Local Government TV

Monday, December 11, 2017

Will Brown Veto Budget, Millage Rate?

One of my readers claims that outgoing NorCo Exec John Brown is on vacation and we'll never see him again. I believe it's entirely possible that we'll see him again soon, and not in a good way.  He could veto the budget approved December 7, the millage rate ordinance adopted by Council, or both. He has until December 14 to do so, and could even do it after Council meets that day. He has until December 17 to veto the millage rate ordinance. I actually expect him to veto one or both measures, and at the last possible minute. 

After promising Lamont McClure's transition team that he wanted to leave office on a high note, Brown pulled his own Pearl Harbor when NorCo Council met on December 7 to approve next year's budget and millage rate. He proposed a one-mill tax reduction ($8 million) to his own budget. He did so without a corresponding $8 million cut in spending. This was an attempt to sabotage McClure, forcing him to dip into cash reserves and limiting the county's ability to deal with an emergency.

Because Republicans were unable to agree on whether the tax cut should be a full or a half mill, they ended up with the millage rate originally proposed.

Three of them - Seth Vaughn, Glenn Geissinger and Mat Benol - are out to hurt the county. They voted against everything, even the salary for professional employees. Not surprisingly, all three are on their way out.

On Friday, Vaughn used Facebook to lash out at his fellow Republicans on Council for refusing to agree to a one-mill tax cut. "[F]our Republicans on council, Matt Deitz, Hayden Phillips, Peg Ferraro, and John Cusick voted against it. Keep that in mind next time you go to the ballot box."

What surprised me is that Brown's wife Tina slammed them, too. "True colors," she said of this quartet. Never mind that Peg Ferraro invited Tina and Brown to her fundraiser at Holy Family and let him give a speech that was so boring that Nazareth Ambulance had to be called in to revive the cooks. That's gratitude, Tina! Up until now, I considered you a civilian.  If you want to engage in these debates, you become fair game.

Given Tina Brown's comment, my guess is that the attempt to sabotage McClure is alive and well. But the Home Rule Charter may very well protect the citizens of Northampton County.

As I said, his options are to veto the budget, the millage rate ordinance, or both.

Veto of the budget. - The Home Rule Charter does give the Executive authority to veto the budget, but he may only delete or decrease items. So he can decrease the fund balance by $8 million and set the stage fora new millage rate ordinance.

Veto of the millage rate ordinance. - The millage rate ordinance is a separate ordinance, and the Executive can veto it, just like he can veto any ordinance. But guess what? Council would have no authority under the Home Rule Charter to adopt a new ordinance. It lacks the time for a new ordinance, which would take a month for two readings. It would be unable to adopt a new millage rate except as an emergency ordinance. And that's impossible for two reasons. First, there's no emergency. Council and Brown are just playing politics. Second, the Charter expressly states that "an emergency ordinance shall not levy taxes."

That would necessarily mean that the millage rate set in 2017 or the one that Brown vetoed would remain in effect. So Brown and his minions will try, but they will fail.

The law has never been their strong suit.

Ken Kraft had a good retort to Vaughn's false outrage. "If [Brown] wanted to create a budget with a lower tax rate, he would have done it from the beginning. What don't you understand? What part of County government don't you get? I understand exactly what you are trying to do, you're trying to be a vindictive prick and pass an illegal unfunded budget so the next guys are in a bind, you are probably the one who said those words about, lets cut taxes and see them balance the budget... little passive aggressive these days since the voters handed you your well deserved defeat... ."

10 comments:

  1. Supposedly Vaughn's wife goes by a different last name and also posts on his Facebook. It is obvious there is a game afoot. These people will hurt the county just to be vindictive? Has anyone ever seen behavior like this? They should all be ashamed of themselves.

    Kraft is right, these Trumpians are showing their true colors.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Geissinger an Vaughn are the faces of the new republican party. They are the apostles of Trump and ole judge Moore. They will put politics over principle and do what ever they must to make their political point.

    Sadly, Benol, Cusick, Ferraro and Phillips will tag along wringing their hands.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Playing with taxpayers HARD EARNED DOLLARS! Go back to Commissioners.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It just shows how Brown & Company ran this government for the last four years. No need to rehash their abysmal record because the voters saw through their BS and sent them packing. The only survivor, pocketbook Peg, is still carrying on with their agenda of self-propogation and posturing. No need, because Ms. Peg is writing her own political obituary. 2018 is on the horizon and these pariahs will be gone with the wind.

    ReplyDelete
  5. a bunch of soar losers...they should be embarrassed to show their faces to the citizens of Northampton County.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What the hell has happened to the Republican party?!?!? They have completely lost the plot both locally and nationally.

    Fiscal responsibility was always one of the calling cards for Republicans and a good counter balance to "Tax & Spend" Democrats. The recent behavior is dramatically inconsistent with what has been the bread & butter of the party for decades.

    I'm no conspiracy theorist, but how the party allowed this schism within itself to happen is just baffling. I hope that they are able to somehow able to fix themselves, but honestly have a hard time seeing the "alt-Right" and Trump Republicans coexisting long term with any moderate or for that matter the traditional suburban/Wall Street type Republicans. It just seems to be a coalition of convenience between the two and both sides would like to see the other removed from having any influence in the parties direction.

    You would think the Dems would make some attempt to veer towards a more centrist agenda to potentially attract moderate elements of the Reps and independents, but am sure they'll view this as further reason to double down on pushing further to the left...

    ReplyDelete
  7. NORCO Dems are centrists, always hav been

    ReplyDelete
  8. The comment at 11:03 is correct. Can any dem be more left than pocketbook Ferraro? Seriously! People listen to their media and that is how they think.

    NORCO dems are as fiscally responsible as any republican but they do not get as worked up about gender and cultural issues.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In addition to reducing tax revenue by 8 million, you didn't mention that Mr. Brown et. al. also wanted to lock up 6.7 million in the stabilization fund. Combined together, that made no financial sense. So they lost.

    Assuming that nothing changes, Lamont McClure was a big winner here. More money in the budget went to open space, employee raises, and there will be a significant surplus at the start of his term next month.

    ReplyDelete
  10. He would never have proposed this if he won. His county council would never have proposed any cut for next year if they had won the election. This is nothing but a political stunt.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.