Local Government TV

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

NorCo Ambulance Ass'n Advocates Expanded Radio Service For First Responders

At their November 7 meeting, Northampton County Council voted 5-4 to reject a $63.5 million bond that would be used for a new parking deck and office building at the courthouse complex. It would also finance several other projects, including a $6 million P-25 radio system for first responders. These replace analog radios with digital and have the capacity to transfer data as well as voice. 

Council members Lori Vargo Heffner and Jeff Corpora both said they had no problem with building a parking garage to replace an outdated and unsafe structure. But they wanted more details on options about building the garage but delaying the county office building. Council member Jeff Warren wanted a vote on the entire package, all or nothing. He got nothing. Democrats Corpora and Vargo Heffner joined Republicans John Brown, John Goffredo and Tom Giovanni in voting down the bond. 

Since that time, the Council members who voted No have been criticized for voting against public safety, especially with regard to the parking deck. But there's been no attempt to separate what a consensus of Council wants from the office building, the only controversial part of the bond proposal. 

At the November 21 meeting of NorCo Council, Executive Lamont McClure shared a letter he received from Daniel Gordon, President of the NorCo Ambulance Ass'n: 

"The NorCo Ambulance Ass'n would like to lend its voice of support for the effort to expand the County's Motorola Astro P25 advanced communications system. This strategic expansion will not only enhance radio coverage for emergency responders but will also ensure the adoption of cutting-edge communication technology necessary for the effective operations during emergencies. 

"The expanded P25 system will deliver secure wide area communication providing seamless interoperability among all county emergency service organizations. By replacing the current communication infrastructure, which is prone to interference, the new system will ensure reliable uninterrupted communication when it is needed most during critical incidents and emergencies. This project represents a pivotal advancement in public safety capabilities. The upgraded P25 system will significantly improve response times and operational efficiency, ultimately contributing to a safer environment for all county residents. 

"Additionally, we strongly support the continued funding of the Northampton County public safety grant program. The use of bond funds for this initiative will support public safety agencies across the county while simultaneously allowing general tax revenues to be directed to other essential services. In closing, we commend your efforts to fund the P25 system expansion through bond proceeds and would like to extend our sincere appreciation for the recent upgrades to the radio infrastructure in the southern region of the county. These investments demonstrate a steadfast commitment to enhancing public safety and ensuring that our emergency responders have the tools they need to protect and serve our communities effectively."

Participating by phone, Council member Ron Heckman questioned why the county was unable to use funds from its fund balance, but Finance Director Steve Barron stated that money was needed to balance the budget. 

Council member Goffredo suggested splitting the cost over two years, but McClure was uncertain whether that is possible. 

What McClure could do is introduce a new bind without the county office building until a majority of County Council supports it and the interest rates make it worth it. 

5 comments:

  1. Oh please! The first part of the letter is the fire chiefs, and the second part is all McClure. Which lackey wrote it? The emergency people want and need the expanded p25 system to safeguard the residents, they don't give a rat's ass how it is paid for. That is another McClure political game, and you know it. He is using the safety of citizens to push his huge bond issue. So much for being a real leader for the people. What a sleezy political move
    Barron is not going to say they couldn't do it; he is nothing more than a puppet mouthpiece for McClure. only you take anything he says seriously.

    They put millions aside for a health center that won't pass this year or next. What happened to that money? They have hidden millions into BS line items including money they took from emergency funds. So, will he agree to fund items that shouldn't be in a bond issue to begin with (short lifespan usage) or will he hold the safety of Northampton County hostage to his massive ego? Let's see which elected officials' side with resident's safety or McClure?

    ReplyDelete
  2. "What McClure could do is introduce a new bind without the county office building until a majority of County Council supports it and the interest rates make it worth it."

    Exactly. McClure is why the radios weren't being replaced. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lamont should ram the bond through, while you sue to stop him.

    It worked before...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Where is the $11 million from the Financial Stabilization fund going in the proposed 2025 budget? Heckman is right. The county has the money for the radios in the fund balance. McClure and Barron know this and are playing games.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a typical partisan political move by McClure. He’s obviously trying to use the radio issue to get support for his whole bond proposal, not all of which is immediately needed.

    As disgusting as it is that McClure is doing this, it’s even more disgusting that the president of the ambulance association is allowing his organization to be used for political purposes. While I can understand the president of the association wanting to inform council about why they THINK they need new radios, they have no business giving an opinion about how that equipment should be funded, assuming that council agrees with the need.

    I used to think highly of the ambulance association, but that’s changed now that I know they’re just another bunch of political hacks.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.