About Me

My photo
Nazareth, Pa., United States
Showing posts with label sales tax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sales tax. Show all posts

Monday, September 20, 2010

Callahan on How to Deceive the Public ... For Their Own Good


When Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan first started touting a 17% increase in sales tax last year, the NRCC slammed him pretty hard in a short video, hinting that he was telling some group how to spin his tax hike. Actually, that's exactly what he was doing. Charlie Dent's congressional campaign has uploaded six videos to its Youtube channel, showing Callahan's cynical presentation to a dubious Lehigh County Council of Governments. In this little lecture, we learn:


(1) Callahan is the Lehigh Valley Partnership's bitch, doing the bidding of a collection of rich old white dudes. I thought that was why God created Republicans.

(2) Callahan is a spinning instructor, telling COG members how to avoid calling this a tax increase. He also explains how a deal with Philly legislators would enable the LV delegation to vote against this proposal, even though they secretly support it, for political cover;

(3) CACLV bossman Alan Jennings, an advocate for the poor, endorses a regressive sales tax hike because it comes from the rich old white dudes in the Lehigh Valley Partnership. They fund him.

From John Callahan:

"Who would be in favor of a 1% tax?"

Alan Jennings raises hand. (Audience laughs).

"Uuup. Alan Jennings. That's good to know"

"Hopefully, the word 'tax' will no longer be part of your description of what this is about."


"This idea, which has now grown to be a statewide idea, was actually born here in the Lehigh Valley. It was born out of the Lehigh Valley Partnership - a group of CEOs and leaders throughout the Valley that have worked towards greater regionalization. They have done that in various forms; they're pushing the bi-county health bureau, they're pushing a lot of greater Lehigh Valley regionalization initiatives. This is one of them."

[Governor Rendell is unwilling to dip into the tax charged at liquor stores to help the cities because it would create a hole in his own budget. But he told Callahan and Allentown Mayor Edwin Pawlowski that if they could come up with something else, he'd support them.]

"So I brought that information back to the Lehigh Valley and I met with the [Lehigh Valley] Partnership and ... I said, 'We have this thing we've been kicking around in the Lehigh Valley that would be a 1% sales tax increase for Lehigh and Northampton County ... .' Maybe we could work this in such a way that it would be - number one - an independent revenue source that the Governor said he needed, but do something that would apply statewide, and not just in the Lehigh Valley.

"When we went to the Governor initially with this proposal about the sales tax - the county optional sales tax - his initial reaction was 'I love it, but you gotta' get the counties. Get the counties on board, then we can start talking.'

"We got the Counties on board. Slowly and surely, once the counties came together, we brought the boroughs association in; we brought the township commissioners in ...

"We've been working very hard collectively - all five local government associations - trying to sell this in Harrisburg, trying to sell it to our local legislators.

"You'll see we no longer refer to it as a 1% local county optional sales tax; we refer to it as the Bill is described in its current form now as The Local Property Tax Relief Act because that's really what the outcome of this legislation will be. Now, if I had started the presentation and said, 'Who's for The Local Property Tax Relief Act?' everyone would probably raise their hands except for maybe Mr. Jennings.

"It's a 1% sales tax. It's collected on the same basis that the current tax is collected ... .

"There's something in there for everyone.

"There's politics here. We all recognize that this is, after all, perceived as a tax. And we're trying to give everybody adequate cover. ... We are trying to give everybody along this chain adequate cover, in a good way, so that everybody does, at the end of the day, the right thing.

What about a small borough or township that opposes an increased sales tax, and refuses to adopt any resolutions seeking it?

"We are asking the counties to enact the taxes, so we think it's appropriate that local governments step up and say, 'We think this is a good thing.' And that's how you become qualified. If you don't pass that, and then the County passes the tax, then you will still be taxed, but you will get none of the proceeds back to your municipality, and you'll be locked out for three years. ... I think that's fair to give the County some cover.

"This is a game changer for local government.

Who would be in favor of The Local Property Tax Relief Act as just described?

"Who would be in favor of a one percent tax?"

Apparently few hands go up except for Alan Jennings. Asked how much he could really expect to get, Callahan acknowledges he only has figures for Allentown and Bethlehem, not all 25 Lehigh County Municipalities.

"There's gonna' be some winners, and there's gonna' be some losers.

"The bottom line is the funds are going to come from somewhere to fund our operations. I think this is, while not perfect, more equitable.

"The idea is that we would potentially link ourselves to Philadelphia either formally or in a negotiated way, with a core of legislators. ... When Philadelphia went from 6 to 7, everybody outside Philly voted for it so they could say, 'I didn't vote for a tax for my constituents,' and all the Philly legislators voted against it and said, 'I didn't vote for a tax for my constituents.' So what we could do is we could get Philadelphia to vote for ours, right, everybody outside Philly could vote for theirs, ... and we get Allegheny voters to come on board with us."

Callahan Sales Tax Part 1 - 7-14-09
Callahan Sales Tax Part 2 - 7-14-2009 Callahan Sales Tax Part 3 - 7-14-2009
Callahan Sales Tax Part 4 - 7-14-2009 Callahan Sales Tax Part 5 - 7-14-2009

Friday, May 07, 2010

Callahan Playing DodgeBall on National Sales Tax

Last month, I told you that LV Congressman Charlie Dent has signed on to a resolution offered by Rep. Todd Tiahrt, expressing Congress’ belief that a VAT (value added tax) would be harmful to America’s economy. A VAT is basically a national sales tax. It's regressive and, as Congressman Dent has noted, “Imposing a VAT on the American people would disproportionately hit working families and seniors, raising the cost of virtually all economic activity in America and crushing any economic recovery. It would be a path to more and more government spending, instead of fiscal responsibility.”

As Bethlehem mayor, John Callahan recently advocated a 17% sales tax increase. In fact, he was pretty much the point man on this bad idea. Now that he's running for Congress, did his thinking suddenly change? In an effort to be fair, I called his campaign HQs and asked for his position, especially since he has already supported an optional increase on a more local level. His communication director told me she'd either call or email me with his position that very day.

That was April 22.

Well, just as he played dodge bill with his position on that health care overhaul, he's avoided taking a position on a national sales tax.

He could get away with ignoring me. After all, I'm just a bottom-feeding blogger. But now Congressman Dent has issued a news release, asking for Callahan's position.

I wonder if he'll try claiming that this is just a hypothetical question, like he did with the health are overhaul. Maybe he'll pull a Biden, and claim, "This is a big f----ing deal!"

“John Callahan has long believed that government bureaucrats and politicians like himself are best entrusted with your money,” Congressmen Dent said. “And the evidence is clear that Callahan is wrong. Finding new ways to tax working Americans so government can spend more is not fiscal responsibility.”

“Because of John Callahan’s strong support for a sales tax increase, voters have a right to know where he stands on a national sales tax that would send more of their money to Washington,” Congressman Dent said. “The people I represent know I will continue to fight for lower taxes, allowing the American people, innovators and small businesses to make the decisions that will lead us to sustainable recovery.”

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Callahan Advocates 17% Sales Tax Increase


I thought gambling revenue was supposed to solve all our fiscal woes. Guess not. Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan now advocates a 17% increase in sales tax. About half of the revenue would be used to reduce property taxes, but the rest will just enable more spending.

A sales tax is a regressive tax that will be felt most by middle and low income people. Callahan, as you know, wants to replace LV Congressman Charlie Dent, but advocated a new tax on the middle class and poor is a strange way to get elected. The NRCC, which refuses to go gently into that good night, has quite properly taken Callahan to task, but he will be defending his tax increase idea on August 17th.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Proposed County Sales Tax Option Explained.

Sales tax, which has a disproportionate impact on people with lower incomes, is certainly a regressive tax, one of the most ridiculous things to consider during a recession. But that's exactly what's happening in the land of midnight payraises, where a 1% sales tax increase is being considered as a county option.

Here's how the County Comm'rs Ass'n of Pa (CCAP), a sales tax promoter, describes this optional plan. "Under the proposal, 50% of the sales tax proceeds would be returned to the participating county, 40% would be distributed to qualifying municipalities, and 10% would be allocated to a Municipal Collaborative Efforts Fund. The county would be required to use at least 60% of its share for property tax relief and to eliminate nuisance taxes. Municipalities would have to use at least 60% of their share for property tax relief and/or to offset revenue losses from tax-exempt property." CCAP's talking points are here.

Sixty percent of the revenue would be used to reduce property tax, but the rest could be used to enhance revenue. If the real concern is reducing property tax, then why not dedicate the entire sum to property tax reduction?

Basically, this is a tax increase that covers more spending.

Is Now the Time for a Sales Tax Increase?

Deep in the bowels of the land of midnight payraises, state legislators are debating whether to give counties the option to increase sales tax by 1%. The current bill, which only applies to third class counties, would have to be amended. Approximately half of the money generated would reduce real estate taxes, but the rest would be a windfall to county and municipal coffers.

Calling it "tax fairness," the County Comm'rs Ass'n of Pa. (CCAP) supports this tax increase. But this is precisely the kind of regressive tax that has a disproportionate impact on the middle class and poor. One study shows that the poorest twenty percent of our nations's population already pay 5.4% of their income in sales taxes, while the top one percent pays just 0.6%. Is this tax fairness?

And is now the time? Northampton County Exec John Stoffa, noting the number of lost jobs and paycuts in this area, told the Express Times that he has reservations.

Wasn't casino money supposed to wash away all our sins?