Local Government TV

Monday, September 09, 2019

State Rejects Challenge to ExpressVote XL From Paper Ballot Purists

The ExpressVote XL with male model 
Under Pennsylvania's Election Code, ten or more citizens have the right to challenge the Department of State's certification of a voting system. That's exactly what happened to the ExpressVote XL voting system, a hybrid that combines a voter-verified paper trail with the simplicity of a touch screen. This system was certified by both the federal and state governments in November 2018. Eight months later, a consortium of paper ballot purists filed a challenge, which triggered an automatic re-examination. This was conducted,off-site, in August. On September 3, the Department of State rejected the challenge (read report here) and has maintained its certification.

This petition for re-examination was signed by 200 citizens in "Free Speech for People," "National Election Defense Coalition," and  "Citizens For Better Elections." With a full quiver, they launched 10 separate attacks on the ExpressVote XL in the vain hope that at least one of them might hit its intended target. They missed.

Seven of these arrows were batted away because "they amount to purely legal arguments which do not apply to the reexamination or certification of an electronic voting system."

The first argument considered is that it's possible to tamper with the machine. I suppose it's possible to tamper with any voting system, but independent examiners were unable to do so after two days of testing.

Second, paper ballot purists complained that the paper ballots cast into a secured black box are in chronological order, making it possible to determine how someone voted. This was rejected because the votes go into a sealed black box that is never seen by poll workers. Also, when the ballot boxes are returned, the paper ballots are commingled by the county elections office before the canvas (official count).

Third, if a voter decides he is unhappy with his paper ballot, he can "quit" and ask for a new ballot. Because an elections worker must retrieve the spoiled ballot, these "better elections" people complain a poll worker might see the spoiled ballot. Well, they might see a spoiled paper ballot, too. Moreover, the ballot is located on the far right side of the machine and is very difficult to review unless a concerted effort is made. Moreover, it's a spoiled ballot that goes right into a spoiled ballot envelope, not the actual vote  So there's no privacy violation.

These "better election" groups are naturally still complaining, but the company that makes the ExpressVote XL feels vindicated.

""We appreciate that the DOS conducted its due diligence and we respect the right of anyone who wants to ask questions and learn more about our voting machines," said Election Systems and Software VP Steve Pearson. "Many counties throughout the Commonwealth have already been experiencing positive results with demonstrations and trainings. We look forward to working with all counties utilizing our systems and ensuring that they have the tools necessary for proper education and outreach."

This system worked flawlessly in Warren County in November and in Delaware in May.

"Accessible and secure elections are our goal in Northampton County, and we have a system that’s passed the test twice!" said NorCo Exec Lamont McClure.


7 comments:

  1. The local Dem's most popular and best regarded candidate, Deb Hunter was the leader of the paper coalition and may not let this go that easily. There is some tension as Tara Zirinski felt she should be the leader of the paper coalition. The future looks cloudy at best.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah Charles! Ever the provocateur. Still think you know it all and are wrong as usual.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The old machines were the best, we are being scammed into buying new machines every few years, it is just like new math books and new math, we could still be using math books produced in the 1900's.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Matt is still wearing his Tinfoil Hat I see

    ReplyDelete
  5. I tried the ballot machine out and the only thing that stood out to me was in the beginning when they ask if you want Cyrillic or English for your alphabet choice. RUSSIANS ARE COMING FOR THE ELECTIONS!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can see the Chinese lady through the screen that on the Russians election meddling payroll. November 2020 I will be sure to wear my tinfoil cap and mirror front glasses so at least one vote is valid.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I met that male model at the Blue Valley Farm Show while volunteering at the Smokey Bear/DCNR stand. When I told him I worked for the county, he turned 14 shades of red but still was nice enough to demonstrate the voting machine for me anyway. I liked it! They even let my teen try it, which was awesome, as she looks forward to voting as soon as she is able.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.