Today's one-liner: "The shortest way to the distinguishing excellence of any writer is through his hostile critics." Richard LeGallienne
Local Government TV
Monday, May 21, 2018
NorCo Council May Investigate General Purpose Authority
War is certainly brewing between Northampton County and its own creation, the General Purpose Authority (GPA). At their April 10 meeting, the GPA voted to hire Philadelphia law firm Conrad and O'Brien as "special counsel" for anticipated litigation against the County.
First established on May 6, 1999, pursuant to the Municipality Authorities Act, the GPA is a seven-person board appointed by the Executive and confirmed by County Council for staggered five-year terms. Though a creation of Northampton County government, it is considered an independent state agency.
Over the years, the GPA has operated under the radar. It traditionally acted as a conduit for both taxable and tax exempt bonds to help finance public and private projects, mostly with hospitals and universities. It also administers the NorCo Loan and Development Fund and the Community Investment Partnership Program Revolving Loan Fund.
The problems began in 2016, when the GPA became the lead agency in a public private partnership plan (P3) to refurbish or replace 33 county-owned bridges at a cost of $38 million, with the work being done by Kriger Construction. Kriger has completed repairs to one bridge thus far, with two more projected for completion by the end of June.
Prior to P3, the County's ability to repair or replace its 119 bridges was hampered by the Transportation Improvement Program, a statewide plan to improve infrastructure, broken down into 12-year and 4-year plans. The County would be lucky to see two bridges repaired over four years This is unsatisfactory because 99 of these bridges needed to be repaired or replaced. Twenty-two are rated "functionally obsolete." Twenty-seven are considered "structurally deficient." Three bridges were closed, and another 37 are weight-restricted.
Aware of the problem, former Executive John Stoffa floated bonds in 2009 and 2013 that would repair or replace 13 bridges. Former Executive John Brown embarked on a more ambitious P3 project that theoretically would make things easier for the County. Thirty-three bridges would be conveyed to the GPA, and the work would be done by Kriger Construction. All the County would have to do is write a check once milestones are reached.
Instead, it has been a headache.
The P3 was sold on the theory that it would create between 1,000-1,800 jobs. But where? According to the Administrative Code, 80% of them should be within a 10-mile radius of the Lehigh Valley. But John Lushis, a former Bethlehem Steel lawyer who now is the contentious solicitor at GPA, has said that the 80%-rule is unconstitutional
Somewhere along the way, former Executive John Brown decided to use Lushis to research the applicability of P3 to the County jail. Lushis' bills for these services were passed through and approved by the GPA as "special legal services" and were ultimately paid by the County. As a result, his firm has billed and has been paid $813,000 for legal work over the past two years These "special legal services" appear to run afoul of the Administrative Code
The County was even billed to copyright agreements drawn up Lushis, with the designated owner as Lushis' law firm instead of the GPA or the county. GPA Chair Shawn Langen, has billed $11,950 for his own services last year Lushis has submitted a bill this year for $34,000 for his response to three RTK requests (two from me, one from the Morning Call)
Most recently, the GPA canceled its May meeting, at which time the outside auditors financial statements were going to be reviewed. As a result, the County has been unable to release its own financial statements on May 1, as required by the Home Rule Charter.
Former Executive Brown failed to budget for the cost of easements that are needed for the bridgework. This made it necessary for current Executive Lamont McClure to look under the mattress and find the money. McClure noted that only eight of the 33 bridges selected for repair or replacement are actually "structurally deficient."
One of those eight bridges, the Meadows in Lower Saucon Township, was just closed. A recent inspection revealed it is too dangerous to drive. But the way the P3 is structured, the County is unable to do anything. The bridge is owned by the GPA, and was only slated for repairs.
Though the Home Rule Charter does provide for investigatory hearings, it is probably something that should be done by a Committee of the Whole, as opposed to the Finance Committee. The Charter does provide for the issuance of subpoenas, but how far do they extend? According to the courts, only so far as they relate tp a proper legislative function. It is unclear to me whether subpoena powers extend beyond county employees. Also,since the GPA is an independent state agency, it is unclear whether its officials may be subpoenaed. For this reason, an ordinance is necessary to spell out the proper legislative function concerned.
10 comments:
You own views are appreciated, especially if they differ from mine. But remember, commenting is a privilege, not a right. I will delete personal attacks or off-topic remarks at my discretion. Comments that play into the tribalism that has consumed this nation will be declined. So will comments alleging voter fraud unless backed up by concrete evidence. If you attack someone personally, I expect you to identify yourself. I will delete criticisms of my comment policy, vulgarities, cut-and-paste jobs from other sources and any suggestion of violence towards anyone. I will also delete sweeping generalizations about mainstream parties or ideologies, i.e. identity politics. My decisions on these matters are made on a case by case basis, and may be affected by my mood that day, my access to the blog at the time the comment was made or other information that isn’t readily apparent.
This is unbelievable. This "agency" has placed itself above anyone. I am surprised you want to let them just do what they want. You sound like you don't believe or want county council to try and question them. If the county pays all the bills why can't the county at least have the right to ask about how the money is spent? I didn't vote for any of those people.
ReplyDeleteThis entire situation with the bridges sounds like a crazy movie.
As the person who has been breaking the stories about the GPA, I have every reason to want Council to do its job. In fact, this should have been started this month. But a real investigation should be done by a Committee of the whole, not Finance. An ordinance should be adopted setting Forth exactly how it impacts the legislative function or possible remedial legislation. Also, Council is vested with the residual powers so there should be a detailed explanation. Then, there needs to be legal research on whether a county council can subpoena the person or records of GPA members. I think they can, but let’s get some authority. It is better to have this fully researched first. I absolutely want an investigation, but one that is done right. Kraft should run it bc he knows what questions to ask. I don’t want a motion to quash on the basis that a subpoena to the finance committee is invalid bc Finance only includes a few council members. Let’s do it in way that minimizes court appearances.
ReplyDeleteGPA is a poster child for why agencies are undemocratic and dangerous - at all levels of government. It should be disbanded.
ReplyDeleteAtty Lushis fits the mold of Bethlehem Steel Attorneys needing a job. Didn't Steve Donchez do the same thing with the "Museum" at Bethlehem Steel. He created a job for himself with very high wages. It wasn't until John Morganelli got involved that something finally changes and Donchez was thrown out. Can't the Attorney General's Office look into this?
ReplyDeleteBernie may not like the way it is being done but I am glad someone is at least looking at this.
ReplyDeleteThis is way beyond a council. The DA should contact the AG or FBI for investigation. It is obvious
ReplyDelete$800,000 in legal fees is absurd. Appointed boards are dangerous with conflicts of interest prevalent in various cities as buddies serve in multiple roles on different boards. Way too powerful & subject to abuse.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree.
ReplyDeleteThey have recklessly spent money with all their lawyer fees and this patent nonsense. I agree that council should get off their collective asses and do something. I am glad that at least this committee is asking questions. This is about county money and that is county councils job. So I am OK with at least a finance committee looking into it.
ReplyDeleteUnbelievable. How in the world could county council go along with this.
ReplyDelete