Lehigh Valley Ramblings
Today's one-liner: “In a republican nation whose citizens are to be led by reason and persuasion and not by force, the art of reasoning becomes of first importance.” T Jefferson
Friday, July 10, 2026
Dem House Nominee Bob Brooks Ran Lawn Care Business With No Workers's Comp Insurance
Allentown Seeks Interim City Controller
From Allentown City Council: Allentown City Council is continuing to accept applications from qualified residents interested in serving as the City's interim Controller.
Applications will now be accepted through the close of business on Monday, August 17, 2026, providing additional time for interested candidates to apply following the postponement of the previously scheduled July 1 special meeting due to scheduling conflicts affecting quorum.
Pursuant to the City's Home Rule Charter, applicants must be qualified voters residing in the City of Allentown and must have been registered members of the Democratic Party for at least 30 days prior to the vacancy, which occurred on May 27, 2026.
The Allentown City Controller serves as the City's chief fiscal officer, providing independent financial oversight on behalf of more than 130,000 residents. The Controller is responsible for reviewing City finances independently of the Executive and Legislative branches, conducting financial and performance audits, reviewing the annual budget and providing recommendations to City Council and the Mayor, monitoring the implementation of audit recommendations, assisting with independent audits, overseeing the operations of the Controller's Office, and promoting accountability and transparency in the expenditure of public funds.
Individuals with backgrounds in accounting, auditing, finance, budgeting, public administration, government oversight, or related fields are encouraged to apply. Experience managing financial operations, interpreting financial information, conducting audits, or working within governmental or nonprofit organizations is beneficial.
Interested individuals should submit:
- A current resume; and
- A statement describing their qualifications, relevant experience, and the value they would bring to the Office of City Controller.
Applications may be submitted by mail or email to:
Allentown City Council
Attn: Tawanna Whitehead, Deputy City Clerk
435 Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101
Email: Tawanna.Whitehead@allentownpa.gov
Documents submitted as part of this application process will become public records. All applicants will be subject to a background check.
Following the close of the application period, Allentown City Council will publicly review all qualified applicants and conduct interviews during a Special City Council meeting in August before voting to appoint an interim City Controller in accordance with the Home Rule Charter.
The position of City Controller carries an annual salary of $76,000.
Questions regarding the application process may be directed to the Allentown City Council Office at 610-437-7555.
Attached is the job description for the position. Per the Home Rule Charter, the responsibilities of the City Controller are to:
A. Have financial oversight of City finances, independent of the Executive and Legislative branches and shall review all expenditures of the Mayor, City Council and City Boards, Commissions and Agencies;
B. Review the Annual Budget before approval by City Council, and make nonbinding recommendations to the Mayor and to City Council for consideration, if he or she deems it necessary;
C. Be present or represented at all Council meetings;
D. Perform audits, including performance audits, of the City and any City department, office, authority, board or commission. In the performance of such audits, the City Controller, to the fullest extent allowable by law, shall be given access to any and all information and documents reasonably and actually necessary for the completion of such audits. The Controller, in conducting such audits, shall in all respects comply with Section 171.02.B (Confidential Information) of the City Ethics Code and Section 140.17 (Employee Conduct and Work Rules), Part H.12 of the Personnel Code prohibiting the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information in violation of federal, state and local laws. All information and documents made available to the Controller to conduct such audits and any reports resulting therefrom shall be subject to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law.
E. Report, to the Mayor and to City Council, on the progress of the implementation of any recommendations as found in the Annual Audit and Management Letter;
F. Assist in all audits conducted by independent auditors;
G. Assure the accurate and timely completion and submittal of audit reports along with appropriate follow-up recommendations;
H. Furnish to City Council, the Mayor, and others, as appropriate, periodic reports of audits conducted;
I. Interpret and communicate audit policies and procedures to all City management and staff;
J. Direct internal financial security and loss investigation activities;
K. Prepare an annual budget for the office of City Controller and operate the office of City Controller within approved budget limitations; and
L. Issue any subpoenas in order to fulfill the duties and responsibilities of the office of City Controller.
Thursday, July 09, 2026
Zrinski Spurns Olive Branch Resolution That Would Give Her Authority to Negotiate Salary for Fiscal Director
At last week's Northampton County Council meeting,Executive Tara Zrinski spurned what I will call an "olive branch" resolution that would give her authority to negotiate an appropriate salary for a Fiscal Director. The county has gone without a Fiscal Director since Zrinski assumed office in January. In June, she nominated Deb Watlington, a CPA with 30 years of accounting experience, as the county's new Fiscal Director. County Council conformed her, but at a lower starting salary - $109,632 - than the $125,108 proposed by Executive Tara Zrinski. As a result, Watlington withdrew.
Zrinski chastised Council, insisting that she, and not Council, has the authority to set the pay. She complained of an "increasingly adversarial dynamic between council and the administration, particularly when it manifests in ways that complicate routine governance functions. It's neither warranted nor productive. Effective government requires mutual respect, adherence to defined roles, and a shared commitment to outcomes over objects."
She went on to argue that negotiating a salary for the Fiscal Director is her role, and her role alone. So she was unwilling to accept an olive branch resolution prepared by Council member Jason Boulette that would have given her the authority to negotiate a salary.
After her lecture, and despite Council President Ken Kraft's attempt to stop him. Council member Dave Holland asked Council Solicitor Matt Deschler whether Council had acted appropriately by setting the salary at a lower rate than that negotiated by Zrinski.
"Council acted appropriately." responded Deschler. "I can expand, but that's my conclusion."
Kraft acknowledged that while Council did have the authority to reduce the salary, "it was a rotten thing to do."
Boulette later withdrew his olive branch resolution. He would have hired Watlington at the salary proposed by Zrinski.
In an email, he explains that his resolution was "a fair compromise. My resolution reaffirmed that County Council is the body with the power and responsibility to set the salaries and wages of employees, but temporarily extended to the Executive the ability to negotiate with potential hires at Step 4 for the Director of Fiscal Affairs position. I believe I could have gotten 5 votes for this resolution.
"I was disappointed the Administration attacked the resolution as strongly as they did. They made it clear that they did not want the temporary authority this resolution would have extended to them, so I pulled it.
"I disagree with the Executive's position that Council can only approve or reject nominees without any say in their salary. The Home Rule Charter clearly gives us this power. My resolution will not be the end of this discussion. We will go into this matter more thoroughly at my Governance Committee meeting on July 15th."
Former NorCo DA and County Council Member Don Corriere Has Passed Away
Don Corriere a former Northampton County DA as well as a former member of County Council, has passed away. He was 87.
Corriere, with his ever-present cigar, was fixture at the courthouse until recent years. A graduate of the University of Michigan, he served on County Council from 1976-1980 and was President of the governing body during his last two years in office. He was then elected District Attorney in 1980, a position he held for 12 years.
He is survived by his wife Carol, and children Michael, Julie and Christina. His son Michael has also served on County Council and is currently an Assistant County Solicitor.
As District Attorney, Corriere went after corruption in Bethlehem Tp government, which resulted in the prosecution and conviction of several township officials, including the township manager. His office also prosecuted and convicted Joseph Henry for the rape and murder of Jeanne Clery, a fellow Lehigh University student. Henry was sentenced to death but dropped appeals in exchange for a sentence of life in prison without parole.
Physically robust, Corriere was gardening at the time he suddenly passed away.
I have no information about his arrangements.
Wednesday, July 08, 2026
Zrinski Issues Apology Over "Friends of Gracedale" SNAFU
Blogger's Note: Yesterday, I told you that that Northampton County had instructed "Friends of Gracedale," a nonprofit organization that raises funds for the nursing home's residents, to "cease and desist". It had even been barred from conducting a fundraiser at the facility. This was based on the incorrect assumption that its "tax exempt" status had been revoked. Last night, NorCo Exec Tara Zrinski issued an apology on her Substack page. Here is what she said:
To the residents of Northampton County, to the families who rely on Gracedale, and to the volunteers of Friends of Gracedale, I owe you that responsibility and an apology.
Since day one of this administration, we have been operating in what can only be described as crisis mode, drinking from the same hoses we are using to put out fires we did not start. From regulatory pressures at Gracedale, to staffing challenges, to uncertainty surrounding Medicaid reimbursements and state budget delays, not to mention the crisis emerging from Northampton County Jail and litigation I’m not even allowed to talk about, we have been forced to react to urgent, often daily issues while simultaneously trying to stabilize operations and set a long-term course. That is not an excuse—it is context.
I entered this role believing that with a strong team of seasoned professionals in both the Solicitor’s Office and county administration, we could hit the ground running. That belief was predicated by confidence, not arrogance, but also a little ambition. In hindsight, that ambition outpaced the reality of the challenges before us. Four years seems like a very short time to douse a thousand flames with a single hose.
Gracedale, as many in this community know, is both a point of pride and a constant test. It is, in many ways, the gift that keeps on giving—rewarding when we succeed, but unrelenting in the demands it places on us when we fall short.
When it was brought to my attention that Friends of Gracedale may not have had an active 501(c)(3) status, I took that concern seriously. Given the regulatory environment surrounding Gracedale, already operating under heightened scrutiny and a provisional 2 license, my immediate priority was to protect the integrity, reputation, and legal standing of the facility.
I did not independently verify that information. That is my fault. Instead, I relied on what was presented and trusted that it had been properly vetted before it reached my desk. The matter was referred to the Solicitor’s Office, and based on their recommendation, a cease-and-desist letter was prepared. There was an added sense of urgency due to a planned vacation by the Solicitor, and the letter was approved under the assumption that all necessary due diligence had been completed.
Compounding the situation, we believed the letter had been sent via certified mail on June 25. It had not been. When no response was received, we operated under the mistaken belief that Friends of Gracedale was either choosing not to engage or, worse, ignoring the letter. A Second Notice was sent out, prompting our favorite blogger to add fuel to an already smoldering flame with a leaked screenshot of the letter embedded in an accusation that this administration is both inept and motivated by a “hostile takeover” of Friends of Gracedale. Neither is wholly true, yet the blog relies on loaded phrasing and selective interpretation of events at Gracedale to support this dismissive narrative.
Nonetheless, I can admit that this series of missteps was a failure in process and, ultimately, a failure in leadership.
I am not willing to allow these missteps to hold the administration captive, though. Instead, I wish to acknowledge what happened, express my regret for the confusion, and resolve to repair any harm caused.
However, let me be clear: at no point was this administration motivated by retaliation or hostility toward Friends of Gracedale; quite the opposite. I, the administration and the Solicitor’s office, recognize and deeply value the compassion and generosity that volunteers bring to Gracedale’s residents. Their contributions enhance lives in meaningful ways.
At the same time, concerns had been raised internally about governance practices, financial recordkeeping, and the absence of formal legal guidance for the organization. In a highly regulated environment like a county-owned nursing facility, those concerns cannot be ignored. They must be addressed carefully, collaboratively, and correctly.
In this instance, we did not get that balance right.
It is accurate that my requests to merge Friends of Gracedale with the Gracedale Strategic Plan were denied. We attempted to encourage a partnership—one where a County-led development team could assist in structured fundraising while allowing volunteers to continue focusing on what they do best: supporting residents. That effort was met with understandable skepticism. Trust is not built through urgency or assumption; it is built through communication and transparency. On that front, we have work to do as well.
The fact is I remain fully committed to keeping Gracedale county-owned and fulfilling our moral obligation to the residents who call it home. That commitment was made publicly at the State of the County Address and will continue to guide every decision we make.
But progress is rarely linear. Too often, it feels like for every two steps forward, we take one step back. Admittedly, this was one of those moments where we have taken four or five steps backwards. We understand earning the public trust and the trust of Friends of Gracedale will require work, but; I also believe that honesty goes a long way to redemption.
As County Executive, I know that asking for forgiveness is not something the public expects. The expectation is steadiness, accuracy, and sound judgment at all times. I strive for that standard every day. But I am, and my staff is also human; when we fall short, we must acknowledge it plainly
I have chosen to do that here and now.
We will correct the record. We will improve our internal processes. We will work to rebuild trust with Friends of Gracedale and the broader community through our continued transparent communication.
At the end of the day, this is not about any one office, organization, or individual. It is about Gracedale and getting it right for the residents that call it home now and the community that relies on its future.
Gracedale Administrator Morton Is Both Defensive and Inaccurate in Report to NorCo Council
Last week, Northampton County Council was slated to receive an update on Gracedale from Himan Services Director Sue Wandalowki. Since the nursing home has been removed from her portfolio, I questioned why she, and not Administrator Michelle Morton, would be talking about the beleaguered nursing home. Wandalowski apparently got the message and deferred at least temporarily to Morton until the subject of finances came up. That's when she interjected herself.
Before I get to that, let's talk about what Morton herself had to say.
The first thing Morton told County Council was that the state DOH had visited the facility that very day all F-tags had been lifted, including those for the latest elopement as well as a belligerent resident who is pocketing prescription drugs. These are issued for deficiencies in compliance with regulations that ensure resident safety.
She then went on to say that though Gracedale will self-report deficiencies when they happen, there have been no substantiated complaints since began her job in March 2025. A review of DOH visits reveal, however, that complaints were, in fact, substantiated on 6/25/25, 10/17/25 and 5/14/26.
She addressed the5/14/26 elopement in which a resident wandered away and had to be returned by police to a home that was unaware he was AWOL.
"I want everyone to know that the elopement for which ... a violation occurred [was] because a resident was taken off campus by another resident family member, who drove that resident to Easton and dropped the resident off. So that's certainly not something that I think anyone would have predicted or anticipated, that someone would take someone else's resident, not even their own family member off site."
Um, that's why you do periodic head counts. That apparently wasn't happening as it should have been. Shouldn't a nursing home be doing this before people start wandering off?
She spoke about the agency nurse who documented that she had administered medications to the AWOL resident: " I do wanna point out what that particular nurse, that was, like, a one time individual.It wasn't a systemic problem of that people, you know, false documenting. It was one nurse who was documenting."
Isn't that why some agency clearinghouse was established so that these nursing journeymen are properly vetted before they are unleashed on unsuspecting residents? Morton noted that this nurse's license has been reported but failed to state whether any background check at all was performed. When pressed on the matter by Council member Jason Boulette, Morton replied, "I'm not gonna go in every detail of the plan of correction. It is available online if you would like to look it up."
She acknowledged that the census, which should be at 520 in order for the nursing home to break even, was down to 470. But in response to questions from Council member Dave Holland, she initially denied that the home is in the red. When he asked her about a financial report from Acting Discal Director Barnadon Dunstane showing that Gracedale was in the red after its first quarter, she at first denied it. "No, that is not true. We are not spending 100% of budget." Then she said that the home has a lot of "Medicaid pending" residents
That's when Wandalowski, who is supposed to no longer have any responsibility for Gracedale, came to Morton's rescue. She said that Gracedale has 9 residents receiving one-to-one care, 24/7. "That is a budget buster," said Wandalowski. She did acknowledge that the home is over budget.
A Warning From Above (or Below)?
In the post you see below about Gracedale, I am highly critical of Gracedale's so-called administration. But as I pecked away on my keyboard, s strange thing happened. My hands began to burn like they were on fire. It's almost as though Council member Kelly Keegan pulled out a voodoo doll of me and started burning my effigy's hands. Was God punishing me for being so mean? Was Satan giving me a sample of things to come? I actually had to walk away for a few minutes until the fire went out.
After some research, I think it was neither the Almighty nor Beelzebub. It was cycling. I sometimes grip my handlebars too tightly, and the burning sensation was my circulation returning to normal.
Tuesday, July 07, 2026
"Friends of Gracedale" Has an Enemy - NorCo Exec Tara Zrinski
Friends of Gracedale is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organized to raise money "to enhance the quality of life and care to those in need at Gracedale." It exists for the residents, not the county. It was formed at the suggestion of former NorCo Council members Bob Werner and Scott Parsons, who actually discussed this with Northampton County Council back in 2017. It is used to purchase items for the residents, like Christmas gifts.
When it was first formed, its tax-exempt status was briefly revoked when it screwed up a tax return (known as a 990). The group is run by volunteers, some of whom are retired Gracedale workers. That revocation was lifted within a few months after the error was corrected, and all donations and gifts are tax exempt, including those made during the revocation.
You can see the IRS Determination here:
IRS Determination Friends of Gracedale by BernieOHare
No harm, no foul, right?
Not according to NorCo County. Solicitor Missy Rudas has sent not one, but two certified letters to Friends of Gracedale demanding that it stop raising funds and "cease and desist" from using Gracedale as part of its name.
Here's her latest missive:
In this letter, Rudas contends that her determination is based on a review of the IRS website. Missy is not stupid, so I can only conclude that someone at Gracedale or in county administration misread the webpage and subsequently misinformed her.
In my own review of the IRS website, which took 5 minutes, the IRS determination that Friends of Gracedale (posted above) is clearly linked. So are the tax returns for years 2020-2024 (they are 990-N returns because the gross receipts are very small).
I was unaware that the NorCo Solicitor's office enforces the federal tax code. That would be news to the IRS. That office should have done its research a little better.
I suspect what really is going on here is a what amounts to a hostile takeover. Executive Tara Zriski has created a Continuum of Care department, and part of that department will be raising funds for what amounts to a massive Gracedale Village that will include housing, medical offices, assisted living, and a refurbished nursing home.
That's fine, but that's a county project. Friends of Gracedale exists for the residents, not for county development.
Monday, July 06, 2026
Zrinski Addresses a Senior Center Crisis
On Thursday,NorCo Exec Tara Zrinski updated County Council on the recent decision to close the Northampton Borough Senior Center. She has a "sustainable operating plan" to keep the facility open as a community-based organization.
Northampton County operates 9 senior centers, while Lehigh operates 11.
Zrinski reported that there is a statewide funding crisis for senior centers. This is the result of both the end of federal American Rescue Plan and declining state funding combined with rising costs for meals, transportation, staffing, and other services. A dozen senior centers across Pennsylvania have already closed, with 40 more slated for termination.
Statewide, there's an estimated $50 million statewide funding gap for aging services, and they include far more than senior centers.
The Department of Aging's responsibilities also include:Meals on Wheels (the county cleared a wait list, but 13 more have applied); Emergency food assistance; Health and wellness programs; Transportation; Home modifications; Medication management; Personal emergency response systems; Cooling centers during extreme heat; and In-home personal care services (there are 62 people on a personal care wait list).
Zrinski pointed out that "When you have people at a senior center, and you have people on a care wait list, people waiting to be bathed, people waiting for in-home services, and you think, 'Well, we have able-bodied seniors and we have people who cannot change themselves. Who do we provide services to first?"
Could the county make up the $1-1.5 million shortfall? According to Zrinski, no. She cited and waved a 1991 Council resolution barring the administration from funding more than is allotted by the state.
The budget at Northampton's senior center includes $90,000 for meals, $11,000 for rent and $8,000 for operating expenses. This excludes the cost of a 27-hour per week part-time employee.
So though the county will continue to pay rent until the end of the year, it is unable to support the senior center.
She's suggesting the formation of an autonomous community group that can provide volunteers for a newly organized nonprofit like Neighbors in Need. to provide a safe setting fand social interaction or seniors.
After she finished her presentation, Council member Jeff Warren fawned over it, claiming that Zrinski is thinking "outside the box," a phrase that she herself later used to describe her plan.
I'm a bit more skeptical. If Zrinski wanted to think outside the box, she could ignore a 1991 County Council resolution that has no binding effect on her or future County Councils. She could ask County Council to rescind the resolution. She could also consider merging two senior centers on south side Bethlehem that are within a stone's throw from each other. One is located at the Rooney building, and the other at the Hispanic center/ Frankly, at a time when we should be more inclusive and have even established a Human Relations Commission, why would we want to have separate senior centers for those who speak Spanish and those who don't? With the money saved by this merger, it might be possible to continue the senior center in Northampton.
