Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Pittsburgh Post Endorses Judge Giordano For Superior Court
You can read the endorsement here. I am more than a little astonished that Judge Giordano's opponent would think she is entitled to the job simply because she is a woman. If Judge Giordano suggested that he should be elected because he is male, he would rightly be branded a sexist. Perhaps she was just relaying what election experts tell her, but it's something that was better left unsaid. Incidentally, ten of the Superior Court's 14 judges are women.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
No comments on what a paper from Pittsburgh thinks!Could it be super bowl envy at work here?
Scott Armstrong
or, it could be no one really cares or understands how important these judicial races are. I don't want to hurt his chances but I am a big supporter of Giordano.
Scott Armstrong
I saw the candidates on c-span -Judge Giordano out classed his opponents. If one votes for a woman for example, BECAUSE your a woman --then perhaps you should not be able to vote at all.It's not about the sex of the jurist,but about justice . This is my opinion . I was there when this jurist was first voted in by the people from Northampton County. Judge Giordano has been a very straight forward man and has displayed compassion for unfortunate people along with having always displayed personal integrity. .
Post a Comment