Local Government TV

Thursday, August 23, 2018

The "Legend's" Supporting Letters

The Legend
Disgraced Allentown Mayor Edwin "Fed Ed" Pawlowski will be sentenced September 5 after a jury found him guilty of 47 counts of political corruption. His sentencing memo and 107 supporting letters are both included in a story at WFMZ-TV69. Though his memo claims he is humble man who lives for others, the picture that Attorney Jack McMahon unintentionally paints is one of the very kind of hubris that led to his downfall and that he continues to display today. Referring to him as a "legend" is hardly going to help. The memo is completely devoid of remorse. I also amazed at three of the letters McMahon submitted.

Tricia Mezzacappa? Though I doubt she's ever met Fed Ed, she nevertheless states that Fed Ed has been "unnecessarily smeared, defamed, slandered and framed by media outlets" in what she calls a "witch hunt." Of course, Mezzacappa also penned a letter to the editor defending mass murderer Rockne Newell, claiming he was a victim of government oppression. Last year, she ended an email to West Easton Borough Council member Matt Dees with "Have a nice day faggot!" Earlier this year, she was found in contempt in one of her West Easton lawsuits. She also lost a defamation action I filed against her a few years ago.

Another "character" reference comes from another defamation defendant who, like Mezzacappa, claims Fed Ed was framed. "The real story here isn’t who got a steak dinner and Eagles tickets but who was out to get Ed Pawlowski and why."

Alrighty then.

Then we have Kevin Lott, a Carpenters Union official who participated quite extensively in legal pay-to-play, giving Fed Ed gobs of money and getting lots of work. Lott also filed a frivolous suit over the P3 bridge project in Northampton County, and is at least partially responsible for the excessive legal fees that Northampton County paid.

Many of the other letters are actually quite touching, but not these.

23 comments:

  1. Get used to Kevin Lott. You will be seeing a lot of him in Northapton County. At least that is the word about the rubber stamp council.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There was no irreparable damage done to the city.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The King has No clothes..... A letter from Tricia.. yup that will do it for him..... That Is one everyone wants in the file OMG you cant maKE THIS STUFF UP!

    ReplyDelete
  4. He never took a penny to enrich himself.
    LOL!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. A good lawyer would have had any letters of support checked to see if they should be included. A simple Google search would have revealed nuts like Mezzacappa.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So Moody taught its scholars that the end justifies the means. Hmmm

    ReplyDelete
  7. There are some nice letters. A person should be judged based the totality of their good and their bad. The most effective letters are not the ones that claim he was framed, but the ones that say he does not deserve a long sentence.

    One letter describes how a father could not get the police to act when his daughter was in danger. He called Pawlowski and he made sure the police acted, which resulted in his daughter going through recovery and getting her life back together.

    He regularly has volunteered at my church's food bank for a couple years, in addition to other food banks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Al Capone provided food for the poor and he was a real sweetheart. Especially on Valentine's Day.

      Delete
  8. The letter to which you refer was penned by Bill Leiner.

    Frankly, McMahon should have redacted some information in these letters in the copy for the public. These people did not agree to having their personal emails, cell phone numbers and other private information made public.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just for laughs, who was it who was supposedly out to get Pawlowski and why?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I understand the feds were out to get the State Treasurer for pay for play, and they happened to catch Fleck and Pawlowski in the process. Fleck and his assistant then had connections to the City of Reading officials. The Reading Mayor's trial is underway now, and other Reading officials have pled guilty.

    Reportedly, Pawloski refused to wear a wire to go after others. I believe there is a powerful person (who does not live in the Lehigh Valley) who was the desired target.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know this back story, but I can think of two (possibly 3) political and business people who fit that bill. Maybe 4, if you go as far as Montgomery County. I'd be curious which one it was.

      Delete
  11. Bernie, thanks for the links. Page 9, letter E of the sentencing memorandum states that only two public officials convicted of corruption have received ten years. Of those two, one is being re-sentenced after appeal and another is described as more serious because it involved an official working with the mob. It also notes other officials who pocketed money received substantially less than ten years.

    What do you make of this argument?


    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If you are unable to post w/o being vulgar, expect to be deleted.

    ReplyDelete
  14. At least 20 years Mr.Wonderful !

    ReplyDelete
  15. Pawlowski was a wolf in sheep's clothing. His "good deeds" were meant to fool simple minded people.

    This guy fooled a lot of people.

    ReplyDelete
  16. That picture of Ed in the king's outfit kind of makes him look sweet and innocent.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Instead of focusing on Tricia, let’s focus on how the Executive Director of a nonprofit used company letter head on company time to write a letter supporting a convicted criminal. I hope it wasn’t for political reasons because that could jeopardize their 501c3 status. It’d be interesting to find out if she’s ever donated to his campaign.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.