Yesterday, I told you that Northampton County DA Steve Baratta authorized a private criminal complaint by county Republican chair Glenn Geissinger against four elected state committee members Steve Lynch, Deb Biro, Melanie Heilman and Richard Morea as a result of their unruly and disruptive behavior at a county committee meeting on June 8, 2023. At that time, two Republican County committee members who are married to each other were confronted with pictures of them engaged in intimate relations, together with accusations that they had posted several videos on an Internet porn site. Both have denied to me that they were aware that their intimate videos had been taken and posted online. But I learned yesterday afternoon that the female half of this married couple posted those videos herself. She admitted it to me.
When this first happened, I was deeply concerned about this woman's mental health. She was already suffering from depression, and abruptly left the meeting after being confronted. She had been attacked on social media by Steve Lynch's myrmidons with comments like this: "[A]re they little problems or big problems, meaning are the 5.56 problems or .308 problems or,…. Do we have .50BMG to problems, You got problems, I’ll solve it, check out the beat while my DJ revolves it." Moreover, the husband half of this married couple was suspicious that someone stole their private videos.
Although police declined to file charges, I thought approval of the private criminal complaint might provide some measure of justice. So did the female "victim" who texted me after my story published to tell me. it was a "good story."
And that's the problem. It's a good story, but it's not the truth. I finally got that yesterday afternoon.
It's no secret that I'm no fan of Steve Lynch, whose constant conspiracy theories and bullying of everyone who disagrees with him, make him a threat to democracy. He and his allies have disrupted meetings before the one that took place on June 8, 2023. He was ejected from a Nazareth eatery after disrupting a meeting there. But his bad behavior is no justification for dishonesty.
After my story initially posted, I received numerous comments, including this one:
"The "Victim" admitted (after initially lying) on the Bethlehem township police report #23-04723 that she was not hacked and that she uploaded the videos herself to her and her husband's public porn hub site. This police report is available to the public. Do your research before blindly defending these people. It's just going to make you look bad in the end when the whole naked truth comes out."
I immediately contacted both husband and wife.
Husband told me that the first time he knew these videos were posted online was at the June 8, 2023 meeting.
After nearly a year, the wife finally acknowledged to me yesterday afternoon that "I was not completely honest with you." She flat-out lied to me, and on several occasions.
Her explanation: "I never imagined anyone would see them and I don't know how they could've found them amongst the millions of photos and videos that are available online."
If she didn't think anyone would see them, then why post them in the first place?
Now look, I'm no prude. It makes no difference to me whether someone wants to post his or her private sex life online. I think it's a bit odd, but I won't judge. But when a person lies and maintains that lie for nearly a year and allows a person to defend her based on that lie, it's a pretty clear indication that person is untrustworthy.
Does this mean the private criminal complaint filed by Geissinger lacks merit? No, they are predicated on unruly behavior at a meeting, not the sex tapes themselves. I do think that the First Amendment, which guarantees core political speech, might encompass at least rowdy behavior.
It seems to me that NorCo GOP committee members have formed a circle and are just shooting each other. Glenn Geissinger should be asking himself if he really wants to ruin his own county party.
85 comments:
Dumbass was right!! 🤣🇺🇲🇺🇲
This gets better by the minute. Made everyone forget about what's going on in Easton
(and 136). If Sultana were smart, she'd be using this time of not being in the news to regain some traction in her campaign.
Stands short of an apology, but then again ohare is a "short" sighted person. You smeared this man and others for 3 years. Apologize
Baratta promises an end to a clown show district attorney office which has been a clown show all the way back to the morganelli years. He's off to a horrible start.
Now baratta can charge her with false reports
Good lesson for ya, Bernie. Never trust a witness with purple hair. You should have known she was a mental case before you hitched your wagon to her inside info l.
First thing that came to my mind was chants of "We the PeepHole" and "Muh Liberty"
This is how baratta victimized a victim. He took her 5 kids away and saddles her with child support payments for all 5, while She had no prior work record as a stay at home mom.. She went to jail for non payments. She uploads sex videos to raise funds for the payments and gets caught. Then lies for a year, destroying the reputation of others. Maybe baratta might want to acknowledge the mess he caused an apologize to everyone.
Exactly and there is legit proof mr and mrs flower and geissenger engaged in a conspiracy and committed perjury.
Boomerang effect. Lynch and his crew will be vindicated simply because pornstar is crazier than the them.
Disruption ? So merely voicing your opinion at a political meeting and offering a suggestion is now disorderly conduct? Did he stand outside Glenn's house and yell profanities with a bull horn? I'm not sure what political disruption had to do with criminal charges. After all, the 2017 inauguration was completed with numerous cars burned, people assaulted, streets blocked and mobs of screaming protesters. This was called political speech and most of it was protected. I guess the rules change when your not an obedient Democrat like Glen, Matt and margie are.
"Stands short of an apology, but then again ohare is a "short" sighted person. You smeared this man and others for 3 years. Apologize"
My main obligation to my readers is to tell the truth. Be honest. Yes, I have a POV and will never pretend I don't. But what always trumps my inherent bias is a fidelity to the truth. I have fulfilled that obligation.
I have no intention of apologizing to anyone. The fact that this Republican committee woman is a liar does not change what Lynch or his many lemmings are. He is a bully who likes to get his way, is intolerant off diverse views, is very poorly informed and tends to bend the truth himself. Thus is a guy who wanted to fight me because he's unable to handle criticism. I will continue calling him out when necessary.
He may very well be guilty as hell of the most recent charges that were filed. That has nothing to do with whether this committee member was being truthful. I personally think that Geissinger's complaint is just allowing a circular firing squad among our county Rs. I doubt very much this helps his party be united. But that is his call.
Geissenger should resign, i have a feeling that wont be necessary and he will be removed by state chairman tabas
"Now baratta can charge her with false reports"
She can't be charged with false reports for lying to me. And according to the cited police report, she eventually told Beth Tp police the truth, so false report charges are unlikely.
Sounds like you are looking at a defamation suit because your short sighted pov of never checking out the other side of the story. You've coasted for 20 years smearing numerous people and now admit your smears were based on lies. Are you going to retract the numerous lies in numerous stories, or face a very likely defamation judgment?
Ok, so it's ok to lie to police , tell them your sex videos were stolen by Steve Lynch, then uploaded by Steve Lynch, then spread around a meeting by Steve Lynch and others...but when eventually caught red handed in your own lie, and deleting your own uploads, its all a-ok, and not to worry, because after lying and deceiving the police, telling them later it was all a lie, is somehow lawful? It's no wonder you lost your law license.
"This is how baratta victimized a victim. He took her 5 kids away and saddles her with child support payments for all 5, while She had no prior work record as a stay at home mom.. She went to jail for non payments. She uploads sex videos to raise funds for the payments and gets caught. Then lies for a year, destroying the reputation of others. Maybe baratta might want to acknowledge the mess he caused an apologize to everyone."
Her dishonesty and poor judgment probably have more to do with her family situation than whatever Baratta did from the bench as a judge. And frankly, I don't really care whether she uploaded sex videos. But people who do that can expect pushback if they hold public positions even as members of a local party committee. It would not matter to me, but what does is the dishonesty.
Sounds like margie has alot more to worry about than just a defamation suit and child support arrears. Sounds like she needs to be committed, and charged appropriately by the police and district attorney. She'd be a great candidate for mental health court.
Bernie, are you going to disclose promoting her blog while she was lying to you? Got conned by someone half your age.
"Sounds like you are looking at a defamation suit because your short sighted pov of never checking out the other side of the story"
Bring it on! I am quite familiar with defamation law. I always tell the truth as I see it. I am also quite familiar with the bully tactics used by Lynch and his allies. He is supposed to be suing McClure and the post office, too.
Sure it had nothing to do with completely unreasonable child support payments? Most moms with child support arrears don't wind up incarcerated and traumatized. This was absolutely on baratta s shoulders, and he should be the one apologizing.
Who da thunk it? A lying republican female porn star. trump will be campaigning in Norco as soon as he hears about this story.
Add "Porn-Again-Christians" to the "We the Peep Hole" pun line.
"The truth as I see it"...apparently the attorney disciplinary panel who yanked your law license had a problem with your definition of the truth.
How's the taste of your own shit? Your little purple haired friend/mole apparently turns out to be untrustworthy.
And your details of the labor day meeting are construed once again. It was the chairman's mission to try and have Steve arrested that night. Hence why the meeting was at a venue owned by someone who has a clear distaste for Steve. I would put money that the meeting was over legal occupancy. It was Glenn's goons changing vote and one of whom laid their hand on a woman.
There fixed it for you
I hope the morman Bible thumper glen geissinger has a good lawyer on standby. Will he issue a public apology to all Republicans in the county, the State gop, and his family for being such a two faced lawless disgrace? Or will he do as Mormons like Romney do, and just keep right on lying? Will margie apologize to Glenn and the 4 gop members?
Your purple hair even informant also lied to you about how the September meeting unfolded. Did she mention the geisinger cronie putting his hands on a woman?
One of the first rules of modern adulthood is: don't put anything online that you don't want others (including your children) to eventually see. Those who later claim they had no idea blah blah blah are testifying to their own mental retardation. If Rs are gathering a solid team of mental retards, they're off to a great start. One party wants your kids groomed and to have their genitals mutilated and breasts lopped off. The other side is supporting the dark world of sex trafficking by providing content to the single worst human trafficking and abuse site online.
Worse than this, are the people who come on here and defend either depraved team. Sick sick sick. And Bernie had to flash his "I'm no prude" credentials because it's prudish to oppose kid grooming and sex trafficking. We're so far gone.
Curious what's it like eating your own 💩
The purple haired starlet should revive her adult film career by doing a group scene with Brotha Steve and his core 4 while hubby watches!
What is wrong with Republican's screwing Republicans? So what if they share it with the whole world. At least they're not having sex with animals (although Lynch could be considered an animal). How about sharing the website with your readers so we can judge for ourselves. Republicans screwing Republicans. you gotta love it. Now, bring on the Donald Trump videos.
Bernie, FYI, you’re confusing the law here and thus confusing the story. The crime never had anything to do with disseminating sex tapes. For good or for bad it’s not a crime to disseminate sex tapes of someone else in PA unless that person is a minor, they were taken with secretively, without consent, or you are a current or former sexual partner of the person who is depicted. See 18 Pa 3131. Of course if the conduct of disseminating them meets some other criminal statute, such as harassment or disorderly conduct, it can still be charged.
Interestingly here, if it’s true that the husband had no idea the videos were posted, the wife is actually the one, and only one, theoretically liable under the “revenge porn” statute.
Lol
I'm confused by your headline. How is it "revenge porn" when it's mostly her in the videos and she's the one who uploaded them for monetary gain? Is her husband the one the victim of revenge?
What a mess. this is very toxic. Lee Snover is behind all this, just to make chaos!
Welcome to the Modern Republican Party! Full of the insane and degenerate. Is this the best Republicans can do? I'm registered Republican because I consider myself "right-wing" but honestly, I just skip voting for candidates due to insanity and degeneracy of most of them. Maybe these losers and wack-jobs need to be ousted from the party. They can joint the Libertarians who have always openly bragged about being insane and degenerate.
What was her porn name? Hopefully it was something like StormyNCRC!
Pennsylvania's Revenge Porn Law
Pennsylvania's law criminalizes the dissemination of intimate images without the consent of the person(s) depicted with the intent to harass, intimidate, or otherwise harm the subject of the image. This is crucial for cases where images were initially shared consensually in one context (such as on a platform like Pornhub by the individual themselves) but were later used in a manner that was not consented to by the individual, especially with an intent to harm or harass.
Key Elements of the Law
1. Lack of Consent for Redistribution: The critical factor here is the lack of consent for the redistribution or sharing of the images. Even if the individual originally consented to post the images on a specific platform, any further sharing or distribution by others without explicit consent could fall under the umbrella of revenge porn if it meets the other criteria of the law.
2. Intent to Harm or Harass: For an act to be considered under the revenge porn statute, there needs to be an intent to harm, harass, or coerce the person in the images. This intent can sometimes be inferred from the manner in which the images are shared, the relationship between the parties, or communications from the person sharing the images.
3. Impact on the Victim: While the law focuses on the actions of the perpetrator, the impact on the victim can also be relevant, especially in civil suits. The emotional distress, damage to reputation, and other negative effects experienced by the victim can play a role in legal proceedings, both criminal and civil.
Potential Legal Actions
- Criminal Charges: If the criteria are met, the individual(s) who redistributed the images without consent could face criminal charges under the revenge porn statute. This would require involvement from law enforcement and the district attorney's office to investigate and prosecute the case.
- Civil Lawsuits: In addition to criminal charges, victims of revenge porn may have the option to file civil lawsuits against the perpetrators for damages. This can include compensation for emotional distress, reputational damage, and any financial losses incurred as a result of the unauthorized distribution of the images.
Important Considerations
- Evidence: For any legal action, evidence plays a critical role. This includes documentation of the original consent for posting, evidence of the non-consensual redistribution, and any communications indicating the intent of the person sharing the images.
- Legal Advice: Given the complexities involved, it's vital for anyone considering legal action under the revenge porn law to consult with an attorney who has experience with these types of cases. An attorney can provide guidance tailored to the specifics of the case, including the best legal strategy and the potential outcomes.
Pennsylvania's revenge porn law aims to protect individuals from the unauthorized distribution of intimate images, recognizing the harm that such actions can cause. Each case has its own nuances, and legal counsel can help navigate these challenges effectively. Advice: Given the complexities involved, it's vital for anyone considering legal action under the revenge porn law to consult with an attorney who has experience with these types of cases. An attorney can provide guidance tailored to the specifics of the case, including the best legal strategy and the potential outcomes.
I’ll start by saying that even the most slimy liars swear that they’re telling the truth, so you can choose to take my word here, or you can continue to believe the lies, but with God as my witness, the following is all factual and accurate to the best of my ability.
I’m happy to see you corrected the record regarding where the porn came from. Many of us knew this for over a year now, but you refused to believe it or even look for yourself. You were lied to by the star about her porn just like you are being lied to about.. virtually everything else.
I’ve been present at ALL of the meetings in question. Is Steve “disruptive”? Uhh, sure.. if bringing up valid concerns in a manner that abides by Roberts Rules of Order is considered disruptive, then yes. Is he ever out of order or out of line? No.
The stupid comments you quoted here from Facebook were from one dim witted pea brain of which Steve has completely removed from his life. When Steve saw the post, he immediately demanded the post be removed. From what I recall, the majority of the comments on that post were from some guy I don’t even know. Never saw the name before, and never saw it again.
The Nazareth meeting. That was a coordinated shit show on Glenn’s part. Steve not once raised his voice, or even stood up from his chair, aside from getting up to cast his vote.
I hope and pray that one day the truth comes to light and the four accused are rightfully vindicated.
So when she uploaded her porn videos to porn hub and its 1 billion viewers did she place the ncrc as excluded parties from viewing? It's kinda hard to unring a bell, and more difficult to comprehend that she thinks she got harassed because she put her ass out there for everyone to see..and puts her entire life on Facebook instead of getting a job and supporting her children. Where is the gag order on porn hub, or am i misunderstanding what the meaning is of a public platform?
You are correct, if you just take a peak, everyone will realize in both parties the scum of the earth degenerates are imbedded because they are losers in life. Being part if politics gives them a purpose but all candidates should deeply verify who is out promoting their campaign. Having an amateur porn couple advocating for conservative seems troublesome. The local Republican committee should be dismantled, based on what I have read they are all democrats.
"Where is the gag order on porn hub(?)"
It's a fetish category you can click on the top left.
Maybe this isn’t as cut and dry as so many are quick to talk when they should be listening. It seems this complaint had sat with the DA for quite some time and one would assume that the fact 2 seperate police forces decided not to press charges was known when the DA moved forward. So whether or not you agree with her life choices but if what people have said about her on here the last two days is even half true and she was honest with police, then the only thing I can see that she did wrong, was to give a fu*k about any of your opinions of her. I’m sure no matter what the reason, that losing custody of your children isn’t easy to cope with. She didn’t steal, she didn’t sell drugs, instead she started to put her life back together only to have only to be ambushed by images outside of the environment which where they came. I mean seriously is there a worst way this could’ve been handled on all sides? Making such a public spectacle rather than handling it privately, shows the sheer stupidity of those whom voted for any of this clown show. Every single one of them should step down, it’s an embarrassment across the board and no one should be more ashamed of themselves then those who voted for any of these idiots.
Ok, so now I know the "actors" involved in the video. However, I'm a little confused and simply looking for clarification, if someone/anyone can explain.
1) Are the Husband and wife still together?
2) Did the wife upload the video without the husbands knowledge? If so, she should be charged with something.
3) Her kids were taken away by Judge Baratta? Was it because of this video? Simply yes/no. I don't need every salacious detail.
4) Were the children that were taken away, given to the "male actor" or is there another person who's the father of the children?
5) I am vaguely familiar with the "actors" in the video, only because of they're involved in local politics, but I thought that she got a PFA against him? Was she claiming at the time that he posted the video online without her permission?
I am more confused than ever.
Again, I don't need sleazy details, but simply a timeline of events. But, if she did post this without the man's permission, she should definitely be criminally charged.
Porn Star ? Gets thrown around a bit to liberally . Let’s just say she was involved
Bernie O Hare to all - I decline to publish comments naming the female committee member or her husband. Will publish if you refrain from naming them. Thanks
Exactly! These two "pornstars" probably cost Nancy Aaroe the win! They worked very closely and very publicly with her campaign. Even though MANY people warned Nancy and her team about them. You reep what you sow.
Why are you still protecting them? You have no problem putting Lynch and the other state committee members full name and details out there (and allowing comments with their names) before verifying the facts but you'll continue to protect them? And before you go saying they are private citizens and Lynch is not, please remember that they are elected members of the Republican party. Be fair! People and candidates have the right to know who these people are (by name) and what they are doing.
(My comment is revised at your request to remove their names). Another point worth mentioning here is that this entire mess could have been avoided if the wife would have told the truth when she was asked in a private meeting about the pornhub channel. Instead she chose to lie to the whole committee and then allow them to be sucked into defending her lie to the police. SHE is the reason all of this went public. I was at that meeting and yes it got heated, but never violent in any way. There was one copy of the email that was handed directly to Geissinger (still folded up). He never even looked at it. He handed it directly to the husband who was in the videos. There was never any pornographic images shoved into people's faces as reported by Geissinger. Glenn is so blinded by his hate for the 4 state committee members that have been holding him accountable for his actions for the past 2 years since he became chairman. He saw this meeting as an opportunity to go after his political opposition by dragging their porn scandal back into the light again. He doesn't care about them. They are pawns in his greater plan to silence his critics. Glenn rules as a dictator in these meetings and meets any criticism of his actions by banning you from meetings or threatening arrest. He calls the cops to keep law abiding, elected committee members out of meetings and standing in the parking lot. He even hired Lance wheeler, a die-hard Democrat who was out on bail for harassing school children, to guard the door and keep Republican committee members from entering. Geissinger is ruining the Republican party in Northampton county.
Only comment about the Chairs current legal complaint against the 4 state committee people - he had no problem with their behavior when they were aligned challenging the previous chair at meetings.
The ENTIRE purpose of discussing this WAS in a private setting. It was a closed meeting, to be discussed and handled INTERNALLY. Absolutely no photos or videos were shown in this meeting. However, she and her husband lied immediately, was defended by Geissinger, and THEY took it to the press immediately. They have absolutely no one to blame but themselves for the entire debacle.
Melanie Hellman is an employee of the US Postal Service and as such is covered by the Hatch Act. Therefore she should not be able to be in an elected position such as the one she currently holds on the Republican State Committee.
Don't these two committee members rep Kevin Dellicker who was just going on at the Slate Belt debate he is against porn? I guess he doesn't know the company he keeps.
Can we use her stage name 🦄
Its still linked in the left hand column
Why is Melanie Hellman on the State Republican Committee? She is a USPS employee and, as such, must abide by the Hatch Act, so she is not allowed to be in an elected position on a public ballot. I know this isn't really related to the main topic of this post, but seeing her name listed and knowing these facts, I felt compelled to comment.
It is terrible to see the mess that it causes when someone lies instead of being truthful. If she would have come out and said the right thing in the first place the situation probably would not be where it is now. There are always two sides to every story and unfortunately when you are in public light your lives are no longer your own anymore and things like this will always come out one way or another.
Everyone knows. She's already deleted her social media accounts, likely due to Bernie berning her back burn 🔥 🔥
Geissinger has really shit outside the pot on this one. He's a punchline and that's not good for the party. Glenn should do the right thing. He's harmed the party. He came. He served. He screwed up. Time to go.
Idk how you can find that this woman has been lying to you about this for the last 9 months and still believe the narrative she's been feeding you. If I were you I'd start to look into every story you published that she gave you any input to do you can find out what the truth was and what she fabricated. And I'd personally start with the labor day meeting. Because the only ppl causing disruptions then were those affiliated with Chairman Geissinger.
You people who believe politicians will save this country are crazy.
"Idk how you can find that this woman has been lying to you about this for the last 9 months and still believe the narrative she's been feeding you. "
Mt story makes pretty clear that I no longer have any confidence in what she says.
I agree with 11 am. This woman apparently slandered some individuals, lied to you, lied to the committee, and apparently lied to the police and DA before finally coming clean.
She is not the victim here, and she should be identified.
For real though, I don't know what I would do for entertainment while at work, if it weren't for Northampton County politics. It's like the DC Beltway on steroids. From chainsaw wielding Chippendales to amateur porn stars. Don't drink the water in NORCO! I hear Monica Lewinski and George Santos are house shopping there.
No they do not represent Kevin Dellicker.
Why the heck is it okay to mention everyone's name except the lying husband and wife? Bernie- Please explain why you are protecting their names but allow others to be called out by name in the comments!
If you saw evidence that Geissinger lied to you also on more than one occasion, would you also disavow yourself from letting him use you as a tool as he has been?
Why do you protect the names of the lying couple but allow other people's names to be used? Seems suspicious!!
Anonymous said...
Geissinger has really shit outside the pot on this one. He's a punchline and that's not good for the party. Glenn should do the right thing. He's harmed the party. He came. He served. He screwed up. Time to go.
He and Brownstain did the same thing on County Council when he was there and raised your taxes
BernieOHare to all: I named the four committe members bc the charges against them are a matter of public record. I do not name the husband and wife whose sex acts were posted online bc (1) they have not been charged; (2) it is very salacious; (3) the female struggles with mental illness; and (4) the husband might actually himself be a victim
Then do your due diligence on the other blogs you published with her input, because if you care about the truth you need to correct any other false information you've published on her account. She destroyed her own credibility already, don't let her take yours down with you.
When I read the story, my first thought was "one of this couple posted this content." It is the most likely source, these days. You'd never find me posting intimate photos/videos of myself, but a lot of people do.
If you believe the husband is a victim I have a Texas border wall to sell you.
Is Baratta capable of making a well-informed, sound judgement? The absence of any logical decision making suggests politics, incompetence, dementia, Morganellian tactics, or a combo. He’s on a roll and it’s only March. I’m running out of popcorn!
Lesson learned for a party chair. Never take sides in a petty brawl between members. Always act like a leader and stay independent. Always. Try to mediate and unite, not pick sides. Glen had zero leadership skills and it shows...where is Glenn, hiding under a desk somewhere.
1. Yes they are but she often makes public posts that she is leaving him and later deletes it.
2. That I don't know for certain but knowing him I highly doubt it.
3. Not to do with the video. That happened long before the videos. I honestly don't know why he did. I did not know her then.
4. Another person is the father.
5. His PFA's are from previous spouses. Not his current one that was in the videos. She has posted that she was going to get a PFA in the past but never did.
Hopefully that answers your questions.
2:46 pm: I’m right with you! I look forward to lunch so I can read Bernie’s blog and laugh at some of the comments. Posts such as this one are just too good to be true. As for all those wanting to know the names of Ron and Mrs. Jeremy, forget it. Bernie’s argument that the wife struggles with mental illness as the reason he is mum is weak, in my opinion. Fragile or not, people have to be reminded that consequences for actions are real. Today’s world tries to excuse everything, which may be why things are unraveling.
Sorry she lied to you Bernie. Now you know the old saying is true.
"Trying to find an honest Republican
Is like trying to find a tootsie roll in a septic tank."
I often say that about Democrats. It's particularly fitting for our current president.
I am really trying to figure out how someone even finds a person on such a site? I am afraid to even look for fear I will then get Trump campaign pop-up adds as token prizes.
10:17, fair enough. Now, go groom some hairless children and call it "progressive." Rs don't have a corner on sexual deviance. At least they keep it mostly to adults, instead of targeting children, whom they seem obsessed with interacting (vs the veterans home or old folks home).
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/04/from-hastert-to-gaetz-lets-talk-about-republicans-and-sex-crimes.html
https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/US/republicans-false-pedophilia-claims-attack-democrats-lgbtq-people/story%3fid=84344687
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/30/republicans-gop-party-children-abuse
Okay
https://www.quora.com/Since-1969-Republican-presidential-administrations-have-121-criminal-indictments-and-89-convictions-while-Democrats-have-had-3-and-1-respectively-How-do-you-feel-about-this
Post a Comment