Local Government TV

Friday, December 13, 2024

Over Past 10 Years, Bethlehem Has Cut Debt Nearly in Half

Many years ago, I sat in the conference room of then Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan's office. With the sun basking behind him, he told me that he was working hard to reduce the City's long-term debt. He was spending money that could be used for many other things in what essentially is a fiscally conservative move. I thought this was a pipe dream. Even if Callahan focused on reducing long-term debt, which no one really notices, his successors would quickly borrow to avoid tax hikes. But they didn't. Bob Donchez and Willie Reynolds, who followed Callahan, have continued this commitment to debt reduction. 

Over the past 10 years, Bethlehem's long-term debt has gone from $171 million in 2015 to $88.5 million today. Mayor Reynolds plans to knock it down even more, to $56 million by 2028.

Let me remind you that Reynolds, Donchez and Callahan are all Democrats. But this kind of fiscal conservatism is worthy of Elon Musk, Vibek Ramaswamy and anyone who considers himself a Republican. 

You can say what you will about Willie's budget or his policies as Mayor, but his commitment to reducing debt is a very positive and fiscally prudent move that benefits the city residents over time. 
I'll have more about Bethlehem's budget in the coming days.

21 comments:

  1. Well, they did sell off the city to developers. So tax dollars CAN POUR IN AS WELL AS A NEW and LARGE TRANSIENT POPULATION. the OWNER OCCUPIRED Homes and APPARTMENTS ARE NOW GIVING WAY TO A NEW DYNAMIC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BINGO and as they did, they ruined the soul of the city

      Delete
  2. Callahan was a good mayor. Donchez was a good teacher but a lousy mayor. Afraid of a decision unless 10 of his committee yes people said it was ok. wee willie self-centered jerk. Other than that, I can't think of anything polite or printable to say about him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Revenue from the casino and massive warehouses have driven the fiscal improvement in Bedlam. Credit the leadership for reducing headcount.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remember when Space Cadet Eric Evans (Business Administrator) miscalculated funds from the casino?

      Delete
  4. As a resident and obvious tax payer I can consider this a huge success story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Some local governments are trying to hold taxes, but some are not especially school boards Bernie Health insurance is going crazy hikes as high as 20% Our health care system is a total failure and Obama care was far from the answer 500000 people a year go bankrupt and more to come if nothing is done.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Don't/won't/can't hire cops (as posted here yesterday); save money. It's just that easy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Callahan had better hair than Willie.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How exactly are they accomplishing this debt reduction? What do the tax increases look like during the same timeframe? Always happy to see debt go down but context is needed to understand how it’s happening so it can be replicated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least 3, and Bob threw Fed money at it too.

      Delete
  9. "Bethlehem's budget calls for 170 officers, but at any given point in time, there are only 142-145 officers."

    How much money does a de facto elimination of 25 cops save? Budgeting for 170 is dishonest, when there are only 142-145, no?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Can’t argue with the debt reduction success but Willie is a terrible Mayor who insulates himself from the public. He has no posted email address nor phone number nor open office hours like Donchez did.

    He is nasty & vindictive and cost the Lutheran churches significant revenue by threatening developers not to bid against the city for those 3 church properties.

    He should be in jail with Pawlowski for that restraint of trade action. Not to mention the Head of Parking authority threatening letter to the same Churches. Both the Mayor & BPA head should be sharing a cellblock.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did the real estate photography of the 3 churches for the realtor and was in touch with others affected by this situation. If people knew what was going on behind the scenes, the threats made, your assessment is pretty much spot on.

      Delete
  11. Bethlehem has done a lot of smart development over the last 20 years which has brought in a lot of new tax revenue. Callahan and Donchez did a great job in starting to reduce debt. Im not a Reynolds fan at all but he has tried to continue the debt reduction despite his raising taxes last year. 9:02 you are spot on with what he did to the churches. The fact that hasn't been in any of the papers or on channel 69 is just ridiculous and typical of the far left media.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Another government body that screws their employees by cutting their wages through less benefits and low wages.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I give the three mayors mentioned credit for reducing city debt, but it's not as simple as it sounds. As the writer at 7:46 writes, it needs context. Why did the debt exist/what was it incurred for? How many city positions have remained open and what is the impact on city services? Borrowing for capital improvements and paying debt off over the anticipated lifespan of those improvements makes sense, and given the deplorable condition of parks like Saucon and Monocacy at Illick's Mill, many city streets, the Payrow Plaza paver surface, etc. not making needed improvements is just kicking the can down the road. And yes, how much of the federal money has been used to pay the debt down instead of maintaining city facilities and streets?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr. Grubb is spot on. Once again.

      Delete
  14. This post is about the reduction in long-term debt in Bethlehem. which is actually the product of three mayors.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Understand your point Bernie about the subject but the issue with this current mayor warrants your investigation as a good investigative reporter & lawyer.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bernie is a Willie guy, so objectivevity isn’t the goal. It is no big deal really

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.