Local Government TV

Friday, August 29, 2014

Lahovski Complaint Unmasks Ugly Borough Government

Fred Lahovski, giving thumbs up. 
An Arbitrator has described Nazazreth Police Officer Fred Lahovski as a "highly motivated police officer". In a 2009 story, I called him Nazareth's very own Robocop. He once stepped in front of a speeding vehicle to protect a child from getting run over by a drunk driver during a block party. He's the officer who once rushed at and tackled a 32-year-old man who sat with a gun pointed to his head for five hours. This ill man still shot himself, but it was nonfatal. Lahovski is one of two officers who whisked a 9 year-old Nazareth boy to safety as that boy's distraught father fired on state troopers, killing one of them. The Express Times correctly called him a local hero, but in the People's Republic of Nazareth, he's a troublemaker who upset the good ol' boys. They got rid of him. That decision was reversed by an Arbitrator. Now it's Lahovksi's turn. This "highly motivated police officer" has fired back with a 410-paragraph complaint aimed at Nazareth, its mayor, its police chief and the entire borough council. In the course of trying to bring him under control, they violated his civil rights repeatedly. Unfortunately, we the people will pay for this arrogance.

That arrogance continues today. Though he's been reinstated, the borough has still refused to pay the back-pay awarded. His problem? He's "outwardly ambitious and opinionated." His work ethic reveals the pattern of someone who refuses to go along to get along. Just as he stood up for the boy being threatened by a speeding drunk driver, he has stood up for a Puerto Rican Nazareth police officer, a woman no less, when she was called a "wetback" and told to refrain from advertising her national origin. He stood up for an openly gay officer subjected to homophobic slurs and who was ultimately taken off the work schedule. He defended another Hispanic officer who was forced to undergo all kinds of background checks not required of others. And he championed another female officer whom another officer refused to certify at the firing range, under orders from Chief Thomas Trachta.  

Instead of keeping his head down, Lahovski filed grievances, something he had the right to do as a member of the police association.

"Your grievance is a false claim and should be viewed as harassment," claimed the then Mayor once in response to a grievance. It was ultimately upheld. In fact, Lahovski won nearly all of them.

He continued standing up for what's right, even after he was demoted from his position as Detective in what appears to be a retaliatory move. He continued to drive on even when borough officials refused to schedule a sergeant's exam because they knew he'd ace it.

Lahovski may have been too motivated. As a result of investigation of drug activity in some Nazareth nuisance bars, Lahovski learned that a Nazareth officer might be involved in drug deals himself. He had information from a confidential informant he considered reliable, but Chief Trachta did not want to hear it, calling it "loose street information". Another officer heard similar allegations, but refused to note it in his report. Lahovski obtained a taped statement from the informant, who stated that she actually observed this officer dealing drugs. He even had her call the Chief herself. Lahovski prepared a full report, but Trachta refused it, and disciplined Lahovski when he tossed it.

That discipline was overturned.

In 2011, Nazareth arbitrarily decided to stop paying shift differentials, in violation of a collective bargaining agreement. Lahovski filed a grievance, which the then Mayor called "frivolous". Lahovski sought arbitration, and eventually won. The borough retaliated by letting the people of Nazareth suffer. It refused for a period to schedule police coverage.

Lahovski was also cited for reporting to work out of uniform. That was overturned, too. Trachta warned him he is going to get hurt if he does not stop filing grievances.

The complaint details instances of what clearly appears to be misconduct by borough council. Council members interfered in several police investigations, usually involving the arrests of friends, and threatened Lahovksi and others for enforcing the law equally.  "Lahovski won't have his job for long," one Council member is reported to have said after a friend was cited.

When Borough Council finally decided to fire him, they publicly disseminated false information to stigmatize him. They even accused him of stealing his own vacuum cleaner. According to the complaint, it was a "sham proceeding with a predetermined outcome."

Mayor Carl Strye defamed Lahovski, claiming that negotiating with him was akin to a "fireman negotiating with an arsonist."

I attempted to contact Officer Lahovski, but he declined comment, stating that he'll save it for court. But I did see him skateboarding with kids at the park, instead of making them feel like animals.

You can read the complaint here.

This is Lahovski's side of the story. I imagine there are several others. But if 10% of that complaint is true, Nazareth residents should be very concerned.

14 comments:

  1. Is this the same Ofc. Lahovski that was in Bethlehem Twp.?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You do know the problems in Bethlehem Twp.? be careful of your heroes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agreed Anonymous!!! This officer knows all about lawsuits. Its basically how he earns his living.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How many PD's has he been with and left involuntarily? He was a big problem in Bethlehem Township. FOI the settlement agreement.

    ReplyDelete
  5. From the previous comments it sound like the lawsuit loser is still bitter

    ReplyDelete
  6. All of the comments above sound like they are from Mezzacappa, a professional at not seeing the forest for the trees.

    As Bernie said, if only 10% of what is in the complaint is true, this isn't good at all for Nazareth. Just like Bernie's 1986 Supreme Court opinion is irrelevant to a crazy woman attempting to destroy his character and the mail being delivered, anything that happened in another department is irrelevant to Lahovski's case.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unfortunately for Nazareth, a great deal of the Complaint appears to be accurate, especially insofar as retaliation for union activity is concerned. Lahovski has attached documentation in which Nazareth officials make that clear.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't ordinarily agree with the blogger but in this case you have to

    ReplyDelete
  9. He either has the worst luck or the best luck at finding corruption at police departments. In either case he comes out smelling like a rose and that much richer.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nazareth still has not paid this guy what they owe him after being ordered to give him back pay. That alone is appalling. That's bad luck. He has drawn Judge Suarez, one of the best to have in a civil rights case. That's good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The BOROUGH should be ORDERED to pay him his back pay immediately with interest IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Shleig for Chief
    Shleig for Chief
    Shleig for Chief
    Shleig for Chief

    ReplyDelete
  13. Officer Lahovski has a lot of secrets be careful who you call a hero.If only I could reveal them.I know! Ask Rosie.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.