Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Wednesday, August 08, 2018
What About That Hamilton Street Facade Grant?
There are many positive things to say about the facade grant program. But there should always be a willingness to listen to constructive criticism.
Previous stories:
Upside Allentown Facade Grant Program Is Upside Down
Upside Allentown Facade Grant Program Being Abused
Allentown Facade Grant Abuse Details
This Old House: History of 1122 Hamilton St
10 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
Would this couple's grant request even be considered had they not contacted you?
ReplyDeleteAll your questions have merit, but shouldn't they have been incorporated into the original nonprofit's mission statement and required annual independent audits? Why didn't the CACLV board require these audits?
ReplyDeleteMore Allentown corruption.
ReplyDeleteIt’s a way of life.
There are numerous layers of oversight that should have caught this. And I will concede there are certain elements at CACLV and CADCA that don’t want to catch things. But I believe most want to do the right thing.
ReplyDeleteDirty stuff.
ReplyDeleteNothing new here.
It’s a dirty town.
This is the way the insiders play.
Not the first time potential grant receivers were pissed off because their creative control was insulted over color choices or over the amount received. Then theirs the contemporary over traditional theme. The david vs goliath story line seems to always work well when played to the max. Shoulda went to Fox or Msnbc first they are the latest version of As the world turns, Guiding Light and All My Childern. MM still longs for those days. This reality show era we live in is getting old. Please God bring back the soaps.
ReplyDelete•The staff with their fingers in the cookie jar must go. Period.There is no need to play the review delay game.
ReplyDelete•The Executive Director sets the tone for any given organization. This situation would appear to speak to a NFP without a strong ethical culture. This episode isn’t a one off.
•The board of directors is ultimately responsible. Action from the board is over due and inaction would indicate a weak or overly compliant board.
The buck stops there.
•If Allentown has any chance of recovery dirty dealing between insiders can only be zero tolerance.
.•There are no sacred cows and instutional ethics and integrity are not a matter of personal friendship or political alliance.
•Time to categorical confront the culture of corruption in the City of Allentown.
This isn’t about color schemes, it’s about corruption.
ReplyDeleteNormalization is complicity.
12:59 -
ReplyDeleteExcellent points! Reminds me of all the grief the Americus Hotel project got from ANIZDA. What a scam that whole thing is.
Robert Ryan do you drink to intoxication every night of your sad lonely life? DOES KDDI know about your smear campaign against Sam Murray? Have some of the 12 steppers help you before u wind up in a rubber room.
ReplyDelete