I recently attended a presentation concerning a proposal to build a data center campus in Lower Mount Bethel Tp. Every member of the public who spoke were opposed to the idea While we all rely on data centers to store our Amazon orders or our Facebook pictures, we'd rather not see them.
Now Northampton County has nothing to do with data centers. But Council member Jeff Warren would very much like to be State Rep. Jeff Warren. He can see which way the wind (hope it's renewable energy) is blowing. So he invited Kim Barrow, Vice Chair of the state Public Utility Commission (PUC) to make a presentation last week. She went on for 30 minutes before Council President Ken Kraft asked her to wrap it up. She went through a lengthy recent history of energy use in Pennsylvania. Her basic message is that any proposed data center should bring its own energy generation.
Barrow said that Pennsylvania’s electric system is undergoing a dramatic transformation focused on reliability concerns, rising demand forecasts, aging infrastructure, and the pressure being created by extremely large data center projects tied to artificial intelligence and cloud computing.
She began by explaining that Pennsylvania is part of the PJM Interconnection, a 14-state regional transmission organization responsible for coordinating electric supply and reliability throughout much of the eastern United States. Pennsylvania historically has been one of the strongest electricity-producing states in the region, exporting roughly 25% of the electricity it generates.
For many years, Pennsylvania enjoyed relatively flat or declining electricity demand while maintaining a highly diverse energy portfolio that included natural gas, nuclear, coal, hydropower, oil generation, and renewable energy. Because of this diversity and excess generating capacity, Barrow stated she long believed Pennsylvania had excellent “resource adequacy” and strong reliability.
However, she explained that several developments have converged to create what she described as a “perfect storm” of challenges.
Among the major issues discussed were increasingly severe weather events, aging infrastructure, power plant retirements, supply chain disruptions, workforce shortages, cybersecurity threats, and the electrification of transportation and other sectors. She noted that stronger storms are becoming increasingly costly for utilities and more difficult to recover from operationally.
A major turning point in her concerns came during Winter Storm Elliott in December 2022. Barrow described the storm as a near-catastrophic event for the eastern electric grid. During the storm, PJM reportedly lost approximately 47,000 megawatts of generating capacity due to failures across multiple energy sources, including coal, natural gas, and renewable systems.
Coal piles froze, gas compressors malfunctioned in extreme cold, and renewable output declined due to weather conditions. She emphasized that the failures were not isolated to one type of generation resource but occurred across nearly the entire fleet.
According to Barrow, the region came within less than 1,000 megawatts of potentially severe cascading outages. She called it “a miracle” that widespread long-term blackouts did not occur.
One of her strongest messages was the importance of maintaining a balanced energy portfolio. While supportive of renewable energy growth, Barrow stressed that reliability requires maintaining all available resources, including nuclear, natural gas, coal, hydropower, and renewables, particularly during periods of extreme weather stress.
The second major portion of her presentation focused on the rapid rise of hyperscale data centers. Barrow explained that traditional data centers historically consumed between 50 and 200 megawatts of electricity. However, the newest AI-driven facilities are now requesting 1,000 to 2,000 megawatts each — amounts comparable to the output of entire nuclear power plants.
She specifically referenced the restart of Three-Mile Island through agreements tied to Microsoft and discussed Amazon Web Services’ arrangements involving the Susquehanna nuclear facility.
Barrow expressed concern that these enormous new electricity demands are arriving much faster than new generation and transmission infrastructure can be constructed. She warned that if data center growth proceeds unchecked, the grid could face serious reliability risks during future extreme weather events.
She cited PJM capacity auctions as evidence of growing stress within the system. Capacity prices reportedly jumped from approximately $35 per megawatt-day to over $300 per megawatt-day within a short period, creating an estimated $13 billion impact on ratepayers across the PJM region.
Barrow stated that these increases are being driven largely by forecasts of future electricity demand, especially from data centers, and not solely by current consumption levels.
A central theme of her remarks involved protecting residential customers, small businesses, and traditional commercial users from subsidizing the infrastructure costs associated with massive new industrial electricity consumers. She repeatedly stated that hyperscale data centers should “bring their own generation” by financing or constructing additional power sources rather than relying entirely on existing grid capacity.
She explained that the PUC recently issued a “large load model tariff” intended to ensure that large new electric users pay the true costs associated with serving their facilities and do not shift expenses onto ordinary ratepayers.
14 comments:
Bernie - while electricity is a concern, its nothing compared to the water requirements these data centers will demand.
You need to stop conflating facebook pictures and amazon orders with why they need these data centers. Thats a bunch of bull shit and you SHOULD know it.
The only way Palantir can properly do its job of complete surveillance on anyone in the world in real time is to have EVERYONE's data stored.
The energy and water are concerns 2 and 3 for me. Our number one concern should be not allowing these tech giants to build Skynet. Dont be dummies, say no to data centers.
This is an excellent report on the comprehensive presentation made by a member of the Pennsylvania Utility Commission on a most pressing and timely subject. And, yet this obvious public good is proceeded by a gratuitous cheap shot at Jeff Warren. You’re very damaged.
The answer is nuclear. But propagandists will fight that, too. We haven't built a new plant since 1979. We worked very hard to put ourselves in this difficult position. Fear of new things and a lack of preparation for the next things is what drives us. Let's solve this by bringing in another 20 million non-contributors who need cell phones for their TikTok videos.
As a consumer I'm willing to take whatever action is necessary to not use AI. We don't have Siri or Dot but Alexa comes on my Kindle and there's no way to remove it. I turned it off but I'm not sure it's really off. Amazon could still be using it to gather data. I don't want to make silly videos with AI or use it in my Google searches. The billionaires keep telling us that AI is inevitable and it will be until the people gain the power to say 'no.' A lot of us want to say no to protect our air and water.
LMB horse and buggy NIMBYS
Typical backwoods logic - the sky is falling, the sky is falling
Only thing worse than a data center is Jeff Warren winning, but hey at least he’s off county council. Voters did a great job ensuring McClure got sent home let’s hope they continue to do the right thing and send Warren packing as well. These data centers are a real problem they are praying on the low income rural areas, it appears these are all going up way to fast without much thought of many things. No data centers and no Warren!
The data centers will be giving local communities as well as the state funds. Than in turn most of the money will go to large and in charge big wigs pet projects.
The infrastructure both above and below will continue decaying. This is all part of the 2030 design. Stupid Chinese wise man's saying order out of chaos, the public pays one way or the other!
If Warren wins, McClure is going to run for his old seat in advance of all the Judge openings coming in ‘29.
Data centers are unpopular everywhere. Being opposed to them is a great way to pick up votes. Never mind that we need them.
Though Barrow went on forever, she said some interesting things. I am a bit more concerned about our ability to respond to energy demand during winter storms thanks to her remarks. But what she had to say has absolutely NOTHING to do with county government or the pressing issues faced specifically in NorCo. The only reason she was there was so Warren could use it as a campaign issue and introduce yet another toothless resolution.
National names in this country also do not support these, it is not backwoods at all. It is coming from the progressive Democrats with Bernie sanders leading the fight. One reason I voted for brooks is he had the backing of Bernie sanders, the older I get the more I see how right sanders is and how much his political stance and viewpoints heavily favor the American work force, health care, tax the rich and American moving forward.
1. Warren is going to win, Emrick was barely holding on in 22 against Thomas and did about the same in 24 despite a better year for Republicans. Look at the fundraising numbers Emrick only raised $2,500 so far this year the House Republicans will eventually have to decide who to protect and they might skip Joe to save someone elsewhere that will actually put in the work. I suspect that big funders goals this year is to just save the senate 2. Emrick voted against putting restrictions on data centers. 3. Should Warren lose he would still be on council.
The TMI meltdown and all of its resulting deaths reminded us of the real horror of China Syndrome. Have we learned nothing about nuclear dangers? Analog is the future until we place enough windmills and solar panels to manage the demand. Let's not go back to nuclear and its millions of annual deaths out of desperation by our corporate masters.
Post a Comment