Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Monday, February 22, 2016
Winner of Democratic AG Debate? Republicans
The three Democrats seeking their party's nomination are Northampton County DA John Morganelli, Allegheny County DA Steve Zappala and Montgomery County Commissioner Josh Shapiro.
Republicans seeking the nod of their party are Montgomery State Senator John Rafferty and former federal prosecutor Joe Peters. They declined to attend a debate at which their presence was obviously unwelcome and joked about by moderator Mike Morrill.
The only candidate with no experience as a prosecutor, or in trying any cases, for that matter, is Josh Shapiro. So naturally, he would be the favorite in a straw poll of 65% of the so-called progressives at this oh-so-important gathering. The crowd seemed to be limited to people from southeastern Pa. and the Harrisburg area. Shapiro's inexperience was blasted again and again by Morganelli, and to a lesser extent, by Zappala.
Noting his 24 years of experience as Northampton County DA, Morganelli argued he is the state's most senior DA, and one who has personally tried 25 first degree murder cases. Zappala has 18 years of experience in Allegheny County, but tries no cases. In a county his size, which prosecutes more cases every year than the entire population of Northampton County, he explained that it's more important to be an administrator.
In contrast to two veteran prosecutors, Morganelli called Shapiro a "self-described politician." When Shapiro touted his chairmanship of the Pa. Commission on Crime and Delinquency, Morganelli derided it as a "MAC machine" that hands out federal funds to municipalities. "It has nothing to do with crime fighting," he complained, noting that Shapiro has only held this particular title for a few months.
"He has titles but no experience," Morganelli observed. "How do you fix something you know nothing about?"
Shapiro eventually countered that he would be an "activist" Attorney General who would stand up for the constitutional right to a thorough education as well as clean air and water. He portrayed himself as a "reformer" who as a state representative stood up for "Democratic" values against the "status quo." Shapiro later added he was not running to be the state's 68th District Attorney.
After Shapiro stressed this constitutional right to a through education, Morganelli noted that Shapiro accepted $25,000 from Students First PAC, which advocates for charter schools.
Moderator Morrill failed to pose a single question about two 800-lbs gorillas in the room - Kathleen Kane and rampant political corruption in Pennsylvania. He instead focused in issues that mean little to everyday Pennsylvanians, like the LGBT movement and "structural racism."
From time to time, the issues came up. Zappala conceded that Pennsylvania is the "most corrupt state" in the country, and Shapiro blasted the "mess" in the AG's office. Though Morganelli has previously called for an overhaul of that office, he actually defended Kane at the debate, admitting only that "she made mistakes."
All candidates pledged to support the eventual nominee.
On points, Morganelli scored an easy victory. If you want to see a vivisection, watch the debate.
You could say Zappala won, too. Morganelli was a pit bull with Shapiro. As underdog, he needed to be tough. But he probably hurt himself as well. Zappala was able to just sit there and watch.
But the real winners weren't there. The Republicans won. If this debate establishes anything, it's that the Republican nominee, most likely John Rafferty, will be the next Attorney General.
Democrats have already ruined any hope they have of retaining this important office with their abysmal failure to address the real issues confronting every day citizens. It's not, like Kathleen Kane thinks, a group of old farts in black robes who sometimes send naughty emails to their pals. Nor is it, as Michael Morrill seems to think, "structural racism," although that sounds very liberal. Nor is it the LGBT movement, which is oh-so-passe.
People don't give a shit about a transgender's right to tinkle in a public ladies' room. What bothers ordinary people are street gangs, fatal drug overdoses, random violence and ripoffs by predatory lenders and other shady businesses. In addition, there's no public confidence in a government so gridlocked it's unable to even agree on a budget. Legislators engage in rampant pay-to-play, ghost voting and violate campaign finance laws as a matter of routine in Harrisburg, where Shapiro claimed to be a reformer.
In the urban communities, crony capitalists have taken over, leading to federal investigations in Harrisburg, Reading, Allentown and Philadelphia. The state's top prosecutor is herself facing perjury charges and her law license is suspended. The party's top Democrat, Marcel Groen, may yet be caught up in the federal investigation in Allentown.
Republicans have long had the power to remove Kathleen Kane from office. But they've allowed her to remain. They know she is a constant reminder to ordinary citizens, including me, that we made a big mistake four years ago when we chose a pretty face over someone who was actually qualified.
In this climate, people will turn to the Daddy party - the Republicans. This debate also establishes that so-called progressive Democrats are out-of-touch. One of the hosts bragged about being at the Hilton without a tux, but he was still at the Hilton. Maybe Governor Wolf should take another trip in his Jeep Wrangler and pretend he's poor.
Blogger's Note: I am compelled to note that I personally support and have contributed $100 to John Morganelli's campaign. In my view, he would be an outstanding Attorney General who would ovehaul that office and restore confidence, but his fellow Democrats have already lost this race.
Updated 9:15 am: In an earlier version of this story, I got one of the Republicans wrong. I have corrected this error and apologize.
16 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
I love the term "progressive", it's so meaningless it's really great.
ReplyDeleteTodd Stephens is not running
ReplyDeleteWolf just endorsed Shapiro. He's big on having no experience.
ReplyDeleteThe other Republican candidate is Joe Peters. Todd Stephens dropped out to run for re-election to his State House seat.
ReplyDeleteWolf's endorsement of Shapiro demonstrates that he, too, is out of touch. He calls Shapiro a proven reformer, but i'm unaware of any reforms from Shapiro's stint in Harrisburg. We still have a bloated legislature, toothless Sunshine Act, no meaningful campaign finance law. Wolf is very much like the put of touch Keystone Progressives and might be even more disastrous than Corbett was as Gocernor.
ReplyDeleteWho will seek the Kathleen Kane endorsement?
ReplyDelete"In the urban communities, crony capitalists have taken over, leading to federal investigations in Harrisburg, Reading, Allentown and Philadelphia."
ReplyDeleteCan we dispense with the "crony capitalist" label?
In truth, what we see is the Democratic Socialism that many of your readers seem to long for.
The term "crony capitalism" is an entirely accurate description of local politics. Businessmen and local elected officials co-opt each other to advance private interests. The biggest example is the NIZ.
ReplyDeleteI love Morganelli, and he is clearly the most qualified of the three Democrat candidates running for AG.
ReplyDeleteBut I was greatly disappointed with his statement (reported in the Morning Call article) that he would be issuing an "Executive Order" to require citizens to report lost or stolen guns to law enforcement.
Maybe he was just trying to prove how liberal he can be to a very liberal group, and it really doesn't matter where you come down on the issue.
I think it's important to have an AG who just wants to enforce the law, not make it.
"The term "crony capitalism" is an entirely accurate description of local politics. Businessmen and local elected officials co-opt each other to advance private interests. The biggest example is the NIZ."
ReplyDeleteIt's far closer to socialism, and involves government attempting to control the market by picking the winners and losers. That's what's happening with the NIZ, and with TIF's, KOZ's, and other tax abatements.
What you see in the those areas is far closer to socialism than capitalism, where people control the markets through their own sales and purchases.
There is a government attempt to control the market by picking winners and losers and there is an attempt by certain capitalists to be those winners. It is crony capitalism. This is not even close to socialism in any form.
ReplyDelete11:00, He did make that statement during the debate, and as someone on the frontlines of gun violence, he is in a good position to know what helps. His point is that these "lost" guns are responsible for most of the gun violence.
ReplyDelete"He did make that statement during the debate, and as someone on the frontlines of gun violence, he is in a good position to know what helps."
ReplyDeleteThat's great, but that's not the issue. The AG should be enforcing the law, not making it. There's a process for making law, and an AG's executive order isn't it.
I expected Morganelli to know better.
Morganelli believes he has this authority under the Consumer Protection Act. I have not researched it.
ReplyDeleteWolf's endorsement of Shapiro is not a bad thing for Morganelli. Wolf is not exactly popular, and for that reason who ever wins in April will lose to the Republican in November...unless the presidential election brings out Ds and it carries down the ticket.
ReplyDeleteMorganelli can't win either election. He couldn't beat Corbett when the democrats sweep the state wide offices. Shapiro will win in a presidential election year in PA. Toomey is finished too.
ReplyDelete