Yesterday, I presented
Bill Leiner's argument for community policing, and they certainly persuaded me. Having said that,
Dean Browning raises legitimate budgetary concerns that should be examined and addressed.
If you click on the above picture, you will see Dean's own detailed analysis of budget trends over the past two years, which worries him insofar as it relates to
Don Cunningham's $4 million anti-crime package. Here's his findings.
1. Lehigh County's operating costs (paid for by real estate tax dollars) exceed supporting tax revenue. This has been the practice for several years and is actually nothing unique to Don Cunningham.
2. This defecit has typically been bridged by using a carryover of a favorable operating fund balance from the previous year end. This has been the practice since at least the 2004 budget.
3. The amount needed to bridge this budget gap has averaged $6.6 million over the past 2 years.
4. The favorable fund balance at the beginning of this year was $6.3 million.
5. Cunningham's anti-crime package would use a substantial portion ($2.9 million) of this balance. This means less money will be available when commissioners consider the 2009 budget.
6. The 2009 budget could be particularly tight given the state of the economy and what commissioners are hearing from Harrisburg. Browning has legitimate concerns about funding for Cedarbrook, changes in state programs, pension costs as well as the coast of other post employment benefits.
As Dean explains in an email, "the intent was not to derail the bill being considered. And it was not to imply that the Administration doesn't have a firm grasp on the numbers and the County's finances - it most assuredly does. But, as Don pointed out on Wednesday, we control the purse strings. As such, I wanted to try and give each of us some perspective before we committed the county to spending $2.9 million of a potential reserve while increasing the County's ongoing annual operating costs by $650,000 (or $1.2 million if Northampton doesn't join us)."
"Part of my concern with the package is that, in my opinion, it should be considered as part of the overall 2009 budget. There may be valid reasons why that was not possible so my intent with putting together my one page analysis was to try to give the other Commissioners (and the public) some context in which to consider the proposal."
Browning's main concern is the funding source for this initiative. he appears to prefer using the tax relief fund instead of general revenue. I believe, like Commissioner Leiner, that all nine Commissioners can still work this out and get some cops out on the street.
Blogger's Note: This is written primarily for Republicans. Dean lost me somewhere between his first and second point.
Update: The Morning Call today endorsed Cunningham's Safe Streets' proposal.
"While it is true that police departments are not part of county government's traditional responsibilities, citizens have a right to expect elected officials to be innovative when it is for a good reason."