Yesterday afternoon, thanks to the Bethlehem City Democratic Committee, five Democrats seeking three seats on Bethlehem City Council participated in a forum at the Bethlehem Steel union hall. Had he been there Dr. Oz would have turned into a Democrat after trying the charcuterie board laid out by Steelworker Union boss Jerry Green. There was even coffee and cookies. But not many Democrats. Though it was raining cats and dogs, I only counted about 35 people. That's a pretty poor turnout in a city of 75,000, It's really bad when you consider that Bethlehem only has about 6 Republicans, one of whom is my wayward brother. The event was filmed, so you can watch it here, once it's ready. I'd recommend you do so because it changed the way I look at them.
Before going into this forum, let me remind you that two Republicans - Tom Ginther and Devin Brunges - are also running. So this race will continue into the general election.
The five Democratic candidates are Richard "Ricky" Butler, a Marine turned mortgage broker; Bryan Callahan , a driving school owner and former City Council member; Michael Colon, a two-term City Council member and Gracedale admissions manager; Celeste Dee, a political consultant for Democratic candidates; and Colleen Laird, Moravian's chief information officer and former board member of Bethlehem's Food Co-Operative.
My two criticisms of this forum? First, candidates were given too little time to respond to questions. They needed more time and fewer questions. Second, this should have been publicized more on social media. One couple told me they only knew about this event because of my blog. It should have been posted weekly on Facebook for three weeks before the event.
All seven current City Council members were there, either in person or via Zoom. Judicial hopeful Brian Panella came, and even had to interject himself at one point to prevent Colon from answering a legislative question because a quorum of City Council was present. District Attorney Terry Houck, who has pretty much been everywhere throughout this campaign, was in the audience. I was surprised to see Easton City Council candidate Frank Pintabone and Palmer Tp Supervisor candidate Baron Vanderburg. "I came to learn," said Pintabone. "I came for the cookies," joked Vanderburg.
Absent were both Northampton County Controller candidates, DA hopeful Steve Baratta and Ken Kraft, who is running for Northampton County Council to represent the Bethlehem District. Oh yeah, Mayor Willie Reynolds was MIA as well.
I was very disappointed in Michael Colon, the current City Council President. He has served two terms and knows better than most what issues the City has faced over the past eight years. Instead of answering direct questions with direct answers, he tried to be all things to all people. When you do that, you're nothing to anyone. "I agree with a lot of what was said," was his usual refrain. At one point, he said that he sometimes votes with Council member on given issues, but for different reasons. He failed to specify what these issues are or what his reasoning was. He avoided questions. What happened to you, Michael?
The most forceful speaker was Bryan Callahan. He pointedly asked why Bethlehem City Council has failed to act as a check and balance on a supposedly transparent Mayor who refuses to answer phone calls, texts or emails. "He's unavailable," noted Callahan. He asked why Reynolds stopped the open door policy that former Mayor Bob Donchez used, at least once a month, to hear from everyday people.Callahan slammed a City Council that preferred to discuss matters in the back room instead of having debates out in the open, which incidentally is what the Sunshine Act demands. "Everybody talks about transparency; let's have the debates in front of the people."
He also caustically challenged a city that supposedly has a climate action plan but has done nothing about the proposed doubling of the Bethlehem Landfill. If this happens a murky soup of rainwater and garbage will soon be sliming its way down the side of a mountain. He noted that Bethlehem is the only surrounding community that has taken no stand.
Colon weakly responded, "Don't mistake our silence as a stamp of approval." Really? I'd say it's worse. It's complete hypocrisy.
Callahan also was critical of a City Council that failed to seek any accountability from a Mayor who used his office to scare away developers who wanted to bid on three properties owned by St. John's Windish Evangelical Lutheran Church, and who even had the parking authority threaten to condemn these sites to prevent Lehigh from purchasing the tracts for more money than the city was willing to pay.
While Callahan was forceful, and perhaps a bit angry at times, Colleen Laird was a walking encyclopedia. I have rarely seen a person as knowledgeable as she is about urban issues. She's been a community volunteer at Bethlehem's Food Co-Op and the Girl Scouts. She was hesitant about running, but her daughter said, "Mom, you've got to do this! You taught our group the democracy badge."In a conversation with me and at yesterday's forum. Laird stressed the importance of communication, noting that's her job at Moravian.
I'm bothered that she has been endorsed by Mayor Reynolds. I think no Council candidate should seek the Mayor's endorsement when a Council member is supposed to be a check and balance against overreaching. She has insisted she is an "independent thinker" who will disagree with the Mayor and her Council colleagues at times.
Notwithstanding this concern, she clearly brought more to the table than other candidates in terms of pure knowledge and ideas. When responding to a question about Bethlehem's air and water quality, she just started firing off solutions: using the environmental justice steering committee; reduction of impervious surfaces (instead of the black top the City just used at Sun Inn); inventive green space; incentivize local transportation, etc. (she was going faster than I could write).\
Some of her ideas are a bit much for me. For example, she wants to use social workers to "advocate higher level change," whatever that means. She also thinks City Council should inject itself into prison reform and cash bail, which makes me wonder why she's running for city and not county office. As knowledgeable as she is, she's apparently unaware that Northampton County has not had cash bail for 24 separate nonviolent offenses for at least 5 years. As for prison reform, she should tour the county jails to get more perspective.
Though I may disagree with her take on some things, I respect the knowledge she brings and appreciate her transparency.
My third favorite candidate is Ricky Butler. In Easton, Frank Pintabone likes to say, "I'm from the neighborhood and I'm for the neighborhood." I got that same vibe from South Sider Ricky Butler.Unlike Laird, he does not to proclaim that he is an "ally." He already is biracial, like much of the south side. He understands what fentanyl can do. His sister overdosed and died. He likes community policing, where neighbors know the cops and cops know the neighborhood. He agrees with Callahan that there's a serious information gap in the city. He would oppose having 911 dispatchers decide whether to send cops or social workers to respond to calls, which is currently under consideration in Allentown. He'd like to encourage more mon 'n pop stores on neighborhood corners.
Celeste Dee had a suggestion in response to a question about food deserts. She thinks LANTA should create a shopping loop to bring people from the south side to groceries. She's apparently unaware that LANTA does that now. She also said ArtsQuest should have farmers;' markets. I believe it already does.
The three candidates I liked best were Callahan, Laird and Butler.
Updated 2:00 pm: You can now view a YouTube video that captures most of the forum.
22 comments:
Since Mayor Callahan's days over 12 years ago council has been just mere puppets. Councilman Callahan was always ready to put a stop to the silliness. Bethlehemites voted him off council. Bethlehemites need to look in a mirror to see who is responsible for the dynasty they have created. Alas, Bethlehem was once a rose among thorns.
Remember what was mentioned recently to you in this blog about Colon swaying with the breeze? He doesn’t appear to be able to think for himself which is dangerous for Bethlehem.
"Remember what was mentioned recently to you in this blog about Colon swaying with the breeze? He doesn’t appear to be able to think for himself which is dangerous for Bethlehem."
I thought about that. All I can say is that I was extremely disappointed in him.
I watched it on line. The amount of time given for the candidates to answer the questions was ridiculous. Laird and Callahan were my top two. The lady in the black dress is tough to listen to!
This how an election in a third world country is done.
The local Dem establishment went through the motions of having a debate, but somehow failed to advertise it. The reasoning is obvious. The local Dem machine does not want the average voter to turn out on May 16 and upset their handpicked ballot. The machine does not want educated voters interfering with their agenda. Question to candidates often went off on political tangents that have no bearing on city government or lay with the authority of local government. With 60% of all voter feeling no one represents them, Butler might have got a leg up. That is; if voters were actually invited to partner.
Callahan VS Reynolds. Part 2. Let's Go!
invited to participate.
I watched the video and I thank you for the link. I believe your criticism of Michael Colon is unduly harsh. Most of his positions were what I would have expected from an incumbent who is running on, and proud of his or her record. In my opinion from what I saw, his knowledge of what is happening in current city government is more comprehensive than any of the other candidates involved. My comment should be seen only as my evaluation of what I saw on the video. I believe all of these candidates showed great promise and would be valued members of council if elected. Although I am defending Colon's performance in the video I have not yet decided how I will vote.
You are being absurdly ridiculous. Before you start your rant about the local Dem establishment, you need to recognize that the Rs had no forum at all. The Dem party did, and although more notice would have helped, they did shoot and publish a video for everyone to watch. If they did not want you to know about the candidates, that would never have happened. Now can we say that the Rs had no forum bc the local R machine does not want educated voters messing with their agenda? That's equally ridiculous but that is your absurd logic. Candidates pretty much stayed on topic. Some avoided questions, but they talked about city,not national issues.
You say 60% of the voters feel no one represents them. Actually it is between 35-60%, and there are many reasons. First, people like you are opposed to ways that make it easy to vote. In some instances, there simply is no good choice. Bethlehem has seven choices, and after the primary, will have five, including you. But as I've told you once before, your strident remarks hurt you more than help you. I believe Bethlehemites would vote for the right kind of Republican. But your cuckoo conspiracy theories hurt you.
Callahan is correct that the mayor needs a check, but the idea that Callahan is the person for the job is laughable. For most of his time on Council, Callahan was one of Reynolds' bros. Just look at his voting record for verification. Then, when he was no longer one of his bros and Callahan turned against Reynolds, Callahan was highly ineffective at holding Reynolds or the then mayor (Donchez) accountable. Callahan's antagonistic style and blatant disrespect for people did more to rally all elected officials against him than create allies who might have shared a desire for more transparency and accountability. Meanwhile, since Callahan has been gone, the current council has done far more to hold the mayor accountable. Just because they are not wildly waving their hands and launching verbal (and often baseless) assaults, does not mean they are not holding the mayor accountable. They've shown a willingness to vote him down (Chicken Ordinance) and to hold out to get concessions (LERTA), and there's actually discussions that go on now, rather than Callahan's using council meetings as a theatrical venue for his tirades. There's a lot more than the normal rubber stamping going on now; even Colon has occasionally shown some backbone. That said, I'm surprised the debate is the first time you've been unimpressed with Colon. You must not go to very many Council meetings if you just now noticed that his general strategy is to appease all and waffle his way to safe positions on almost all issues. If you think he's providing a long and reasoned explanation for his position, listen more closely--he's mostly just saying the same simple point 3-5 times. At that point I usually lose count and leave the room.
"I watched the video and I thank you for the link. I believe your criticism of Michael Colon is unduly harsh. "
That's why I'm glad for the link. Readers can watch and form their own opinions. I stand by my own.
Just watched the debate 🥱 (thanks, Bernie). The criticism of Mike Colon was spot on. I can’t imagine any other conclusion unless I’m Mike Colon (I’m not) or a relative. Callahan was the best.
" But your cuckoo conspiracy theories hurt you."
Physician heal Thyself. lol
Colon is Reynolds rubber stamp. Whatever Reynolds wants Colon goes along with. Bethlehem needs someone to reign in Reynolds who has completely overreached and has gone nuts with the power of being Mayor.
Watching the video, I am struck by the amount of times that those other than Callahan used the term “I agree” with each other. They are all spewing the Reynolds agenda like puppets whose strings are pulled by the puppet master.
Callahan is the only one demonstrating a check & balance to the far left agenda of the current administration. Ricky Butler is one of the only one showing potential to be a check & balance with his economic development agenda.
Very little dialogue about economic development that woukd bring good paying jobs as another alternative to deal with affordable housing vs building tiny homes in the middle of a Southside Neighborhood. Attracting good companies paying good wages creates wealth to afford market based rental rates.
Thank you for watching our debate. As Chair of the BCDC let me assure you that we really were trying to advertise it and get a large turnout - we did what we could and next time we’ll do better - we are all volunteers - this was certainly not an attempt by the establishment to suppress the vote! And I agree with the critique that the candidates should have been given more time. Maybe 2 minutes instead of 1 and 1 minute rebuttals with fewer questions. But this was my first time running a debate and we wanted to keep things moving. And glad you enjoyed the food - that was on us, by the way! Though we thank Jerry for his support and use of the building.
BernieOHare to 12:09, I appreciate what you did. I hosted a DA debate in Nazareth and know it’s no easy task. I had nearly 100 people bc I pushed it on my blog and Facebook one a week for three weeks. I created a Facebook event, which might have helped I loved the bio for tge candidates as well. You produced a YouTube video, which I’m sure will help some make up their minds. I’d say fewer questions and more time. Thanks for putting it on.
I said it before, Colon is a "go along to get along", finger in the wind, rubber stamp. He was a rubber stamp for Donchez and now for Reynolds. He has no backbone.
And if the council had any guts they'd direct their solicitor to intervene on their behalf in the landfill matter.
Bethlehem needs a Bryan Callahan on the council. He is a straight-talking regular guy.
I too attended the Bethlehem Democrat Candidate debate for the purchase of better understanding the candidates and the issues.
What stuck me as odd was the selection of issues that the moderators asked. Of the 10 plus questions, I did not hear any that addressed the “core mission” issues of the City, ie streets, parks, water, sewer public safety and how we can save on taxes. Instead, the questions and responses seemed like a left wing agenda.
Democrats have done an effective job in framing the issues. Is homelessness for 100 people in the city, affordable housing, DEI and climate action really the most important concerns from the 80,000 residents of the city.
Congratulations to any that are willing to serve on the Council, but I question the motivations of some of the candidates. We already have a Council with “group thin” all democrat, most very pro more government spending and only one male on Council. Wish we had more balance of opinion on the council to question the extremely left wing, progressive approach of our mayor.
BTW, I got the feeling the two moderators wanted to have more to say than the candidates – that was odd. Felt like when the reporter wants to be the story, not the story.
12:09 is Ben Felzer. He tried to insert his name but was unable.
Once upon a time a Mayor was voted in to be there for the citizens. Now a days a Mayor is there for future political gain.
Reynolds is a career ladder climbing politician. He cares about one thing, Wee Willie!
He already has his agenda geared toward running for Congress. What a joke!
Post a Comment