You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
Thanks for the clarification.
ReplyDeleteSusan Ellis Wilde, the solicitor, is a former recipient of funds from the friends of Ed Pawlowski PAC in her county race. Therefore, I find it hard to believe that "Fed Ed" didn't have anything to with it. Knowing Roger MacLean, he would not forward anything without checking on the validity of it. Suffering under 7-years of "Fed Ed", he knows the devious one probably better than anybody.
ReplyDeleteWilde has shown herself to be an excellent solicitor for the city.
ReplyDeleteHer name is Susan Ellis Wild. She has an excellent reputation among lawyers in Northampton and Lehigh County for fairness and legal acumen. I am extremely impressed with how she has handled herself during a very difficult time. Few lawyers could do what she has done. She represents neither Fed Ed nor Council. She represents the City, and it is lucky to have her. I disagree with some of her legal opinions, but that's probably bc I am wrong. Fed Ed has made lots of bad choices, but with Wild, he hit a home run.
ReplyDeleteThe team of city attorneys did the bidding of the criminal City Manager.
ReplyDeleteHmmm....
ReplyDeleteLet's see. A department run buy an attorney with Democratic Party up and down the food chain, and one who has taken political money from a disgraced and soon to be indicted mayor.
Perhaps the solicitor is clean as the driven snow but it has the faint order of something not quite right.
Interesting that as the penultimate act approaches every lawyer on the floor is lawyered up and walking on egg shells.
A simple statement of fact.
Your real objection appears to be that she is a Democrat. I have been critical of Fed Ed since 2007 and have never hesitated at calling out Dems who engage in unethical conduct. I am very impressed by Wild. I don't place much weight on comments about integrity made by people who themselves fail to say who they are.
ReplyDeleteLehigh Valley Redacted
ReplyDeleteIf censorship is good enough for your pal Fed Ed's solicitor, why shouldn't you do it as well?
Much black ink on that REsponse document, if it can be called that!
ReplyDelete