Local Government TV

Monday, February 25, 2013

Row Officer Residency Requirement Fails In NorCo

By a 6-3 vote at Thursday night's meeting, Northampton County Council rejected an ordinance that would require all prospective row officers to be residents of the County. Only Lamont McClure, Bob Werner and Ken Kraft supported the measure ... and Controller Steve Barron.

Under our Home Rule Charter, a Controller is "responsible for the internal control of the fiscal transactions of the County." But Barron has acted like a Junior County Exec, injecting himself into numerous policy decisions that have nothing to do with his office. So on Thursday night, after instructing Council that it should reject a centralized human service lease, Barron advocated a residency requirement.

Along the way, he took a mean-spirited shot at Executive John Stoffa.

You see, in 2008, Stoffa had to undergo a hip replacement. While recovering, he named his Director of Administration, John Conklin, as Acting County Executive. But Conklin is a Lehigh County resident.

Now Conklin was no row officer. He was a cabinet level official. He served at the pleasure of Stoffa. But even he did not set policy. He was there to implement whatever Stoffa wanted done. If that including running the County for the four weeks it took Stoffa to recover, that's what he would do.

Now when this happened, nobody minded or complained. Not even Barron. Everyone recognized that Conklin was there to implement Stoffa's will. But five years later, that was suddenly a big problem.

Stoffa told Barron that Conklin's appointment was "my decision." "It doesn't matter," claimed Barron on Thursday night. ,"It was disgusting."

If it was so disgusting, why didn't Barron say something in 2008?

In addition to demeaning the Executive, Barron also confused judicial decisions, which are sometimes made by the Register of Wills, with policy-making. One has nothing to do with the other.

Ken Kraft, who proposed this measure with good intentions, looked like he wanted to craw into a hole after Barron "helped" him.

"I kinda' like the idea of people working for Northampton County living in Northampton County," said Scott Parsons. But at this juncture, he and five other Council members are unwilling to force employees to live here.

18 comments:

  1. Kraft and Barron are joined at the hip. I would have thought a keen political observer like you would have known that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a "keen" political observer, or just an idiot, let me tell you something. Kraft, very surprisingly, is joined at the hip to no one. He is a union business agent, and will naturally support unions. He will often side with McClure and Barron because that is what he thinks. But he is very much his own man. That is increasingly becoming clear.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh oh, I smell a new mancrush. There was a timne when Barron was a mancrush, remember?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, I remember. I supported him when he ran against John Schimmel, a terrific guy, and I have lived to regret it.

    I know Kraft from his days on the Elections Comm'n and Bethlehem's ZHB.

    ReplyDelete
  5. my opinion:kraft is nothing but a dressed up union goon. your faith in him will come back to bite you one day, much like sleeze barron has.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Barron isn`t worth commenting about.

    ReplyDelete
  7. the fact that Conklin lived in Lehigh County was disgusting? Does Barron remember that Hickey also lived in Lehigh? was that disgusting too?

    ReplyDelete
  8. BVF is a drama queen. Between the ridiculous use of the word "disgusting" to describe an innocent act that no one complained about at the time to his Oprah moment linking his wife's labor to his respect for veterans, this guy knows no boundaries in taste.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "s Oprah moment linking his wife's labor to his respect for veterans,"

    I'm still trying to figure that one out.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Where was Barron as the County finances were going down the toilet with the swaption. If he was any kind of watchdog he would have been on thst like stink on doggy doo. Instead he was playing games with Unions and trying to make himself look good in other areas other than what he is responsible for. He is the man responsible for making the finance system work in Northampton county.
    No one else is responsible or has more responsibility for finances and making sure he is truly the watchdog thean he himself. He flunked and we are going to make sure that the fails at his next attempt at retaining his seat as County Controller.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Under our Home Rule Charter, a Controller is "responsible for the internal control of the fiscal transactions of the County."

    ReplyDelete


  12. If your a COUNTY ROW OFFICER or in a Management position in the County, YOU SHOULD RESIDE IN THE COUNTY.

    ReplyDelete
  13. There is a difference between "should" and "must." And drop the caps. It's annoying.

    ReplyDelete


  14. This is why these positions should be elected....that's how it's done in the other penna. counties.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You have no answered why because there is no logical reason for these row officers to be elected, except for those interested in a return to a patronage system.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ad though those folks aren't being picked by who they are now. Just ask your buddy Stoffa.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Increase the time you jog or run for 5 minutes a day. You can have your rest by just sitting around doing nothing.
    If possible let your dietician review your journal. On top
    of that, they may not mandate any amount of strenuous and uninspiring exercises.


    Review my web-site how to lose weight fast

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.