Local Government TV

Sunday, April 10, 2016

NBC10 AG Debate For Democratic Candidates



On Thursday, NBC10 broadcast a debate among the three candidates seeking

2 comments:

  1. Morganelli and Zappalla were far ahead of Shapiro in this debate. Although Morganelli was sharper on some questions (in particular "three consumer issues" where Zappalla could only think of two). And Morganelli made one great point about the Sandusky charity that Corbett okayed giving money to when he full well knew the guy and charity were being investigated by his previous office.

    As for Shapiro, this guy in less than 22 months of getting his J.D. was elected to the U.S. House, so how long did he ever practice law? It's doubtful he took the bar exam the day after graduation. And he went to Georgetown where most end up as legislation lawyers. Shapiro constantly named dropped Pennsylvania Commission on Crime & Delinquency (PCCD). But PCCD mostly handles deputy sheriff and state constable training and certification. It's not like they over see Act 120 police departments. That would be Mpoetc. And the courts are overseen by AOPC. Basically PCCD Chairman is a fancy way of saying "Law Librarian".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shapiro is the sole politician of the three. Neither Morganelli nor Zappala hhave any interest beyond that office, and both have ideas on what they would do as the state's chief law enforcement officer. Shapiro is looking for nothing more than a springboard to launch a campaign for Governor or the US Senate.

    As I've noted in several of my posts, i support John and even contributed to his campaign. I'd love to see the best DA I've ever seen get elected. The fact that Rendell, Wolf and Obama have come out for Shapiro is somewhat scary. He'll preserve the pay-to-play structure while pretending he has integrity. But I don't think any of the Ds will be elected. This position will go back to the GOP.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.