Local Government TV

Monday, February 06, 2012

Boscola: NIZ a "Pilot Project" That Can Be Modified

Late Saturday night. I was throwing hatchets into a wall, one of my usual weekend past times. Then my computer "binged," alerting me to an email. Instead of the usual Saturday night troll, it was an email from State Senator Lisa Boscola, who must put in late hours. She was writing to be about Allentown's NIZ.

Allentown's controversial NIZ is contained in Act 50 of 2009, amended by Act 26 of 2011. Both include language enabling an authority to "borrow" EIT owed to other municipalities to finance the arena and other improvements in the NIZ, essentially interrupting the revenue flow to other municipalities.

Boscola opposed the 2009 bill, but supported the 2011 legislation. I asked Lisa why she supported the 2011 Bill, and whether she would support a repeal of the EIT diversion. Below is her frank response.

Bernie, you are correct in your assumption that both bills were budget vehicles, enacting the state’s fiscal code. The fiscal code is the bill that implements the state budgets for those given years. As a result, both bills contained a number of provisions in addition to the NIZ language.

Regarding Act 50 of 2009 (HB 1614), I opposed this bill for a number of reasons. Most notably, the bill included a new tax on “little cigars” that had a negative impact on a major company in the Lehigh Valley, Cigars International. The legislation also raided the MCARE and Tobacco Settlement Funds to the tune of nearly $800 million in order to balance the budget. The transfer established a one-time funding source, which in turn led to a structural budget deficit in the next fiscal year. Finally, this bill implemented language that was detrimental to libraries and community colleges.

As to Act 26 of 2011 (SB 907), I supported this bill again for a number of reasons. First, the legislation included a long overdue transfer of surplus funds that had been in the hands of legislative leadership. This money should have been transferred back into the General Fund and not kept in the discretionary hands of legislative leaders. Also, as you know, I have been a long-time advocate of reforming our current property tax system to bring about property tax relief. A specific section of the Gaming Control Board’s budget added to this bill allows the Board to levy a surcharge on casinos immediately should there be insufficient funds in the reserve fund used to provide property tax relief.

This bill also transferred funding from PennVEST to fully fund Pennsylvania’s H2O program. This transfer allowed for important water and sewer projects to move forward, including a much needed grant to the Borough of Portland for a sewer facility upgrade. In Portland, the sewer upgrade led to Borough residents having the highest sewer rates in the entire Commonwealth. Thanks to this grant, ratepayers saw a substantial reduction in their monthly rates.

Finally, to answer your question about if I would support a repeal of the section of the NIZ law that allocates Earned Income Tax revenue from non-residents of the City of Allentown to pay off the bonds to finance the arena’s construction, it is critical for us in the General Assembly to see the impact this section has on local governments throughout the Lehigh Valley. I believe we need to look at economic development from a regional perspective. I have always believed this. That is why I advocated for the splitting of local share revenue for Bethlehem’s casino among several area municipalities. Economic development initiatives must be approached in a regional sense. However, the full fiscal impact of the NIZ on local communities is yet to be determined. As with any pilot project, modifications can be made to the current structure once we have all the information.

Although I appreciate Boscola's honest reply, this is a regional project concocted in Allentown, blessed in Harrisburg and provided life in Harrisburg. It provides a mechanism to take taxes from other regional entities without ever bothering to have told them what the Hell was going on.

It is much different from Casino "revenue sharing." Bethlehem and Northampton County share host fee revenue with Allentown, Easton (table games only) and Lehigh County. The arena and the NIZ will share no revenue with their neighbors. On the contrary, they are asking their neighbors to share in the expense, and the risk, via their EIT grab.

9 comments:

  1. The issue here is the cloak and dagger method in which this was accomplished. Even Boscola cannot bs her way out of this one. Is taking money from municipalities without their knowledge Regionalization or Piracy? Is this good goverment ? transparent government? The biggest smartest school yard bullies got the candy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Doublespeak! Called her 2 weeks ago now and still no response to my questions. She gets no pass on this. Unresponsive to her bosses..the people in her district. Sick of the alibi's from HBurg pols!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bernie, It is obvious to me Allentown needs all the tax revenue and public funds it needs to run this arena.If Allentown collects the taxes why would they send it to other Communities. This is common sense.Keep the money for the arena and other public funded perks for the in-crowd.Boscola knows this and had to agree to it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some time ago the Lehgih Valley Partnership floated the idea of a 1% sales tax for regional benefit. As I recall, half of the money generated would go to all municipalities with a mandate to lower property taxes throughout the valley, yes even for the wealthy, and the other half would go to municipalities that have severe financial hardships either because of size, tax-exempt properties, etc. Obvioulsy this would help the cities and the boroughs of the valley. The rationale was that the entire region benefitted from strong municipalities.

    The sales tax proposal was solid in that sales taxes are also collected from people that don't live here, all visitors pay sales tax.

    I really think this idea has merit to at least explore and then maybe Allentown could use their share of that sales tax for their arena.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great Lisa!

    Now please go back and modify the Gaming Legislation to reflect a 60 - 40 split with the majority of it staying local. Similiar to what Corbett and GOP has proposed for Marcellus.

    I find it absurd that so few communities qualify for the MILLIONS generated from the Sands.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why is "Regionalization" only a term used when the primary benefactors are Allentown, Bethlehem, or Easton?

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's still just impossible to take her seriously. I can't look at those ruddy cheeks and not be reminded of her stated preference for oral sex over vaginal sex. That this information is known about her, renders her ridiculous. Please go away, Lisa. You're just plain nasty to even contemplate.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Maybe a smaller pilot project would make more sense.

    ReplyDelete
  9. State representative Justin Simmons was part of this deal.

    Now that it's been discovered he's trying to displace blame elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.