In the story above, I have told you how the county has screwed up the mail-in ballots (MIBs) in the District Two race for Easton City Council. Unfortunately, the errors continue for in-person voters in the Nazareth Area School Board races.
In that race, the MIBs seem fine. I have one myself. But based on the sample ballot for in-person precinct voting, Linda Stubits is being hung out to dry.
Sample ballots never appeared on the election website until after MIBs had gone out. It appears to have been an afterthought.
In the Nazareth Area School Board race, there are three candidates in Nazareth. You can vote for two. Christine Stofko is running as a Democrat. Kathryn Roberts is running as a Republican. Linda Stubits cross-filed and is running as both a Democrat and Republican.
Yet this is what appears on the sample ballot.
"It's not a mistake. That's the law in Pennsylvania. Cross filed candidates are only ever listed once on the ballot, on the left hand side, with both parties by their name. In this case it's under the Democratic side because The Governor is a Democrat. If the Governor was a Republican, they would be listed under the Republicans side even if they were a Democrat.
This has always been the case and it is the case in all cross filed races in the county. See also Bangor, Pen Argyl, Forks (EASD), Saucon Valley, etc. They are all this way and this is not a mistake.
Article X of the PA voting code speaks to ballots and has this to say:
"(d) Whenever any candidate shall receive more than one nomination for the same office, his name shall be printed once, and the names of each political party so nominating him shall be printed opposite the name of such candidate, arranged in the same order as candidates names are required to be arranged."
That's not how the ballot appears. The names of the political parties appear under the candidate, and are not opposite the name of the candidate, as required by the Code. The order in which the parties appear (Democratic/Republican) assumes that all the candidates are listed under the race together, which is exactly how it appears on the MIB. The ballot itself is a mistake because of its design. It lists the cross filed candidate's name under only one of the parties. It needs to be there twice to correct the wrong impression that a candidate is running. If the ballot was designed precisely the way it was done in the MIB, there would be no problem.
This is the exact opposite of "legal, fair and accurate."
Updated 10:10 am.
The county has responded to concerns raised by Stubits. I believe the voting machine can be configured in a way that ensures you may only cast one vote for a candidate who has cross-filed, as I have seen in other races. So I completely disagree with the county's reasoning, but wish to share what the county solicitor's office has to say:
I have received your letter regarding your ballot placement on the 2025 General Election Ballot. It is my understanding that you cross-filed during the primary election and were nominated by both the Democratic and the Republican party as a candidate for Nazareth Area School Board.
In compliance with email guidance received from the Pennsylvania Department of State and the Pennsylvania Election code, specifically 25 P.S. § 2963(d), candidates nominated for the same office by more than one party are printed on the ballot only once along with the names of each party by which the candidate was nominated. The candidates’ names are arranged in the same order as all other candidates’ names are otherwise required to be arranged.
This year, because the last gubernatorial election was won by a Democrat cross- filed candidates are listed with other Democrats in order by number of votes received in the Democratic primary. If a Republican was governor, cross-filed candidates would be listed with other Republicans in order by number of votes received in the Republican primary.
According to the Pennsylvania Department of State, “Ballot Position for Cross- Filed Candidates – Because the Democratic Party has acquired ‘ballot preference’ as a result of the 2022 gubernatorial election, a candidate who has won both political party nominations is listed on the official ballot according to the position he/she obtained at the Democratic Party primary.” According to 25 P.S. § 2963 (d), “whenever any candidate shall receive more than one nomination for the same office, his name shall be printed once, and the names of each political party so nominating him shall be printed opposite the name of such candidate, arranged in the same order as candidates’ names are required to be arranged.”
Listing the name only once is especially important in races, such as school board, that allow voters to vote for more than one candidate. If the same name appeared more than once on such a ballot, it would create the opportunity for a voter to vote more than once for a single candidate which is not allowed. If you have any further concerns, do not hesitate to reach out. If you have questions, I suggest that you consult an attorney.

Same in Region 2 with my race, they have Wendy Whiteash listed only on the Dem side under my name. Though to be honest I believe Wendy and Dr. Stubits’ will have no problem winning their elections even with this unfair issue, they are both good campaigners and very well liked in the community.
ReplyDelete
DeleteNot a chance.
It's not a mistake. That's the law in Pennsylvania. Cross filed candidates are only ever listed once on the ballot, on the left hand side, with both parties by their name. In this case it's under the Democratic side because The Governor is a Democrat. If the Governor was a Republican, they would be listed under the Republicans side even if they were a Democrat.
ReplyDeleteThis has always been the case and it is the case in all cross filed races in the county. See also Bangor, Pen Argyl, Forks (EASD), Saucon Valley, etc. They are all this way and this is not a mistake.
Article X of the PA voting code speaks to ballots and has this to say:
"(d) Whenever any candidate shall receive more than one nomination for the same office, his name shall be printed once, and the names of each political party so nominating him shall be printed opposite the name of such candidate, arranged in the same order as candidates names are required to be arranged."
Explaining it is one thing. Reality is that it needs to be fixed NOW.
ReplyDeleteTrump is right again the elections in this country are fixed.
ReplyDeleteLOL if they were “fixed” then he most definitely wouldn’t be nor should he be President. They seem to only be fixed when the R’s lose a seat.
DeleteYou are assuming tump is part of this…..
DeleteTake a good look at Stofko. I did a little research on her and she’s a radical. She’s endorsed by PFLAG which advocates for including men in woman’s sports! She’s endorsed by the “ working families party” so she’s also a socialist. Endorsed bucket Warren and Kelly Keegan. Please folks do some research on these school board candidates it’s important. This woman is a far left radical who shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near a school board.
ReplyDeleteHad you done your research a little harder, you would've seen that she is not endorsed by Keegan, nor has she said anything about advocating for men in women's sports. Sounds like right-wing scare tactics to me.
DeleteI have taken a good look at Christine. She is an active participant in school district issues who has concerns about ethics in school board members. I believe she is interested in high quality education. I never got the hint that she is a "far left radical." Frank Pintabone was endorsed by Working Families, and he is far from far left. She strikes me as pragmatic and very dedicated. It takes a special kind of person to want to serve on a school board and I believe she is such a person and will vote for her and Stubits.
DeleteYou can't print the name twice when the law says once. I don't know what the solution is on these machines, but your answer isn't it and this is consistent with what has been done in cross filed races for the last 4 years, at least. This was easier to deal with when people could just push a button to select all candidates for a party, in which case the cross file would have been selected no matter which was chosen.
ReplyDeleteYou're incorrect. The law does not say that the name shall be printed only once and it creates a great deal of confusion when a candidate is listed under one party the way she has been displayed on the sample ballot. To eliminate that confusion, the crossfiled candidate should be listed under both parties.
DeleteBernie you are part of the media and any sane person will tell you the media a bunch of hypocrites and democrats .
ReplyDeleteGo away, Tricia. Let the grown ups talk.
DeleteDem Shenanigans?
ReplyDeleteFor a local school board race? Puh-lease stop with the rhetoric.
DeleteThis is designed to get crazy Stofko elected. Linda has done a great job I hope she has a legal avenue to pursue if she loses.
ReplyDeleteThis blog is full of misinformation and should be ignored.
ReplyDeleteIf this BLOG is "full of misinformation and should be ignored", then why do you read it asshole?
DeleteI am always willing to correct factual errors and have published the county's view on this matter. I still believe this is a mistake and that its interpretation of the law is flawed.
DeleteThe EXACT wording of the law:
Delete(d) Whenever any candidate shall receive more than one nomination for the same office, his name shall be printed once, and the names of each political party so nominating him shall be printed opposite the name of such candidate, arranged in the same order as candidates names are required to be arranged. At the right of all the party names or appellation shall be a single square of sufficient size for the convenient insertion of a cross (x) or check (✓) mark.