
Since starting this blog, I've written
114 posts mentioning Northampton County. Sure, I'll write about Nazareth (
35 posts) or Upper Macungie (
8 posts) or even Iraq (
31 posts), but Northampton County is usually on my front burner. This week alone, I wrote that
no Northampton County judge deserves retention, and actually
criticized judicial plans for a veterans' memorial outside our very own Taj Mahal. Well, the Empire has struck back! I learned Thursday that someone somewhere has decided to impose a block on county employees seeking access to my blog on county-owned computers.
County employees seeking access to my blog get this rather scary message:
403 FORBIDDEN - Access to this website has been blocked due to organizational policies. * * * ALL ATTEMPTS ARE BEING LOGGEDThe message goes on to explain that "
X-rated sites are often blocked." Some employees tell me that if they try to get access three times, sirens go off and they're jolted by a nonlethal blast of electricity.
O.K. I made that part up.
Holy cannoli! I'm X-rated, bippy, and the county is censoring me! I asked someone to type in
LVDem's url, and that bastard's blog popped right up
Who could have wanted to shut me up? Actually, that list is pretty frickin' long. I did confront
court administrator Onembo, but he had no idea what I was talking about.
I decided to check this out, called
information services, and was told they are in the process of blocking non-work related sites, although I still don't know who made this decision. Eventually, no blog will be accessible from a county computer. Newspapers are exempt for now, even though they're not work-related. But it's only a matter of time for them, too.
Did information services decide on its own to regulate content like this? I honestly don't think so. I don't believe it is within their province to decide what employees may or may not see. This is a command decision.
Concerns about Internet gambling or pornography might justify some regulation, but the county is actually censoring ideas, treating them as though they are something filthy.
By making it hard to get on this or any other blog, the county has just guaranteed that those who really want to do so will spend far more time gaining access. And in a county workforce that already has terrible morale, you sure don't improve things by treating employees like little kids.
Why not just make clear to employees that web-traffic is being monitored? Why not explain that anyone who spends too much time on non-work related web-sites risks disciplinary action?
I believe the real reason for restricting access has nothing to do with improving employee productivity and everything to do with censoring the free flow of ideas. If this is the county's goal, it will fail.
Attempts to suppress speech always do.
And so the battle rages.
Update:Enclosed is the text of an email I sent to the county executive and information services today:
Yesterday, I became aware of a block that was placed on my blog by information services. County employees who want to take a look get the following message: "403 FORBIDDEN - Access to this website has been blocked due to organizational policies. * * * ALL ATTEMPTS ARE BEING LOGGED" In a telephone call with a very nice lady in Information Services, I was told this block was imposed because my site is not "work-related." But many other local blogs and other news and/or opinion sources have not been blocked.
The purpose of this email is to request that access be restored at your earliest possible convenience. I make this request for the following reasons:
1) You are a public, and not private, employer. I have a first amendment right to petition my government for the redress of grievances. But increasingly, NC is making it difficult for citizens to exercise that right. There's only one way in, and you might die of old age before you get there. Email addresses are rarely published. And now, sites like mine, that deal directly with NC and may even be work-related in some instances, are being blocked. After my second post about the Liberty Bell, I got a call from a then county official who was looking at the blog. Like the ostrich, the county is burying its head in the sand and will miss future opportunities to address matters of public concern by blocking this blog.
2) Some private employers do impose restrictions, but that's counterproductive. You don't make employees better by treating them like little kids. You cause resentful behavior, especially when they've had no raises for nearly 4 years. In the end, they actually become less productive.
3) I've just been lumped in with X-rated sites. Someone, somewhere within the county, whether it is in administration or information services, has decided to defame my blog by implication. They tell employees that 403 sites like mine are "often" X-rated. They are acting in a defamatory manner and are undermining my credibility, whether intentional or not.
4) You are discriminating. Why are some blogs up while others are not? Why are other news sources, like the mainstream publications, still up? Of course, those sources have more credibility, but isn't that a decision a reader can make for himself? How long will it be before someone somewhere in the county decides that The Express Times or Morning Call is no longer work-related? That decision will surely follow some critical article.
5) I could understand a block directed at X-rated sites or online gambling. If that is your goal, then whatever tool you are using is far to extreme.
I repeat my request that this block be removed immediately. I'd also like to know whether my blog was specifically targeted, and the reason for that.
Update #2: I didn't expect to receive a reply from the County Executive today. He's a busy beaver. But late this afternoon, Stoffa was kind enough to drop me a line to say he's looking into my complaint. He assures me no block was specifically targeted at my blog, and thinks we can work things out. I appreciate his very prompt response and willingness to look into this situation. It really sets him apart.