Local Government TV

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

The Anti-Suburban, Pro-City Agenda and the NIZ

Jon Hammer
When South Whitehall Township Commissioners unanimously decided last April to join the suit over Allentown's controversial municipal tax grab, Manager Jon Hammer cautioned everyone against viewing the decision "as a declaration of war against the City, or a proliferation of this City versus Suburb nonsense. It is not." He added, "It is not our intention to stop the arena project." That's been pretty much a universal view among the surrounding municipalities that have discussed this matter. Yet they are being portrayed by Morning Call columnist Bill White, as both smug (column) and as hypocrites (blog).

Is this fair? More importantly, is it even accurate?

Newspapers Fail to Attend Township and Borough NIZ Meetings

I've seen Bill at none of the public meetings in which the NIZ has been discussed. But I've been there. I was at Hanover Township when they voted to sue. I was also at the NIZ meetings in Bethlehem, Lower Saucon, South Whitehall and Williams Townships. I was even at the "smug" Bangor Borough Council on the evening they decided to join the litigation.

At that Bangor meeting, nearly 60 people packed into the meeting room. Aside from the NIZ discussion, there was a hot zoning issue as well as a dispute with the leadership of the tiny borough's three volunteer fire companies. Since Bangor's population is only around 5,273, that's 1% of its population. It would be like  1,180 people going to an Allentown City Council meeting, or nearly 3,000 people at Northampton County Council.

But there was no daily newspaper to cover Bangor's meeting that night. Just me.

That's a very bad sign to those of us who still believe in democracy.

Not only has White failed to attend a single NIZ meeting, but he relies on "reports" from journalists who were also absent.

Township Officials Have Reason For Poaching Concern

I can tell you I've heard no smug remarks at any of these meetings, directed at Allentown. In fact, township and borough officials alike have wished Allentown success in its arena project. They just don't like their tax money being stolen to finance it. They also don't like to see businesses lured from their own tax base into the NIZ.

That's not job creation. It's poaching.

And it continues. Despite assurances from NIZ developer J.B. Reilly that there'd be no more poaching, he has entered into negotiations with at least two tenants currently located off Schoenersville Road, north of Route 22 in Bethlehem.

Is it smug or hypocritical to be concerned?

Media Relations 101 v. Truth

The moment someone resorts to name-calling, that's a good sign he's already lost the argument. But I understand what is going on. So does South Whitehall's Hammer. "Its media relations 101," claims Hammer. "Portray yourself as the victim to garner public sympathy. Nobody roots for Goliath."

Ironically, at the same time that Bill White is calling township and borough officials smug, even their attire is being ridiculed on this blog by NIZ cheerleaders.

I live in the smug and hypocritical Borough of Nazareth, founded in 1740. It's the oldest place in the Lehigh Valley. Yet Bill White offered no words of protest or condemnation when Allentown Mayor Edwin Pawlowski referred to this historical landmark as "the boonies of Northampton County." Nothing smug there.

When a NIZ cheerleader, at a debate that White did attend, referred to the minority merchants along Hamilton Street as a "cancer," White's tepid condemnation of this veiled racism was the literary equivalent of a raised eyebrow.

If you cover township and borough government, as I do, you'll soon see that White's claim is nonsense. In Nazareth, I've seen smug Borough Council members like Jack Herbst mow the grass at the baseball fields, despite his heart condition. I've seen other hypocritical borough council members water potted plants along the street every night.

In Hanover, after its recent Armed Forces Day ceremony was over, it was smug Township Manager Jay Finnigan who helped Public Works staffers put the chairs away. You also might find him behind the wheel of a plow during a Winter storm. In Bethlehem Township, hypocrites like Paul Weiss are regulars at planning commission and zoning meetings. He my actually attend even more meetings than I.

In West Easton, Borough Council President Kelly Gross is paid a pittance, but volunteers her time several days every week to help out in the office, saving that 1,257-person borough the expense of hiring a manager.

The Anti-suburban, Pro-city Agenda

Back in 2007, Hammer and White traded jobs for a day. Even back then, Hammer's column was eerily prescient about the conflict between cities and suburbs.
"For decades, Lehigh Valley regionalists have been promoting their agenda as the solution to our ills. Generally good intentioned people, regionalists look to create valleywide government efficiencies. However, some of them have morphed this idea into an anti-suburban, pro-city agenda.

"While we all want to see the Valley cities prosper, pitting urban vs. suburban residents in the regionalism debate is not the way to go. Recently, it was reported that an Allentown official wished the city's crime out to suburbia. This isn't helpful or acceptable as a way of promoting Valley regionalism."
But that's precisely the script that White has chosen to follow, even to the unfortunate point of name-calling.

White, a resident of the suburbs, calls Hammer, a resident of Allentown, smug. Here's how Jon responds.
"I, perhaps more that anyone, want Allentown to succeed. You see, I was born and raised in the NIZ. I still live in Allentown, and have been a resident for over four decades. My family has lived in the city for over four generations. I have chosen to raise my children in the city of Allentown. I graduated from Allen, and attended the Allentown public school system K-12. I worked as Mayor Bill Heydt's assistant, and served as his Director of Finance. I've served on countless city boards for the betterment of Allentown. I'm about as Allentonian as one can get, and probably more so than most on the 'city' side of the debate."
Why People Leave Cities

Why do people leave the cities? Is it really white flight? Racism? Maybe they don’t want to lug their groceries a block in the middle of Winter because they couldn’t find a parking spot near their home. Not all families want to live in a loft apartment, or in pre WWII housing. Some want clean and safe green space for their children to play on. Lessen the density, update the housing stock, and create family friendly amenities.

Is this smug?

Is Defending Constitution Smug?

One last observation. "We, the people" does not just include some special interest group. It includes all of the people, both suburban and urban. Many suburban communities, and the State Association of Township Supervisors, chose to challenge the Commonwealth over a law they feel is unconstitutional. According to Hammer, "I can understand how many on the suburban side of things feel the Constitution is something worth defending."

Is this smug?

49 comments:

  1. How much more do the suburbs need to steal from cities until you cut urban areas a break. Outcome is more important than process. Unless you just want to make a stupid fight you're gonna lose in court. See ya in Harrisburg.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have a reputation. You fight against "the people". You are a force of negativity.

    You had no problem when the rich suburbs grabed casino impact fees for their "needs". The Northampton County group engineered by your buddy Angle is a joke and against the spirit of the law. No problemn with that one O'Hare.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Outcome is more important than process."???
    A case of : do as I say, not as I do.
    Mr.O, a lot of us are in total agreement with you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To 2:19 AM

    Ah yes, the "rich" borough of Stockertown. You've been there lately? Yes, much different than than West Side Allentown. They can't even afford a full time police department or any fire department. What the hell are you smoking?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The rich suburbs. Why don't you actually do a little homework and find out how many dollars some nearby communities actually receive from casino revenues.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bangor, Wind Gap, Pen Argyl, Wilson, and Chapman are not "rich" suburbs.

    They all have more class than Allentown West Enders, though.

    Enjoy yer stupid hole. You should have covered all bases before you let your retard-for-a-mayor dig it. You deserve to pay and pay for your mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Get the carpetbaggers out and Hammer for Mayor! There is no one in the City of Allentown that is as educated, experienced and trained as Hammer. He is the epitome of the once dream of Allentown. A native son that STAYED. Yet his work is being done outside the City with carpetbaggers running the place. Bring Hammer back!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. "You had no problem when the rich suburbs grabed casino impact fees for their "needs""

    The casino provides $4.6 MM per year to Allentown. That's pretty good. It also awards grants, as per the law, to the five communities surrounding it. They file applications for grants, which are openly reviewed and awarded after a very open process. Then the door is open for all other municipalities,as per the law, to apply for grants in a very open process before a board that meets in accordance with the Sunshine Act.

    In vast contrast to the NIZ, there was no insider trading in which Jeff Vaughn acted as a secret strawman. There were no secret meetings, as was the case with Reilly and Browne and the Mayor. There is no preselected group of NIZ beneficiaries, which certainly occurred for Reilly, Butz.mAny person who is involed in the casino is barred by law from making campaign donations, but Pawlowski picked up 200 large last year from NIZ playa's. I can go on.

    The casino is the anti-NIZ, and your attempted comparison does nothing but illustrate the differen e between a program that gives to other communities and one that sucks its lifeblood.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Too funny Bernie.

    White writes a column calling a city resident smug, while he lives in suburbia!! Then White follows is up with a blog called 'Hypocricy' , when he is the one being the hypocrite.

    You cant gind get a better example of the pro left liberal media than that. These libs want to be pro city but their own personal choices, of where to raise their own families, is all suburban. White lost credibility years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What's smug is not even being able to recognize that suburban development is massively subsidized by the taxpayer. They are the Goliath in this situation. They have the wealthiest residents, they have all the tax and subsidy advantages for development, and in every possible way, the government's thumb is on the scale for more of the suburban-style land development that's killing the cities.

    You set up a straw man argument with the suburbs vs. cities thing. It's not a zero-sum contest at all. A strong city will have strong suburbs. But you can't have strong suburbs without a strong city. The point of regionalism is to create all the kinds of places that people want to live. Right now the LV has some nice suburban housing, but has very little in the way of quality urban housing or office space. The solution is simple - make Allentown, Bethlehem and Easton better at being cities (more density, more mixed residential and commercial uses, less car-oriented planning), and make the the suburban areas the best suburbs they can be. Developing Allentown does not have to mean that the suburbs get less.

    ReplyDelete
  11. First off White and the Morning Call only care about Parkland and him getting people all worked up is so he sells papers. Which from what I hear they are ready to tank soon. And who is this Geeting sap? He doesn't even live in the Lehigh Valley yet he wants to tell everyone here what is best for them. He is nothing but a paid hack for the unions. His words say it all. As for the hockey, I wouldn't go to Allentown in the daylight little alone go there at night. Maybe White should read his own paper sometime and see all the shootings, stabings, and robberies that occur daily within blocks of the arena.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "The solution is simple - make Allentown, Bethlehem and Easton better at being cities (more density, more mixed residential and commercial uses, less car-oriented planning), and make the the suburban areas the best suburbs they can be. Developing Allentown does not have to mean that the suburbs get less."
    Unmitigated crap!
    This is NOT developing Allentown.
    It is just another grab for tax payers money.
    NOTHING is being done for the people living here and the latest proposed scam is no different.
    All those people from elsewhere with all their expendable cash coming into Allentown to spend that same cash - They are not coming. The big bucks dumped into local restaurants has acheived little or nothing.
    Tell us again: just a few more millions and the city will turn around and prosper. Hogwash!
    None of these Robert Moses styled genuises have any stake in the future of our city, especially the perpetrators of this hokey arena swindle.
    The money being squandered, wasted, and/or stolen could very possibly be enough to make a big difference to the whole region.
    Putting it into the hands of two or three individuals will accomplish nothing but giving charity to the wealthy.
    Maybe leave it in the pockets of the people that these crooks are trying to suck it out from.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bernie who would negotiate with Reilly to move to the NIZ with all of the pending litigation?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I Like the part about the bangor meeting.

    Joe

    ReplyDelete
  15. You want smug: read the comments in the morning call. The people on those blogs want allentown to die. They want minorities to kill each other. They want a wall built around Allentown. This sentiment is real and it has existed for decades.

    Why? B/c they think they are better than the people living in the city. They think it's good that the townships and boroughs are doing the world a favor by putting the final nail in the coffin for Allentown. The city/suburb conflict isn't an invention of the media: it exists. There are many people in the suburbs who want Allentown to die (too many reasons to list) and there are people in Allentown who want the suburbs to suffer. The morning call and politicians didn't need to create anything. It already exists. But politicians being what they are and news papers trying to sell copy are happy to tap that sentiment.

    ReplyDelete
  16. There is absolutely no reason that the cities and suburbs should be fighting each other. Northampton and Lehigh County should be promoting a "Municipalities Conference" or anything else you may want to call it, for the sole purpose of working on projects like this and the means to fund them. Coperation between the two entities would promote a dynamite energy source that would unite the Lehigh Valley behind the common goals of prosperity for all its municipalities. Just think of what could have been accomplished and what might have been if this simple mechanism were in place. It's not too late. Quarterly meetings of all township, Borough, and City officals could come up with an agenda that would benefit all of us as taxpayers.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "I find this entire (Palace of Sport / NIZ Tax Theft) conversation to be very interesting. However, I need to state up front that I am not a native of the Lehigh Valley but have lived here for almost 20 years. With that said, my corporate assignments have taken me to many metropolitan areas and even smaller areas all across this great country of ours ... One of these stops was in COLUMBUS, OHIO, where I not only worked but as a child grew up spending time with my grandparents. Columbus also needed to revitalize their downtown and survive as a viable city.

    Instead of getting creative with surrounding communities and stealing tax revenues as Allentown has chose to do, they found a major corporate sponsor who single-handedly revitalized the entire north end of the downtown area. This included building a convention center, two hotels, two corporate offices and, yes, a hockey arena where the COLUMBUS BLUE JACKETS play.

    The point here is simply there is a better way to finance Allentown's hockey arena and that's with a corporate partner not in it for the tax breaks it will generate. If this approach had been taken there would be no controversy that exists today with this project."

    AVANTIDON
    "No Surprise As Easton Area S.D., Suburban Communities Take
    Wrong Path"
    lehighvalleylive.com
    5/23/2012

    ReplyDelete
  18. If the BROOKS BROTHERS were able to put up roughly 40% of their own money first --- as the IronPigs did with Coca-Cola Park ...

    ... the Opposition to Chairman Pawlowski's transformative $ 220.0 million dollar Palace of Sport would probably be about 40% less, it stands to reason.

    :-D

    ReplyDelete
  19. I now know why Jon Geeting feels compelled to comment on Bernie's blog.

    It's the only way people will read what he says.

    ReplyDelete
  20. COLUMBUS, OHIO also annexed most of its suburbs. It is now the largest city in Ohio as a result.

    Clearly there was regional cooperation to do that.

    ReplyDelete
  21. " Right now the LV has some nice suburban housing, but has very little in the way of quality urban housing or office space"

    In this single sentence, Geeting reveals just how ill-informed he is when it comes to the LV. He mustn't have had his fill of lox and NYC bagels this weekend. Historic Bethlehem and its charming residential properties, not quality? College Hill in Easton? Edgeboro Manor in Bethlehem? The West End of Allentown? Prospect Avenue in Bethlehem? I could go on. As for quality office space, let's start with Liberty Center in Downtown Bethlehem, or the Bank of America Building. Main Street Commons? Larry Holmes Plaza, the Alpha Building in Easton? PPL Plaza or even 702 Hamilton Street in Allentown? It seems to me that demand is the issue not supply. The NIZ isn't creating more demand, just shifting the tenants from one part of the Valley to another.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ironpigpen -

    The reality is that doing it the right way takes real work on the part of the City's elected officials.

    Crafting a back-room deal to steal money from surrounding communities and fill your own campaign coffers is much easier.

    ReplyDelete
  23. "What's smug is not even being able to recognize that suburban development is massively subsidized by the taxpayer. They are the Goliath in this situation"

    Yet another flawed argument. This is a red herring. The cities are far more heavily subsidized than the 'burbs.

    ReplyDelete
  24. "The solution is simple - make Allentown, Bethlehem and Easton better at being cities (more density, more mixed residential and commercial uses, less car-oriented planning),"

    This density argument is nutz. Geeting, a guy who lives in New York City, tells a guy who lives in Allentown, and who manages a successful suburb of Allentown, that he is "smug" and doesn't know what he is talking about. Geeting couldn't find his way around Allentown with a map.

    Bethlehem doesn't want more density and has chosen to limit the height of new development to preserve its historic fabric. Bethlehem's current zoning ordinance and its proposed zoning ordinance have plenty of room for development in them - including dense development in the urban core of the City.

    Easton can't afford to squeeze any more development into its relatively small corporate boundaries. What Easton needs is annexation or municipal consolidation to make itself a viable city with a viable land area.

    More density isn't the answer for any of these communities. Besides in Allentown, more density is code for tear it down, displace the current occupants - in the name of density, renewal, and smart growth and start over. That's what Allentown calls a "transformation."

    ReplyDelete
  25. "The solution is simple - make Allentown, Bethlehem and Easton better at being cities (more density, more mixed residential and commercial uses, less car-oriented planning),"

    This density argument is nutz. Geeting, a guy who lives in New York City, tells a guy who lives in Allentown, and who manages a successful suburb of Allentown, that he is "smug" and doesn't know what he is talking about. Geeting couldn't find his way around Allentown with a map.

    Bethlehem doesn't want more density and has chosen to limit the height of new development to preserve its historic fabric. Bethlehem's current zoning ordinance and its proposed zoning ordinance have plenty of room for development in them - including dense development in the urban core of the City.

    Easton can't afford to squeeze any more development into its relatively small corporate boundaries. What Easton needs is annexation or municipal consolidation to make itself a viable city with a viable land area.

    More density isn't the answer for any of these communities. Besides in Allentown, more density is code for tear it down, displace the current occupants - in the name of density, renewal, and smart growth and start over. That's what Allentown calls a "transformation."

    ReplyDelete
  26. 6:39 am -

    Why don't you do a little homework and look up how much Allentown already receives in federal and state grants.

    If those living in the suburbs realized how much the city gets (in comparison to their own townships or boroughs), they'd likely storm the city with torches and pitchforks.

    The problem with Allentown is not a lack of funds, it is the incredibly poor decisions that have been made regarding how to spend that money. Until those who have dug Allentown's financial hole are removed from office, no amount of money will change things.

    ReplyDelete
  27. "You want smug: read the comments in the morning call. The people on those blogs want allentown to die. They want minorities to kill each other. They want a wall built around Allentown. This sentiment is real and it has existed for decades."

    And the City's "progressive" answer is to declare minorities a "cancer" that must be eradicated from Hamilton Street.

    Very enlightened.

    ReplyDelete
  28. " A strong city will have strong suburbs. But you can't have strong suburbs without a strong city."


    Apparently we do have strong suburbs without a strong city or you wouldn't be bitching. Apparently that's why Allentown wants our tax money to pay for their playpen.

    ReplyDelete
  29. "Bernie who would negotiate with Reilly to move to the NIZ with all of the pending litigation?"

    Somebody who thinks it's a done deal anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  30. People really got sucked into this narrative about city versus suburb.

    It's not smug to suggest that Pat Browne pointed the City's own gun at it's foot and pulled the trigger on the NIZ.

    You can't have a strong region without cooperation, Pat.

    If the arena and the NIZ was proposed in any other municipality, I'd bet Allentown would sue just like everybody else did.

    ReplyDelete
  31. 6:41 AM While I agree with you wholeheartedly I feel his only stumbling block to the mayors position is politics. His former roll in the Heydt administration gives him a wealth of experience.Before Oreiley there was Trainer/Schantz. That project failed to win despite alotta hard work on the mayors part.I also agree with jons reasoning on why people fled the city. The real problem is what to do after the urban flight.Tear down and start over? Few dream of living in and raising families in row homes.Its as simple as that.After years of trying to restore Allentown it may just wind up that the current NIZ fiasco is the only way.

    ReplyDelete
  32. 11:05 am -

    I see your reference to the Mayor's role in the Heydt Administration. Please give details.

    To my knowledge, Pawlowski NEVER served in the Heydt administration, but was CED Director under former Mayor Roy Afflerbach.

    ReplyDelete
  33. The City of Allentown has received $9,000,000 in gaming revenue since 2010 as a handout!

    ReplyDelete
  34. "And the City's "progressive" answer is to declare minorities a "cancer" that must be eradicated from Hamilton Street."

    There is enough smugness to go around. That jerk, however, is a private developer, not part of city gov't. He doesn't even live in the city. Sounds like the smugness is imported from the suburbs. Contrast that to a wannabe comedian in Hanover who actually was elected and you can see why the smugness is easy to spot.

    ReplyDelete
  35. He is a realtor and money man hand-picked by Pawlowski to argue for the NIZ in a televised debate.

    ReplyDelete
  36. 11:25, The reference was to Jon Hammer, not Hizzoner.

    ReplyDelete
  37. What's clear from MC and pro-NIZ comments is that there are a lot of racists. Pawlowski has the paper read to him and knows this. Eminent Domain is for minorities. Hockey is for whites. There's more agreement than anyone wants to publicly acknowledge. They all agree that Allentown won't get better until it gets whiter.

    ReplyDelete
  38. 11:16 was not about pawlowski at all.Mayor Heydt worked very hard at the time to bring about the Trainor project at 9th and Hamilton.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Also the reference to jon is jon hammer not jon geeting.

    ReplyDelete
  40. The only reason Allentown got a nickel of Casino money is because John Stoffa gave away over half of the Casino impact fees intended for Northampton county. O'Hare fights that truth because he is in Stoffa's pocket but it is the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  41. "Get the carpetbaggers out and Hammer for Mayor!"

    Best idea I've heard in a long time! Mr. Hammer, if you are a Republican, please change your registration and run! We need competent management in Allentown, doesn't matter to me if they have an "R" or a "D" next to their name!

    ReplyDelete
  42. "The only reason Allentown got a nickel of Casino money is because John Stoffa gave away over half of the Casino impact fees intended for Northampton county. O'Hare fights that truth because he is in Stoffa's pocket but it is the truth."

    insane.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Why haven't the city municipal governments been sued--ACID / City of Allentown. Do they have local immunity. If the state players are knocked out is this all over? I'm scared Bernie.

    ReplyDelete
  44. My recollection of the casino agreement was that it was done BEFORE anyone even knew where the casino would be located (Allentown or Bethlehem; Lehigh or Northampton County).

    I believe it was designed to help all share the benefits of the casino, and defray some of the negative costs that come with it. Preliminary figures were discussed and made public, and all parties had an idea of what they were dealing with.

    You can agree or disagree with the wisdom of doing that, but you cannot compare it to the secrecy that has surrounded the NIZ.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Bernie -

    Another issue is what is the NIZ Authority currently doing with the money they're collecting from the munis?

    I'm assuming they're currently collecting, and if the law is found unconstitutional will they have the cash on hand to repay what they've collected?

    Fiscal prudence would make one think that they should be escrowing the cash collected from the outside munis, until the case is resolved. But this is Allentown, and the fiscal rules others play by are seldom followed.

    ReplyDelete
  46. A wonderfully written article and synopsis of Bill White, trying to sell newspapers, when this blog is free!

    ReplyDelete
  47. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  48. I have deleted an OT and false Stoffa attack.

    ReplyDelete
  49. NIZ=Casino fees! O'Hare can delete words but not the TRUTH!!!

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.