About Me

My photo
Nazareth, Pa., United States
Showing posts with label negative campaign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label negative campaign. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Glenn Kranzley: "Civil Discourse" Missing in Politics

When I recently saw a Callahan campaign ad attacking Charlie Dent over his veterans' stance, which included photographs of one soldier with blood streaming down his face and another holding a prosthetic, I was upset but gave Callahan the benefit of the doubt. The flyer did not come directly from his campaign and I figured he probably had no idea that someone was sending out such tasteless material on his behalf.

I thought wrong.

At Sunday night's JCC debate, Callahan acknowledged and actually defended his classless ad.

Now I enjoy a good, negative campaign. But I also think we should stop short of inflammatory photos or calling each other crooks or liars. Unfortunately, that's the trend this year.

At Sunday night's debate, neither candidate responded very well when moderator Glenn Kranzley asked what efforts they've made to restore civility in politics. Today, Glenn elaborated in an email, and he was kind enough to allow me to share his thoughts with you.

"I've been thinking about Charlie Dent's repeated use of that campaign mailer from Callahan at the debate. Strictly speaking, it was a violation of the ground rules, which said no campaign material except the things placed on the tables along the wall. OK, it wasn't HIS campaign material. If I'd been thinking quicker, I should have taken it from him after the first time he used it. I'm guessing that particular piece came from the state Democratic Committee or another campaign committee from outside the Valley. Just today, I received a Dent mailing calling John a liar about three times. It was paid for the the Republican Federal Committee of Pennsylvania. Certainly doesn't qualify as "civil discourse" that the faith-based organizations are pleading for.

"My point is that when money flows into a community or electoral district from outside, things get nasty fast. Over the years I've seen this happen again and again. The Pat Browne vs. Jennifer Mann campaign of a few years ago comes to mind. Two decent, qualified candidates who tore into each other with state organizations paying the way.

"There's no solution to this and it's only going to get worse. The SCOTUS ruling in the Citizens United case last year says private companies can spend on campaigns and created huge loopholes by which campaign funders don't have to disclose where the money comes from ... two big changes, neither of which offers hope for more civil discourse.

"No wonder people feel they have to take a shower after they take these things out of their mail boxes."

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

That Billboard Must Have Really Bothered Callahan

If you're a candidate for elected office, and wants to slam your opponent, it always pays to be polite. As the stakes get higher, so do the need for good manners. You can still do all the dirty campaigning you want through your evil campaign managers, but you should be above the fray.

This is certainly true in a Congressional race. If you want to claim that your opponent is a lying sack of shit, you should use a word like "disingenuous." That means exactly the same thing, but it's oh so genteel.

When you start throwing grenades like "liar" around, and do it yourself instead of through a campaign manager, you're going to piss people off. That's one reason why Ron Angle is nearly as unpopular as he is popular. When he calls other elected officials "liars, crooks and phonies," they and their supporters tend to get offended. So do many neutral observers.

Ron gets away with it, barely, because he mocks himself as much as anyone else.

Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan is no Angle. He's pretty much incapable of self-examination, as demonstrated by his complete inability to accept any responsibility for Bethlehem's fiscal demise. He's failed to see the irony in touting job creation when he has imposed a hiring freeze and threatened layoffs at the City that is under his control. And now, in a fundraising email blast that went our yesterday, he's calling LV Congressman Charlie Dent a liar. "[H]e bought billboards lying about my record as Mayor," he petulantly whines. He is referring to one billboard Dent purchased along Rte 378 during Musikfest, which incidentally is accurate.

I suspect this personal attack reflects his growing desperation as it slowly sinks in that Hizzoner has picked the wrong time to run for Congress. What troubles me is that Callahan is slinging mud while Dent is serving this nation's interests overseas.

(You can see the offensive billboard ad here.)

Monday, April 12, 2010

Dirty Political Trix



While LV Congressman Charlie Dent and opponent Mat Benol politely exchanged views on Friday night, dark forces were at work. A thug, wearing a Phillies cap and Surf City sweatshirt, smeared an unknowing Dent as he spoke. He handed out a one-page flier captioned "Top Ten Reasons Charlie Dent is not a TRUE conservative." Goofy accusations, including the claim that Charlie supports homosexuals, are cited.

Gee, I know some homosexual conservatives, so what does that make them?

You can see this troll in the video above, handing out the fliers, until the LV Tea Party's Tom McFadden thankfully asks him to leave. I also have a more detailed video of this fellow as he leaves the building.

This no doubt hurt Congressman Dent, who came to this function in good faith for an honest exchange of views. But among many audience members, who resented the inherent unfairness of this tactic, Benol was blamed. There are even those who think this is the handiwork of Democrat John Callahan or independent Jake Towne.

I would be shocked to learn that any of the congressional candidates would engage in this behavior. That's why I'd like to identify this slug. If he's acting on his own, then shame on him. But if he is doing dirty work for one of them, we should know.

If you recognize this person, you can post his name here anonymously. He also had a female accomplice, but I never saw her.

Friday, April 09, 2010

Name That Thug


Over the past week, I've been highly critical of the Lehigh Valley Tea Party. But I was really impressed by the huge turnout of at least 500 people at tonight's candidate's forum for senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial candidates.

Both daily papers sent their elite reporters to cover this event, so I expect you'll find informative stories about the candidates. But this story is about what happened during the debate, just as LV Congressman Charlie Dent and challenger Mat Benol began exchanging views.

As the audience listened to the candidates, two people - a man and a woman - began going up and down the aisles, passing out a flier that smeared Dent as he was speaking. Captioned "Top Ten Reasons Charlie Dent is not a TRUE Conservative!!!", it contained no disclosure. Most of the audience were put off by the intrinsic unfairness of this smear tactic.

As the male passed out fliers on my side of the room, Tea Party organizer Tom McFadden approached him, and asked him to leave. At the conclusion of the debate, Tom apologized for the disruption, called these smear tactics "rude", and asked the audience to discard the fliers.

Mr. McFadden also spoke to me (you can see that interview here) and made it very clear he was very upset by what had happened.

I captured this thug on video as he made his way out of the building. He tried ignoring me and also tried to hide his face, but I got him briefly.

Does anyone out there know this slimeball? Who is he working for? You can post his name here anonymously.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Express Times: Why We Need to Pay Attention to Severson Prosecution

From Sunday's Express Times: "In the end, though, this prosecution is about fair elections, and that is why we should pay attention. One of the hallmarks of our election reporting laws is that we get to see, in standardized public filings, who's paying what to whom in a campaign, and who the big contributors are. And in the case of advertising, which candidate or party or special-interest group is behind the message. That's particularly important when it comes to attack ads. "

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Severson's Mudslinging & Deception Outlined

Dauphin County Prison was the setting for today's preliminary hearing on the Attorney General's deceptive campaign practices prosecution against political consultant Tom "Scissorhands" Severson. As I've already told you, ALL charges were bound over for trial by District Judge Steven M. Semic. That includes 55 counts of what The Express Times calls "fraud and deception."

It was a strange place for a hearing. Peering through a doorway, I could easily see the bars of a county jail. Unlike any local magistrate, this judge had a guard and two clerks sit with him throughout the five-hour hearing. Eleven witnesses were examined by Senior Deputy AG Mark Constanzo, accompanied by six agents and boxes full of files. Prominent Defense Attorney George Heitczman represented Severson, who sat quietly, even though Ron Angle was right behind him.

(1) Agent Kevin Carney, who has worked in law enforcement for about a gazillion years, laid out the background concerning Severson's anonymous smear campaign against Brian Monahan. In 2007, when Monahan ran for magistrate, Severson sent out three mailers slamming him. None of them identified Severson as the person who paid for these ads. Carney also testified to a "John Doe" independent expenditure report, which was filed after the election.

(2) Priscilla Jroski, a notary for thirty-five years and legal secretary with Bethlehem law firm Leeson & Leeson, described seeing Severson sign a document she was asked to notarize. Instead of seeing Severson''s signature, the name "John Doe" was scrawled on an independent expenditure report. She notarized the document after being assured "It's OK" by Attorney Joe Leeson. But in her notary journal, she noted that Severson had signed the document as John Doe.

(3) Cheryl Dorschutz is a gum-chewing graphic designer employed at Severson's Precision marketing. She prepared the anonymous mailers slamming Monahan, using copy supplied by Severson. Severson told her he had talked to a lawyer and was allowed to send anonymous mailers. He also told her he had permission from Pat Vulcano to use his bulk mailing permit.

(4) Mary Lou Yarnell prepares the bills at Severson's Precision Marketing. He paid her cash for the anti-Monahan mailers and she put the money in petty cash. There is no record that the invoice was paid.

Yarnell also describes Severson's practice of using other companies to bill clients for his work. He supplied her with stationary from an outfit called Political Strategies, a California corporation, and had invoices for Severson's services sent to Democrats under that letterhead. When she receives checks made out to Political Strategies, she stamps them for deposit in Precision Marketing's account.

At Severson's direction, she instructed then state rep. candidate Tony Rybak to pay what he owed Severson to Printex, a company owed money by Severson for work involving other candidates.

(5) Pat Vulcano is the owner of the bulk mailing permit used to slime Monahan. He told a grand jury that Severson had denied using his permit, but now he's singing a different tune. He now claims that Severson admitted to him that he used his bulk mailing permit. He explained he suffers from a sleep disorder and that's why he gave the grand jury a different story. Vulcano's wife, Sandy, must have the same disorder. She had to change her story, too, and did so in a letter to the AG. I believe this disorder is called fibberitis.

Vulcano now claims Severson had "carte blanche" to use his permit and "didn't have a problem" with the sleaze mailers directed at Monahan. When he spoke, he denied knowing who had used the permit and condemned the sleaze campaign. He must have been suffering from fibberitis when he spoke to me, too.

(6) Bethlehem City Council Prez Bob Donchez has been using Severson since 1995, and acknowledged paying Severson bills on MJR and Political Strategies letterheads. He assumed these were other Severson companies. He emphatically denied ever asking Severson to bill him in any special way that would make it difficult for the public to know that Severson was running his campaigns.

(7) Steve Goodsoozian, Judge Jack Panella's campaign treasurer, acknowledges paying Severson invoices from companies like MJR and Political Strategies, thinking they were Severson companies. Like Donchez, he denies that he or anyone in Judge Panella's committee ever asked Severson to bill him in any way that disguised Severson's involvement.

(8) Beverly Rossetti happens to own a small mail house known as MJR Services. She actually leases space from Severson and runs his mailroom, but when he asked her to use her company as a front for some of his billing, she told him she'd have to get back to him. Then she got a few checks made out to MJR, which were delivered to her home in Phillipsburg. She gave them to Severson and asked him to stop billing in her company's name. But those checks kept coming. She eventually stopped handing them over. "I was upset. I just felt a little used. The whole thing was distasteful to me."

Call me cRaZy, but I have a feeling that Rossetti's lease with Severson has the shelf life of a loaf of bread at the beach.

(9) Northampton County Controller Steve Barron really lawyered up for his appearance. He was flanked by two attorneys as he walked into the courtroom. He was asked about his pre-Controller activities, when he was Treasurer for the local Dems. He took in the bills and donations, made deposits, paid the bills and filed campaign finance reports.

At one point in '07, Lamont McClure gave him a $12,000 bill from Political Strategies. McClure told him to pay what he could and record the rest as debt. So Barron, who had no idea that Political Strategies was connected to Severson, sent two checks to California. When he later looked at the bank statements, he noticed those checks were endorsed and deposited by Severson's Precision Marketing. He called party bossman Joe Long, but got no explanation.

(Blogger's Note: McClure's connection to Severson's work resulted in a subpoeana being sent to McClure late last week. Because McClure had a scheduling conflict, he was released from the subpoena. But knowledge of his deep involvement has only recently come to light.)

10) Anthony Rybak did himself no favors in his testimony. He acknowledged paying Severson's bills directly to Printex, assuming that was one of Severson's spinoffs. But he had no explanation for his failure to itemize phone calls and campaign signs. He never reported those expenditures. His mommy financed his unsuccessful campaign for the state house in 2006.

11) Precision Marketing's Tim Butler is Severson's right hand man. As he delicately put it, "I am number two." He proceeded to prove that point by being unable to recall any knowledge of any specifics about anything.

George Heitzman gave a detailed closing argument involving criminal intent and the Constitution. AG Mark Constanzo's basic reply? "Hey, we're the Commonwealth." Severson will face a jury.

Monday, June 08, 2009

Scissorhands Severson' Preliminary Hearing Scheduled

Tom "Scissorhands" Severson, political consultant to the Joe Long Dems, is being prosecuted by the Pennsylvania Attorney General for deceptive campaign practices that extend from anonymous mailers to invoices designed to disguise his involvement on behalf of different candidates.

Severson's preliminary hearing has been scheduled for July 13. But instead of being around here, it's in Harrisburg before Dauphin County Magistrate Marsha Stewart. A flurry of subpoenas has spread among Commonwealth witnesses. The burden of proof at a preliminary hearing is very low, but it's a good opportunity to see and hear some of the witnesses.

Sounds like a road trip for me.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Severson Prosecution an Indictment of Joe Long Dems

In the 2007 Nothampton County Council races, campaign maven Tom "Scissorhands" Severson was a pitbull for the Joe Long Dems. After proving his worth with his vicious, anonymous smear campaign against Attorney Brian Monahan, he was unleashed to go after Ron Angle and Peg Ferraro. He bombarded voters with a steady stream of smear mailers and sleazy anonymous robo calls. But when it was all over, Angle and Ferraro were victorious and the Joe Long Dems owed Severson about $9,000. They still owe him $6,586.45.

Severson may be the Defendant, but yesterday's charges are really an indictment of Northampton County Democratic chair Joe Long and the cronies who surround him. This is what happens when all decisions are made in some smoke-filled back room. Instead of embracing a county executive who wants to restore integrity to local government, Long allies himself with someone who skirts election laws.

Is this the change Obama talked about?

In Northampton County Exec John Stoffa's request that Long step down, he specifically condemned

"* your silence in the face of such activities as negative and misleading robocalling as well as anonymous mailings which violate Pennsylvania Campaign Law; something good Democrats never support and former leaders such as Marty Bechtel and Gene Hartzell would never have condoned;"

* your ill-advised use of a political consultant now under investigation by the state Attorney General's office."

Instead of stepping down, Long and his cronies endorsed Ann McHale, Stoffa's opponent for county executive. He wants to replace integrity with someone who winks at election hijinks, as McHale did when goons stole and blocked over 600 Stoffa campaign signs.

Is this change we can believe in?

For those of you unfamiliar with Severson or his connection to Long, let me clue you in.

Who is Tom Severson?

Severson, a Pen Argyl resident, uses at least three different corporations for political campaigns. He usually operates under the corporate umbrella of Precision Marketing, Inc., where he is listed as company prez. Between 2000 and 2007, that company has collected $9.9 million from candidates seeking state offices.

But when Severson wants to stay under the radar, or is working for Dems, he's used MJR Services, Inc., a New Jersey corporation whose Pa. address just happens to be where Precision Marketing is located. MJR collected $281,000 from state office hopefuls between 2000 and 2007. DA John Morganelli and Judge Roscioli are part of this gaggle.

Severson also uses Political Strategies, Inc., a California corporation. Although it's not even registered in Pennsylvania, state senator Lisa Boscola paid that outfit $43,659.65 in 2006. Finance reports filed by local candidates indicate this California corporation just happens to have the same address as Precision Marketing! Since 2000, the total amount paid to this business, in state races, is $170,522.

This total figure - $10.35 million over 7 years - does not include payments to other companies I know nothing about, or payments made in federal and local races. And it only reflects payments that are on the radar screen.

Severson's History

The phrase, "King of Sleazeball Politics," is used often to describe Severson. It first appeared in a 1991 Morning Call story. Severson got that title the old-fashioned way - he earned it. Let's review some of his campaigns.

In 1989, county exec hopeful Jerry Seyfried saw his lead dwindle as anonymous telephone calls, made in the waning days of the campaign, warned voters that Seyfried had accepted money from the owner of a local landfill. DA Don Corriere, challenged by Morganelli, complained they actually used callers who disguised themselves as state ethics commission investigators. Seyfried won. Barely. Corriere went down.

Severson also plays on prejudice. When Len Gruppo was running for the state senate in 1998, Severson distributed an anti-welfare campaign mailer containing a photo of mostly black applicants, standing in line, creating the false impression that most welfare recipients are black.

In 2003, Severson's Precision Marketing was paid $9,600 in public money by DA John Morganelli's Drug Task Force to distribute 20,000 "informational" mailers. They included a large photograph of Paula Roscioli, four times the size of other staffers. She just happened to be running for judge at the time. DA Morganelli assured the Express Times (4/9/03) that Precision Marketing was not doing Roscioli's campaign. While technically correct, Severson was still running the show. He just used another company. And the idea of using taxpayer funds to promote candidates was pushed again by Severson in Spring '08. Bucks County commissioners paid him $67,000 in taxpayer money for a thinly disguised campaign ad.

When Joe Brennan was in a four-way dogfight to capture the Democratic nomination for a state rep seat, he was assailed by three mailers, some of which falsely portrayed him behind bars. After turning over a few rocks, Tom Severson ran out. Brennan's opponent falsely claimed that, since he was never charged for Severson's services, he had no obligation to report this in-kind contribution. To this day, the in-kind contribution appears nowhere on any campaign finance report.

These are just a few examples of Severson's modus operand! - anonymous and misleading calls, appeals to prejudice, drug task force money to promote a candidate, misleading mailers and flying below the radar of our disclosure laws. As disgusting as these tactics sound, Severson has become rich using them.

Severson's Reputation Among Local Leaders

Former Norco GOP chair Charlie Roberts (1994): "He's working both sides of the fence. ... I don't trust him. ... He's done more to hurt this party than anyone. ... "How can he work for Seyfried and Ferraro in the same election? How is working for Seyfried going to do anything but hurt Ferraro's chances? Tom Severson works for his pocketbook. I work for the Republican Party."

Former Norco GOP Chair Larry Kisslinger (1991): "He did not handle his affairs with me in an honest way 99-1/2 percent of the time. ... I hope he makes $1 million. I hope he's comforted with the money surrounding him."

Former Norco Councilman Jim Hemstreet (1991): "If telephone calls are being made ... you have a right to know who you're talking to, what they're paid. ... That is really deceptive campaigning. It's like turning your campaign over to a hired gun."

Norco Judge Emil Giordano (1994): "I never heard anything good about the guy. ... It's sleazeball politics, and he's the leader of the pack."

Morning Call columnist Don Russo (1994, then a member of the GOP): "Severson basically goes to the candidate with the money."

District Attorney John Morganelli (1994): "I went to him because I heard he was the best. I wanted to hire the best person to do the job. I didn't care what party he was. The party thing didn't bother me, and I don't think it bothered Mr. Severson. He's staying with me."

The Anti-Monahan Sleaze

Here's some of what former Northampton County Republican Chair Bob Kilbanks has said.

"This all began during the primary cycle when some very ugfy flyers were sent out against a local District Justice candidate. They had no disclaimer, which is required by Pennsylvania's state election laws on every campaign piece to inform the public about the source of any political information that they receive. There were accusations flying all over Northampton County as to who had sent the three mailers. The mailing permit was traced to a person [Pat Vulcanol who said he had no knowledge of its use. An examination of the paperwork at the Post Office yielded nothing because the signature was unreadable. At that time, local blogger Bernie O'Hare presented the situation to District Attorney Morganelli. Mr. Morganelli told Mr. O'Hare that the matter, as he saw it, did not rise to a prosecutable level. He felt that there was case precedent from Ohio [Mclntyre v. Ohio Ejections Comm'nl that made this allowable under the First Amendment. A few days later, and under question of lawful filing date, an independent financial report was filed at the Voter Registration office under the name of 'John Doe.'

"The report arrived complete with the Ohio decision attached to it and a notarization for a 'John Doe.' The Notary works in the offices of a local politically-connected attorney. [This attorney just happens to be Morganelli's campaign treasurer, Jay Leeson]."

Severson's "John Doe" report, of course, is a sham. He clearly paid more than $500 to send these mailers about a week before the election, but failed to report this expenditure within 24 hours as required by our campaign finance laws. Three mass mailings cost much more than the $861 claimed, and those payments had to be made before the primary, because that's when they were mailed.

How could Leeson's notary, a secretary in his office, acknowledge an anonymous signature? Because he tells her to do so. But a notary exists to identify the person appearing before her, not obscure that person. She must have personal knowledge or satisfactory evidence in the form of a driver's license or other form of identification.

Severson Admits Anonymous Campaign Against Monahan

Not long after the mailings went out, I talked to District Attorney John Morganelli. I told him he could send a detective with Pat Vulcano, the bulk mail permit holder, and get all the records for the bulk mail permit. That way we'd know how much was paid for these three mailings and who sent them.

"I'm not going to do that."

"Why not?"

"I already know who sent those mailers. It's Severson."

The Dirty Politics Continue - July '07

In July 2007, Severson started a push poll against Angle. Telephone calls from 484-548-6413 asked whether voters would be less likely to vote against Angle if they knew certain negative things about him, which were listed, one by one. Although this poll has been estimated to cost $3,000, its cost is listed nowhere in any of the campaign finance reports listed by Angle's opponent, John Maher, or the Northampton County Democratic party. That telephone exchange has been used by Severson to conduct political polling and robo calls.

The General Election Against Angle and Ferraro.

According to Kilbanks, "Our fears were realized in this past election cycle as unattributed, and very nasty, smear phone calls, whether or not they are considered 'legal,' invaded homes across Northampton County. All of the calls traced back to one phone number [actually, it's two phone numbers - 484-548-6400 and 484-548-64131 that [were] listed as 'not working,' but ownership was traced to a data management corporation in King of Prussia that does robo-calls."

Amazingly, these are the same phone numbers used to do the push polling against Angle in July. The number 484-548-6413 shows up as MCS Industries on Caller ID, and is also the number Lamont McClure used for his robocalls. His campaign consultant? Tom Severson.

Mailings with content identical to these anonymous robocalls were posted with the Northampton County Democratic Committee's bulk mail permit. Lamont McClure, Tony Branco, John Maher and the local Democratic party were obviously using Severson. Against Angle alone, there were twelve negative mailers (estimated cost - $36,000) and twenty-one anonymous robocalls (estimated cost - $21,000). Against Peg Ferraro, there are at least four negative mailers (countywide cost - $20,000) and ten anonymous robocalls ($10,000). The total amount of money estimates to be spent, just on the negative campaign, is $87,000.00.

Campaign finance reports filed by the opponents to Angle and Ferarro, as well as the local Democratic party, reveal much smaller sums. They only report spending and indebting themselves in the total amount of $54,000.00. These reports are shams and do not reflect the total amount of money being spent.

In addition to an obvious funding disparity, there are the following facts: First, a former Severson employee acknowledges that he has witnessed Severson making large cash deposits at banks other than those where his businesses are located; Second, checks that supposedly were being paid to Political Strategies, a California corporation, were in fact being deposited with Precision Marketing; and Third, there is a transcript claiming Severson forged names to campaign materials on behalf of MJR.

Other Campaign Violations in Other Counties

Severson's name has also been associated with anonymous mailers in a campaign over a referendum in Lower Macungie Township and in various Bucks County races for the GOP.

Severson's Erratic Behavior.

Severson's erratic behavior has already been demonstrated in an unemployment compensation case, where there was testimony about him making switchblade knives, threatening to kill and stab people, and threatening one of his own employees. In addition, he recently disrupted a funeral service simply because he saw Ron Angle in the crowd. He was convicted of criminal harassment in that funeral fracas.

Sources:

Precision Marketing Corporate records:

$9.9 MM paid to Precision marketing since 2000 by candidates seeking state office:

MJR Services, Inc. corporate records:

Money paid to MJR by state candidates:

Political Strategies, Inc. corp. records:

Money paid to Political Strategies by state candidates:

Elections Code:

Anonymous mailers directed against magisterial candidate Brian Monahan

O'Hare email to DA Morganelli

John Doe Independent Expenditure report

Severson admits he is behind Monahan smear

The Monahan mudslinging

Notes about 1-484-548-6413

Notes about 1-484-548-6400

Campaign finance reports filed by Northampton County candidates in 2007 election

robocall recording

Anti-Angle mailers

Severson disrupts funeral services

Negative campaign against state rep. Joe Brennan engineered by Severson

Tom Severson's profitable world of sleaze politics

Unemployment compensation case against Severson - claimant transcript

Unemployment compensation case against Severson - findings of fact

Thursday, May 14, 2009

AG Corbett Prosecutes Sleaze Consultant Severson

Earlier this week, I told you that Tom "Scissorhands" Severson, political consultant to the Joe Long Dems, would be indicted today. Scissorhands loved sending mailers that falsely depict various candidates behind bars. Now I get to do it to him! AG Tom Corbett has a detailed news release, reproduced below.

"HARRISBURG - A Northampton County political consultant has been charged today by agents of the Attorney General's Office for filing fraudulent campaign expense reports and submitting deceptive invoices to his clients.

"Attorney General Tom Corbett identified the defendant as Thomas E. Severson, 63, 901 East Walnut Ave., Pen Argyl, Northampton County. Severson is the owner of Precision Marketing Inc., 2906 William Penn Highway, Easton, Northampton County.

"Corbett said his office initiated the investigation based on a conflict of interest referral from Northampton County District Attorney John Morganelli who had hired Severson as his political consultant.

John Doe Campaign Finance Report

"The Attorney General's investigation began with a probe into anonymous negative campaign mailings that were directed against Brian Monahan, a candidate for Northampton County Magisterial District Judge in the 2007 Primary Election.

"An independent expenditure report was filed in June of 2007 in Northampton County by a "John Doe." The expenditure report specified that John Doe paid $861 on May 2, 2007, to Severson's political consulting company, Precision Marketing Inc. for campaign mailings.

"Attorney General agents reviewed Severson's business and financial records and found that between May 4 and May 10, 2007, Severson paid for postage and mailed negative campaign advertisements against Monahan.

"The Monahan mailings did not contain an attribution clause, which is required by law and indicates who, or what entity, paid for the advertisement.

"The charges state that the notary public who notarized the John Doe campaign expense report told agents that Severson signed the document in her presence as John Doe.

Deceptive Campaign Companies

"The investigation also found that Severson sent deceptive invoices to some of his Democratic clients. Severson allegedly employed this tactic because he claimed that these clients did not want the name of his company Precision Marketing Inc. to appear on their campaign expense reports.

"The charges state that Severson used three different business names in the deceptive invoices: Political Strategies Inc., Santa Monica, Calif.; Printex, a Lehigh Valley printing company and MJR Services Inc., with an address in Phillipsburg, NJ.

"The investigation found that Political Strategies Inc. is essentially a front company for Precision Marketing Inc. Political Strategies Inc. has no employees, no actual building and no business is conducted in California. Checks mailed to Political Strategies Inc. in California were picked up by a Severson relative living there and mailed to Severson.

"The charges state that MJR Services Inc. is a small mail house company that rents space from Severson's company.

Deceptive Campaign Invoices

"The charges state that the campaign of Anthony Rybak, who ran for state representative for the 133rd district in 2006, hired Severson as a political consultant. Rybak's campaign allegedly was directed by Severson to make all checks out to Printex.

"Rybak's campaign filed two campaign expense reports in 2006 indicating that the campaign work, which included mailings, printed materials and phone calls for the campaign was done by Printex, when in fact it was done by Severson.

"The Northampton County Democratic Committee received invoices from Political Strategies Inc. in 2007 for phones, printing and campaign services and sent two separate payments. The Democratic Committee later filed a 2007 campaign expense report that listed Political Strategies Inc.

"The charges state that in 2003 Severson sent invoices to the campaign of Robert Donchez, who was a candidate for city council in the city of Bethlehem, from MJR Services Inc.

"The Donchez campaign received four invoices from MJR Services Inc. and one invoice from Political Strategies Inc. In 2003, Donchez' campaign filed three separate campaign expense reports listing services from Severson as either from MJR Services Inc. or Political Strategies Inc.

"The charges also state that in 2003 the Committee to Elect Judge Panella to Superior Court, received invoices from Severson for MJR Services Inc. and Political Strategies Inc. Judge Panella's campaign filed five campaign expense reports that listed the deceptive invoices from Severson.

"There is no information from the campaigns or candidates to indicate that they specifically directed Severson to send them deceptive addresses.

"Corbett explained that the underlying principle of campaign expense reports is openness and transparency and by sending his clients deceptive invoices, Severson's actions caused his involvement with their campaigns to be hidden from the public.

"Severson surrendered before Harrisburg Magisterial District Judge Marsha C. Stewart and was preliminarily arraigned and released on $100,000 recognizance bail. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Monday, May 25.

"Severson will be prosecuted in Dauphin County by Senior Deputy Attorney General E. Marc Costanzo of the Attorney General's Public Corruption Unit.

"Severson is charged with 12 third-degree felony counts of tampering with public records or information; 12 second-degree misdemeanor counts of false swearing, 12 third-degree misdemeanor counts of false swearing, 12 second-degree misdemeanor counts of unsworn falsification to authorities and five third-degree felony counts of criminal conspiracy. He is also charged with one misdemeanor count of violation of the Election Code related to the Monahan negative campaign mailings and one misdemeanor count of violation of the Election Code related to reporting by candidate and political committees and other persons for the John Doe report.

"(A person charged with a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty.)"

Monday, April 20, 2009

Six Hundred Stoffa Campaign Signs Stolen Over Weekend

Ann McHale, John Stoffa's opponent for Northampton County Executive, whispers that if you blow hard enough, that old man will keel right over. Yet John Stoffa has been chipper enough to get up at ungodly hours and plant hundreds of campaign signs throughout the Lehigh Valley. Hey, he's a farmer by nature and it's time to sow those seeds. If he can't plant crops, he can at least plant his verdant signs.

In addition to the work he's done on his own, he's had lots of help from people like Bethlehem's Anna Lawson, who put signs along Pembroke Road, Stefko Boulevard, Washington Street. I've even been planting signs myself.

I'm Bernie Stoffaseed!

Stoffa's sign campaign caught McHale and the Joe Long Dems completely off guard. They anonymously whined here, but the logos were largely unmolested. Sure, a few here and there were yanked out and I saw two cut to shreds in Easton, but that could be kids. I just replaced them. The signs were basically untouched.

All that changed this weekend. McHale was told she needed to get her signs out right away if she hoped to get any votes. Well, I can see why she waited. Her posters are almost identical to Stoffa's. She looks like a copycat. Copycat or not, her signs are welcome by John Stoffa. He thinks people should always have a choice. He's goofy that way.

Not McHale. She appears to have hired goons and thugs to plant her signs. I say this because, in addition to getting McHale's nearly identical signs out, they spent much of the weekend removing hundreds of Stoffa signs. County Executive Stoffa reports that between Friday night and Sunday afternoon, at least six hundred placards have vanished.

Poof!

In addition to the outright theft, these goons are also blocking numerous Stoffa logos by placing McHale signs right in front of them. Traveling along Route 191 between Nazareth and Bethlehem, I can see that at least half of the posters I planted are now being blocked from public view by McHale's Navy. The same is true along Route 512 between Bethlehem and Bath and along Route 248 between Nazareth and Bath. Anna Lawson reports signs have been removed or blocked in Bethlehem. In fact, Lawson claims that McHale's posters are actually in the same holes drilled for missing Stoffa signs. Slate Belt volunteers tell me the same thing. Even in Northampton and along MacArthur Rd, in areas where there are hundreds of feet of space, McHale signs block Stoffa's.

On Saturday night, two fellows in a red pick up were spotted near Moravian Academy planting McHale signs and removing Stoffa signs. They took off when approached.

Although stealing campaign signs is criminal, the thieves are rarely caught. What makes this situation unique is that Stoffa's signs go missing at the very same time that McHale posters are being planted. In addition, we have two fellows in a red pickup removing Stoffa signs and planting McHale's. At the very least, McHale should identify the goons she hired to do her dirty work.

If McHale wants to run a clean campaign, this is a strange way to do it. What McHale really thinks and has said is that "Nice guys finish last." I think she's wrong and that people are tired of these junior high school antics. McHale is unable to control a council so dysfunctional that Morning Call reporter Michael Duck has started a series he calls "Council Behaving Badly." She's unable to control the thugs she hires to place her campaign message. How will she ever control a county?
Update: Ralph Stampone, a Wind Gap resident, reports McHale signs this weekend that block Stoffa signs through Wind Gap, Pen Argyl & Bangor.

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Is an Ethical Campaign Possible?

Cedar Crest College's Ethics Institute will tonight sponsor a community presentation about the climate of our political campaigns. Are ethical campaigns even possible anymore?

When: 7:30 PM

Where: Alumnae Hall, Cedar Crest College

Panel:

Pam Varkony, Nationally recognized writer, commentator, blogger extraordinaire and speaker

John Reynolds, Ph.D.a Professor of Political Science at Moravian College who currently has the misfortune of teaching AJ.

I'd go, but tonight I'm stuffing an anonymous attack mailer.

Monday, September 22, 2008

I. Bennett & Dent Refuse to Agree at JCC

Allentown's beautiful Jewish Community Center was the setting for last night's televised debate between LV Congressman Charlie Dent and challenger Sam Bennett . A giddy crowd of nearly two hundred people (and one miniature French poodle) waited for the show to start, munching on cookies and swilling down bottled water and coffee. We are mutants, people who actually prefer a congressional debate to an exciting Eagles-Steelers game.

We probably should all be committed.

Two Allentown cops were on hand in case a blogger started rolling around on the floor or foaming at the mouth. Since nobody was actually willing to throw a punch, the cops slipped off to a side room to watch the game.

So who won?

Judging from the applause in the beginning, during eight minute speeches from each contender, I'd say most of us miscreants thought Sam came out on top. They're already posting comments on my previous blog about tonight's festivities. By night's end, however, it was Charlie Dent who was swarmed by spectators while Sam Bennett was forced to wander the room, hoping for a few minutes with different people.

Dent was clearly the better debater, informative and extemporaneous. Bennett, on the other hand, was actually reading off cheat sheets. When Dent spoke, instead of listening with the respect that Dent gave her, she would smile and shake her head "No" the entire time. Don't believe me? You can make your own call, thanks to a webcast done by Channel 69 .

This debate will also be rebroadcast on Channel 69, making it the first of three televised face offs between the two candidates. There will also be two non televised showdowns.

So much for Bennett's debate ducking charges.

Candidates answered seven audience-prepared questions, vetted by a panel of three rabbis, about energy independence, job creation, health care, Israel, Iraq, immigration and our local economy. I will transcribe two of their answers below, and hope to have a few more by Tuesday. Three of these questions concerned foreign policy and national security, playing into Dent's strength and Bennett's weakness. Nowhere was that more apparent than when she declared Hamas "must behave."

These are not elementary school children, Sam.

One thing's very clear. There's no love lost between these two. Before the night was over, they were both accusing each other of personal attacks. They may belong to the same church, but I'll bet they sit in different pews.

Bennett teed off with this, after the question about Iraq. "While we're talking about war, I would like to point out - Charlie, I guess there's no more Mr. Nice Guy anymore. I have to tell you I've been disappointed that everything you've done in this campaign has been a personal attack upon me in TV, radio and mail. Our country is in a terrible state, our finances melting and we are at war. Charlie and I actually go to church together and I have to ask you a question, Charlie. Are you proud of the way you've been conducting this campaign?"

"Yes, if you want an answer," responded Dent. She didn't. "Onto Iraq."

Dent responded at the end of the evening. "I want to say something about personal attacks. During this campaign, she accused me of using my job to enrich myself without one shred of evidence or substantiation. When she was called on it, she said, 'Big Gas, Big Oil.' That's a bunch of hot air. It was offensive and insulting to me and to my wife, especially to my wife. We don't like that. That's a personal attack."

"This summer, in July, she talks about nasty campaigns, I was burying my aunt at Arlington National Cemetery. . . . The Democratic Congressional Committee on that day started attacking me falsely and calling me names."

Blogger AJ Cordi served as cameraman and beautiful Pam Varkony was color commentator, passing me hilarious notes at different points. She's already posted her Perspectives. Blogger Michael Molovinsky, who earlier today called Rendell a "reluctant Jew," is hiding in some bunker somewhere.

Monday, September 15, 2008

Bennett Ads Analyzed by Dent Campaign

If you want to strike fear into the heart of a local Democratic operative, walk up behind him and whisper these two words - "Shawn Millan." You're bound to get a kick out of watching how fast a local committeeman can run.

Shawn Millan, who's actually a very nice guy for an evil Republican, is managing Charlie Dent's campaign for reelection as your LV Congressman. He has a very interesting and well-written analysis of Siobhan Bennett's attack ads (posted here and here).

POINT: “Bennett didn’t take a salary for 7 years.”

INTERESTING: Most people who are volunteers don’t take salaries. In fact, not taking a salary is a crucial element to volunteering. People volunteer because they believe in giving their time to a cause. I guess we taxpayers should have realized that we ran up quite a tab for all that Siobhan did for us.

NOTE: Why is Siobhan trying to chat with people who are obviously hard at work building something? The last time I checked, Properties of Merit didn’t build houses for people. Volunteer workers at the Habitat for Humanity do that. Habitat’s director gets paid $56,000 a year. Siobhan must do twice as much for our community as he does, based on her $110,000 a year salary.

LVRamblings: I don't know why Bennett would run an ad drawing public attention to her role at POM and her excessive salary there. Here's how she justified it a few months ago. "The political reporter of The Morning Call writes an investigative piece based on lies, half-truths and innuendo. But I had to be perceived as being responsive."

POINT: “This race is all about getting the greedy corporations out of our gas tanks, out of our grocery stores (emphasis added), and out of health care."

COUNTERPOINT: People who have been following this race know that Siobhan hates Big Oil. They know she doesn’t like Big Gas. Now the Axis of Evil is complete. Beware of Big Grocery. If you’re asking if you really heard a Congressional candidate say that they want to get greedy corporations out of our grocery stores, sit down, because, yes you did. We eagerly await the Bennett plan to nationalize the grocery delivery system in the United States.

POINT: “To send them a message. It’s time for change – now.”

COUNTERPOINT: Beware greedy grocers, I suppose.

I suppose this is the commercial that Siobhan thinks will inoculate her against charges that she really took a lot of money from a charity.

POINT: “I like gas at $4 a gallon!” --

COUNTERPOINT: Charlie has an energy plan. Bennett is the one who is adamantly opposed to increasing American energy production from traditional sources. She’s a “drill-nothing” candidate who also opposes coal and nuclear energy. Heck, based on Bennett’s energy plan, she wants gas to cost more than $4 a gallon.

POINT: “More war with no exit strategy!”

COUNTERPOINT: Charlie worked with Democrats and Republicans to try and pass legislation that would have enacted the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group into law. It’s true that Charlie has never voted to cut funding for our troops. Bennett, on the other hand, has repeatedly stated that she would vote against bills that provided funding for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

INTERESTING: Senator Obama voted for 4 out of 5 of the Administration’s funding requests. I guess Sam thinks he’s just another 80% rubbertstamp.

POINT: “Children’s healthcare.”

COUNTERPOINT: Charlie voted for the SCHIP bill and twice voted to override President Bush’s veto. Charlie actually met with Democrat Majority Leader Steny Hoyer to discuss how the bill could be presented to draw more bipartisan support.

POINT: “Food is expensive.”

COUNTERPOINT: Just another one of those wild “mud” pitches – like Musikfest and Mack Trucks – that Bennett likes to throw. At least, so far, she hasn’t tried to link Charlie to the Lindbergh Kidnapping.

POINT: “Cut Veterans' Benefits.”

COUNTERPOINT: Charlie has not voted to cut veterans' benefits. (Documentation attached.) In fact, Charlie just voted to vastly expand Veterans’ education benefits through the GI Bill. It was attached to legislation funding our troops – which, again, Bennett opposed.

INTERESTING: 16 whole seconds into her commercial before Bennett ran out of real people supporting her campaign and put Northampton County Democrat Committee Chairman Joe Long, into her commercial.

LVRamblings: Actually, Shawn, none of those are "real" people. They are all Democratic committeemen.

POINT: “Good guy Congressman. Bad Votes.”

COUNTERPOINT: Yes. Charlie is a good guy. Bad votes? Hardly.

INTERESTING: Hey, they stole one of our signs! Unless they paid to have them produced like the Dent T-shirts. Also, is that Rick Daugherty, Lehigh County Democrat Party Chair and sometime director of the Lehigh County Senior Center, a non-profit, supposedly non-partisan organization? Yep.

POINT: “It’s Sam or the Same.”

COUNTERPOINT: No, Sam is the same. Same old conglomeration of far left talking points, distortions and untruths.

NOTE: There’s a complete lack of documentation in the ad to support her assertions. Perhaps, she would be willing to provide those to you.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

I. Charlie Dent Strikes Back


Up until now, LV congressional challenger Sam Bennett has been swinging freely at incumbent Charlie Dent. That's a mistake. On Monday, Dent began swinging back with TV ads like the one above.

Here are three examples of Bennett's own mudslinging.

First, she claims Dent has suddenly become rich in Congress, a charge Dent forcefully denies. "[I]f Siobhan Bennett and the truth ever came into contact, there would be a mighty collision."

Steerike one!

Second, on a local talk radio show, Bennett actually conducted a mock debate with "Chicken Charlie the Dented," "moderated" by Dem Bossman Joe Long. But she's missed two opportunities to mix it up with the real Charlie at Parkland High School and Northampton's Allaince Fire Company. Her web page accuses Dent of refusing to debate her, but she recently told Express Times reporter Jessica Coomes that four or five debates are scheduled. Two will be televised.

Steerike two!

Third, her webpage even contains a faux George Bush phonecall to Charlie, yukking it up about GOP standing for Grand Oil Party and baloney like that.

Steerike three! She's outa' here.

I personally think what really annoyed Charlie the most was Bennett's claim that she goes to church more often than him. She might want to stop talking about that. When I mentioned it, the usually relaxed and affable Dent suddenly sat up straight, visibly annoyed, with a very steely look in his eyes.

After that, I knew it was only a matter of time before he would respond.

In the post below, I'll detail Bennett's complaint about the negative campaigning.

II. Bennett Condemns Dent's TV "Smear Tactics"

LV congressional challenger Sam Bennett is quite upset with incumbent Charlie Dent's TV ads, which began Monday. She's circulating a short, but but pointed, news release.

ALLENTOWN – Today, Democratic congressional candidate Sam Bennett called out her Republican opponent, Charles Dent, for his smear campaign, which hit the airwaves this week.

“At the beginning of this campaign, I challenged Republican Congressman Charles Dent to a clean campaign pledge and he refused. Now, we know why. Yesterday, my opponent launched multiple negative, dishonest, and personal attack ads against me. Charles Dent has, once again, stooped to the same old George Bush-Karl Rove smear tactics of the past,” says Sam Bennett. “So I am calling on Congressman Dent to accept our clean campaign pledge, debate the issues, and pull down the negative, dishonest, personal attack ads immediately."

As wages fall and companies cut jobs in Lehigh Valley, Dent takes hundreds of thousands of dollars from mega wealthy executives, Big Oil, Big Pharma, and Washington Lobbyists. Now, he's using these contributions to run a smear campaign ad, saying that helping communities is “money wasted.”

Bennett adds, “If you’re listening Congressman, sorry Charlie! You can run on your rhetoric, but you can’t hide from your record.”

“Dent makes three times the income of the average voter, while he opposes fully raising the minimum wage. And he takes taxpayer-funded health care, while he opposes expanding health care for kids, veterans, reservists, and our National Guard,” says Bennett. “To change the way Washington works, we’ll have to change the people that work in Washington.”

Charlie Dent dismisses Bennett's complaint.

“Sam Bennett has no grounds for complaint about our ad detailing her blatant misuse of taxpayer money. Our ad is fact-based, unlike the attacks she has made in this campaign. The voters are going to hold her accountable for ripping them off by paying herself an exorbitant salary arranged for her by her political cronies in Harrisburg. The Morning Call reported on Bennett’s giant grab of our tax dollars and said ‘it raises questions about her decision-making.’ I agree with that assessment and so do the people of the Lehigh Valley.”

Dent's campaign guru, Shawn Millan, adds this thought.

Sam’s press release is wrong. We’re not saying that money spent helping communities is “money wasted.” We’re saying that money meant to be spent helping communities but that ends up in Sam’s pocket is “wasted.”
Update: Pa. Progressive, which claims that "Bennett has Dent running scared," has a video of Sam Bennett's press conference.
Update #2: The Morning Call's Bill White asked Bennett this question. "Why do you feel his campaign is any more negative than yours? I'm trying to distnguish what he's doing that you're not doing." She really had no answer.
Update #3: Bill White's blog about the news conferences mentions that, aside from a Channel 69 cameraman, he was the only reporter in the room. In fact, and I suspected this, the first questions is posed by Dem Bossman Joe Long.

III. Wanna' See a Real Attack Ad?


I found this trolling on youtube last night. Juvenile? Absolutely. But it's also funny as hell. It makes Charlie Dent's TV ad campaign look pretty mild by comparison.

This one must have been rejected, but it appeals to a Three Stooges fan like me.

Monday, February 04, 2008

Blue Coyote: LV Legislators Continue Push to Ban Robocalls

During last Fall's municipal elections, many of us witnessed, firsthand, the destructive nature of anonymous robocalls. BethlehemDem and his wife have lived in Lehigh County for the past two years, but still got one over their dinner hour, instructing them NOT to vote for Peg Ferraro. In fact, Peg got a call herself, and was surprised to learn she voted to increase taxes a gazillion per cent. One of Peg's close friends, who has never even voted, was unable to persuade her she had been duped.

In December, three Lehigh Valley legislators - Rich Grucela, Joe Brennan and Craig Dally - became sponsors of legislation that flatly bans political robocalls. "Automated political calls – A person may not use automatic dialing equipment to make a telephone solicitation call on behalf of a political candidate or a political party." Brennan and Dally also signed onto a similar bill that deletes the political exemption from Do-not-call lists.

Blue Coyote reports that the state house government committee today has agreed, nearly unanimously, to send this bill to the full house. "It is expected that the bill will be amended on the House floor. The amendment may extend the Do Not Call opt-out for robo-calls to commercial phone customers as well."

Friday, February 01, 2008

Northampton County Exec Stoffa Smeared For Trying to Sell His Own Land

If you ever meet Northampton County Executive John Stoffa, you're going to notice a few things. First, he's ninety feet tall. Second, there's a sad look on his face - as though he's really constipated. Third, large and rough hands, with a finger missing here and there.

He came up hard.

You'll still never know a thing about this amazing man unless you sit down and actually talk to him. What you'll find is a bright and surprisingly humble man with a laconic wit that bloggers and news people envy. Like flamboyant Jim (are you looking at me?) Hickey, one sentence from Stoffa is usually worth a few stories.

With Stoffa, you'll also find a simple set of ideals that no one in local or any other office possesses.

He does what he thinks his right, and never lets political considerations interfere with his thinking. When he ran for county exec, he actually promised voters he'd raise their taxes. As he puts it, "They elected me anyway." When council adopted a popular American Heroes Grant, it was really just window dressing that helped no one. But voting against that is political suicide. Stoffa, himself a vet, vetoed the bill, saying it needs more work. When council attempted to shove an overpriced IT bid down Stoffa's throat, he ignored them, and saved county taxpayers $1.8 million in the process.

The nonpolitician has slaughtered a partisan council every time they've tried to tangle with him.

As an eight-year old farm boy, he struggled one hot day until he finally yanked a nasty ragweed from a cornfield. He eventually went to college and got involved in county government. But in his outlook, he's still that eight year old farm boy, pulling out ragweeds. There's no shortage of them in Northampton County government.

I've been labeled a Stoffa sycophant, but John and I have our differences. We were actually on the opposite sides of the open space referendum question a few years ago. He supported it. I organized the opposition, and ran a dirty, negative campaign. Anonymous fliers. Automated robocalls. I still remember making prank calls while he was out baling hay or doing whatever the hell farmers do. I even had forty pizzas delivered to his home. It was a close race. The bastard beat me about 65/35. Severson Scissorhands was so impressed he offered me a job.

After it was all over, I blamed everything on Angle. Stoffa bought it.

Concerned about poor government performance, Stoffa came out of retirement to challenge a heavily financed, two-term, county executive who had the party's blessing. John had no paid advisors, accepted only small political contributions and did no negative campaigning. Handmade signs and mimeographed fliers did the trick. On the night he defeated Glenn Reibman, John and his wife were at the movies.

The "pay to play" crowd never forgave him for that.

Now it's crunch time. Stoffa's trying to decide whether to seek a second term. I'm sure his wife would like nothing better than to have her husband home. But a lot of us think John can do a lot of good in a second term. That's the last thing the "pay to play" crowd wants, so they're trying their best to muddy him up now, instead of waiting for the usual nasty anonymous robocalls and mailers.

In yesterday's post about John Stoffa's meatloaf cabinet, someone anonymously (and of course it's always anonymous) snarked Stoffa.

8:05 PM: "[W]hile no one is looking he carves off a piece of his environmentally sensitive land from his farm and tries to sell it for a profit using a real estate agent he just reappointed to the assessment board who was also a campaign contribitor."

I said I'd look into it on Thursday, but that wasn't good enough. Twelve hours later, this comment appeared.

8:35 AM: "The question is, is Stoffa selling land across the street from his house, that he separated from the original deed, or not? Is he using Miklas as his realtor or not? Is Miklas on the revenue appeals board or not? Did Miklas give to Stoffa's campaign or not? Is the land that Stoffa is selling in a flood plan or not? If it is, is this an environmental friendly Stoffa or a man trying to make a buck off the county? I have many more so called spurious questions, but I know you will never answer them Bernie, because you espouse Stoffa as the next coming of Christ. Maybe the MSM can check this out, or are they Stoffa disciples, also."

Wow! A challenge to do some investigative reporting! And I get first crack, too! Here's what I found.

1) Stoffa owns two tracts of land in Allen Township. He still likes to do a little farming. His big piece, 26 acres, is where his home is located. But across the street, there's a smaller, 2.9 acre, tract of vacant land. Stoffa bought these properties in 1989. There are two separate parcels and two separate deeds. The larger piece is outlined in red above. The property was properly subdivided before Stoffa purchased the tracts. To be honest, because of the size of the land involved and the natural division caused by the road, no subdivision is really necessary. I know that because I'm a title searcher. I even went to college. It was subdivided anyway.

2) The realtor involved in this shady transaction is Bob Miklas, a licensed real estate agent and appraiser. I know Bob. I've seen him at the courthouse many times, looking at deeds. Miklas is an old fart like Stoffa and does a little farming himself, so they hit it off pretty well. Prior to '89, they had never met. But now, after an extensive interrogation of Bob Miklas, I've discovered that he and Stoffa are friends. This is pretty hot stuff, isn't it? I strapped Miklas to a waterboard, and he confessed that Stoffa sometimes visits his grandson and gives him little trinkets for his tractor. Man, this stuff is dynamite!

3) Stoffa may still think with the ideals of an 8 year old farm boy, but he's now nearing seventy. It now takes him nine hours just to cut the grass on his larger tract. He's often seen at 10 PM, cutting his lawn with lights on his lawn tractor. So, as campaign consultant Russ Shade tells me, Stoffa decided during his county exec campaign that he should sell off his smaller piece.

4) As Stoffa explained to me, he worries when taking his equipment across the road to cut the grass on his vacant lot. It's extremely dangerous, especially at night.

5) After being elected, Stoffa simply had no time to cut the grass. When he finally did get to it, it would be torture. Ron Angle offered to help out, but stole one of Stoffa's tractors and drove off, laughing. He later fenced the tractor at one of Zee Weikel's Allentown yard sales.

6) Stoffa and his very lovely wife, Barbara, tried selling the property to an adjacent neighbor, but the price offered was unacceptable. They also tried with Allen Township. Hokendauqua Creek does go through the property and the Stoffas have always allowed fisherman to try their luck there. They've never posted or kept people off the lot. But Allen Township supervisors had no interest. So the Stoffas tried to sell the lot.

7) First, they tried on their own, but were unable to guarantee that a buyer could build his dream house there. Realtor Bob Miklas was already familiar with the property and knew the procedures necessary for site approval (PennDot, perc testing, environmental studies and other appropriate approvals), so he was engaged to try and unload this vacant land. The property did not sell.

8) Last week, the Stoffas took the property off the market. Their 36-year-old son, Jeffrey, has returned from Miami to live with them and will cut the grass. Problem solved.

9) Bob Miklas did contribute a small sum (between $250 and $500) to Stoffa's campaign. After I pulled a few of his fingernails out, he admitted why he did this terrible thing. "John Stoffa has the best interests of the people at heart."

10) Miklas was appointed (by Stoffa) and confirmed (by council) to the Revenue Appeals Board. As a licensed realtor and appraiser, he has excelled in deciding property valuation questions that inevitably arise. As Bob explained to me, "I hope I'm doing a service for the county." According to Deputy Director of Human Services Lorraine Cordaro, the revenue appeals board conducted hearings at twelve meetings last year, and Miklas was paid a whopping $1,800 for his services. As supervisor of an eight person office, these hearings in all probability resulted in a net loss of income to Miklas.

11) Stoffa has asked his wife to engage Miklas to sell their property if something happens to him.

Sadly, this type of anonymous, negative and spurious smear has become the norm since Bossman Joe Long has ascended to the throne of Northampton County Democrats. They still have not learned they are only hurting themselves. This is also why good people avoid public office like the plague. In Stoffa's case, he's being hammered for trying to sell a piece of his own land. And Miklas is being flogged for his willingness to share his real estate appraisal knowledge with the county, and in an area where it is desperately needed.

These sleaze comment were made, not to further good government, but to prevent it. John, this little episode had to be distasteful to you, your wife and Bob Miklas. The attempt to smear you makes me want to jump in the shower. But it's also why you need to seek a second term. The county still needs you.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Harrisburg Takes Aim at Negative Robocalls

According to The Express Times, the state senate yesterday approved legislation making clear, yet again, that robocalls must contain a "clear and conspicuous" announcement identifying their funding source. The senate apparently forgot to run this bill by DA John Morganelli. He has consistently winked at anonymous sleaze ads, most of which is done by his own political consultant, Severson Scissorhands.

Over at the state house, three Lehigh Valley legislators - Rich Grucela, Joe Brennan and Craig Dally - are co-sponsors of legislation that flatly bans political robocalls. "Automated political calls – A person may not use automatic dialing equipment to make a telephone solicitation call on behalf of a political candidate or a political party." Brennan and Dally have also signed onto a similar bill that deletes the political exemption from Do-not-call lists.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Severson Plays Both Sides of the Fence in Easton Races



In the closing days of the Easton races, a negative mailer was directed at Easton city council candidate Jeff Warren by Easton Republicans. This mailer is so low it even includes a reference to me, who called Warren "Easton's Magnet for Special Interests."

That bulk mailing permit for that campaign piece, Permit No. 132, goes right back to Tom Severson, King of Sleazeball Politics. This Severson slam against Warren is odd for two reasons.

First, Severson is Senator Lisa Boscola's campaign consultant, and Jeff Warren works for her. Lisa Boscola paid that Severson $43,659.65 for her state senate race last year. I guess that was then.

Second, Severson was also Democrat Sal Panto's campaign consultant. Panto's latest report reveals that Severson's Political Strategies, Inc. was paid $11,088 on November 30 for mailers, postage and calls.

Can you say conflict of interest?