Local Government TV

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Mr. McClure Goes to Upper Mt Bethel Tp

In the famous movie, Mr. Smith went to Washington to fight against government corruption. Mr. McClure, our Northampton County Executive, is going in a different direction. Instead of Washington, he visited Upper Mount Bethel Tp on Monday night in an effort to prevent the use of public money to incentivize warehouses. He had a better reception there than he gets from his homefield County Council.  

"The era of warehouse proliferation in Northampton County is coming to an end," he told Supervisors. He urged them to adopt a new ordinance to replace a current ordinance that gives a tax break for warehouse development in the township. Under his proposal, the Board would be able to give manufacturers a tax break, but not warehouses. "There is no reason any government at this time in Northampton County or the Lehigh Valley should be using our fellow citizens' tax dollars to incentivize the building of purely logistic buildings," he argued. 

McClure's proposed ordinance would include a hearing board that would enable all taxing authorities to meet with the developer if he disagrees with the denial of a tax break for a specific parcel. Under the current ordinance, the tax exemption would be automatic. 

25 comments:

  1. Hés only around 15 years too late. It does make for great political points. Good vote harvesting for Lumpy!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You compare McClure to Jimmy Steward? Mr. Smith fans just threw up in their mouths. A sincere simple man fighting political insiders in Washington vs. the consummate insider uber pol who will do say or do anything for votes. MY God man, have you gone mad?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is not surprising. McClure has paid a ton of attention to the Slate Belt during his time as Executive.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It’s good to see Lamont out amongst the people fighting to build support for his ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think John Brown who lives in Bangor did far less for the Slate Belt as Executive than Lamont McClure has.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No matter what you think of him. He is right. Stop the warehouse insanity.

    ReplyDelete
  7. He waddled up there to suck up a few votes - end of subject.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Pure politics. He’s just up there trying to pressure Goffredo and Giovanni to change their votes. They don’t care what the public wants. They ain’t changing their votes.

    ReplyDelete
  9. McClure’s message is essentially right. We have enough warehouse jobs for all of us living here if we needed or wanted one. Now we need manufacturing jobs which pay way more.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anyone advocating for corporate welfare to build more warehouse should be publicly flogged. Also, why does every municipality have to permit warehouses (welfare ones or otherwise)? Moore is a perfect example. The township will be largely destroyed by a single warehouse that will also destroy a portion of Bushkill, and will absolutely crush Bath under more truck traffic than it already has.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It’ll be interesting to see if the UMBT Supervisors weigh in on McClure’s proposal. We know the Vargo-Brown’s just mean to obstruct, but Ron Heckman really does care about what the locals think.

    ReplyDelete
  12. A little late for that Lamont. They say better late than never I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Don’t worry about attendance. St. Peg legislated from St. Petersburg for two years before she retired.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Keep in mind, this does not prevent warehouses. Only zoning changes along with a multi-municipal plan can steer development where it makes most sense, or a state land use law change giving more power local governments to deny certain developments would do so.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Brown’s lack of attention to the Slate Belt was appalling. Even now, JP Goffredo advocates more for the SB than JB.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Vargo-Brown’s are dug in on this one and you ain’t budging that family. Move on.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think the real disappointment here is Giovanni. He had no opponent because Muncy used his head for once, and it benefited Panella and Zarinski. But, he’s a rubber for stamp for Brown. It’s news when he doesn’t vote exactly the same way as Brown.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Maybe they can turn some of these warehouses into affordable housing, and then Willie Reynolds won't have to destroy the City of Bethlehem.
    https://www.mcall.com/2024/02/25/your-view-bethlehem-says-it-wants-more-affordable-housing-the-message-i-hear-is-get-out/

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tom Giovanni should be fighting for the good people of Mt. Bethel. He should not be fronting for the developers from Bethlehem who are fronting for big New York money.

    ReplyDelete
  20. In terms of advocacy for the Slate Belt on Council. JP is No. 1. and Brown and Tom are tied for 3rd.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Giovanni a rubber stamp for Brown. Heckman a rubber stamp for Vargo-Heffner. A recipe for gridlock.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ron Heckman is nobody’s rubber stamp. Right after he’s done yelling at Stevie Blunder he’ll do the right thing !

    ReplyDelete
  23. The Vargo-Brown’s a rubber stamp for obstruction. Nothing will get done.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Despite all the humorous McClure toadies' comments, there is a serious nature to this. The county can't even pay these people it has to do the work the county must do, so why is McClure pandering about something the county should not even be involved in. This is nonsense. Get out of this economic stuff and staff the jail, Gracedale and human services. Stop trying to be the mayor of the county. Can't wait until the republicans nominate a worthwhile opponent who understands county govenrment..

    ReplyDelete
  25. A Republican cannot win in Norco.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.