Local Government TV

Thursday, February 25, 2016

183 House Seat: Grammes' Nomination Petition Under Siege

Nomination petitions filed by Marc Grammes in the 183rd State House race have been challenged by three citizens. Gammes, a Republican, is running for the seat being vacated by Julie Harhart. Two other Republicans - Cindy Miller and Zachary Mako - are also running.

Two Democrats are also seeking to win the seat - Phillips Armstrong and Terri Powell.

Updated 3 PM, Grammes Petition Challenged For Failure to File Statement of Financial Interests, Powell and Mako Nomination Petitions Challenged as Well.

According to a news release from Cindy Miller, in which she refers to herself as "small businesswoman, trusted township supervisor, wife, and mother," she states Grammes' petition has been challenged because he neglected to file his Statrment of Financial Interests with the Ethics Commission at the time he filed his petition. If this is true, his campaign is in trouble. In other cases, the state supreme court has ruled that this omission is a "fatal defect."

In addition to the challenge directed at Grammes, there have been two other nomination challenges in the 183rd legislative distict.

The noimination petition filed by Republican Zachary Mako has been challenged by the same attorney who filed against Mako - Larry Otter. In addition, a legal attempt to remove Democrat Terri Powell from the ballot has been mounted by a group of four Democrats represented by Adam Bonin.

25 comments:

  1. I do not know at this juncture. There may actually be another challenge aimed at Mako as well, and Grammes claims Cindy Miller is behind them

    ReplyDelete
  2. You never know I guess. Politics.......

    ReplyDelete
  3. i would think with 600 signatures, this is indeed a nuisance suit. however, as a true outsider who was interested in this seat, i find his claim of politics amusing. not only is his party support, i.e. eckhart and browning, partisan, they're partisan for lehigh county republicans, vs. those from northampton.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There's no doubt Cindy Miller is behind it, this has Mr. Harhart's fingerprints all over it. Julie played the nice old lady while her husband was the backyard bully. Old habits die hard when you are trying to bestow your kingdom to the chosen princess.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have heard whispers that Terri Powell's Petitions are being challenged, also.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rep Harhart did not choose, John Brown did. It was reported here on LVR that the Northampton seat on NorCo Gaming control board was switched without explanation, despite the a very respectable job by the prior board member who wanted to retain the seat. Makes sense now.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You have a typo in your headline.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for pointing out the tyopo, which I've corrected.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting and amusing, these allegations by Grammes. What plausible reason might there be for a local politician to fail to disclose finances? Surely must have been caused by his opponent, and not a blatant disregard for the election law that governs all of us. Suggest creating a checklist of stuff to submit when running for office, will be useful next time around.

    ReplyDelete
  10. D Grim 6:14. Finance form was filed with 670 signatures and available for review. Was not filed in Ethics office.
    That is the dispute. No disregard for the law. Harrisburg wants to control the election. Voters should decide.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This will be a tough race in both primary and general as this is a Presidential election year. Dems will be out in greater numbers. Any other year this would be a Republican landslide.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If Miller pushes Grammes and Mako off primary. Potential for write in and Independent candidates will push election over to Dems.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bob Guzzardi was thrown off the ballot in 2014 for almost the same reason Grammes is being challenged. His chances of survival are grim and it will cost campaign $$ to fight it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it was filed, and simply just not filed with the Ethics Comm'n, Grammes might skate. He would have to make an evidentiary record as to exactly what happened.

      Delete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have deleted a number of off-topic comments attacking various individuals involved in another state house race. If you can't follow the rules, you don't deserve to be heard.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The sins of the mother shall not be visited on the son. It is obvious someone is wasting a lot of time trying to dig up dirt, but that is very weak.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 10:17 post rather confusing.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.