Local Government TV

Thursday, September 05, 2019

Meth Found in NorCo's Historic Courtroom 1

Faces of Meth
Northampton County's majestic Courtroom No.1, in existence since 1861, is the venue where officials are sworn into office and immigrants are naturalized. Portraits of long dead judges adorn the walls in a cavernous room with a high ceiling that reaches to the heavens. The centerpiece is the judges' bench, raised above everyone else. It's a place that inspires awe. It's also where a deputy sheriff recently discovered a envelope containing meth.

It's possible to keep a secret in Northampton County, but never for very long. I first heard yesterday that meth had been discovered in the well of Courtroom No. 1, near the jury box. The only people who sit there are lawyers and an occasional probation officer. I contacted Sheriff Richard Johnston to find out if what I had been told is rumor. It is unfortunately true. It is even more unfortunate that there's been no real investigation.

August 8 was arraignment day in Northampton County. On that day, many criminal defendants walk into the courtroom, but are directed alongside one side of the room to the benches behind the well of the court. Inside that well, and on the opposite side of where the public enter and exit, is the jury box. Attorneys sit there. The public is barred from the well and especially the jury box

Before arraignments got underway on August 8, "Boomer" (a K-9 with the Sheriff's office) and a Deputy searched the area for explosives and found nothing. According to the Sheriff, they also looked for contraband, although Boomer has no training yet in drug detection. This was at 7:45 am.

After the morning arraignments, Courtroom 1 was searched again at 12:45 am. This is when a Deputy observed a small glassine envelope containing a clear glassy substance, along with a pack of rolling papers. This was near the jury box, where only attorneys and an occasional probation officer sit.

The Sheriff's Department reviewed a video of the area and was unable to pinpoint anything conclusive because of the location and pedestrian traffic in that area, which gets heavy as numerous lawyers move around.

The substance was field-tested and determined to be methamphetamine.

According to the Sheriff, the DA's office was informed "of the circumstances and the lack of a suspect" and then the suspected meth was destroyed.

This was news to the actual DA, who knew nothing about the incident.

I believe there are suspects and they consist of every lawyer who was in the well of the court that day, particularly those who were in the jury box. I am even told that some lawyers can name the lawyer who dropped his meth bag. An investigation is difficult now because the meth has been destroyed. What's unfortunate is that a local lawyer using meth is a problem, both to his clients and himself. What the Sheriff's office did just enabled a probable addict.

29 comments:

  1. No fingerprints on the pack of meth. Or they didn't look.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Be real! the only way that stuff gets destroyed is if it is ordered to be destroyed. The Courtroom, lawyers, etc...
    This was made to go away. Anyone else and someone would be in trouble. It is and always has been an insiders game in the Peoples Republic of Northapton County.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 12:12 am,
    Exactly what i thought. Whoever left it was already fingerprinted for their crime.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Best to destroy evidence before the investigation is complete. Maybe video should be reviewed or was that also destroyed

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow sounds like a cover up.....or incompetence. Also, can an explosives detection dog be a drug detection dog. That sounds like overload for the poor dog. Is the dog a union member and does the dog have to walk on egg shells like the deputes?

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is a dog bites man story. We're talking about lawyers, here. These ain't exactly model citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't think explosives detection dogs can be effectively cross trained for narcotics detection. If so, they're rare.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another theory - client gave meth to lawyer to “dispose” of for him/her fearing a search of defendants entering courthouse and betting lawyers wouldn’t be searched? Ethical nightmare if true, but also now apparently a moot point.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is anyone surprised that a lawyer could be a drug user, you have to be kidding.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Are we sure that it wasn't the dog's?

    If my job was to poke my nose into explosives, I'd have a drug problem too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think the judges using that courtroom should be raising hell over no follow up investigation with testing unless it was one of their buddies! I am pretty sure the guilty one has already has his/her name mentioned in quiet whispers. Maybe soon someone will be taking a needed quietly arranged "leave of absence."

    ReplyDelete
  12. Reportedly was an immigration lawyer who is no stranger to controversial situations including one a few years ago where another attorney passed away in his office.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yeah. Whatever happened to the lawyer who died in the other lawyer's office? That story was kept hidden. Journalism's job is to cover stories like a blanket - until they stop breathing. Best place to get away with criminal activity is at the courthouse, apparently.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have no idea what you're even talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Damn it, I knew I dropped something...I mean!...nothing...nothing

    ReplyDelete
  16. omg you people gossip so much its annoying.

    ReplyDelete
  17. If it was Ritalin or Adderall there wouldn't be a fuss...and now that it has been destroyed we won't know if was the street form and not just a crushed Adderall.

    Drugs are held behind private paywalls enforced by the government, to be obtained only through the proper organized syndicates that own the legal language and give the same pharmacologic drug legitimacy.

    A small amount of this drug being found in a courthouse is nothing compared to the amount being passed out to children in almost every school, or the amount being used by law students to get through law school.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Maybe it was the tip staff that was recently let go?

    ReplyDelete
  19. No tip staff was recently let go. One tip staff is battling stage four lung cancer, and this is the second time you have attempted to demean him with lies.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yea, Lawyers are such upstanding citizens. Just look at the clown that writes this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  22. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I have deleted two pieces of complete disinformation from an ugly person who attacks people but hides behind a veil of anonymity. If you wish to libel someone please do it in a way that clearly identifies you so you can be sued.

    ReplyDelete
  24. These types of people are the ones deciding the future of others and even children. Does anyone remember Nitchmans grade school methfreak principle naked and whacking off to porn.
    The after pic look like the two bearded fat lady that raped and dismember our poor Grace that also fell victim to a bicounty criminality that has become a exceptable modern social ills acting under cover under colour of local law!

    ReplyDelete
  25. You mentioned the Sheriff informed the District Attorney. You also stated the District Attorney claimed this was the 1st he heard of it. What s that about??

    ReplyDelete
  26. You mentioned that the Sheriff said he informed the District Attorney. You also stated the District Attorney said this was the 1st he had heard of this. What s that about?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lies and cover-up sounds like the answer to your question.

      Delete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.