When seeking truth, two things can be true at the same time.
Yes, folks can and should have real concerns about how U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operates in American cities right now. And yes, it can still be a mistake to cut off a successful relationship between county government and federal law enforcement that helped combat human trafficking and other serious crimes in Lehigh County.
I share concerns about due process, reduced training and recruitment standards, and a sense that enforcement is not focused on those with serious criminal records. Recent reporting shows training for new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers has been shortened, with recruits completing less instruction than in the past and many struggling with basic standards or being placed into field roles before full training was finished. Law enforcement training experts outside the agency have raised questions about preparedness and use of force protocols. I think most agree law enforcement should be held to the highest standards. These issues deserve serious discussion and stronger policies to protect civil rights, including the rights of American citizens who could be falsely accused. But turning a lease decision into a claim that all cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security harmfully oversimplifies a complex picture.
What also is true is that intergovernmental partnerships with DHS have helped our local community confront the brutal reality of human trafficking, a serious and ongoing problem in our region that preys on vulnerable people and destroys lives. Our geography makes us particularly vulnerable. The question should be about local realities. Reality is, there is no local evidence that HSI here has operated outside its criminal investigative function from this county office. What got lost in the politics is the real work happening here at home. The human trafficking task force in Lehigh County, created under an agreement unanimously approved by a bipartisan board, brought together local law enforcement, medical professionals, social service providers and federal investigators to target traffickers while supporting survivors. After a very political press event led to a rushed decision to evict the investigators, I heard directly from survivors, nurses, advocates and local law enforcement about how critical the partnership has been. Real cases and real lives were protected because agencies worked together.
Counties are not immigration policy makers. We are service providers. Our job is to protect residents, support victims and keep our communities safe. That means setting clear local boundaries on how county resources are used, being transparent with the public and, when needed, holding partners accountable. It does not mean dismantling partnerships that work because national politics are heated. When we shift into politics over objectivity we weaken our ability to focus on the core responsibilities our residents rely on us to deliver.
It’s important to understand. DHS includes many different functions. For example, airport security through TSA. We would certainly not suggest evicting TSA from LVIA over immigration policy disputes. The same principle of distinguishing roles should apply to all federal partnerships. Put yourself in the shoes of a victim of trafficking and ask what makes you safer, political theater or maintaining real investigative resources?
Leadership should not make unilateral decisions without engaging stakeholders. Unfortunately, I believe that happened here. Conversely, I’ve learned through conversations with local service providers that victims do not report crimes directly to federal agencies. They come through hospitals, shelters, advocates and local police first. Federal partners are brought in later when cases require broader investigative tools that local agencies alone do not have. My perspective comes from listening to the people who work closest to victims and who see the consequences of hasty decisions in real time. The consistent theme I heard was not about politics, but about making sure survivors continue to have safe entry points and that frontline workers have access to the tools needed to stop traffickers. Claims that victims will not seek help because of federal perception overlook how victims actually enter the system and how investigations work in practice.
To the survivors who have reached out, law enforcement officers, medical professionals, nonprofit leaders I’ve spoken with, and others now working with one less important tool, I am sincerely sorry that county leadership has failed you.
Two things can be true at once. Effective local governance should not be about headlines or national political battles. Here at home? It should be about objectivity. Yes, we can and should demand accountability, insist on due process and set firm local guardrails. But we can do this without weakening known partnerships that protect victims of trafficking and other serious crimes. We should set limits without breaking the tools that protect the most vulnerable. We should talk to stakeholders before holding press conferences. Ending this partnership does not change federal immigration policy, but it does change whether local investigators, medical providers and survivor advocates have access to the tools they were using to go after traffickers. That is what responsible local government looks like, and it requires an independent, nonpartisan, fact driven perspective focused on outcomes, not party lines.
Ron Beitler is an Independent Lehigh County Commissioner.

.jpg)

