Local Government TV

Tuesday, May 02, 2023

Timeline For Allentown Initiative to Have Social Workers, and Not Cops, Respond to 9-1-1

Yesterday, I posted the text of an ordinance submitted by a citizens' committee to Allentown City  Council, based on a petition ostensibly signed by 2,000 registered voters.  This proposed law would require social workers, and not cops, to respond to some 9-1-1 calls.  In fact, social workers would be the default response. They would respond unless there's a raging inferno; violent criminal activity that must also pose a threat to public safety; a threat of immediate physical injury or death;  or cops and firefighters are specifically requested.  

Here's the timeline of this citizen's initiative:

April 11 - Petition presented to City Clerk

April 21 - 2,000 signatures certified by City Clerk

May 21 -  City Council receives proposed ordinance

June 21 - City Council adopts, rejects or takes no action

July 11 - City forwards proposed ordinance to County for initiative and referendum

August 8 - County deadline for initiative to appear on ballot. 

November 7 - Voters decide 

12 comments:

  1. What a bunch of hokum. Pity the poor sap of a social worker who even considers getting involved in this mess.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The “Social Justice Industry” is attempting to take us down the same road that leads to the mess we see happening in California and other states. In their Utopia, there is no need for anyone to question, nor monitor, the behaviors of others. This latest idea for Allentown is outrageous and unsafe for everyone. It must be rejected.

    I expect to also see a similar destructive move not to arrest for shoplifting of items totaling under $900, another device created in radical liberal places like Los Angeles and San Francisco. Vote NO on nonsense now!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stupidity is a flower that grows in gardens in Allentown.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe 10 or 15 years ago might have been ok. Times have changed and there seems to be a volatility in folks that makes these encounters more problematic. Need exceptionally good screening from call center. Should not be default to social worker.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Vladimir Ill-itchMay 2, 2023 at 7:50 AM

    "Tell me you want to 'defund the police' without saying you want to 'defund the police.'"

    This is step 1.

    Considering Allentown City Council is in a dead heat with the Allentown School Board in the competition to see which local elected body has the most brain-dead members, this will likely pass.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i wish they would send a social worker to curtail all of the atvs and motorcycles blowing through stop lights and going up one ways the wrong way.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for posting the text of the proposed ordinance.

    I see no option for City Council to amend it if they find portions are not within the City's power (directing how the County's 9-1-1 dispatchers handle calls). If they vote no because the ordinance is flawed, it still goes to the voters, flaws and all.

    That means at some point it may have to go to the Courts for resolution.

    What a mess.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 12:34, Once the matter is turned over to Lehigh County, I believe the elections commission can refuse to place the matter on the ballot bc the ordinance is illegal.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This works in a society where people have pride and shame.
    Sometimes thing need to fail before the get better.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Election Board could make that decision but I believe this would be wrong.

    The county election board isn’t a court of law and that’s where the question of legality of the proposed ordinance should be decided.

    As much as I want the proposed ordinance to fail, I think we head down a very dark road if we allow a small board of political appointees to start making those type of decisions.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Suggest you include in the timeline: May 3. City Council meeting, 6:30 PM - Bill 47 introduction. [ Section header in agenda says “(To be referred to Committee with public comment prior to referral)” or words to that effect ]. Council will vote whether to send to a Special Committee meeting sometime in the future.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.