
Last night, an unholy triumvirate of
Northampton County Council were convinced they had finally caught their nemesis, the
evil Ron Angle, in a conflict of interest. Lamont McClure, Charles Dertinger and Diane Neiper ganged up on Ron.
Uh oh.
Prosecutor Charles Dertinger had the goods. He took off his glasses, which he always does when he means business, and launched his attack.
"I have information that Angle owns six properties in Portland ... " that will be served by a
county-financed sewer project."Actually, I own seven," Angle corrected.
Dertinger's conclusion, shared by Neiper and McClure, is that these sewer hook-ups will increase Angle's property values. McClure immediately moved that Angle be barred from any votes concerning that project. He even quoted the
Home Rule Charter. Dertinger solemnly seconded the motion. Schoolmarm Neiper sanctimoniously told Angle he should have recused himself from voting about shit in Portland when he had the chance.
None of these three stooges produced anyone to declare Angle's property values actually would increase. Dertinger did claim he spoke with people in the revenue office, but never named them. Angle, a real estate maven, pointed out that each of the seven homes he owns in Portland already has a functioning sewer system. A sewer project is irrelevant to his property values, and could actually end up costing him money with sewer hook up fees.
That wasn't good enough for DA Dertinger, who really just wanted to embarrass Angle in an election year. McClure reluctantly withdrew his motion only when
Solicitor Lenny Zito promised to investigate Dertinger's claim.
When Lenny Zito reports back, council will be told that Dertinger, like the Portland sewer project, is full of shit. Under our ethics laws, a
public official does not have a "pecuniary interest" when he votes on something that affects the general public or some segment of the general public in which he is merely a part. In this case, the sewer project has an impact, beneficial or detrimental, on
all Portland residents. Angle is just part of that group. If it were a conflict of interest for him to vote on this sewer project, he should be barred from voting on tax increases, too. Last night's maneuver was no attempt at good government, but was instead a thinly veiled election smear. Had it succeeded, it would have disenfranchised the voters in Angle's council district. That's who would have been hurt.
As McClure insisted there was a terrible conflict, Angle asked Lamont to justify his votes concerning the DA's office. After all, McClure's wife works there. McClure piously replied,
"I abstain from votes involving the DA's office." That's baloney. Last year,
McClure actually voted to increase the DA's budget.
Council Prez Wayne Grube considered the whole ordeal
"embarrassing," and accused the Unholy Three of having an
"agenda." "This is nothing more than vindictive stuff." What's really sad is that, while three inexperienced council members waste time playing political games, everyone is distracted from the real problems facing our county. These include a
prison expansion that is over capacity less than a year after it was completed.
Update: The Express Times has a well-written account of last night's meeting. Reprter Sarah Cassi has a few of the good quotations, including Neiper's sanctimonious tripe.