At its November 26 Budget Hearing, Northampton County Council considered seven different amendments, two of which are apparently unlawful. I explained why yesterday. One of the seven amendments was Council President Lori Vargo Heffner's attempt to divert $225,000 set aside for outside nursing at Gracedale for yet another pointless passenger rail study. Aside from Vargo Heffner herself, that amendment received no support. Council Clerk Alina Shafnisky solemnly instructed Council that amendments needed the support of all five Council members in order to move forward to the budget hearing. "If these budget amendments are not passed by motion at this meeting, they will not move forward for the adoption of the budget," she pronounced. And Council Solicitor Chris Spadoni chimed in as well. "They die tonight," he instructed.
They are both incorrect.
Typically, what happens at the final budget meeting, which takes place tonight, is that Council votes separately on each budget amendment. Then they are all put together and voted on as a package.. If necessary, there's a recess so the Clerk can compute the changes and their effect on the final budget. Shafnisky obviously wants to have her figures ready to go, but the reality is that budget amendments can be proposed any time after the public hearing on the budget and up and until the budget is actually adopted. Yes, there needs to be a public hearing at which members of the public can be heard.
Under our Home Rule Charter, the Budget is adopted by ordinance following at least one public hearing.. (Section 704(a)). It further provides that "After the public hearing and before adoption, the County Council shall have the power to amend the budget submitted by the County Executive." (Section 704 (b)). The only time constraints are that budget amendments be proposed after the public hearing but before final adoption.
I'm unclear whether there has actually been a public hearing on the budget ordinance. Assuming that has happened, only then may budget amendments be introduced. And under the Charter, they can be introduced up and until the budget itself is adopted. Nothing in the Charter requires that the only time they can be introduced is at the final budget hearing. That might make life easier for the Clerk, but it's not the law or even prior practice. I have often seen last-minute changes on the night of adoption. Bruce Haines from Hotel Bethlehem has made numerous last-minute appearances with his hand out. And Council has obliged him because Haines and any member of the public has the right to request changes.
Amazingly, after both Shafnisky and Spadoni told Council that amendments needed five votes to push forward, they have submitted John Brown's amendment to add $5 million to the rainy-day fund on this evening's agenda. His proposed amendment received only four votes. As I previously explained, this will result in an unbalanced budget if it is adopted.
Shafnisky and Spadoni both gave bad advice but ignored their own instructions to push an amendment that they have to know is unlawful.
