Local Government TV

Wednesday, November 30, 2022

McClure Fires Back at NorCo Council Ordinance Killing Employee Health Center

In August, Northampton County Exec Lamont McClure proposed an employee-only health center that would be managed by a third party called Integrity Health. In addition to appearing before Council on two separate occasions, Integrity CEO Doug Forrester has sent two detailed responses to questions. He's also offered to meet with them individually. McClure presented Council with a proposed Resolution under which the County would have at least have a green light to pursue the concept, pending an actual contract. Instead, Council members John Goffredo and Tom Giovanni have introduced an ordinance that effectively kills an employee health center.  Council is slated to vote on this ordinance on Thursday, along with a few other minor items, like a budget.  In the meantime, McClure has prepared a point-by-point rejoinder (in blue).

WHEREAS, Northampton County Council has been advised by the Administration of Northampton County (Administration) of the intent to institute, operate, and maintain an Employee Health Center; and
·        The idea and concept of an Employee Health Center was pitched to Council on August 17, 2022 at the Finance Committee meeting.
·        Integrity Health operates several health centers in New Jersey and recently expanded into Lycoming County, Pennsylvania. 
 
WHEREAS, Northampton County Council has not been advised as to the startup costs for this Employee Health Center, liability issues, operational costs, return on investment, and detailed projected cost savings to Northampton County, if any; and
·        Council was provided with additional details and answers to all their questions shortly after their meeting on August 17, 2022.
·        On October 19, 2022, Council was able to further question and vet Integrity Health Care about their services and their proven model.
 
WHEREAS, The Administration has advised that funding for this Employee Health Center is present within the 2023 proposed Fiscal Budget; and
·        There are funds in the budget designated to cover the costs of Employee Healthcare for 2023. While this ‘trust fund’ is for those costs, we believe that the expenses and cost savings can be covered by the money we have requested in the 2023 Budget.
 
WHEREAS, Pursuant to the Northampton County Administrative Code, Section 13.15 et al., any contract exceeding $100,000 requires the review and approval of Northampton County Council, and no contract has been produced; and
·        After the October 19, 2022 Finance Committee meeting a resolution was presented to County Council to allow the County to pursue the Employee Health Center in concept and then present a contract to Council for approval once all the details were resolved.
·        Council does have the power to approve, and we would seek Council’s approval for any contract with Integrity Healthcare, but Council was asked to consider the concept of the center via resolution at their October 20, 2022 General Meeting and did not present the resolution as an agenda item.
 
WHEREAS, Pursuant to the Code Section 13.07, competitive bidding is required, but was not entailed, nor have exceptions been stated in detail as required in Section 13.10, in the proposal forwarded by the Administration; and
·        Competitive bidding is not “required” by Administrative Code Section 13.07; rather, Section 13.07 states that procurement of County goods and services over $25,000 shall be made by one of the five methods outlined under Section 13.07(a): competitive sealed bidding, competitive negotiations, noncompetitive negotiations, emergency procurements, and cooperative purchasing.
·        Section1 13.10 vests the County Executive or his designee with the authority to determine whether Noncompetitive Negotiation is required and that prior
to the award of the contract an Executive Order is issued stating the reason for using Noncompetitive Negotiation.
·        Integrity offers a unique concept for an exclusive employee health center which we presented to Council and the public on at least three occasions.
·        While there are two major health networks in the Lehigh Valley which may provide similar services, County Administration wanted to avoid branding that might prevent or dissuade employees from using the health center.
·        The County Administration and entities associated with the County approves bonds and financial instruments for those local hospital networks and it was easiest to avoid favoritism by going with an entity that is stand alone and provides a la carte services unique to our employees.
 
WHEREAS, Pursuant to the Code Section 13.14.c, the purchase and/or leasing of any real estate for any Employee Health Center requires review and approval by Northampton County Council, which has not been forthcoming; and
·        Leases and negotiations are exclusively the prevue of the County Executive with Council approval pursuant to the Home Rule Charter.
·        At each meeting the Administration has been clear that they did not want to talk about the location in public to protect the County’s negotiating position (therefore protecting taxpayer money). Council can ask the Administration individually or in an executive session for those details, but have not done so yet to date.
·        We will get whatever appraisals and disclose lease details when we are ready for Council to vote and a deal is negotiated as is done with MDJ leases and others the County engages in every year. A lease will be ready for presentation to the Finance Committee for the first meeting in the New Year.
 
WHEREAS, Northampton County Council requires that a full and complete review be had for any Employee Health Center, including, but not limited to, full disclosure as to all costs and expenses, staffing, compensation, operational costs, liability, and the County’s return on investment; and
·        This full and complete review was done on August 17, October 5 and October 19th of this year and during interim calls between Commissioners and Integrity to answer questions individual Commissioners might have. Calls to Commissioners by Integrity have, in some cases, been ignored.
 
WHEREAS, The Administration has advised County Council that the Employee Health Center has been overwhelmingly approved following a survey of Northampton County Employees. The survey contacted less than 25% of the County’s workforce, did not include details and circumstances as to its operation and effect upon County employees, and did not set forth the terms and conditions of its use or operation. County Council requests that conditions of its use or operation. County Council requests that a full and complete survey with regard to the detailed data be made of Northampton County Employees as to this Employee Health Center, including but not limited to location and hours; and
·        Employees cannot be forced to answer a survey. Twenty-five percent on any survey is a very good sample of the Northampton County workforce. Council has been asking employees what they need; Council can clearly ask employees if a free convenient alternative to health care was provided to them, would employees use it?
 
WHEREAS, Northampton County Council requests that a Request for Proposal be issued by Northampton County for any Employee Health Center; and
·        Council cannot compel a service to be procured or determine the manner a service is to be procured. Council’s powers in the Home Rule Charter and
Administrative Code are clear. Administration Code Section 13.03 states that “procurement authority and responsibility resides with the County
Executive, subject to approval by County Council as required.” The Executive proposes and Council can approve or disapprove of the proposal. This section of the ordinance violates the separation of powers inherent in the Home Rule Charter.
 
WHEREAS, Northampton County Council requires that there be a full, complete, and transparent disclosure of all facts and circumstances of any Employee Health Center; and
·        This was done during the meetings listed above and can be viewed online. Any suggestion this has not been done is simply not factual.
 
WHEREAS, Northampton County Council has been advised that other Counties within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, prior to the establishment of an Employee Health Center, have done so only after competitive bidding.
·        Council has yet to provide this information to the Administration. While the Administration has been open and transparent about our intentions, it is clear that members of the Northampton County Council prefer to place statements into law without sufficient backup.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ENACTED AND ORDANINED by Northampton County Council as follows:

1.   The Employee Health Center shall only be considered after a full and complete survey of County employees as stated above
a.   This violates other provisions of Article 13 of the Administrative Code.
 
2.   The Employee Health Center shall only be considered after a full and complete survey of County employees as stated above
a.   “Full and complete” is subjective and there is no objective measure determining if this provision of the law is met. There is no legal authority which requires an employee to fill out a survey that may or may not be in their job description, and for union members such a mandate may violate applicable Collective Bargaining Agreements.
 
3.   All Departments and Employees of Northampton County shall comply with the terms of this Ordinance
a.   If this is an enforceable law it must be complied with. This statement is redundant and repetitive to the extent it is adjudicated lawful.
 
4.   Any Ordinance or part of any Ordinance conflicting with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed in so far as the same affects this Ordinance
a.   Standard language
 
5.   The Administration is prohibited from transferring any monies from the 2023 Fiscal Budget of Northampton County for an Employee Health Center prior to review and approval by Northampton County Council
a.   The Budget is an ordinance in and of itself. This Ordinance may have weight, but since there is no budget passed for 2023, this Ordinance references a law/Budget Ordinance that does not exist, therefore rendering this section of the Ordinance unenforceable as it would bind a future Council or Administration as stated in the Home Rule Charter.

Blogger's Note: I have no problem with a County Council deciding to take its time with a novel idea and refusing to be rushed. According to McClure, he was also skeptical at first. But I've never seen a County Council react to an idea by proposing an ordinance that effectively kills it with next to no consideration. I am especially bothered that this bill is dishonest.

This proposed law mendaciously asserts there's been no disclosure of costs, staffing or return on investment. This has been made clear in two presentations, two memos and an offer to answer individual Council member concerns. In short, this ordinance starts off by lying to the public. 

In addition to being disingenuous, McClure's response reveals what appears to me to be a Sunshine Act violation. He indicates that, after the October 19 meeting, he submitted a proposed resolution authorizing the county to proceed with the concept. This resolution never made its way to the Council agenda. Refusal to place this matter on an agenda is considered "official action" as that term is defined by the Sunshine Act.  This requires a public meeting, not a decision to keep the public in the dark. President Lori Vargo Heffner has no authority to take official action from behind closed doors. That's quite clearly what happened. 

And why? Could it be that she has a conflict of interest?  She is employed by St. Luke's, which has indicated its interest in this idea. She should seek an opinion from state Ethics Commission whether her conflict is real or de minimis and let the rest of Council decide on the health center. 

.

12 comments:

  1. What an arrogant and pompous ass you and McClure are, you deserve each other. Finally, a council standing up to the bullies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Until we see the presentations from LVHN and St. Luke's, this is neither a serious nor thorough investigation. This is poor government, and the administration's rush seems strained at best, and slippery at worst. Table everything until the local heath systems are provided an opportunity to earn the business. Any council members with conflicts should recuse. This isn't difficult or unusual. Taxpayers should not bear the consequences of a dysfunctional county government where the executive and council don't like each other. In the absence of leadership, we should pause.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I’m supportive of any and all public policy that supports working class county employees. I’m tired of corporate greed and stupid billionaires (Elonia Muskifina) accumulating our stolen wealth and decimating the middle class.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now that Lori has carried the water for her employer she should disclose her Christmas bonus or however Anderson is going to compensate her for limiting competition in the Lehigh Valley.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My thoughts are that whenever there's this much back and forth between council and McClure on a particular topic whatever it is; then its probably a good idea to back away from it and start over or have an outside agency to review it and make recommendations one way or another.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Forget studies, and other deliberations, where does the county get off with the idea of a separate health organization for county employees. They have no authority for such a thing. I would expect that they would also cover lots of things not covered nor should be covered by other organizations.
    Are they going to provide gender transitions and gender reassignment for juveniles? Is this what this is all about?
    I hope the citizens, not only the council understand what they are buying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Gender Transitions" I love it. Sounds like a fun gay bar!

      Delete
  7. McClueless needs to GO along with his lackies! STOP WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have no opinion for or against, but it seems McClure has presented a good argument. I suspect he likely has the option of taking the matter before the Court, if push comes to shove with the Council?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I hope Council votes this down!No one wants to leave their Dr.s to go to this so it would not be used by many! Just another waste of County money by McClure and his wacked out Adminstration. Most Employees can't wait till him and Chucky are long gone!

    ReplyDelete
  10. "I have no opinion for or against, but it seems McClure has presented a good argument. I suspect he likely has the option of taking the matter before the Court, if push comes to shove with the Council?"

    Actually Mr. Barron, he always threatens court. Council should finally stand up to him. His argument is that of a tyrant, not an elected official.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Actually, and I warn that I am a disbarred lawyer, I see no basis for legal action, no matter what Council does with this proposed ordinance. It's just dishonest and very poorly written. You really can't expect a court, which lacks common sense, to tell a legislature, which lacks common sense, or an exec, who lacks common sense, what to do. Government by litigation is always a losing proposition.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.