Local Government TV

Thursday, June 05, 2025

NorCo Controller Audit: About Half of $5 Million in Retention Bonuses Paid To Employees

Back in March, NorCo Council member John Brown wanted to know what happened to $5 million in retention bonuses, set aside by Council for Gracedale employees. By a 8-1 vote, Council tasked Controller Tara Zrinski with finding out how much money had been spent, and what was left. Brown was the sole dissenter, and that was because he wanted a report within 20 days. 

Council had the right to wonder what had happened. They, and not the Executive, control the purse strings. And it is they who directed that $5 million in federal pandemic funds be used to stop the bleeding of nursing home staff. They actually did so at the request of Executive Lamont McClure.

The $5 million in retention bonuses at Gracedale was part of a larger $15.5 million spending plan at Gracedale, passed in 2022 by County Council. The only Council member to vote against bonuses was John Brown. 

McClure had told Council that the administration would pay all employees at Gracedale an annual $2,500 bonus over a period of four years to bring in 54-60 additional nursing staff and enable the nursing home to provide the required nursing care needed at the facility.

"If you're a CNA [certified nurse's aid] within the sound of my voice, it would be a really good time to come to Gracedale," he said at the time, and repeated it several times. 

That was then. 

Early this year, on January 16, career service workers at Gracedale received an email from nursing home administrators informing them these bonuses were "temporary," were being stopped and that "the remainder has been used for caring for our residents." 

So what happened? 

At the time, I believed I had a partial answer. I speculated that retention bonuses set aside for some bargaining units may have been negotiated away in exchange for higher salaries. At that time, in response to a direct question from Council member Tom Giovanni, McClure said that the bonuses had ended, but that was only with respect to one of several bargaining units. I had no explanation for career service workers. We now know because Controller Tara Zrinski has finished her audit of this money. You can see her news release as well as the actual audit below. 

Zrinski's audit concludes that, of the $5 million approved for retention bonuses, only $2.36 million was actually paid to employees. The rest was used for operating expenses at the nursing home. Three bargaining units at Gracedale gave up the bonuses in exchange for higher pay. These agreements were unknowingly ratified by County Council. Had they known that the retention bonuses were ending. But there was no agreement with career service to end bonuses in exchange for higher pay. They just ended.

In her audit, Zrinski notes that since the money was commingled with other Gracedale funds, iit is impossible to state exactly how each dollar was spent. 

McClure told LV News that county council resolutions are generally mere suggestions, but he knows that it is Council, and not the Exec, that controls the purse strings. When bonuses ended for bargaining units, he could have been more clear. And he has provided no explanation for his decision to defy their will and prematurely terminate them for career service, who are nonunion.

He prides himself on transparency, but the way he handled this is a poor example.

Zrinski News Release

(Easton, PA) - The Northampton County Controller’s Office has released the results of its independent internal audit examining the use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for retention bonuses paid to employees at Gracedale, the county-owned nursing facility, as authorized by County Council Resolution #70-2022. The audit covered the period from 2022 through April 13, 2025, and focused on ensuring that the distribution of these funds complied with the resolution and relevant labor agreements.

 The audit found that a total of $2,360,891.18 in retention bonuses was paid out to all eligible union and Career Service employees at Gracedale during the review period. Specifically, $2,204,441.08 was disbursed from 2022 through 2024, and an additional $156,450.10 was paid in 2025.

 

“The audit found that, although $5 million was designated for retention bonuses in the County Council Resolution, only a portion of that money was paid out specifically to retention bonuses. The remainder of the ARPA funds, while allocated to Gracedale, could not be specifically tracked once transferred to Gracedale in 2023 and were commingled with other funds. The Controller’s Office could not determine the exact Gracedale expenses paid with those ARPA funds after they were combined with other Gracedale resources,” said Tara Zrinski, Northampton County Controller. “Because the management responsible for that decision is no longer in that position, we cannot determine why the money was not tracked in a more transparent manner.”

 

A sample of 40 employees was tested to verify the accuracy of retention bonus payments, and it was determined that each employee received the correct number and amount of retention bonus payments ($2,500 annually). Any variations were due to the timing of employment anniversaries or employment status changes. For example, some employees received part of their bonus in one year and the remainder in the next, depending on when they reached their employment anniversary. There was one instance where an employee received a $5,000 payment in 2024, which was a catch-up for a missed prior-year payment, not an overpayment.

 

The audit also confirmed that no retention bonuses were paid to per diem employees, the Gracedale Administrator, Director of Nursing, or Assistant Director of Nursing, in accordance with the County Council’s resolution. The payment of retention bonuses was governed by union contracts for the AFSCME and Steelworkers unions, which were amended to include or sunset retention bonus provisions. While there was no formal written policy for Career Service employees, the audit found that they received bonuses consistent with union terms.

 

“Our review confirmed that retention bonuses that were paid out were paid accurately and all eligible employee groups received payments according to the established rules, with only minor issues related to timing and administrative delays, which were quickly corrected. We also found that no ineligible personnel—such as per diem staff or senior administrators—received bonuses. Additionally, the County properly amended union contracts to reflect changes in the retention bonus program and affected career service employees were notified of the program’s end in a timely manner,” said Zrinski.

 

The retention bonus program ended at different times for different employee groups, depending on contract negotiations. Steelworkers’ bonuses ended on December 31, 2023, while AFSCME Residual Union employees remain eligible through December 31, 2025. AFSCME Gracedale Union employees hired in 2024 or earlier are eligible for 2025 payments. Career Service employees were notified in early 2025 that retention bonuses to them would cease due to the exhaustion of ARPA funds.

 

In summary, the audit determined that all ARPA funds designated for retention bonuses through the Council Resolution were transferred to the Gracedale fund by the end of 2023. These funds were not tracked separately from other county contributions once transferred and were fully expended on Gracedale operations. As a result, the Controller’s Office could not determine the exact Gracedale expenses paid with the ARPA funds after they were commingled with other resources.

 

“Without tracking of the balance of the $5,000,000 allocated to Gracedale retention bonuses by the County Council’s resolution, there is no way to specifically determine what that money was used for at Gracedale beside what was indicated by the previous management—operational expenses and the care of residents,” said Zrinski.

 

One final note, the audit found that for federal reporting purposes, the County was only required to report that ARPA funds were used to replace lost revenue, not required to track specific expenditures; thus, the decision not to track the retention bonus funds separately from other Gracedale resources was consistent with federal reporting requirements.



Final Report Gracedale $5 Million Retention Bonus by BernieOHare on Scribd

53 comments:

  1. County council needs to look into the entire county now, where there is smoke there is fire. Where did the rest of the money/funds go. If I recall during COVID the county used funds to buy mobile health vans for st Luke’s and lvhn 1 million each or total of the two?, where are these health vans? Also if so many departments in the county are short staffed where is the money allocated for their staffing going? Many questions and not to mention this report came out after the primaries

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a terrible coverup!

      Delete
    2. Nobody said fraud or cover up, but the people really should know where this money is going. It very much lacks transparency and one must ask is that somebody I want to vote for congress, answer is NO

      Delete
  2. Par for the course for the McClure gang. They do what they want, and the rubber stamps applaud him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. But I was assured by several Republican candidates running for office this year that the money was missing and stolen and probably given to the Clinton Foundation or something!

    Still a very bad look for Lamont and whichever bureaucrat was supposed to set this up to be way more transparent potentially worth firing over

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dirty double-crossers. This is really shady.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Theft and cover up. Lamont is going to be trounced in the primary by Whatzername, the Wild-backed DEI box checker. Too funny. He'll finally pay for his Covid sins.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no theft. That's ridiculous. The $ was spent on Gracedale, but McClure should have explained this better to Council.

      Delete
    2. Yeah no theft. Just keep covering for your boy. It was all spent on covid. Lol. And now these people voted for Tara???? Who was she hugging at her little victory screaming conference???? She new this all.

      Delete
  6. If this is the biggest scandal of Mclures tenure...yawn. wake me when a real scandal happens

    ReplyDelete
  7. So Gracedale's massive operating deficits have been plugged by COVID relief funds. That money is gone. This administration has hidden the true financial picture of the nursing home. A big tax hike is looming, Lamont knows it, and Tara has agreed to take the hit for it when she's elected.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She’s not getting elected. One clown was enough. We don’t need another Bozo.

      Delete
  8. “ but the way he handled this is a poor example” Really !!! That’s like a slap on his paddies !!

    ReplyDelete
  9. No surprise from McClueless and he wants to run for a higher position. God help us!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He’d fit right in with our corrupt and sneaky Members of Congress. Doesn’t matter what party label he carries, both Republicans and Democrats in Congress are NOT working on behalf of average everyday citizens.

      But, you’ve been warned. We now have a one party government in Washington. They are ALL money wasters and crooks.

      Delete
  10. 1st the monies should have been put in a separate fund for the intended purpose of retention bonus, 2nd they should have told the unions these are temporary payments period, 3rd who authorized that the funds could be used for operating expenses for the facility. This is a screw up. Now you have a built in perpetuity a higher wage structure for the union workers which over time will be greater than the federal monies allocated, and this tells me that there is at least a $2mm funding gap since the retention money was used for operations. Lastly the non-union employees were not paid in full as directed by council. Who foots the bill when the federal monies run out?

    ReplyDelete
  11. “In her audit, Zrinski notes that since the money was commingled with other Gracedale funds, iit is impossible to state exactly how each dollar was spent.”

    That’s the kind way of saying that the funds were misspent.

    Exactly what I’d expect from an unqualified controller who was bought by the executive with campaign donations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It also says there weren't required to report or track the funding for the Federal government but they absolutely are required to do that. Top notch auditing.

      Delete
  12. I love watching Republicans roll the dice and lose. They tried it and the only thing they found were snake eyes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wait, what? Republicans are losers here, how so?

      Delete
  13. “He prides himself on transparency, but the way he handled this is a poor example.”

    Uh, he prides himself on CLAIMING he’s transparent, and this is a perfect example of how he ACTUALLY operates.

    ReplyDelete
  14. How many of the new 54-60 nurses came to Gracedale specifically because of the bonuses? Or don’t they actually keep score on the programs they start?

    ReplyDelete
  15. This is what you get when you follow John Brownstain and LVH on a witch hunt to give there friend a platform to run on on his losing campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Keep listening to the worst county executive in the history of NORCO (John Brownstain) and this is the kind of money you waste that you do not have.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wow! This is not a good look for someone looking to run for congress. It’s also an interesting dynamic between two allies in Zrinski and McClure.

    ReplyDelete
  18. McClure has a PhD in Smoke and Mirrors

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But, he's Bernie's guy, so its ok

      Delete
  19. Bernie, can you or someone else look into why the recording of the Council meeting is not available on the County YouTube Account? It is typically available immediately after the meeting. It is very odd that neither the council meeting nor the preceding committee meeting is available online after such a contentious meeting.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Please tell us what meeting is missing from Youtube.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, it was my mistake. I got my dates mixed up and thought it was last evening rather than tonight. Please delete my previous comment if you feel it is appropriate.

      Delete
    2. Humility is always appreciated especially when it’s anonymous.

      Delete
  21. Like every report in the Controller's office, Zrinski didn't do this audit- she's unqualified. Her staff does all the work, while she takes the credit. This is what happens when you're bought and paid for by Lamont..

    ReplyDelete
  22. Too bad the Controller in Bethlehem is buddy buddy with Wee Willie. He should audit where all of Bethlehem's ARPA money went and not just go by Willie's talking points.

    ReplyDelete
  23. You all do not understand. The retention bonus was a scam that was a purposeful major step in the privatization of Gracedale. In the future, the county executive and the council will be able to point back to the retention bonus as “Proof” they tried to save Gracedale and it just didn’t work so they have to sell. That’s all that program was about. And the healthcare industry in the valley knows that. The employees were smart enough to understand it was a temporary 1.25/hr raise when already underpaid by several dollars an hour in some situations versus the region. And the program led to a number of employees to leave for other nursing homes in the county and even in Lehigh County. That’s why 3/4 of the nursing staff is Temporary agency staff. I don’t believe Lamont is that stupid. I believe he purposely set this up to be able to sell in the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are perhaps aware that he isn’t running again? His term ends in about seven months.

      Delete
    2. You're giving McCluless the benefit of the doubt

      Delete
    3. 3:35p - I’m not sure we are going with this logic, or lack thereof. The bonus program was announced 3 years ago and only fairly recently did Lamont announce that he was not seeking reelection.

      Delete
  24. This same story on LehighValleyNews.com contains the following: “County Executive Lamont McClure said he did not direct nursing home administrators to use ARPA money to cover operating costs, and was not involved with the decision. ‘It definitely wasn’t brought to my attention,’ he said.”

    Right out of the Obama/Biden/Pelosi playbook. “I didn’t know about this until I saw it on the news.” “We have to pass the bill so we know what’s in it.” Best of luck in the 2026 Congressional election Lamont.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The meeting at which Brown wanted the audit is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7_0d6UJpz0&list=PLIwCf6dD6DEtA1ksj2HTzbVOvSkM4JOkh&index=48

    ReplyDelete
  26. McClure already fired the lead accountant at Gracedale- that guy hates taking responsibility for ANYTHING- what a leader!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Typical local government! How is there no up to date financial data to track that type of money? Oh, it’s because local governments want to keep their antiquated systems…they love manual processes. First it’s employees giving themselves thousands in overtime and now this. 2.5 M not accounted for; heads should roll.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Just heard a boom in Nazareth. Thought it was the quarry. Turned out to be Lamont's election chances crashing and burning. Doh!

    ReplyDelete
  29. It was apparently never feasible that a facility of 688 licensed beds and a daily census in the 400s was solvent or even breaking even. Yet this is what was apparently reported at council meetings, etc. by McClure and the Gracedale administration. Why is Ms. Stewart King no longer administrator? The reason that she’s good at filling beds doesn’t appear to be plausible either. Oh my.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Is this embarrassment the reason Lamont is out today with a bucket-and-mop[ statement pretending to be tough on illegals? Keep bailing water Lamont! Bail! Bail! Bail! NARRATOR: "But it was too late because everyone knew Lamont was terribly weak on illegals and ICE cooperation."

    ReplyDelete
  31. Oh Great, now Missing McKenzie will push for a federal audit of the county.

    ReplyDelete
  32. County budgets account for all monies spent with a line item. Admittedly they move monies as allowed after original budgt to make necessary changes. But all of this is clearly logged as is every transition outlining what line it was taken from. No way they can't tell you what it was used for or where it was put. That's simply not true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They can tell you what was spent and how much was reallocated, but not where ever dollar came from once it was mixed into the general operating accounts. This is what the controllers report said. Taking funds from one program or department and reallocating it isn't inherently wrong. But when those funds are tied to specific requirements as to how they need to be spent, it matters greatly.

      Delete
    2. I disagree. When it us moved from one line item to another there should be a transaction accounting of that move

      Delete
  33. John Brown the most incompetent executive ever. It’s funny hearing him call someone else incompetent.

    ReplyDelete
  34. why didnt county council ask this at the last budget meeting, laziness, non attentive, pure ignorance. it was all in the budget they voted for

    ReplyDelete
  35. I thought Steve Barroness his highness was the bean counter at the County Home as well as the county administration in general. Why is he off the hook?

    ReplyDelete
  36. There are many moving parts to setting out a budget for services to all the county divisions, but of all of them, Gracedale was always the concern due to the 1-2 million per year it takes to keep the facility open. The budget specifically addresses the Gracedale needs and to not use the directed funds for what they are tagged
    for opens up a fiscal hole if/when a major event
    Occurs at the physical facility. There is Way more liability than meets the eye, and the smartest person coming into this matrix is David Holland. He was part of and understood how the nursing home and its many needs could be managed. He will be an asset to this county if he speaks up about it.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.