Local Government TV

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Bangor Poised to Vote On Police Regionalization

Bangor Borough Council is poised to vote next Monday on a state-financed police regionalization plan for the 5 Slate Belt communities.

A regional department would result in 24% total savings in police costs. .

In Bangor, it is basically a wash in the first year. Plainfield Township would save $250,000 in its first year. Pen Argyl would save $100,000.

Bangor Borough Council member Dave Houser, who supports the plan, states, "I think we can pull this off and assure the public of no drop offs in service."

The plan was prepared by PA Governor's Center for Local Gov't Services, but does not appear to be available online.

40 comments:

  1. Here's my prediction, it won't pass.

    Another study, paid for by the taxpayers. These municipal Officials don't want to give up their Authority.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope this works.

    With that said, Bangor will get short-changed if this goes through. being surrounded by larger areas, the police will be outside the borough most of the time. Bangor residents, as stated, will see NO reduction in cost. But will lose what protection it has.

    One only needs to look at what happened to Bangor in other regional plans. The incinerator, which could now be a cash-cow, was successful at first because the other towns supported it. But as they began to leave, the site slowly shut down, and was closed many years too early. And a once profitable venture, has sat vacant for decades.

    There are other examples, such as the BASD, but let's hear the critics first.

    yea it's me!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Morning Bernie, in the 90's, our committee had done a cost and pension analysis, hours of patrolling, etc. and we couldn't get it through council. Have Plainfield and Pen Argyl committed to the regionalization plan? In any event, I wish them well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Regional police forces are unresponsive and unnaccountable. They are speed-trappers and DUI enforcers.

    With all due respect, Dave, you WILL have a drop off in service. After the honeymoon, when you are all in, they will tell you to go pound sand and start your own force if you don't like how they are doing things. They know you will have neither the resources nor the will to go back to doing it yourself.

    -Clem

    ReplyDelete
  5. Clem, Colonial Regional seems to be pretty responsive to me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Carol, so far as I know, there has been no commitment by anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow, Bangor couldn't be more irrelevant to the valley. I thought this was Lehigh Valley Ramblings not Slate Belt Meth Lab Surveillance Ramblings.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Clem - Perhaps they just know how you feel about public employees and could give two shits about you?

    ReplyDelete
  9. 9:05, Last time I checked, the Slate Belt was very much a part of the LV, but you are under no obligation to read this blog, let alone comment.

    ReplyDelete
  10. anon 7:53 well spoken, hit the nail on the head

    ReplyDelete
  11. Regional departments do not save costs. That is a myth. Enough studies have demonstrated that good neighborhood services are lost through regionalization. The major benefit is professionalism. A larger department does attract quality officers and departments are less politicized. The cost factor does not work because local neighborhood policing which is the most effective is lost in a regionalized department. To maintain that level of police coverage which is considered the best requires a larger investment in manpower and facilities which is not anticipated in the regionalization model. Safety is better produced on a smaller scale. The objective of protective services is safety first, cost second.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 11:08, Thank you for an insightful comment.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous 11:08, your sentiments are basically those of the study that was done in the early 90's for Bangor. Carol

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bernie - For now, I will simply say that my experience has been quite different over the years.

    I will try to find the chief's comments regarding whether or not they would agree to cover Nazareth if the borough decided that was the way to go. As I recall, the tone was "We'll decide if we do it. If they want this, their gonna do that", and it was about that time that the borough kind of pulled back on their pursuit, even though they had voted otherwise.

    Mr or Mrs troughfeeder (or dependent thereof) at 9:06 :

    As "Clem" is a pseudonym - and I hope that term doesn't tax your union noggin too much - I would not put my money there. My opinions are reflective of experience long before there were blogs or a "Clem", not the preconceived talking points you lazy goofs live by. I have no problem with the concept of government as it was intended. The disdain and disgust is for those - no matter the party - who would co-opt and expand those instititions, for their own gain and comfort, to the detriment of the people for whom a limited government was created to serve. It is for those who won't or can't do the simple tasks they are paid to do, believe government is above its creator and, yet, continue to demand more for less.

    11:08 has it mostly right, though, with the exception of the politcal aspect. Larger organizations typically offer greater opportunity for coalition building within the ranks, opportunity to hide the poor performance of favored employees and place more emphasis on bureaucractic and organizational activity than field productivity.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nonsense Clem. Your posts make it quite clear you have contempt for any civil servant regardless if they do a good job for an honest day's pay.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The report may be subject to exec. session as personnel issues are part of the study. Our Atty. will advise us as to that. Due to the staggered meetings of the gov't parties in the study..it would seem to be prejudical to put all the info out before they all get a chance to review the document.After all the parties get to signal their interest or withdrawl..the report will probably go public then or at a joint public info session of all the muni's wanting to move forward. My wish is for the public to see this study asap and have all their questions answered at the public session before formal agreements are entered into. The numbers above are estimates at this time and not concrete but I see significant savings overall and better service region wide.

    ReplyDelete
  17. To Dave,

    Don't waste anymore of your time on this Pipe Dream, It won't PASS.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Correction..it will pass and several other communities will join Bangor. This council has vision and the figures to prove it's worth. Come to the council workshop next Monday and see for yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Clem is the expert on everything. What a jerk!

    ReplyDelete
  20. To Dave,

    You're wasting your time with this Pipe Dream..In the end, Mayors, Chiefs and Council don't want to give up their authority.
    P.S What happened with the Fight you had with the Fire Departments?

    ReplyDelete
  21. There is no fight that I know of. They are all cooperating with the boro on a comprehensive plan that will ease the burden of paying for fire service on the tax payers. Are you really concerned or just a nay sayer?

    ReplyDelete
  22. When this fails (and it will), the shallow thinking of "dave" will be exposed. Dave, please google the history of this, and educate yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  23. It's 2012..Not back in the day. Failure is not an option and unless your voting Monday night.. all the people of Bangor will be the winners. All that matters is NOW..not what went wrong and who failed to get the job done in the past. Did you drop the ball then and are feeling guilty? This council will not drop the ball.

    ReplyDelete
  24. You are in dreamland my friend. There are great meds available for that.

    ReplyDelete
  25. While Colonial Regional and Stroud Regional are examples of regional Police working. Further north in Monroe County is Pocono Mountain Regional Police who are an example of what is wrong with regionalization. I attend the board meetings every month. If one township or borough needs more time or services they are dependent on the others approval, which often will not occur due to the cheapness of many other townships, or even personal pettiness.

    One township has become significantly larger since joining PMRP in the 1990s, yet their representation on the commission is still at the level from early membership. The larger township needs the approval of the other municipalities in getting an additional commission member. The other municipalities will never approve this fearing the biggest township will get more protection than them.

    While Stroud Regional has swift response times, Pocono Mountain Regional has lacking response times, often taking over 15 minutes to arrive on accident scenes due to budget cuts.

    What you have to do is look at the square miles that will make up the department. Colonial Regional may be a smaller turf than this Slate Belt Regional. Stroud Regional is only two boroughs and one township, they can move around fast. The bigger the regional PD, the more lacking it will be in swift response. (Let alone the bigger the townships in the regional, the more ground to cover).

    ReplyDelete
  26. They are all cooperating. What!

    They are just awaiting their time until the next election ...They will then recruit candidates to run, who will back their postion.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Many times this regional concept is used to reduce wages and benefits for the Municipal Off icers involved.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Dave said it will pass!

    Was a secret vote already taken?

    You should read the sunshine law.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The council voted by a majority in public to join the study and Mayor Brown of Bangor has devoted much time to see that the idea has now reached this point. It is my OPINION that it will pass muster. Is that CLEAR enough now? I am entitled to an opinion..no? Is this America or not? Please get a life.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Dave,
    You can have an opinion, but you can't announce that this will pass prior to a formal vote.

    Keep your opinion to yourself...learn good politics!

    Council should consolidate or reduce size.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Maybe the new police force can investigate the conspiracy between mayor Brown and an unnamed officer, which led to the firing of chief Kerrigan.

    word on the street

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hey Joe..save the drama. Your not the mayor anymore..thank goodness. The regionalization plan passed without a dissenting vote. Lead..follow..or get out of the way! Mayor Brown out front..leading!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Cowards who are afraid to identify themselves get no respect. Come back when you grow a pair. Your advice means squat!

    ReplyDelete
  34. "dave" does protest too much!
    You can pin these comments on anyone you want. Glenn Kerrigan has many friends (over 30 years of public service will do that). But until someone (mayor, council,lawyer) explains the reasoning behind the firing of Chief Kerrigan, there will be a cloud over ALL those involved. If mayor Brown runs for county executive, there are those who will raise this question every day.

    Put that in your bag of nuts and eat it.

    ReplyDelete
  35. We agree with you! Dave knows squat!!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Dave forgets to tell us about approving $7,000.00 for Mayor Brown to go for training at Notre Dame. That could pay for over 400 police hours, for some one who will be in office for 1 1/2 more years. A complete waste of tax dollars. defend that Dave Houser.

    ReplyDelete
  37. one more thing. If Bangor council continues to allow Dave houser to speak for them, it will hurt thier image too. He has no respect in Bangor.

    yes, I 2 am an anon coward dave.

    ReplyDelete
  38. It sucks to be the minority voice on council..doesn't it? I think you should move across the room and sit between Mommy and Daddy. That way you can be sure to vote as your told to with a nod and a smile. Why do you even bother coming? It must be terrible to be owned by others. I wouldn't know how that feels.

    ReplyDelete
  39. What is happening at Bangor Borough council meetings, it sounds as if spitballs are flying. Carol

    ReplyDelete
  40. Carol, you did a fine job in your many years. So did some of those before and after you. It seems dave only sees himself as a great councilman. The mirrors in his home must cover the walls. And he still can't defend spending $7,0000.00 to train John Brown. The biggest waste of tax dollars this town has seeen!!!!!

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.