Sam Bennett, handpicked by party bosses to seek the Democratic nomination for the 15th Pennsylvania district, may have an opponent.
In a small comment at the Morning Call forum, you'll find this:
"If you search the Federal Election Commission website you can find all the people/groups that have contributed money to Bennett.
"I am running to be on the primary ballot for the 15th District. I am a Democrat. You won't find much on me now b/c I am just literally getting started. A website will be launched soon. You will also see me out and about collecting signatures and calling for contributions shortly. Watch/listen for Mattson for Congress. Thanks."
My thanks to LehighValleyHousewife, for tipping me off about this latest development.
23 comments:
This is like the old "Only the shadow knows" announcement.
Could we have a more mysterous claim?
Oh wait Billy Givens could always claim he's running.
Hopefully this entity is a little more legit.
Perhaps to quote McHammer "too legit to quit".
Billy Givens couldn't get elected dog catcher
Then again, neither could I! LOL
Vote Billy Givens For Chains In The Lehigh Valley !
Vewy mistewious. Although any registered democrat who can fog a mirror must be considered a serious challenger to Sam Bennett.
as I said before a bag of donuts could be a viable challenger to her
Good, good. We have someone who wants to seek the Democratic nomination again Sam Bennett. Great. And they announce. On the Morning Call's internet comments forum.
We are so screwed.
Cheer up, anon. It could be worse. The announcement could have been made here!
Bernie - that is a VERY good point!!! :)
Haha, the way you get covered in the call, that may not have been a bad thing!
You won't find much on me now b/c I am just literally getting started."
We can't find much on anyone when all they provide is their campaign slogan.
Who exactly is "Mattson?"
AJ, I'm pretty sure Mattson is Bennett in Gaelic.
So what would it be in Klingon?
In Klingon it's Phyrillas.
Ha ha...
I'm not sure which is worse.
Should I assume that in Wookie, it's Rendell?
In Wookie it's Cordi.
Well, people seem to like Wookies anyway :)
A Bloggers' Code of Ethics
Some bloggers recently have been debating what, if any, ethics the Weblog community should follow. Since not all bloggers are journalists and the Weblog form is more casual, they argue they shouldn't be expected to follow the same ethics codes journalists are. But responsible bloggers should recognize that they are publishing words publicly, and therefore have certain ethical obligations to their readers, the people they write about, and society in general.
CyberJournalist.net has created a model Bloggers' Code of Ethics, by modifying the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics for the Weblog world. These are just guidelines -- in the end it is up to individual bloggers to choose their own best practices. CyberJournalist.net follows this code and urges other Weblogs to adopt this one or similar practices.
Integrity is the cornerstone of credibility. Bloggers who adopt this code of principles and these standards of practice not only practice ethical publishing, but convey to their readers that they can be trusted.
A BLOGGERS' CODE OF ETHICS
Be Honest and Fair
Bloggers should be honest and fair in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.
Bloggers should:
• Never plagiarize.
• Identify and link to sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources' reliability.
• Make certain that Weblog entries, quotations, headlines, photos and all other content do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.
• Never distort the content of photos without disclosing what has been changed. Image enhancement is only acceptable for for technical clarity. Label montages and photo illustrations.
• Never publish information they know is inaccurate -- and if publishing questionable information, make it clear it's in doubt.
• Distinguish between advocacy, commentary and factual information. Even advocacy writing and commentary should not misrepresent fact or context.
• Distinguish factual information and commentary from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the lines between the two.
Minimize Harm
Ethical bloggers treat sources and subjects as human beings deserving of respect.
Bloggers should:
• Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by Weblog content. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
• Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.
• Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of information is not a license for arrogance.
• Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone's privacy.
• Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects, victims of sex crimes and criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.
Be Accountable
Bloggers should:
• Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
• Explain each Weblog's mission and invite dialogue with the public over its content and the bloggers' conduct.
• Disclose conflicts of interest, affiliations, activities and personal agendas.
• Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence content. When exceptions are made, disclose them fully to readers.
• Be wary of sources offering information for favors. When accepting such information, disclose the favors.
• Expose unethical practices of other bloggers.
• Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.
Why do Anonymous people always post this crap?
Is this Sams counteroffensive?
Anon 2:44,
Apparently it's unethical to report factually that another Dem is going to challenge bennett. She has a few synciophants that do this sort of thing.
A few weeks ago, George Speros Maniatty was posting Molchany's op-ed about Sam Bennett anywhere he could, including here. It was a word for word cut and paste job, like this, with no independent thought. It was lengthy, like this. It was anaonymous, like this. He finally had to ID himself when he did it on Varkony's blog.
anon 12:41 is either a bennett attack or the republicans latest attempt to destory the blogging community
I am pretty sure Ronald McDonald or the late Kaptain Kangaroo could give her a good run for the money.
Billy Givens better announce his running for that office soon. That way he can use his political contributions to stop the sept. 20th sheriff sale on his home for back taxes to the tune of over $12,000
Post a Comment