During what can only be described as a bizarre meeting, Easton City Council voted 4-3 last night to end Council member Frank Pintabone's proposal to decriminalize possession of a small amount of marijuana. Voting No were Mayor Sal Panto and Council members Taiba Sultana (she actually abstaine, effectively a No), Roger Riggles and Kenny Brown. Voting Yes were Pintabone, joined by Council members Crystal Rose and Jim Edinger.
At the onset, Lehigh Valley Justice Institute Executive Director Joe Welsh, who happens to be a resident of Easton's west ward, told Council that one of six cases filed in court involve marijuana charges, clogging the courts and diverting resources from real crime. More troubling a person is 6.4 times more likely to be charged with a marijuana offense if he happens to be black. He was echoed by Julie Zando-Dennis and Susan Hartranft Bittenger, both of whom are running for city council. A local downtown business owner joined the chorus of support.
No one from the public spoke against the proposal.
During a committee hearing just a few weeks before, Sultana said, "This is something that should have been done years ago." She went on to claim marijuana "is not a drug" and went on to say there should be no fine at all. Mayor Panto spoke in support of the ordinance but said the fine should be high to deter people from smoking in public.
That was then.
Last night, both of them suddenly switched.
Sultana kicked things off with a "heavy heart," saying that the ordinance needed to be tabled because she had heard "allegations" against an unnamed "official" and needed to investigate them first. Hmmm. While going door to door seeking signatures for her latest nomination petition, Sultana actually accused one unnamed (and elected) official of being a drug dealer. This unnamed and elected official knows about this libel because the very people that Sultana solicited immediately called this person.
Despite this baseless smear, Sal Panto seconded the motion to table. The very ordinance he supported on February 25 was now suddenly objectionable because he now feels that decriminalize should come from the state, even though 17 municipalities have already decriminalized marijuana.
Once a motion to table is made and seconded, Robert's Rules clearly provide that discussion ends and the matter is supposed to be voted on immediately. But the discussion continued, and even Solicitor Joel Scheer joined in the discussion instead of instructing them that they need to vote.
After several unnecessary minutes of discussion, a vote on the motion to table was taken and failed in a 4-3 vote. Panto, Ruggles and Sultana voted Yes while Edinger, Brown, Pintabone and Rose voted No.
On the merits, Ruggles said that this was a matter for the state, not Easton. He said that anyone who supported decriminalization would be violating an oath to uphold state law. He added that police officers take the same oath and would face a dilemma whether to enforce state or city law.
This argument is illogical. City Council members and even police officers take no oath that requires them to enforce every statute on the books. City Council members legislate and play no role in enforcement. And police officers who do enforce laws have what is known as prosecutorial discretion. If they charged every violation, things could get out of hand very quickly because we have same pretty strange laws, including a law that requires a child's bedroom to be within 200' of a bathroom. Under Ruggles' interpretation, every driver who goes 26 mph in a 25 mph zone should be ticketed. That's absurd.
Pintabone countered that the state has never argued that its laws concerning marijuana pre-empt the decriminalization in 17 municipalities that have voted to do so.
In fact, the state has actually encouraged civil instead of criminal remedies for some vehicle violations. I personally think that a driver who passes a school bus with flashing lights should pay the heaviest fine possible and be assessed points. But guess what? Under the AlertBus school safety program, which operates in Easton, it's a mere civil fine. Money trumps the safety of children, I guess.
Once again, Solicitor Joel Scheer piped up and injected his personal views instead of advising on the law.
In fairness, Ruggles has consistently held the view that decriminalization of marijuana is the province of the state legislature. So has Ken Brown. But Panto and Sultana did about-faces. Sultana is just trying to smear someone. Panto has always had a tendency to say one thing and do another.
Economic Times reports
Pitabone in way over his head, glad they voted to do the right thing and keep illegal items illegal. Good job Easton council
ReplyDeletePeople are aware of the fact that Frank is one of your newer mancrushes, but even for you this is wild. You are vilifying others and claiming the law isn't important, if it is not aligned with FB's proposal. As a former attorney, you do realize the levels of govenrment and law and how it can be enforced. This is an unneeded and silly proposal being done by desperate woke politicians. Even in your diatribe, you bring up how this vote is anti- minority. It is a stupid, dumb, dumb idea put forth to grab votes from the alleged oppressed. It endangers the users, emboldens and enriches the pushers' and is unneeded. Also, it could be enforced in an unfair way. Create problems where there are none. You want FP to be mayor, but this is silly. Frank you are on your way.
ReplyDelete12:59, I do like Pintabone. He and Crystal Rose have both impressed me very much. They have been very good for Easton.
DeleteI do understand and respect the argument that this should be done by the state, not the city. I have no issue with that argument. So I get why Browne and Ruggles are opposed.
What does bother me are:
1) People who publicly state they support something, then refuse to vote for it when the time comes. This applies to Panto and Sultana. It is dishonest.
2) The outrageous attempt to smear a city council member by insinuation coming from Sultana. She has been doing this at her numerous door knocking adventures and now is bringing it up at council as well. It is a libel.
3) While I respect the argument that this should come from the state, Ruggles made the ridiculous and illogical argument that council members who support this are violating their oath of office. Council members do not enforce any laws. This ordinance merely provides for a civil alternative. Nor would a police officer be violating any oath. An officer can always exercise discretion when it comes to offenses. If he didn't, he would be unable to patrol more than a few feet without pulling someone over. So while I respect that this should be done by the state, no one is violating any oath of office or acting unethically by supporting this alternative.
4) I do not respect your argument that this emboldens the pushers, etc. That argument has no factual basis and those municipalities who have this ordinance have not seen this problem.
5) Your Solicitor is totally out of control. He constantly injects himself into policy issues, and at length, and at the same time refuses to instruct council properly on the law. Once the motion to table was made and seconded, there is no debate. But Joel Scheer let them all bray away. Then, once they argued on the merits. Scheer actually started repeating Ruggles' arguments. He is not an elected council member and should be there solely for legal advice.
The no votes were Panto, Ruggles and Brown. The 3, 70+ yr olds that have been on council 20+ years. It’s high time ( pun intended )the City voted these 3 out. Their time has come And is long gone. Panto is one hell of a politician, but as a man leaves a lot to be desired.
ReplyDeleteIn a town focused on historic preservation, this is offensive. Easton's proud history (not including race riots and the destruction of minority neighborhoods as part of devastating "urban redevelopment") is of a town that rejected a Constitutional amendment and never went dry during prohibition. It was an exciting whorehouse town where booze wagons regularly traversed Northampton Street without even bothering to cover their cargo. MEHA. Make Easton Historic Again.
ReplyDeletePanto, Brown and Ruggles have been in office combined for over 60 years. Sultana gives the finger to elderly residents.
ReplyDeleteTime to start changing this May 20th.
The same group of chuckle-heads vote on all sorts of stupid resolutions that have no teeth now are concerned that this should come from the State/Federal government? How’s that resolution to end the war in Ukraine going?
ReplyDeleteYou can smell pot downtown all the time anyway. Ever since NJ and NY made recreational weed legal, it’s everywhere.
ReplyDeleteSo it goes.
My biggest problem with the weed is the public use. It stinks! Trying to enjoy a day in the city with my kids and the stench is everywhere. I think it’s rude to smoke it walking down a crowded sidewalk. I wouldn’t mind it being legal, but public use should result in arrest.
ReplyDeleteGiven the correlation of pot smoking-munchies-Doritos, I suspect Pintabone is practicing radical self-preservation.
ReplyDeleteIs Easton City Council trying to "out-clown" Allentown City Council? Sultana's accusations may be unproven and even defamation, but if so many people, both on council and some running for council, are so obsessed with this issue, it's got to pertain to some of them in some way. Otherwise, why would you ever think about it? Don't tell me "it clogs the courts" or "not a drug" or "victimless crime" or some other nonsense like that. Fess up.
ReplyDeleteCouncilman Ruggles belongs in assisted living. Ruggles is also a Panto lap dog. Ruggles will do what Panto tells him to do. It’s time for fresh faces on Easton City council. Sultana has no chance of reelection and I suspect thst Republican Ruggles will get caught up in the national anti-Republicans movement being brought on by the Musk Whitehouse.
ReplyDelete