Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Monday, February 15, 2016
Unlike Schlossberg, Ryan MacKenzie Returns Haddad Contribution
Unlike Darth Voter, MacKenzie returned the money. In fact, he returned $2,000, which must have included $1,000 from a previous year.
MacKenzie rejected tainted money, while Schlossberg is using it to pay himself.
14 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
why would Haddad give Mackenzie $2,000. What did he get for it? That's the question you should be asking....
ReplyDeleteHe didn't get anything for it. The money was returned. And I'll let you know when I'm interested in what some anonymous coward thinks I should be asking..
ReplyDelete1:07,
ReplyDeleteJust the little guys way of slapping the other rep because he really can't find anything else. As I am sure you have noticed this is his MO.
Why did MacKenzie accept it in the first place? What is the connection? There is nothing to justify a $2k contribution.
ReplyDeleteNo one gives 2000 without expecting something in return. I wonder when Mackenzie returned the 2000. Bernie how can we find out?
ReplyDeleteBernie how do you know for certain that Haddad got nothing from Mackenzie?
ReplyDeleteThe above attacks at MacKenzie are made, not bc he did anything wrong, but because he is a Republican. The argument that "they all do this" is simply wrong. At the time Mackenzie accepted this contribution, Haddad had not been accused at anything and there would be no reason to suspect any problem. But ince Haddad pleaded guilty to pay-to-play as out-and-out bribery, the only ethical thing to do is return any money contributed by the entrepreneur. I dion't much care for MacKenzie or his politics. But he did what is right, while Schlossberg is ethically tone deaf.
ReplyDeleteYou highlight an important topic, fund raising. What if all candidates were allowed to only spend a specific dollar amount. So much pressure would be eliminated.
ReplyDeleteSclossberg is an exercise in bad government.
ReplyDeleteBOH Quote "I don't much care for MacKenzie or his politics. But he did what is right, while Schlossberg is ethically tone deaf".
ReplyDeleteWhat exactly, in regards to his politics, do you not agree with?
Can you honestly say the democrat party has done a fantastic job in the Lehigh Valley over the last decade? If so , for whom ? It might be better for the pay top play criminals from both parties, but I seriously can't think of anything the democrat party did to help all people? If I missed something quite obvious, I will be the first to say thank you for the education.
They have a done a great job for their special interest groups, big money developers, unions, lawyers, and illegals.
I could careless about party. If they demonstrate poor judgment, drunk driving issues, drug issues, continual ethics "issues" , and other scams like pay to play , ghost voting and paying oneself 13,000 dollars to himself....they need to be gone.
Now where is the accountability, let alone an investigation, for guys like Schlossberg ? Where is the outrage? Wonder how the so called leadership from the democrat party feel about Schlossberg ethics and other violations? Did I miss the comments from the democrat party leadership?
From what I have seen over the past two years, MacKenzie has been a reliable ally for a Republican agenda, to which I am philosophically opposed. But I share your dismay at the lack of outrage over the moral decay so evident in Allentown Democrats. I am heartened to see City Council begin to do the right thing, but I am disgusted tgat some of those who consider themselves reformers will turn a blind eye to Darth Voter. Even assuming tgat giving tainted money to charity is acceptable, this ethical oil slick engaged in ghost voting, improperly reimbursed himself and failed to report $1000 Fed Ed sent him in July. I doubt very much that Schlossberg can be defeated,
ReplyDeleteIf Senator Brown decides to retire, there is the potential of a Repub primary between MacKenzie and Simmons in 2 years. MacKenzie would represent the moderate wing of the party.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteNo way Sir Mackenzie runs for Browne's seat. That seat is way to urban and democrat for him. He would actually have to knock on doors and talk to the peasants of Allentown. That is beneath Sir Mackenzie. He wants to go right for Dent's seat. That is nice and gerrymandered for him like his current house seat.
ReplyDelete