Local Government TV

Friday, December 01, 2023

UPDATED: Judge Smith's Wake To Be Held In Courtroom One

Before I start this, I want you to know I had a very high opinion of Judge Edward Smith, both as a judge and as a person. I'd often see him in the courthouse cafeteria at lunchtime, talking with lawyers and employees. He was a Navy Captain who served his country with distinction, and his passing is a tragic loss for us all. I nevertheless think it is a mistake to schedule his viewing for today in Historic Courtroom 1 at 5 pm.

Typically, memorial services for deceased judges and lawyers are conducted by the bar association at the courthouse or some other venue. Family is invited. But this is a first. I've never seen the actual viewing of a judge scheduled for Courtroom One, and after normal business hours. Not for President Judge Clinton Budd Palmer, who I believe died in office. Nor for Judge Al Williams or numerous other judges who have since passed away.  Moreover, Judge Smith himself will be participating. Funeral directors plan to bring his casket to lie in state. Because they lack personnel to bring his body up some of the steps, deputy sheriffs will be enlisted to assist. 

Judge Smith had been a federal judge for the past nine years. He was no longer a county judge. But his viewing could not be conducted at a federal courthouse because it would be a misuse of public resources for private purposes. This is also improper on the county level. The very judges who are doing so just sentenced Bethlehem's former finance director for misusing city resources for private purposes, but they think themselves above the law. 

This decision is going to force the county to provide security, at its own expense.  Both entrances, including one restricted to employees, will have to be opened. Deputies will have to monitor the hallways to keep members of the public away from vital records and computer systems and to respond to possible medical emergencies.   

I believe Judge Smith, who was always a bit humble and self-deprecating, would be embarrassed. This is more about making the living county judges feel like big shots than it is to honor a good man. If they really wanted to honor him, they could start by acting more like him. 

As much as I liked Judge Smith, I have to ask, Where do you draw the line? 

If we conduct a public viewing for a judge who left the county nine years ago, do we have to do it for them all?  How about former Executives? Do we conduct their wakes as well? 

This is a county government, not a funeral home. We should be more focused on core county services than in giving special treatment to anyone.  Our court should know better.   

UPDATED 11:57 am

43 comments:

  1. As much as I too respected Judge Smith, having his viewing and funeral service in a county courtroom is a travesty. It is nearly obscene. Why did his family request this? Taxpayer paid resources should not be used for a private funeral service.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bernie should offset the costs via his advertising from his blog !

      Delete
  2. Simple question: who is responsible for this? A person with a name authorized this. It's the last thing Ed Smith would have wished. Who did this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, my understanding is this what he wanted. . The court did their best to carry out his final wishes.

      Delete
  3. Please pass along to Ron Angle that I look forward to his viewing in courtroom 1...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Vert true BO. This leads to a big party to celebrate your passing. You are so beloved I know the county will go out - not a viewing but a weeklong festival.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lamont sees this he’ll want to be mummified and permanently displayed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dumbass agrees with you on this one. Have a wonderful weekend, maybe I'll see you on the trails.

    Dumbass

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your reasoning sounds very sensible, logical & ethical Bernie, but do you think the county leadership is any of those things?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Isn’t this illegal. Is the expense being paid by the courts to reimburse the county? Keeping in mind that is probably also a misuse of taxpayer money

    ReplyDelete
  9. While I share the sentiments of all the accolades, respect and fond memories of Judge Smith since his passing, the honor of lying in state and lying in honor in a prominent public facility is not suitable to a trial judge. I do hope the current judges favoring this decision
    take a step back to realize their position is not worthy of this honor, and none of them are in Judge Smith's league of having the same respect of the bar and the public, or service to his country.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Weird and not appropriate. I look forward to a three part Netflix documentary about the bad decisions that lead up to this colossal fuck up. This is not what Judge Smith would want. A military salute? Yes. This? Uhh…no.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Our part time Judges are out of control. They make 250K a year and none of them puts in a 40 hour week.

    ReplyDelete
  12. How much is this wake costing the taxpayers ?

    ReplyDelete
  13. This sounds like a Jermaine Greer idea. The court should get rid of him.

    ReplyDelete
  14. So, the Feds said no, and the County said yes ?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Did anyone ask the County Executive what he thought ? I guess he’s in the tank for the robes too.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is the pinnacle of judicial arrogance in Northampton County.

    ReplyDelete
  17. It’s just plain weird.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Dally’s rich. Maybe he can reimburse the county.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Since Greg Daily thinks this is such a good idea, let him pick up the tab.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This may have been a request of the family and if so, it should have been denied. He was a judge. He was a veteran. He was, reportedly, a class act. There are, fortunately, many who fit these descriptions, yet their passing isn’t a show. If the judge was truly humble, this wouldn’t be happening because his family would want something more low-key. Frankly, I find this tacky.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I would imagine the family has requested this and the estate/family is bearing the costs. I can't imagine one county functionary would just give the go-ahead. In any event the family and friends should be given some deference. Protestors can address the next county council meeting.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The county, and not the family, is bearing the cost. One county "functionary" - the President Judge - waved his judicial wand and blessed it. Family and friends are entitled to deference, but not entitled to use county resources to conduct a wake. What this does is exalt some people over others - the antithesis of being an American.

    ReplyDelete
  23. You’re comparing a guy stealing $17k from the City and being criminally convicted to using Courtroom 1 for a few hours a former Judge’s funeral? It’s far too late, but you should seek help.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I will be filling a right to know request on what this costs the taxpayers of Norco County on Monday

    ReplyDelete
  25. Do they have a plan in place to deal with how Courtroom #1 is going to be forever haunted?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Easton should consider covering the cost with revenue generated from county employees by the Panto commuter tax.

    ReplyDelete
  27. "The family is paying"

    No one has conveyed that information to the county. The use of public resources to benefit oneself or another is a crime. It is public corruption, contrary to what the Legislature states in the preamble to the Ethics Act: "-The Legislature hereby declares that public office is a public trust and that any effort to realize personal financial gain through public office other than compensation provided by law is a violation of that trust."

    The family or Judge Dally should request a bill and pay. No one is above the law.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anyone on thois blog who is speaking negatively about this man or his funeral arrangements (.including those seeking a right to know) apparently have no fear of God or anything else. It truly is no one’s business. A great man has been lost. Let’s leave it at that!

    ReplyDelete
  29. "Actually, my understanding is this what he wanted. . The court did their best to carry out his final wishes."

    Assuming this is true, that is no justification for using public resources for private purposes. The court should have advised the family that Judge Smith would be honored and remembered in a bar association ceremony to which they would be invited.

    9:11, I have great admiration for Judge Smith, but it's everyone's business when public resources are used to convert a courthouse into a funeral parlor for one person.

    ReplyDelete
  30. lighten up, Francis..

    ReplyDelete
  31. You've defended some true lowlifes. This is not your best hour. May Judge Smith eventually rest in peace and may his family eventually be comforted. It's a shitty world full of shitty people.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I particularly disagree, Ed was a Federal Judge (Federal) just like when highest political figures ,- a President s wife passed, who pays that bill? Yes ,it’s a step down but he was our highest Federal person to pass while in office. . Additionally, it is highly unlikely that this would happen again in our lifetime. Don’t forget ,he wasn’t retired , he was walking around vertically just prior to his unfortunate demise. Don’t forget all the good he had done for us ,for this country and county that most of us wouldn’t Evan been qualified to attempt. Shame on some of you talking about costs, what ever was absorbed by they county ,is easily wasted every month by some lack of supervision, vehicles idling or driving unnecessarily , lights and heat on at wrong times, etc, because of the size of “us”. It’s just going to happen. Good day.

    ReplyDelete
  33. When I die, I want to be dismembered and mailed to my enemies.


    Guess what part you're getting bernie

    ReplyDelete
  34. A very nice man who served his Country as a veteran and public servant has passed away. May he rest in peace. He earned my respect by his dedication and commitment "in service to others".
    County Executives have their pictures hanging in the Rogue Gallery on the 3rd floor of the Courthouse/government center. Nobody says anything about that. Not all of them earned the respect of the general public, yet they permanently take up room on the wall. Some of these politicians may have had, or, in the future may have only two pall bearers when they pass. After all, there are only two handles on a garbage can.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Judge Smith presided over a county court matter I was involved with, and he seemed like a very fine judicial officer. I didn't know him personally, but all reports are he was a well liked and respected human being. I believe that holding this service in the county building is not appropriate, however. Rest in Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  36. You know? Judge Hogan was such a wonderful human being. He served in the Armed Forces. Why was he honored in the same way? Bogus!

    ReplyDelete
  37. JJ Cordi
    Are you asking why WASN'T JUDGE HOGAN HONORED THE SAME WAY or do you mean JUDGE HOGAN was honored the same way? Please clarify

    ReplyDelete
  38. "County Executives have their pictures hanging in the Rogue Gallery on the 3rd floor of the Courthouse/government center. Nobody says anything about that."

    I have no issues with portraits of former Execs or the portraits of our Council. That is our history, and we do that for judges as well. We also do have memorial services for judges who pass. What we do not have are wakes in which someone's casket is actually paraded into the courthouse. Judge Smith was a federal judge and had not been in Northampton County for nine years. I admired him, but this was entirely inappropriate

    ReplyDelete
  39. Well, whatever happens, I'm sure the Judge wont be aware of it.

    ReplyDelete
  40. This man gave 30 years of his life for military service! I don't mind using my tax dollars to grant his last wish, County uses tax dollars for things way less important than this!

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.