Local Government TV

Friday, May 04, 2018

Orloski Gets Push Polled For Wild

Blogger's Note: In early April, many were upset about a push poll that seemed to favor John Morganelli, though he had nothing to do with it. Around the same time, there was a push poll  that seemed to favor Susan Wild. Rick Orloski, a prominent Lehigh Valley attorney, has agreed to my release of an email he sent concerning it. 

Just got off the telephone with a push poll on the Congressional The polling agency was from Melboure, FL and I got the name, but I already forgot it.

It was obviously pro-Wild and anti-Morganelli. A few name ID questions about the other candidate, but this was clearly a Susan Wild poll.

WILD is a highly respected layer .... Wild believe in transparent government... .Wild is pro-choice .... Wild will support students going to college .... Wild was a City Solicitor... Wild supports responsible gun control etc ...Wilde was an Army Brat..

John is a NRA guy ...John does not support women's rights ....John is anti-immigrant ... John sued Casey to execute more people ... wants to expand the death penalty.

Interestingly, they asked for my name. I gave it to them. I kept saying that Wild was Pawlowski's solicitor, and Pawlowski was convicted in Federal Court for being a crook.

14 comments:

  1. Orclownski should run for something, maybe dog catcher is something he could achieve.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tricia Mezzacappa, aka Tricia Phillips, Just make sure you show up in court on 5/11 or you may get arrested again. You have been held in contempt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dent always said to run hard or not run. Politics is tough. If elected, one joins a club that enjoys a 12% approval rating. Except for a few sychophants, most people hate politicians. The hatred is well earned.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Were there charges against Wild for the Pawlowski affair? If not, the innuendo here is disturbing. This guy is basically accusing her of being a crook too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Looked up campaign contributors on Open Secrets the other day.I saw Rev. Edwards appears to be collecting some big tech donations from Apple and Facebook among others.Amazing how the money flows to these candidates

    ReplyDelete
  6. I will have a story about campaign finance next week.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Were there charges against Wild for the Pawlowski affair? If not, the innuendo here is disturbing. This guy is basically accusing her of being a crook too."

    I gave her the benefit of the doubt, but that was BEFORE she proved herself to be a liar. If she lied to the DA, she could lie to others. If she is so innocent, why was Fed Ed telling Wieand and Saidel to funnel campaign contributions thru her? Why was she failing to award legal work to firms that made no contributions? This all has a stench about it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. So the FBI is investigating her? Is that what you are suggesting?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I make no such claim. On the other hand, I no longer think that she handled herself with integrity because she I now know she is dishonest. One of her assistants was prosecuted. So were two cabinet members. It was her job as solicitor to keep the ship of state from drifting into legal shoals, yet we are told that potential donors were told to funnel money to fed Ed thru her.

    ReplyDelete
  10. So is the FBI incompetent or is she a member of the Deep State?

    Is John Morganelli dishonest by whitewashing his Twitter feed? What else has he hidden from view?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Susan Wild contributed to Ppawlowski, [numerous times], supported Pawlowski until the July 2, 2015 raid on city hall, and received a big job {City Solcitor] job from him. True as the world is round.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Susan Ellis Wild donated to the Pawlowski Campaign [numerous times], supported "Fed Ed" until the FBI raid on July 2, 2015 and received a big job from him [City Solicitor]. Closed Case!

    ReplyDelete
  13. So, we have a Pawlowski crook vs. a Trump toady. Nothstein's got a chance.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.