Tuesday, March 22, 2011

When Home Countries Refuse to Accept Deported Aliens


American courts have ruled that the federal government cannot legally hold criminal aliens in custody for longer than six months following their sentence of imprisonment if their home country refuses or unreasonably delays reentry, unless the individual is proven to be “specially dangerous.” As a result, more than 17,000 convicted criminals have been released in our communities because their home country refuses or delays repatriation.

LV Congressman Charlie Dent last week introduced legislation (H.R. 1156, the Accountability in Repatriation Act) to get tough with hoe countries refusing to accept convicted and deported aliens.

Dent’s bill requires quarterly reports to Congress listing the countries that refuse or unreasonably delay repatriation, including information on the total number of criminal aliens in the United States. To encourage cooperation, the Secretary will have the power to deny immigrant and non-immigrant (or diplomatic) visas to citizens and residents of the offending country. Under H.R. 1156, the Administration retains the authority to exercise diplomatic flexibility with an affected nation in order to protect American interests.

“It is simply unacceptable for a country to deny or delay its own citizens’ reentry after they have been scheduled for deportation, including those who have been convicted of a crime,” Dent said. “By applying pressure on foreign nations to act responsibly, H.R. 1156 is an appropriate first step to reversing this objectionable practice that drains federal resources. Furthermore, the United States can no longer continue to release criminals who face deportation into our communities, where they jeopardize the safety of American citizens.”

According to 2009 figures provided by ICE, eight countries, including Laos, Iran, Eritrea, Vietnam, Jamaica, China, India, and Ethiopia are currently refusing or unreasonably delaying the repatriation of over 147,000 aliens – increased from 139,000 in February 2008.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Charlie Dent ... the empty suit.

Clem said...

It is, at least, a first step.

Better though, to freeze assets, expel a diplomat, or something that punishes the offender nation than to refuse to take LEGAL immigrants. This solution seems to punish those who would take the lawful road to entry, while the bad guys end up here anyway.

But for Dent, it is something.