Local Government TV

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Harhart Has a Write-In Challenger, Matt Miles

As recently as today, Morning Call columnist Bill White has lamented that State Rep. Julie Harhart is running unopposed, "unless a Democratic write-in emerges."

That appears to be the case. Harhart was unable to attend Friday's state budget forum, but Matt Miles was there. This Danielsville resident is waging a write-in campaign for the Democratic nomination against Harhart.

On his webpage, Miles argues that "[s]eniors, unemployed and the disabled are losing programs and support they need to survive, and are treated like second-class citizens."

Harhart has apologized for her absence from Friday's budget forum.
"I apologize I was unable to attend the meeting because of a conflict with my schedule on this date. I was unable to send a staff member because I had staff out sick on this date. I am not ignoring these issues. I have been meeting one on one with a lot of individuals regarding Corbett's budget cuts in health and human services, along with cuts in education and early childhood, conservation, and many other budget issues.
Again, I apologize for not attending this meeting."

13 comments:

  1. Generation Occupy Wall Street ...

    ... we are all saved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just another dem slut trying to feed off the public dole. Does this boy even have a job?

    Harhart is no better then any other simple minded dem. Their motto is lets give the country away as long as we can keep our cushy jobs and bloated benefits.

    ReplyDelete
  3. At least someone is trying to step up. Her last opponent was a green party bloke to pulled 20% of the popular vote.

    Mark, what are YOU doing to change it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mark Baker, Let's drop the personal attacks, shall we?

    ReplyDelete
  6. One thing Ms. Harhart did wrong. She should have cancelled everything else and attended the Fowler meeting. Bad decision.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe that, in view of the sheer number of people who were there, she should have been there.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Justin simmons did not have a job and lived in his moms basement, but that was good enough for you right leaning sycophants to vote in, was it not?

    ReplyDelete
  9. There too. Harhart missed the boat. Emotions are running strong right now. Listen to all the people.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous said...

    Justin simmons did not have a job and lived in his moms basement, but that was good enough for you right leaning sycophants to vote in, was it not?

    7:04 AM

    This is ridiculous. The guy won 2 years ago. Run against him if you want or hire a new publicist but give this single sentence a break.

    ReplyDelete
  11. In defense of Harhart, this event took outside her district and while there was a good turnout, sometimes these things DON'T have a turnout. If you already have a commitment with your own constituents, why would you break that to go out to the Bethlehem? Even us armchair-pundits can't be two places at once. At least she responded with an explanation

    ReplyDelete
  12. When voters had the choice, they picked that Simmons kid who lived in his parents basement over Beyer. Karen - what the hell does the say about the job you did? I'd stop saying that because it continues to make you look like a horse's ass (which you are).

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm pretty sure Simmons had a job. Unless I am mistaken, he was an aide to Senator Wonderling. Further, how does voting for Simmons over Beyer make anyone a sycophant? What kind of influence did Simmons wield to make supporting him sycophantic?

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.