A reader has sent me this opinion:
I'm not ready to pick a fight with Morganelli or Council's Solicitor so I will give you my unsolicited opinion here. If the DA is lawfully allowed (under the County Code or under Home Rule) to arbitrarily dole out wage increases or create new positions, you then eliminate any system of checks and balances given to the County by State Statutes. Think about this, The Controller is elected, the Magistrates are elected, the Judges are elected. Are you saying because they are elected that they have the authority to dole out pay raises? What a financial mess this will create. Could you see the Courts giving wage increases and creating jobs at their will and fancy? No system of checks and balances will result in Mayhem.
You are aware that Lauer [the Council Soliticor who agrees with the DA] must bargain with the DA on many of his criminal cases. What do you expect him to say to the DA? Stoffa must take this to court or Council is impotent when dealing with elected officials in the future.
How did the DA get the extra money in his budget to pay for these raises? That's easy enough, You simply don't spend money you allocate for something else and use it for pay raises. I don't think so. Stoffa must stand up to the DA and take this to court.
County Commissioners in most Counties are both legislature and administrators. In all Countys, the DA brings his budget before the Commissioners. No here is the DA allowed to dictate to the Commissioners. State Law (County Code) allows the Commissioners to be the check and balance on the DA.
Council should give a lot of leeway to the DA so as not to hamper his everyday operation however, Council cannot and must not give in to the DA because he simply wants raises for his people.
Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
▼
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
13 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
Just guessing, a suggestion: it's possible the DA gets the funds from seized drug money? I read something he sent out to the public via the US Postal Service in which he stated the mailing was paid for by funds seized from illegal drug sources.
ReplyDeleteIf PA is anything like WA then the DA is running the county not the commissioners. Think about "eminent domain", tax foreclosures, code enforcement... All of these situations require the DA. If the DA didn't play ball with the commissioners then the "grand design" each commissioner has and the 'taking for a government purpose' will never occur. This issue is just another symptom of our governments mutation into a socialist system.
ReplyDeleteStoffa scfrewed up again. County cpouncil will probably give him another building.
ReplyDeleteBergoglio! Francis I! Argentina!
ReplyDeleteAnd it's another office Morganelli didn't win. Womp womp womp womp wommmmmmp.
Who is the reader or did you make this up and said it was a reader?
ReplyDeleteI pretty much expressed my opinion below. It is pretty close to the opinion expressed here, but it is not my writing. For one thing, I seem unable to talk about this subject in less than ten paragraphs. But your attack on my honesty is noted.
ReplyDeleteI find it not a good political move on Morganelli's part to draw so much public attention to his people, their raises, their pay, and how his dept. operates, which is obviously so different from Corporate America that has budgets and checks and balances and less despotism.
ReplyDeleteBernie, how much do Morganelli's people in question make and how much are the raises?
ReplyDeleteAny allegations that anyone in the DA's office is overpaid would be absolutely ridiculous. Further, the DA's office, or rather the criminal side of the courts, is the top income generator for the courthouse.
ReplyDeleteOver 60% of the Northampton County Courthouse budget comes from criminal fines and costs. From a corporate america standpoint it makes sense to give raises to your top income generators.
From an ethical point of view... not so much.
But regardless of the ethics of where the money comes from, the ADAs are underpaid.
"Bernie, how much do Morganelli's people in question make and how much are the raises?"
ReplyDeleteI knew that at budget time but have since forgotten. I was shocked at how low the base starting salary is.
Oh, so you will take a letter from an anon. and post it as a "story"...yet you will bash any anon that doesn't agree with you. Hypocrisy at its finest!!
ReplyDeletei will happily publish a post anonymously that does not involve personal attacks. This email was full of good ideas and attacked nobody personally.
ReplyDeleteWhat I detest are people like you, who hide behind anonymity to spew venom.
You need a system of checks and balances. If the DA gives raises to his people without having to be accountable to anyone it is a "dictatorship". If he is accuntable it is good government. You decide which is right.
ReplyDelete