Local Government TV

Monday, May 15, 2023

Why Terry Houck Will Win the DA's Race

Terry Houck and staff

Northampton County DA Terry Houck is going to be re-elected on Tuesday.  To be sure, challenger Steve Baratta pulled out all the stops. He raised nearly twice as much money. His campaign heralds a return of big money to local  politics, with $10,000 donations from J.B. Reilly, Joe Topper and Ray Lahoud, to say nothing of the nearly $40,000 in-kinds that Ray poured into the race.  Baratta got the backing of established Morganelli machine politicians Bob Donchez and Lisa Boscola. He sent out six mailers, advertised on TV, radio and in social media. He even took out ads on this blog. He ran an ugly negative campaign to paint Houck, a person who has spent 45 years in law enforcement, as incompetent, racist, ethically challenged and a closet Republican. He's raged at Houck in two debates and several news conferences. Despite Baratta's bluster, Terry's going to win. I'll tell you why. 

One week ago today, there was a debate between Easton Mayor Sal Panto and challenger Pete Melan.  A throng of about 100 Easton voters cascaded into a chapel at Lafayette College for the show. These people were not just voters, but Democratic voters. Before the fireworks started, Terry Houck came and worked the room. He marched up and down the aisles to talk to people and ask for their support. 

I saw that happen repeatedly throughout this election cycle. At the Bethlehem City Council debate, Houck appeared and spoke to people informally after candidates had their say. Baratta was absent. He failed to even appear at the endorsement meeting conducted by Lehigh Valley For All (who agree with them). They ended up endorsing Houck, even though Baratta is more liberal. 

Baratta missed the LV Labor Council's annual dinner, which is sacrilege if you're a Democrat and want to get elected. 

He missed a candidates' forum at Kirkland Village, even though it's so close that he could have fallen out of his bedroom window and would be there. 

Even at events where he did appear, like the candidates' night at Easton's Southside Civic Association, he stayed off in a corner by himself with campaign manager Leo Reilly. There were few voters there, but he could have scored points with numerous candidates by just talking to them. 

I know one Bethlehem voter who will vote for a candidate simply if he or she knocks on his door, regardless of their views. 

People like to be asked. 

For the past 25 years, Baratta has been secluded in a perch on the third floor of the courthouse, isolated from the community. This was not his choice, It's a security measure to protect judges from disgruntled litigants and gang bangers. Though Baratta actually has a great sense of humor, which I've experienced from him a few times during this campaign, he's out of touch. He still talks to people as though he's God and believes his word is final. 

Just as a deep sea diver needs to rise slowly from the murky depths to prevent nitrogen bubbles in the brain, a person who descends from the judicial heavens needs time to adjust to his new role as an  ordinary human being. 

Baratta should have stayed where he was until his term expired. His resignation was actually selfish to the community he claims he wants to serve. The courts have been forced to bring in two senior judges, at taxpayer expense, to assume the duties he should have been performing.

He describes his departure as a selfless move to continue serving the community in a different capacity. He notes he walked away from his state judicial pension before it maxed. He fails to mention that he has a county pension, too. That pension will be based on his three highest years. If elected District Attorney, that county pension will increase dramatically and he will end up with more money than if he had just remained on the bench. 

Baratta also burned bridges. Right off the bat, he sent a complaint to the Disciplinary Board against  three lawyers with spotless records. This turned off a lot of lawyers who might have been tempted to support him. 

He has conducted a negative campaign. Say what you will, negative campaigning usually works. But the person conducting the negative campaign has to appear to be more likable than the person he is attacking. Instead of looking like a reformer, Baratta has been the Captain Queeg of Northampton County. His campaign has been conducting a relentless and increasingly elaborate investigation of Terry Houck in a vain effort to find the missing strawberries. 

In his last news conference, he ended up in a confrontation with an assistant DA who did not like her hard work demeaned. He had previously handed out a paper claiming that she was one of the assistants who quit, but there she was. He handed out a heavily redacted memo that involved a personnel matter. It was almost impossible to decipher and should have remained private. He even started to criticize  fellow judges for a backlog in criminal cases. All to find those missing strawberries.

Captain Queeg was suffering from battle fatigue. Baratta is also showing signs of the toll that 25 years of very hard work as a common pleas judge has taken on him. 

Terry Houck is no politician. His allies are good cops and victims, not real estate moguls or established politicians who dole out campaign funds to each other. But he ran a good campaign, spent money and was everywhere. He asked people for their support in person. 

They like to be asked. He's going to win. 

Campaign Timeline

1/4: Before he even announced, Baratta filed a 65-page complaint with Pennsylvania's Disciplinary Board, attacking the ethics of Houck, his top assistant and a prominent criminal defense lawyer. He never bothered to supply copies of his jeremiad  to the persons he attacked. The state board has taken no action. 

2/21: Baratta attacks Houck and Colonial Regional Police Department for refusing to take sides in what is essentially a civil dispute between two Sikh factions over control of their temple, even though police have responded to every complaint, have filed harassment charges when warranted and are investigating two incidents. 

3/28: Baratta accuses Houck or racism: At a debate in Nazareth, Baratta continues to attack Houck over Sikh temple dispute, and plays race card. He tells Sikhs, " He [Houck] doesn't want to look at that and doesn't care because you guys don't look like him ... ." Houck denies the accusation, states he's met with both Sikh factions, that police have responded to the temple 20 times, and three people who engaged in harassment were charged and convicted. He noted the dispute over control is properly handled in civil court. 

3/28: Baratta attacks Houck over referral fee: Every year, public officials must file a Statement of Financial Interests, reporting all sources of revenue aside from their public appointment. Houck did so, and reported income from the Specter & Kline law firm. Baratta has repeatedly attacked Houck for accepting this money. Hocke explains that about 12 years ago, long before he was DA, he was approached by a friend on a soccer field and asked wht firm his wife should use for a mesothelioma claim. Hock recommended Specter & Kline because he saw their ads on TV. He ne3ver met with the firm and had no idea his friend had even listed him as a referral. When he received a check, he contacted the state Ethics Comm'n, which advised him he could accept the money because whatever he did was done long before he became DA. 

4/13: Baratta accuses Houck of being a closet Republican. - At a PBS debate, Houck acknowledged  that he is seeking write-in votes from Republicans, who have fielded no candidate. This resulted in a Baratta mailer that accused Houck of "siding with the Republican party." Houck responds, "I am a Democrat. I have always been a Democrat and will remain a Democrat regardless of the outcome of this election." 

4/17: Houck snags FOP endorsements - Houck, himself a former cop, is endorsed by Bethlehem FOP Lodge 20 (Bethlehem police) Easton FOP (Easton police), PSTA No. 40 (Northampton County Pa. State Police) and PSTA (statewide Pa, State Troopers).

4/21: Politically inspired lawsuit against DA and police is dismissed. - A politically inspired lawsuit, filed by the lawfirm employing Baratta's biggest financial backer, Ray Lahould, sought the return of money that two warring Sikh  factions entrusted with police in what is essentially a civil dispute. ent Judge Michael Koury, Jr., dismissed it. 

4/28: NorCo GOP distances itself from Democrat Terry Houck. -  In an unrelated news conference, NorCo GOP Chair Glenn Geissinger specifically denied that his party is backing any attempt by Terry Houck to win a Republican write-in. The party has since that time prepared palm cards urging the party faithful against writing in either Houck or Baratta. 

5/4: Baratta Electioneers Aside Drop Box: - He conducted a news conference assailing Houck within 10-20' of a drop box set up for voters. At least one person come in to drop off a ballot during his harangue. He was confronted by an Assistant DA who disliked having her hard work demeaned by him. 

5/8: Baratta's Pre-Primary Report a disturbing return  of big money in local politics. - NIZ developers J.B. Reilly and Joe Topper gave Baratta $10,000 apiece. Norris McLaughlin lawyer Ray Lahoud gave $10,000 and added a whopping $37,900 in in-kinds. The Morganelli machine was revealed as well, with contributions from former Bethlehem Mayor Bob Donchez ($1,000) and State Senator Lisa Boscola ($5,000). Baratta paid Morganelli son Chris $5,000 for website design. 

39 comments:

  1. Baratta's seemingly incessant negative mailers turned me off big time. I get way more junk mail than one person deserves. I have to collect it, store it, and haul it to recycling. Send me one mailer - any more than that is harassment. And they were just so damned childish. Just like in the 2020 election, it was not whom I was voting for, but more whom I voted against. "Look what they are saying about Houck, and look what these right to know requests yielded." I couldn't care less what dirty muck you think you dug up. Go the hell away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When a former judge selfishly stoops to using the same thug tactics, exposure of guarded court data, whisper down the alley rumor and false narrative, that he once strongly condemned while serving the courts….voters might want to question his sudden change of interest and attitude in pursuing a DA position over completion of his judgeship which better fits his claim of serving this county and constituents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hitting the bottle tonight, Patricia?

      Delete
  3. Negative ads harm the sender and the target. The trick to making them work is the sender having plenty of goodwill to spare. Baratta had little little to start. He has no goodwill now. Whomever convinced him to run and whomever suggested he run negative ads should have their head examined. What a disastrous and embarrassing end to a career.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Disbarred Bernard and Tiny Terrence. The tag team no one smelled coming.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He'll lose because he's a jerk, and I'm being very polite, if you get my drift.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Gang bangers" is a racist term used to describe unemployed African Americans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, you're a regular riot. 🤣

      Delete
  7. Sophomoric name calling and belittling rather than offering objective concerns…truly out of a
    playbook of a loser

    ReplyDelete
  8. Baratta will win since you are the kiss of death!

    Houck will end up with the R nomination due to his write-in campaign.

    Voters lose because they get negative mailers all autumn long.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Baratta is either incredibly confident in a win, or already conceding defeat because he was doing yard work on Saturday during prime campaigning time.

    ReplyDelete
  10. BernieOHare to 8:29, lol it’s true that I often am the kiss of death, but my batting average has improved.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Whoever wins this race goes into the office limping. They’ve both beaten the shit out of each other.

    Baratta has spent 5 months insulting a staff he wants to be in charge of. Houck will have to spend the next year restoring his hard earned reputation.

    The real losers at the end of Election Day will be the people that just want a healthy, thriving DA’s office, not Baratta or Houck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One person who isn’t limp is Lahoud. ;)

      Delete
  12. I was at an event where a very large number of people atteneded and Unfortunately for Baratta he never went around the room to campaign. He probably could have picked up a lot of votes but he sat there like a wallflower. He must learn to campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Neither one is worthy. Too bad there’s no Republican willing to run. The Lehigh Valley is becoming Philly. Look at where Panella got most his campaign money 😮

    ReplyDelete
  14. Polling shows negative towards Baratta’s personal attack pieces, tv ads insinuating he is the only Dem and Numerous fallacies about Houck and the courts. He will lose.

    ReplyDelete
  15. If Baratta wins, it’s a sad sign that being an unrelenting complete asshole to the other candidate is a working formula. Not good for our community or politics. Also, being tied to Morganelli is harmful - people are tired of the old guard.

    Baratta was asking important questions, but he himself has come across so hateful that I think it backfired. This will be yet another loss in the Morganelli column.

    ReplyDelete
  16. “Terry Houck is no politician”…LOL. Houck is the definition of a political opportunist fraud. Spent his whole life in Philly and Bucks County, then after losing TWO races for Bucks County DA he comes crawling to the Lehigh Valley. He lived in Bucks County until late 2018 and ran for NorCo DA in 2019! Now after he loses yet another race in the Democrat Primary tomorrow but gets a couple hundred Republican write in’s, this time instead of switching counties he’ll be switching parties in a pathetic attempt to keep his opportunist train moving.

    Cute final monologue and timeline, Bernie. That take you all weekend to put together? What has Terry promised you for your blog acting like his own personal Newsmax the past few months? You know he can’t get you a new law license, right?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sorry Ray and hit gang. Terry has risen above your lies and intimidating dollars. The high road will always win against false accusation.
    Your former judge will be soundly beaten because he surrendered his moral and ethical compass to ambition.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Terry is running for elected office, ergo he is a politician. If you are running, you are a politician. If you are running and saying you're not a politician, you're lying - which also makes you a politician.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Let’s just say, Ray Lahoud is well endowed in many areas ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  20. C'mon, give the Leo "Rooney" boy the credit, "Rielly"?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bernie, amazing that Baratta grew up here in the Slate Belt, and he threw two people up here, one an Attorney who’s father was best friends with his Father, AND a so to be President Judge who graduated with him at Lafayette, under the bus! I have been telling every Republican I know to write Terry Houck in when they vote, and I Don’t give a f…. What the Northampton Republican Party tells us what to do!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally agree. I live in a conservative neighborhood they are all writing Houk in.

      Delete
    2. Great! It’s good that Republicans are writing Republican houck in.Republicans helping a republican.

      Delete
  22. @5:21, Terry would make a great Republican candidate because he is a Republican. You can have him.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bernie are you going to get court side tickets to Sixers games for backing Terry?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bernie you said that Fetterman would lose after the debate showed he was seriously brain damaged, and yet he still won. You probably just caused Houk to lose by posting th

    ReplyDelete
  25. Whoops hit the button by mistake. What I was saying is I hope you didn’t jinx Houk.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ughhhh…I’m worried.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Shit I think Houck is losing. That goes to show you what's going on in Northampton County. All the NY and NJ folks fleeing what they voted for, just to vote for the same shit here. They'll ruin this place and then move on, they're like locusts LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  28. The Inuit didn’t fear the cold; they took advantage of it. During the 1950s the Canadian government forced the Inuit into settlements. A family from Arctic Bay told me this fantastic story of their grandfather who refused to go. The family, fearful for his life, took away all of his tools and all of his implements, thinking that would force him into the settlement. But instead, he just slipped out of an igloo on a cold Arctic night, pulled down his caribou and sealskin trousers, and defecated into his hand. As the feces began to freeze, he shaped it into the form of an implement. And when the blade started to take shape, he put a spray of saliva along the leading edge to sharpen it. That’s when what they call the “shit knife” took form. He used it to butcher a dog. Skinned the dog with it. Improvised a sled with the dog’s rib cage, and then, using the skin, he harnessed up an adjacent living dog. He put the shit knife in his belt and disappeared into the night.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.