. "Porn Gate" must end, and the OAG must return to its core mission.

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Will Kathleen Kane Step Down Now?

In a per curiam order, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has temporarily suspended Attorney General Kathleen Kane's law license. Since the Pennsylvania Constitution expressly requires that the Attorney General must be a licensed attorney, logic would dictate that she step down. Instead, she's doubled down. Not only has she vowed to complete her term, but did so from the Attorney General website, using public resources to discuss her criminal prosecution.  She just doesn't seem to be getting it.

Look, she's entitled to a presumption of innocence in the criminal case, and will certainly have her day in court. That's her constitutional right. But under that same constitution, she is now unqualified for the position she holds.

If she bitterly holds on, she can still be removed. Option One: The House can impeach her, followed by a conviction in the Senate. Option Two The Senate can exercise its never-exercised direct removal power, which requires a 2/3 majority and the assent of the Governor. Option Three. Any of the Commonwealth's 67 District Attorneys can bring an action in quo warranto.

She's playing with fire. Since she no longer is a practicing attorney, I can see defense attorneys filing motions to quash anything she files as legal nullities. I could even see a defense attorney arguing that, since no qualified person holds the office of AG, any prosecution from that office has to be dismissed.

Instead of being concerned about the effective administration of criminal justice, Kane is misusing the resources of her office to deflect attention away from her own wrongdoing by pointing the finger at others who may have exchanged - Gasp! - naughty emails. While denying anyone who files RTKs the right to see these horrible emails, she wants Justice J. Michael Eakin electrocuted because someone sent him inappropriate messages at his personal email account. Never mind that he sent none himself, and there's no evidence he actually saw the offensive Internet crap that almost everyone receives.

Have you no sense of decency, Kathleen Kane, at long last? Have you no sense of decency?

A poll on my left sidebar asks whether Kane should resign. I'll share the results on Friday.

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

KK Has Primary Challenger

Embattled Attorney General has a primary challenger, and it's not John Morganelli. At least not yet. Jack Stollsteimer, a former federal and Delaware County prosecutor,claims he is running to restore integrity and experience to the office. In the meantime, flamboyant activist Gene Stilp, who once used a pink pig bus to convey his messages of government waste, questions how she was able to use the Capitol Media Center or her publicly paid spokesperson to address the criminal case against her, which really is a personal matter. Last week, he also filed a complaint with the Disciplinary Board, seeking Kane's disbarment.

In the meantime, a new website - The Truth About Kathleen Kane - has emerged, and defends her as "the victim of angry men who targeted her after she exposed their pornography habits."

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Can a LV Candidate Win Statewide?

Many will argue that it's impossible for a Lehigh Valley resident to win statewide. So they dismiss NorCo DA John Morgenelli as a serious AG candidate for that reason. But our appellate courts do already have two people - Superior Court Judge Jack Panella and Commonwealth Court Judge Robert "Robin" Simpson - who managed to do it. Northampton County Judge Emil Giordano appears poised to capture a Superior Court seat, too. So I believe Morganelli can easily win statewide if he can raise the millions needed.

Incidentally, Judge Panella very nearly prevailed in the Supreme Court race. He was beaten only because his opponent, Joan Orie Melvin, criminally used public resources. In other words, she cheated. She ultimately resigned in disgrace while Judge Panella never missed a beat

Monday, August 10, 2015

Morganelli Should Replace Kane NOW

The Morning Call reports that Northampton County DA John Morganelli is interested in running for Attorney General. After noting his interest, it goes on to recite the improbability of a local official being elected statewide. But that's nonsense. Two statewide appellate jurists - Democrat Jack Panella and Republican Robert Simpson - have beaten the odds. So can Morganelli. In fact, I believe he should be appointed to the position when Kane resigns (she says she won't go down without a fight) or, more likely,  is suspended by the state Supreme Court (former Chief Justice Robert Castille has floated this possibility).

Governor Tom Wolf was recently rated by HuffPo as the nation's most liberal Governor. Morganelli is a conservative Democrat. So why should Wolf appoint him? Why not instead appoint some liberal law school professor from the University of Pennsylvania to act as a caretaker until the people decide? I'll give you three reasons.

1. The people need a prosecutor, not a professor. - Morganelli is the state's most senior District Attorney. He still tries his own cases, including over 20 murder cases. Pennsylvania has enough crime, just in government, to warrant the appointment of a real prosecutor who is both seasoned and has administrative ability. Independent of the criminal charges against her, Kane has mismanaged her office and has left it in turmoil. According to Pittsburgh Tribune investigative reporter Brad Bumstead, "Kane intimidated and threatened to fire underlings to get them to do her bidding, undercut her top deputy and later tried to blame him for her legal woes."

Morganelli can turn the morale around and restore the public's confidence in a way that will be impossible for a caretaker.

2. Morganelli more likely to be confirmed. - The Republicans who control the State Senate would be more likely to confirm Morganelli than a more liberal type. Morganelli's positions on immigration and the death penalty might make him acceptable, despite his allegiance to the Democratic party.

3. Morganelli and Wolf have chemistry. - Morganelli is among the first who urged Tom Wolf to run for Governor, and was one of his early backers. They obviously disagree on the death penalty, but anyone who wants a tough but fair prosecutor should consider the man from the Lehigh Valley.