The recent disclosures of sexual misconduct by film producer Harvey Weinstein have cast a bright light on the Hollywood culture which permits such behavior to continue even when it is well-known. But, sexual harassment isn’t just a Hollywood problem. It can be a problem for any organization that is permissive of such behavior.
Almost 25 years ago, my employer, Lehigh University, first sought to codify its policy on sexual harassment. When that proposed policy was brought to the faculty for approval, I rose in opposition, and not because I thought the policy was too tough. Quite the contrary, I felt the policy was too weak. Instead of outright prohibiting sexual relationships between faculty members and their students, and between supervisors and their supervisees, the proposed policy used language like: “an instructor (e.g., advisor, course instructor, teaching assistant) should avoid developing a romantic or sexual relationship with a student taught, advised, or supervised by that instructor.”; and, “a supervisor should avoid developing a romantic or sexual relationship with an employee.” (Emphasis mine)
I asked my fellow faculty to draw a clear line and replace the word “should” with the word “must.” While some applauded me, others jeered. I then asked those who jeered to cite a single example where it was appropriate for an instructor to engage in a sexual relationship with one of their students, or, a supervisor to engage in a sexual relationship with one of their supervisees.
Silence.
My point was (and is) a simple one: a romantic or sexual relationship between an instructor (supervisor) and a student (supervisee) should never be assumed to be consensual. The instructor (supervisor) has power over the student (supervisee). It is not a relationship of peers.
Nevertheless, the language was not amended, and “should avoid” was codified as official Lehigh University sexual harassment policy.
Nearly a quarter century later, Lehigh has spent untold dollars to hire additional staff devoted to issues of harassment and discrimination, and to require all faculty, staff and students to complete annual training on harassment and discrimination. You would think that Lehigh might have strengthened its official sexual harassment policy.
You would be wrong. The current sexual harassment policy (found on Page 180 here:http://www.lehigh.edu/~inprv/pdfs/active_pdf_forms/RULES_PROCEDURES_MAY2017.pdf) still uses the original language. To wit:
“Supervisory Conflict of Interest A supervisor should avoid developing a romantic or sexual relationship with an employee. Similarly, an instructor (e.g., advisor, course instructor, teaching assistant) should avoid developing a romantic or sexual relationship with a student taught, advised, or supervised by that instructor.” (Emphasis mine)
Compare Lehigh’s sexual harassment policy with that of Lafayette (which can be found here:https://sash.lafayette.edu/lafayette-college-policy-on-sexual-harassment/):
“While a student is a student of a particular instructor/staff member, the instructor/staff member shall not ask the student for a sexual favor or in other ways make a sexual advance to the student. While a student is a student of a particular instructor/staff member, any romantic advance or sexual relationship between the student and the particular instructor/staff member is prohibited. This rule applies even if the romantic advance or sexual relationship is welcome.” (Emphasis mine)
Or, the sexual harassment policy of Moravian College (which can be found here: https://www.moravian.edu/policy/sexual-misconduct):
“Additionally, employees of the College may be charged with sexual harassment when romantic/intimate relationships occur between students and College faculty or other members of the administration and staff who teach or exercise authority over students, who provide counseling, advising, and mentoring to students, or who assess and evaluate student academic, artistic, or athletic performance. The College prohibits these relationships, whether consensual or nonconsensual, due to the existing power differential and possibility of abuse and favoritism.” (Emphasis mine)
I urge all companies, all organizations, and all colleges and universities to review their sexual harassment policies to insure that any behaviors that may lead to abuse or favoritism are strictly prohibited.
Stephen F. Thode has been on the faculty of Lehigh University’s College of Business and Economics since 1982
Blogger's Note - The op-ed above was rejected by The Morning Call on the basis that Lehigh bans rides to Space Mountain between faculty and students. But the plain language of the policy makes clear that it is permitted.
Blogger's Note - The op-ed above was rejected by The Morning Call on the basis that Lehigh bans rides to Space Mountain between faculty and students. But the plain language of the policy makes clear that it is permitted.
4 comments:
I graduated from a college in the Lehigh Valley. During my senior year, I had an internship where I did quite a bit of traveling around the area. One night, I stopped off at a roadside bar about 20 miles from campus.
I saw a professor and another co-ed having dinner. I didn't think anything of it, as I knew the professor was married and had children. I figured that he was mentoring her. I went over to their table and said hello. I had a couple of beers and then went to the bathroom. While in the bathroom, the professor came inside and asked me to "be discreet" about seeing him there with his student. I never said anything, but I lost all respect for him since then.
I too graduated from a LV college and there was an English professor who played the "cool guy" with designer jeans and blazer look in class. I found out that he would routinely pick out freshmen girls and invite them to a small dinner party at his house whereby she would be the only invitee. I informed the Dean about the guy, and his response was "Yeah, we know" and I was allowed to transfer out of his class.
Add untold barrels of alcohol into the social dynamic.
Back in the 80’s, a male psychology professor at NCC stalked a nursing student and sent and placed items at her residence. She complained to the college and disciplinary measures. He was cited and appeared in a Northampton County District court and surprisingly, all charges were dropped. She sued the professor and he countersued. He was eventually fired.
Interestingly, his name has been brought up many times during the investigation in the unsolved murder of Holly Branagan in Bethlehem on March 28, 1979.
Post a Comment