Local Government TV

Monday, June 11, 2012

Why Pols Should Have No Role in Funding the Press

As daily newspapers continue their decline, rocket scientists like Ezra Klein have actually argued that government should directly fund the news. What's good for the banking and automotive industry is good for the press. But seriously, would you really want some politician deciding how you get your news?  Unfortunately, it's already happening, as Noel Jones points out in her Easton Neighbors blog.

Noel's maintains a terrific hyper local blog that concentrates mostly on Easton's West Ward.  But her story is not about her own publication. It's about the West Word. That's published only three times a year. It's funded by the CACLV's West Ward Partnership Program, which in turn gets its money from both public and nonpublic sources.

It was up for a $9,750 renewal last week, and two elected Easton officials dropped by to complain about West Word. One of them is Mayor Sal Panto himself, who groused that, instead of reading about West Ward shootings, he wants to see more stories about girl scouts selling cookies.

Say what?

Panto still supported the funding.

The other Easton official? Mike Fleck. He's a City Council member, NIZ cheerleader, and political consultant to Democratic candidates and trade unions.

According to Noel, Fleck stated, "The primary objective of the paper is not to get the people thinking and discussing.”

In his case, I can see why.

Although The West Word was ultimately funded, I expect to see a lot more girl scout stories.

14 comments:

  1. Why the surprise? People know that Fleck is a Panto pol. He will get a county job if Panto runs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are mistaken. In fact, on this blog, they have argued. I doubt too many people trust Fleck.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just say no the government funded news. PBS is a cheerleader for activist causes.

    All of us remember Dr. Joseph Goebels. News ends up as propaganda eventually.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the NAZI's would have thought this was a good idea. Of course they achieved the same ends more directly by shooting any editors who criticized them in print. Paying for propaganda is perhaps a step above that methodology.

    Scott Armstrong

    ReplyDelete
  5. This Fleck guy is really quite entertaining.

    Or should I say "hysterical"?

    Repeatedly.

    :-D

    http://www.goironpigs.com

    -------------------------------

    Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeitpartei = National SOCIALIST German WORKER's PARTY = the Nazis

    He who cannot learn from history is condemned to fall for the same tricks ...

    ReplyDelete
  6. If only Panto was as upset with the shootings as he seems to be with the reporting of the shootings. Best to blame the reporters.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the publisher doesn't want to have gov't interference, don't apply for the funding. Go sell ads.

    You can't have it both ways. If you want the gov't money, you get the gov't hassle.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Captain Obvious PicardJune 11, 2012 at 3:52 PM

    Cable news and the print media are already run by the same crooks running our government. Super PACs, and other assorted special interest groups and lobbyists. Average people call them, bribers.

    They just don't get tax dollars, unless we count the ads in print papers for public sales and meetings--and the federal agencies ad campaigns for all sorts of programs for decades on the broadcast media. (Plus O'Hare's beloved NPR).

    But now I'm just splitting hairs with FACTS! lol

    ReplyDelete
  9. I do like NPR and many of its programs. It does receive some public funding, but much less - 4.6% - than was true at one time. Stations like WDIY receive no funding from the feds at all.

    I would agree completely that no public money should be spent to fund public radio or any form of news.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks Bernie for Noel's link.

    The Fleckster is a Trickster and will try to get away with whatever he can. His past is proof of this.

    ReplyDelete
  11. anything remotely associated with ccalv should be suspect and investigated by real Americans.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "real Americans"

    You mean white folks, not black Muslim presidents from Africa.

    ReplyDelete
  13. anon 8:10,

    u obviously have a severe problem

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.