Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Friday, October 14, 2016
NorCo Recorder: E-Recording Just as Time Consuming
"We need those positions," one of the clerks told me. She and several others pointed out that, though the real state market is no longer going gangbusters, like it was doing in 2006, things are busy. My own review of recordings over the past four years indicate an average of about 37,000 documents recorded per year. Though residential sales are down, the industrial market is hot.
Hunter's claim that e-recording has made life easier for clerks is also false. It's certainly true that this option has reduced foot traffic into the Recorder's Office. Title companies can simply email recordings. So it is a great convenience to them and participating attorneys and banks. But the convenience ends there. It is actually a little more time consuming to process an e-recording,clerks tell me.
Jim Hunter could learn this if he ever dropped into the office. I've never seen him there, and believe me, he's hard to miss. Almost as hard to miss as I am.
The real estate market fluctuates. Instead of the complete elimination of these positions, I'd suggest funding two of the slots at $0, so that the positions are there in case the need to fill them arises. Otherwise, County Council will have to adopt a resolution, and that is time-consuming. Also, Jim should visit the office and speak to the people who work there, and take a closer look at filling the positions.
If he did that, I'd offer to buy him lunch.
But that would be a bribe.
9 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
bleeding heart liberal cry baby county workers wwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa - we actually have to work - wwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
ReplyDeleteHunter has no clue, same for Brown and Cathy Allen. Council as a whole no better.
ReplyDeleteTime for voters to make changes next election!
Humans grasping to keep jobs in the face of technology. Buggy whip makers faced the same challenge. Unions kept firemen (coal shovelers) on trains long after coal engines were replaced with diesel and electric. Progress eventually marches on.
ReplyDeleteA bit of a history lesson 9:19...
ReplyDeleteWhile it's true that train firemen were kept on, it wasn't because the union had gotten them do-nothing jobs. The time was provided for training them on jobs that still exist. Jobs that required more skill than just using a shovel.
The firemen became conductors, brakemen, electricians, and even engineers of those trains.
Without their Unions they would have ended up in unemployment lines.
9:18, There must be something wrong with your reading comprehension. As I point out in my story, eRecording has actually increased the amount of time that it takes a clerk to record a document.
ReplyDeleteA bit of a history lesson for 10:17 ...
ReplyDeleteFiremen were still required to be on trains until 1985, 26 years after the conversion from coal. 26 years. That's a lot of retraining time.
If eRecording increased the amount of clerk time, perhaps we should go back to paper and pen.
It does take just as much time or more, but does spare the public the inconvenience of bringing the recording to the courthouse. For that reason, it is probably worth it, but it does not make the office more efficient. Jim Hunter got that wrong.
ReplyDeleteNot sure where the counties numbers are coming from, but the current real estate market in the Valley is not down, with over 1,100 more homes sold in 2016 YTD than the comparable time in 2014 and 400 more than a year ago. It's definitely not the 6,954 it was in 2006 (currently 5,922), but it shouldn't have taken the county 10 years to decide that volume wouldn't continue forever. As a point of reference the 2011 number was 3,690 home sold YTD. These numbers from Lehigh Valley Area Realtors.
ReplyDeleteI have written before about the LVAR and how they skew numbers to make it look like things are going gangbusters. They count agreements of sale as homes sold. I go by the recorded deed, and the number is ALWAYS lower than represented by an outfit who is trying to create a buzz. I have written about this several times, and think it is time to do so again. The newspapers accept the data from LVAR as reality without doing any independent research.
ReplyDelete