One of the many people running for office is none other than Tricia Mezzacappa. She has filed nomination petitions for a slot on West Easton Borough Council. All candidates seeking elective office are required to file a copy of their Statement of Financial Interests, along with the petition. Mezzacappa has done so, but it's defective. She has failed to list a creditor.I know this because I happen to be that creditor.
Under the state Ethics Act, Mezzacappa is required to list the name and address of any creditor to whom she owes more than $6,500, along with the annual interest rate. She currently owes me $70,991.81, with an annual interest rate of 6%. She failed to list the debt.
According to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, a nomination petition may be challenged on the basis of a defective ethics statement like the one Mezzacappa filed. Hopefully, a West Easton Republican will step forward.
Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
▼
Thursday, March 12, 2015
116 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
That is absolutely correct, Bernie. She is supposed to list you, your address, and the rate of interest she is paying - which according to your page is 6%. She fu*$ed up.
ReplyDeleteTurn her ass in, for all the trouble she has put you through - including defaming you and then dragging out paying the damages the court awarded you.
I can't challenge her petition. But an R who lives in West Easton can.
ReplyDeleteHow can you keep complaining about her posting on an anonymous allowed blog, when you post this type of stuff? You are encouraging her and baiting her. I don't think the judge will approve of your actions. You complain about her contact, yet you continue to harass her and instigate contact.
ReplyDeleteMezzacappa has the votes to win, people in Grossville are tired of the gavel wielding tyranny that takes place during council meetings. Thank god for a little sanity in the form of Dan DePaul otherwise it would be a complete shit show.
ReplyDelete12:48, people are entitled to know when a candidate for public office files a dishonest ethics statement. My hope is that she will be removed.
ReplyDelete12:54, Mezzacappa, you are one again in violation of your bail conditions.
"How can you keep complaining about her posting on an anonymous allowed blog, when you post this type of stuff? You are encouraging her and baiting her. I don't think the judge will approve of your actions. You complain about her contact, yet you continue to harass her and instigate contact.
ReplyDeleteYou are incorrect. She is a political candidate, and this story is about paperwork associated with her petition to run for office. Not baiting. News.
March 16 is when MezzaCRAZY's campaign begins - in court on criminal charges. BWAHAHAHAHAHA
ReplyDeleteGo check out her Facebook page on her campaign - she's so embarrassed she deleted it. Read em and weep - straight to the bottom of the heap. Democrats sweep 4 available seats and she remains the old maid.
12:54 is Mezzacappa, breaking a court order for about the 4th night in a row. Put on a slab of bacon and some yummy cocoa - the night has just begun.
Vote for me. I break the law at will, and believe all the judges that find me guilty are wrong, but I complain bitterly when my town council members don't follow the law. In other words, I am proud to be a raving hypocrite. Vote for me!
ReplyDeleteI don't think the judge will approve of your actions.
ReplyDeleteSince there is nothing unethical or illegal about posting election news based on inspection of a public record, you are grossly mistaken.
Besides, it is unrelated to the criminal charge against her. But you wouldn't care about this minor detail since you just wanted to deposit your pile of dung here. Look - you made that! Touch it.
The mil rate has been creeping higher and higher, people are fed up. There is no transparency, even that short bus driving cretin Matthew Dees agrees with Mezzacappa on many points, thankfully he has largely stopped blogging about her probably because to most it comes across as obsessively vindictive.
ReplyDeleteNot too many people singing Kelly's praises these days, no R will betray her to appease the Nazareth hobgoblin.
anon 1:32, How is that butt love working out for you? Bernie, loves your work.
ReplyDeleteLots of potential for change if Dees and Mezzacappa are elected, wish they would work together instead of squabbling as both have strong analytical minds along with superb oratory abilities.
ReplyDeleteSeeing west easton run into the ground via nepotism, senility and apathy makes me sad. Too bad the dailies are in cahoots with the author of this blog to tarnish her image otherwise she could be in Harrisburg.
even that short bus driving cretin Matthew Dees agrees with Mezzacappa on many points, thankfully he has largely stopped blogging about her probably because to most it comes across as obsessively vindictive.
ReplyDeleteMezzacappa is persona non grata. Other than a transparency issue, there is no common ground we share in the upcoming election. Even her statement above shows her true nature. I still believe her to be mentally unstable, lacking any civility, or filter.
She would not be an asset on West Easton council. Anyone who writes to Wilson in an effort to torpedo a hoped for agreement toward police coverage isn't acting in the best interest of the residents. Anyone who calls an employer of someone they disagree with, to give false witness in an effort to have them fired, is evidence of a sociopath. Her personal vendettas are too numerous and she cares nothing about others.
Nobody should associate my name with hers.
Matthew A. Dees
3:07 AM : Let me fix that last sentence for you: Good thing the dailies are in cahoots with the esteemed author of this blog to expose her ideologies; she should be confined in SCI Muncy.
ReplyDeleteThe above comment comes from Mezzacappa, and is one of the many false claims she made while on the radio. The dailies run from Mezzacappa and are mostly afraid of her bc she sues them and costs them money. The Express Times has actually allowed her to post on their comment board under numerous pseudonyms , has even quoted from them, and has published several LTEs containing her venom. If anything, that paper is in cahoots with her, not against her.
ReplyDeleteThank you for for respecting the sensibilities of your readers by not posting the hideous horse face picture to this post. Since it is election season, you may want to consider resurrecting the Wicked Witch picture - that one is much more representative. WYSIWYG.
ReplyDelete"even that short bus driving cretin Matthew Dees agrees with Mezzacappa"
ReplyDeleteThis comes from Mezzacappa, pulling her usual all-nighter. Her bail conditions bar her from posting here, but she doesn't care about laws.
West Easton voters deserve a lot better than some crazed woman with an ax to grid with everyone around her, and who thinks she is far above the law.
Imagine of she were elected, and she was sitting on council with all the targets of her viscous behavior and venom? Gross, Gross, Schlottman, Nodoline?
Is this an improvement for WE? A bull in a china shop? Not at all. A politician needs to be able to get along with those around them - not threaten to drown them.
Mezzacappa - wrong for West Easton, wrong for Pennsylvania.
Ex Times posted election filings this morning and TM, and the entire West Easton ballot for that matter, were listed as uncontested. Does this mean, barring write in votes, that she is assured of a seat? Did I read this right?
ReplyDeleteI'm trying to get an answer to that question. One person says yes, and another says no.
ReplyDeleteWhat do I have to do to contest her petition?
ReplyDeleteI thought there were 4 seats, so the R and the 4 D's goes through the primary and than 5 people vie for 4 seats. No?
ReplyDeleteThey are all uncontested in the primary, in other words.
If you are a West Easton R and wish to contest the petition, contact me at bohare5948@aol.com
ReplyDeleteThere are four seats up for election, so unless someone withdraws prior to March 25, The four Dems should move forward to the general, and the one Repub, and the top four vote getters in the general will get in. In 2013, TM was odd woman out in this scenario, receiving the least votes of five candidates for four seats, with four Dems elected. She got 19 votes of 41 Repub's who showed up. Whoa daddy.
ReplyDeleteBut if any of the 5 withdrawals, the remaining four will get in, since there are four seats open.
I wrote the comment at 11:53 and the 19 votes was in the primary.
ReplyDeleteShe got 48 votes in the general, and the lowest vote counts for the four Repubs were 80, 83, 92 and 92.
She shouldn't do any better this time. She shot herself in the foot in 2013 by getting into the snafu with Garcia in April. This time, she kicked off her campaign she blew off the other foot with a criminal charge. What will it be next time?
Hopefully, her home will be sold and there will be no next time.
ReplyDeleteWinning a seat...scary thought. Good source of amusement though...like reading MAD magazine!
ReplyDeleteBernie - any update on the "uncontested" issue? If there are 4 seats, the primary should result in all of each party going to the general, IF 4 or less of each party run, which is the case here. So they are all uncontested in the primary. But then it comes down to votes in the general election, and the lowest count is booted, and the other 4 are in.
ReplyDeleteThis looks like it will come down to a contest between Mr. Lewis and Mezzacappa. Dees will batter the crap out of her. Lewis is kind of laid back - he needs to get out there and make his case, but he has several months to do it. And an R needs to contest TM's disclosure form.
When will you vicious beasts leave this poor, young woman alone. Enough is enough
ReplyDeleteShe is not young, and she is not poor. She is acting like she is poor, by having a public defender appointed to defend herself against criminal charges. But she owns a car and house outright. And she was foolish enough to defame Bernie, and then foolish enough to not show in court to challenge the damages. She is 50 - old enough to know she is doing wrong, but she does it over and over. She's headed the same way Gregory did - landing in jail as a senior citizen.
People need to know what this menace has done. She didn't need to run for council.
She promised council she would be a thorn in their side like radioactive waste, and she's making good on that promise.
ReplyDeleteWhen will she stop harassing council and leave them alone?
There are four seats, so it appears Mezzacappa will win the primary but should lose in the general. I spoke to a West Easton R, and we both agreed it is probably dangerous for this person to challenge Mezzacappa's petition.
ReplyDeleteLet the people decide. Stop derailing democracy by harassing this woman.
ReplyDeleteBernie does the hearing on the 16th of this month have a time set yet, I'd like to attend the spectacle.
ReplyDeleteKind Regards, Belvidere Bear.
Hopefully after the 16th things can calm down. The judge will probably order you not to write about this woman anymore if you want no contact.
ReplyDelete3:34, the hearing is set for 1 pm
ReplyDeleteJudge Yetter's courtroom?
ReplyDelete4:38, the judge will decide if there is evidence that a crime was committed and that Mezzacappa committed it. He may also impose new bail conditions bc she is not cooperating with law enforcement, is armed,and has a history of violent threats.
ReplyDeleteYes
ReplyDeleteJudge Yetter, please consider the following blog and enter your name into this sites search engine.
ReplyDeletehttp://lehighvalleyramblings.blogspot.com/2011/05/richard-yetter-needs-anger-management.html
5:49 is Mezzacappa. She wouldn't know what to do with an apostrophe if it came and bit her on the nose.
ReplyDelete"The judge will probably order you not to write about this woman anymore if you want no contact."
ReplyDeleteMy God Bernie, you have some morons for readers. All you seek is partial payment for what this woman owes you - in this case a car that you now own.
If as a bonus, this woman stops posting on your blog, bonus.
This reminds me of House of Cards...LOL!
ReplyDeleteThere is no cause for the judge in the criminal matter of Mezzacappa concealing assets to issue any directive at all to Bernie regarding contact with her.
ReplyDeleteHer obligation to not contact him is because it is a bail condition.
People have a really twisted idea of how the law should work for them when they find it is causing them a hardship. As Jerry would say, that's a shame.
She is now trying to poison the judge by noting an article I wrote when he was running for the job, and backed his opponent. Guess what? I have also written articles critical of numerous judges on every level, from Saylor to Melivin (before she was in trouble) to Moran, Baratta and Koury. But I know them well enough to know they do not take these things personally and never felt i was treated unfairly. Your attempt to poison Judge Yetter is a reflection of how you think judges react, not how they are. Knock yourself out.
ReplyDeleteOMG, here's are the facts, looked at the race in the voter registration office (1) 4 people running for 3 four year seats on the D side, on the R side 1 crazy (2) 2 people running for 1 two year seat on the D side, on the R side 1 crazy.
ReplyDeleteYou use this blog as a weapon and are running out of local figures who have not at one time been in your cross hairs.
ReplyDeleteThe attempt to deny this woman a fruitful and prosperous existence nothing short of a civil rights violation. There was never any accusation of pedophilia, and your reputation was already about as soiled as the undergarments of a Joey Chesnut on the 4th of July.
Stop playing kingmaker and go back to scuttling about the prothonotary for Angle, Atiyeh, and Stoffa.
Mezzacappa, bring a civil rights action against me. Shit, you've tried everything else. See how far you get. You can't bring a civil rights action against a private individual, but knock yourself out. You make an idiot out of yourself every time you file something. Why stop now?
ReplyDeleteShe is now trying to poison the judge by noting an article I wrote when he was running for the job, and backed his opponent. Guess what? I have also written articles critical of numerous judges on every level, from Saylor to Melivin (before she was in trouble) to Moran, Baratta and Koury. But I know them well enough to know they do not take these things personally and never felt i was treated unfairly. Your attempt to poison Judge Yetter is a reflection of how you think judges react, not how they are. Knock yourself out.
ReplyDeleteExactly, Bernie. People like TM and Gregory and Blog Mentor are always grasping at straws, because they have nothing of substance. They throw out a shitscreen, and act like it is a piece of art.
For example, the lawsuits TM has lost that she blithely claims she won.
She's shooting blanks on this one, like usual. As if the judge gives a damn what you wrote about him - and more to the point, it would have zero relevance to considering how she broke the law. Knowing her, she sent this nonsense to the judge. It's like 2nd grade all over again.
"The attempt to deny this woman a fruitful and prosperous existence nothing short of a civil rights violation. There was never any accusation of pedophilia, and your reputation was already about as soiled as the undergarments of a Joey Chesnut on the 4th of July."
ReplyDeleteBernie isn't running for office - you are. This has nothing to do with his 1986 suspension - you can mention it all you want. Your reputation was made by you, and you trashed it but good. Why else would you have to shut down all your web pages - even the one announcing your candidacy?
Stop talking in the third person. You are dishonest and the very last thing WE residents need on council. Your good qualities have been completely nullified by the bad ones. Civil rights action - good one! That's the funniest thing I've heard in weeks. Stay away from the wacky weed - that stuff will mess you up. Your lack of ability to find a job is your own doing, and you've screwed up any chance you had of swiping a seat on council as an R in a D community. What did you think would happen when you suggesting drowning the Mayor's daughter, a council member? Harassed the town secretary? Invites for tea?
Joey "Chesnut"?
I can see it now. At your hearing next week, you'll have a file with the 1986 opinion, and printouts of this blog. "Judge, I have evidence of why I hid my car here. When you Google my name, all this stuff comes up. Judge, this isn't fair." And the judge will reply, "Ms. Mezzacappa, do you have anything relevant to why you concealed your car after it was levied?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3q5iLy2ciE
ReplyDeleteIt's almost like Mayberry, birds chirping, Jim well dressed, lavishing treats upon our deceased brother in arms Earl, a well kept house that is inhabited by our fair maiden who's golden trusses bring many to their knees. This scene will be recreated soon enough and Bernie will still be living in squalor with Trevor as his closest confidant.
@12:05AM The scene will be recreated? You've had too much to drink already, and it is just midnight.
ReplyDeleteEarl has been consumed by maggots by now, and they are probably visiting Jim in his cell and hanging in his food.
The subject is your candidacy for council. Where is your web site promoting your platform? Why are you wasting time here?
Mezzacappa - I have wasted tens of thousands of your tax dollars on appeals. I harassed a town employee until she quit. I dreamed about drowning your council president and shooting a reporter with a hollow point bullet. I currently have criminal charges against me, and am friends with another criminal who is in state prison - Mezzacappa, wrong for you, wrong for West Easton. Vote for me!
When will you womanless poison posse "men", stop harassing this poor young woman. It is no longer funny. You should all be ashamed of yourselves.
ReplyDeleteChallenging her petitions might be fun, but unlikely to have any real effect.
ReplyDeleteLet's say that the challenge is successful, and she is thrown off of the primary ballot. What do you think she is going to do? All she needs is ten write-in votes in the primary to be back on the ballot for November.
Would you write in her name? I think there's a difference between personally asking someone who lives right by you to sign your petition, and what goes on in the voting booth.
ReplyDelete"All she needs is ten write-in votes in the primary to be back on the ballot for November."
ReplyDeleteGood point, but she got a total of 19 votes in the last WE primary she ran in. What are the odds 10 people would actually write her name in? Probably pretty low.
I'd like to see her stay in the race and get battered by the truth during campaigning, and then take it uta in the general. That would give her the message the people really have no interest in crazy.
She actually received 48 votes in 2013 General Election, so there are a few people who think that electing her is a good idea.
ReplyDeleteKevin - the write-in you suggested would take place in the primary. That is why I used the 19. We know primaries are not well attended in comparison to the general.
ReplyDeleteI don't deny the 48 votes she got in the general, of 60 R's that voted. She was the only R on the ballot, which means 12 of the R's that showed up voted for a D. How many of the 48 (80%) voted the party line?
Statistics on voting the party line are hard to find, but one statistic I found is 72%-82% of voters voted the party line in one county across 5 general elections.
Thus, it is possible that all R's who vote on the individual, not the party, chose a D instead of TM in the 2013 general.
This West Easton R is voting for Mezzacappa in the primary and is urging anyone with a desire for change to do the same. Tricia is supported by Unity PAC so in the fall Dem's can feel confident in casting their votes for her as well.
ReplyDeleteforgive me for speaking up ohare, but the more you dump on this woman, the more it appears your internal torment and desire to allow her to control your every single emotion trumps any credibility you may have had.
ReplyDeleteat what point does 'enough is enough' enter your mode of operandi, and at what point is hatred and revenge worth the considerable amount of time you spend chasing her around and looking into her election papers?
I have seen that you have not been able to keep her name off your blog for a day in many years now.....suddenly I have to question who the REAL crazy one happens to be.
Anon 2:26, word is she rebuffed his advance sand she dumped him. he has never gotten over it.
ReplyDeleteJust contacted someone at Der Spiegel and gave them a synopsis of the TM/BOH/JG saga and they will be sending a correspondent to cover the hearing on 3/16. Finally the case can be presented by a responsible journalist.
ReplyDeleteGet Tom Shortell on this. "Former NC and WE council candidate faces criminal charges in connection with defamation lawsuit damages."
ReplyDelete"Anon 2:26, word is she rebuffed his advance sand she dumped him. he has never gotten over it."
ReplyDeleteThis is load of smelly bull crap and you know it. Are we to suppose that every political candidate that Bernie covers critically, like the ones just today here in his blog, Bernie had some relationship with? The truth is Bernie printed the truth about you 3-1/2 years ago, and you've been obsessed with trying to discredit him ever since. You didn't win that election, and you won't be winning one anywhere here.
Take your nonsense elsewhere. Try telling the judge on Monday this all stems from a dalliance - that will get you nowhere because it isn't relevant and it isn't true.
Keep trying to deflect from the subject. You defamed Bernie. He has a judgment against you and is a secured creditor. You concealed assets. That is the conversation. Not your "evidence" box of trash.
Ms. Gross is freaking out, it would appear.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your point, 4:20?
ReplyDeleteIt looks like Mezzacrazy is freaking out, posting here constantly instead of maintaining her own blog. She must have tired of posting pictures that represent how narcissism has destroyed her.
The BM doesn't look like he approves of the work of defender James Martin Connell - he's on his sh$t list.
ReplyDeleteBummer for Whacky.
This whole story sounds suspect at best, but what I think does not matter anyway. All that matters at this point is what the judge thinks.
ReplyDeleteThe one thing that I do know for sure that Bernie is telling the truth about is the false accusation of pig kicking. Earle was big, fast, and nasty. If Bernie kicked Earle he would be missing some toes..LOL!
They placed the court perfectly for TM - it is two blocks from her house. She can walk there, which is perfect if she wants to continue to hide the car. Or, she can turn it over as the law requires, and walk home.
ReplyDeleteYetter is no puppet, he sees O'hara for the scoundrel he is
ReplyDeleteperhaps ohare needs to turn the AM radio dial off 99.9 Mezz, West Easton for the first time in many years.
ReplyDeletethe constant loud buzz is hard on the ears, incredibly boring and as old as William Penn.
Being stuck on one topic, lost in emotional torment, and spewing toxic waste daily has the beaten horse dead, about 5 times over.
The horse is dead, move on
The comment above is the 70th posted to this thread, probably by Mezzacappa, Blog Mentor or Their Remfeld, Henry C Schaadt. They hate to be exposed for what they are.
ReplyDelete@6:12PM Please, by all means - move on. You've been battered by the truth, and all you can do is claim nonsense that is not supported by the facts.
ReplyDeleteThe truth hurts when people have no respect for the law and are so dishonest that they lie on important disclosures. Read em and weep.
That wasn't her only lie. Sje also failed to report that she was receiving unemployment.
ReplyDeleteThere you go. A perfectly horrible choice for West Easton. I'm sure she feels perfectly fine lying to achieve her goal - a very undesirable quality for someone in public office.
ReplyDeleteBernie, I hate to tarnish the otherwise good name of Al Davis, but hence here it is. In the land of make believe and living in the courts as a hobby for 2 decades, constantly, Davis earned quite a name, until he croaked...and lost a 1.2 billion lawsuit...he constantly played the victim, and eventually, he became one:
ReplyDeleteChronology of lawsuits involving the Raiders during the past 21 years:
1980 -- Team owner Al Davis and the Raiders join Los Angeles Coliseum antitrust suit against the NFL in Los Angeles.
1981 -- Hung jury declared in antitrust trial.
1982 -- Raiders and Los Angeles Coliseum win retrial of antitrust suit against NFL in Los Angeles.
1982 -- Raiders move from Oakland to Los Angeles.
1983 -- Raiders awarded $35 million from NFL in damages portion of antitrust suit. NFL later paid Raiders $18 million in settlement.
1986 -- Davis testifies for United States Football League in its antitrust suit against the NFL. A New York jury voted for USFL on one of nine counts and awarded it $1 from NFL.
1995 -- NFL sues the Raiders in Los Angeles over their alleged refusal to share Oakland revenues.
1995 -- Raiders return to Oakland.
1996 -- Raiders sue NFL over alleged mismanagement of its merchandise sales. The suit is pending in San Jose, Calif.
1997 -- Oakland Coliseum sues Raiders over alleged refusal to sign a stadium-naming rights deal. Suit also asks that team's lease with Coliseum be declared valid.
1998 -- Raiders countersue Oakland and Alameda County over Oakland Coliseum lease, claiming breach of contract. Both suits are pending in Sacramento.
1999 -- Judge dismisses NFL's suit against the Raiders over revenue sharing.
1999 -- Raiders file suit in Santa Clara County, Calif., claiming NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue and another league official deceptively set up an executive compensation fund for league officials. A judge dismisses the suit.
1999 -- Raiders file $1.2 billion suit against the NFL, claiming the league sabotaged its plans for a new stadium at Hollywood Park, and that the Raiders still "own" the Los Angeles market.
2001 -- A Los Angeles jury rules against the Raiders in the $1.2 billion suit on May 21, following six-week trial.
This woman has been unhinged for 4 years or more.
ReplyDeleteLook at this "Kelly Gross stole my zoning complaint letter" police matter from 2011:
http://lehighvalleyramblings.blogspot.com/2011/12/wwwe-files-w-easton-stole-my-letter-to.html
Bullshit like this is what caused Easton PD to no longer provide coverage to WE. This woman is a total menace to WE taxpayers.
The hate cultivated by this blogs author and his minions are a good indicator of where our once fine Judeo-Christian nation is heading(down the tubes)
ReplyDeleteCharacter assasaination for sport is the new national pastime, values are eroding faster than an NJ beach, tyrants are elected year after year while blocks of ignoramus voters sit at home and let the government trample them.
This woman's persecution is an indicator of an ill populace, being spoon fed toxic misinformation by a callous and conniving misfit hell bent on revenge at any cost.
I'm calling for silent unity in regards to this situation, pray for a just resolution.
The emotional violence this blogger inflicts on a daily basis to this woman and many others shows how a morally bankrupted person with deep seeded hatred, envy and rage is potentionally more dangerous than a violent criminal
ReplyDeleteShe better surrender her car on Monday or she may not be going home after the hearing. It is one thing to thimb her nose at me, but she is now thumbing her nose at the courts.
ReplyDeleteThis candidate is hiding a lot. The blogs she maintains are all closed to the public.
ReplyDeleteAlso you say she is collecting unemployment and didn't declare that or a judgment you have against her as a secured creditor on her financial disclosure.
Is this transparency?
She was collecting unemployment last year and failed to disclose that on her ethics form.
ReplyDelete"The emotional violence this blogger inflicts on a daily basis to this woman and many others shows how a morally bankrupted person with deep seeded hatred, envy and rage is potentionally more dangerous than a violent criminal"
ReplyDeleteDeep seeded. Potentionally. Good one Trish. Only you can mangle the English language the way you do.
You are the one who is morally bankrupt. You thumb your nose at the law, and simultaneously think citizens will vote for you. You are the acting in a criminal manner, not Bernie. You've harassed and libeled Bernie incessantly, and the bill is now due. No amount of deflection or fog can change that. Pay your bill so YOU can move on.
Bernie...My comment was deleted? Why was what? You don't believe in freedom of speech?
ReplyDelete"This woman's persecution is an indicator of an ill populace, being spoon fed toxic misinformation by a callous and conniving misfit hell bent on revenge at any cost.
ReplyDeleteI'm calling for silent unity in regards to this situation, pray for a just resolution."
Keep hallucinating. A just resolution is that she turns over the car that Bernie owns and she is concealing, and then paying the remainder of the $70,000 she owes him. She's already bragged that she is capable of paying it. Just do it, instead of continuing to wage war on her victim - Bernie. She libeled him.
If you insist on coming here and attempting to cast her as a victim and asking for silence, you can fully expect people to continue to support Bernie. Silent unity? You're out of your mind. If you don't know the difference between right and wrong, then you won't understand. Carry on.
your inability to read the ethics statement instructions about what must be reported as income or creditors comes as no surprise to anyone.
ReplyDeleteYour inability to report anything remotely factual is caused by your seething hatred and desire for complete degredation of the person you stalk and harass daily.
your wild interpretations of law law are precisely why the Supreme Court told you to get lost 30 years ago, and never allowed you back it.
Go play your violin and scream at rooftops that you are a victim, thats all you have ever been able to do, because you are a classless sociopath with no life.
"Bernie...My comment was deleted? Why was what? You don't believe in freedom of speech?"
ReplyDeleteRead the site policy. What exactly don't you understand? Email him privately if you want one on one attention.
If you look around, Bernie is darned generous in not deleting comments. If you can't figure out why yours was deleted, you're probably a moron.
@12:34PM Right Bernie - thanks for clarifying. The reporting period on the disclosure form was 2014, not 2015.
ReplyDelete12:52. If you don't surrender the levied car at the hearing, there's a possibility you won't be going home.
ReplyDeletegood sources tell me the car you seek was long ago chop shopped, with its parts bought and sold on the worldwide web
ReplyDeleteOther than a barren chasis with a stale side of bacon stuck to the bottom, the car is no more.
The title was used as kindling for the Easton Rover Football bonfire, and the keys to said car burned beyond recognition.
weep
@12:51PM Assuming Bernie doesn't delete your personal attack on him, you are incorrect about his ability to understand the instructions on the SEC-1 disclosure form you filled out. Let's stay on facts, OK?
ReplyDeleteCREDITORS: This block contains the name and address of any creditor and the interest rate of any debt over $6,500 regardless of
whether such debt is held solely by you or jointly by you and any other individual, including your spouse, where each obligor is fully responsible for the obligation. A joint obligation with other persons, for which the filer is responsible only for a proportional share that is less than the reporting threshold, is not required to be reported. Do not report a mortgage or equity loan on your home (or secondary home), or loans or credit between you and your spouse, child, parent or sibling. Car loans, credit cards, personal loans and lines of credit must be listed on the form if the balance owed was in excess of $6,500 at any time during the calendar year. If you do not have any reportable creditor, then check "NONE."
The debt to Bernie must be disclosed, because it is $70K+ and you are accruing 6% interest on it - which you need to disclose as well.
DIRECT OR INDIRECT SOURCES OF INCOME: List the name and address of each source of $1,300 or more of gross income regardless of whether such income is received solely by you or jointly by you and another individual such as a spouse. "Income" includes any money or thing of value received or to be received as a claim on future services or in recognition of services rendered in the past, whether in the form of a payment, fee, salary, expense, allowance, forbearance, forgiveness, interest, dividend, royalty, rent,
capital gain, reward, severance payment, proceeds from the sale of a financial interest in a corporation, professional corporation, partnership or other entity resulting from termination/withdrawal therefrom upon assumption of public office or employment or any other form of recompense or combination thereof.
If you were paid over $1300 unemployment, you have to report it.
http://www.ethics.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/forms/9044
good sources tell me the car you seek was long ago chop shopped, with its parts bought and sold on the worldwide web
ReplyDeleteOther than a barren chasis with a stale side of bacon stuck to the bottom, the car is no more.
The title was used as kindling for the Easton Rover Football bonfire, and the keys to said car burned beyond recognition.
weep
Even if this were true, all it means is that when Bernie goes after the house that was illegally transferred to her mother, he will get more of the proceeds from that. Read em and weep...
@12:51PM Assuming Bernie doesn't delete your personal attack on him, you are incorrect about his ability to understand the instructions on the SEC-1 disclosure form you filled out. Let's stay on facts, OK?
ReplyDeleteCREDITORS: This block contains the name and address of any creditor and the interest rate of any debt over $6,500 regardless of
whether such debt is held solely by you or jointly by you and any other individual, including your spouse, where each obligor is fully responsible for the obligation. A joint obligation with other persons, for which the filer is responsible only for a proportional share that is less than the reporting threshold, is not required to be reported. Do not report a mortgage or equity loan on your home (or secondary home), or loans or credit between you and your spouse, child, parent or sibling. Car loans, credit cards, personal loans and lines of credit must be listed on the form if the balance owed was in excess of $6,500 at any time during the calendar year. If you do not have any reportable creditor, then check "NONE."
The debt to Bernie must be disclosed, because it is $70K+ and you are accruing 6% interest on it - which you need to disclose as well.
DIRECT OR INDIRECT SOURCES OF INCOME: List the name and address of each source of $1,300 or more of gross income regardless of whether such income is received solely by you or jointly by you and another individual such as a spouse. "Income" includes any money or thing of value received or to be received as a claim on future services or in recognition of services rendered in the past, whether in the form of a payment, fee, salary, expense, allowance, forbearance, forgiveness, interest, dividend, royalty, rent,
capital gain, reward, severance payment, proceeds from the sale of a financial interest in a corporation, professional corporation, partnership or other entity resulting from termination/withdrawal therefrom upon assumption of public office or employment or any other form of recompense or combination thereof.
If you were paid over $1300 unemployment, you have to report it.
http://www.ethics.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/forms/9044
sources ay that JM Connell is preparing a precedent setting case for the 9-12 dame flanked in sub machine artillery, who is temporarily sidetracked with a phony Morganelli vendetta charge.
ReplyDeleteAl, I mean Bernie, too many dockets spoil the broth
ReplyDeleteBetter call Saul
Bernie I looked up her judgement case on appeal and saw that the high court stated in its last entry in Feb of 2015
ReplyDelete"Due to Exrtrodinary Circumstances...et al"
What does this mean, can you comment please
who is temporarily sidetracked with a phony Morganelli vendetta charge.
ReplyDeleteAfter her temporary sidetrack with what you call a vendetta, her house is next. You'll have to come up with an excuse for that one.
@1:24PM She got a continuance for fighting this related matter. Delay delay - she'll have to do something eventually.
ReplyDeleteShe told the Superior Court that after she handled the criminal matter, she'd be ready to "dispose" of the appeal. She implied, falsely, that a settlement was in the world.
ReplyDeleteSimilarly Saul, I mean soul speaking the other neighborhood DA with a vendetta has some pretty sprained competition in his viscious vendetta with a local blogger
ReplyDeleteAny reports on this ?? A joint/ several to the West Is going to explode the courtroom when the cherry picked conflict judge rolls up to that court, sporting a 1.3 million smile.
can you comment?
1:44PM sounds like the blog mentor, vainly attempting to call attention to his pathetic obsession. Have some spaghetti - you'll feel better. Or will you? You need to find something else to do.
ReplyDeleteThat's my comment.
Word on the blog is that Ms. Gross is going wild today.
ReplyDeleteAll the cyber stalking blog trolls who's prying eyes can no longer access the WEFP should try something more constructive instead of heaping calamity on it's author in the form of vicious anon slurs.
ReplyDeleteFaith in god is something many of you miscreants lack otherwise you wouldn't be perpetuating such hateful myths about people you don't know.
Salvation will not come through these despicable perversions, renounce your "leader" and cast him into his home of darkness, always shun him and redemption is possible.
Follow the teachings of the "messenger", Jim Gregory.
ReplyDelete"All the cyber stalking blog trolls who's prying eyes can no longer access the WEFP should try something more constructive instead of heaping calamity on it's author in the form of vicious anon slurs."
ReplyDeleteAn anon slur is not the same as the truth, which is what you are being battered by - something your blog was allegedly but failed to do to others.
Let's look at your resume:
Nov 2011 lost WE General Election
Nov 2012 convicted of disorderly conduct at WE borough hall
May 2013 lost NorCo Council Primary
May 2013 convicted of defamation of Bernie O'Hare
June 2013 convicted of harassment of WE borough employee
Nov 2013 lost WE General Election
Mar 2014 ordered to pay $67,130 for defaming Bernie O'Hare
May 2014 denied LTCF by Sheriff Ziegler
Feb 2015 criminal charge for concealing assets from a secured creditor
Mar 2015 Submits petition for WE council seat
Come on, open WEFP and tell some more of the true story. Don't hide the past - celebrate it.
That's quite a record. She'll have no trouble with name recognition on the ballot. Errors in her financial interests disclosure are the least of her worries.
ReplyDeleteanyone who knows this person personally is able to separate viscious scandal propoganda, made up fictional accusations, and complete , never ending retaliation from a Borough whose ass was whipped in 10 consecutive court dockets, by the pro se defendent up against skilled and experienced municipal lawyers.
ReplyDeleteReporting half the facts, and sensationalizing non stories by exaggeration half truths and toxic inneundo is well known throughout west easton, and is precisely in the malignant spirit of the black soul blogger who hasnt been able to change the station in years. It sucks to be told you have no penis, but the truth is the truth.
the gavel weilding tyrant is in for a ride this election year, and my money is on the lean and mean horse armed with a master's degree and semi-automatic weapons.
I'll let the Ethics Commission know about her attempt to hide the fact that she is or was collecting, or why she failed to report her debt to me. I'm sure they'll understand. Her biggest concern right now is to stay out of jail on Monday. I don't see how she does that with her violent history, no-shows at various proceedings and her continued thumbing of her nose at judicial process. Our system can't tolerate someone who plays these kinds of games. Unless she produces that car, there is a very good chance that she won't be going home.
ReplyDelete"anyone who knows this person personally is able to separate viscious scandal propoganda, made up fictional accusations, and complete , never ending retaliation from a Borough whose ass was whipped in 10 consecutive court dockets, by the pro se defendent up against skilled and experienced municipal lawyers."
ReplyDeleteWhat are you babbling about, Trish? You lost most of the RTK appeals you forced WE taxpayers to foot the bill for, while you've perpetrated your little war with the government. It has cost WE 10's of thousands of dollars, but you are so sick you are proud to mention it. Here is the no-propaganda record that matters:
Nov 2011 lost WE General Election
Nov 2012 convicted of disorderly conduct at WE borough hall
May 2013 lost NorCo Council Primary
May 2013 convicted of defamation of Bernie O'Hare
June 2013 convicted of harassment of WE borough employee
Nov 2013 lost WE General Election
Mar 2014 ordered to pay $67,140 to Bernie O'Hare for defaming him
May 2014 denied LTCF by Sheriff Ziegler
Feb 2015 criminal charge for concealing assets from a secured creditor
Mar 2015 Submits petition for WE council seat, with omissions on ethics disclosure form
As much as some of you haters would love to see Berries revenge come to pass, chances are things may be a bit different. Fortunately debtors prisons no longer exist, so think again.
ReplyDeleteDebtor prisons do not exist, nor should they, but the courts will not tolerate someone who defies its own wits. This is a crime against pur very system of justice, not just me. I can guarantee you this is going to end badly for you.
ReplyDeleteJudge Yetter was not happy the LAST time TM appeared before him and he found her GUILTY. Uh-oh, better call Saul.
ReplyDelete"As much as some of you haters would love to see Berries revenge come to pass, ..."
ReplyDeleteYou are ignoring the truth, as usual, which is odd because you say you will batter others with it.
The truth is this has nothing to do with revenge. Just paying what the court ordered you owe.
Try telling the judge this is about revenge. He'll laugh in your face. Mention "debtor's prison," and he'll ask "Ms. Mezzacappa, do you have ANY evidence this levy was defective?" Lots of luck with babbling in court. It doesn't work here, and it won't work there. Read em and weep sweetie. Tip - don't try to introduce the 1986 opinion.
Bernie what are the chances she doesn't show and what would the repercussions be.
ReplyDeleteI would not place any bets on it. She has refused to show for numerous court proceedings and has repeatedly thinner her nose at Sheriff attempts to serve the writ of execution. She has hidden her car after levy and has openly taunted me about it. But if she fails to show tomorrow, or come in and waive the matter into court, a warrant for her arrest will be issued.
ReplyDeleteMore defective paper work at the elections office. Ken Brewer has filed a nominating petition that has signature/date errors on it. He is running for reelection to Bangor council. Will a R party member step forward and challenge it? probably not..
ReplyDeleteAnd....the silence of it all.
ReplyDeleteThat's the sound of TM working not on her campaign for council, but the endless stacks of briefs in her war on O'Hare. And looking through the phone directory for her next lawyer.
ReplyDeleteHope it is worth it all. If she'd admit she screwed up, pay her debt, and move on, it would make her life a lot easier.
Rumor is she was quite stoic today during the hearing at which she was bound over for trial in the Court of Common Pleas.
April 1 is coming - read em and weep. How ironic - an April Fool.